10% Efficient Solar-to-Hydrogen Conversion via Ternary-Phase Organic Light Absorbers With Ni Heazlewoodite Electrocatalysts

Jaemin Park , Jin Hyeong Rhee , Youngeun Kim , Min Jae Kim , Junbeom Park , Sunil V. Barma , Jun Ho Seok , Sang Uck Lee , Eul-Yong Shin , Dong Su Kim , Hyung Koun Cho , Jin Young Kim , Sae Byeok Jo , Hae Jung Son , Wooseok Yang

Carbon Energy ›› 2025, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (6) : e706

PDF
Carbon Energy ›› 2025, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (6) : e706 DOI: 10.1002/cey2.706
RESEARCH ARTICLE

10% Efficient Solar-to-Hydrogen Conversion via Ternary-Phase Organic Light Absorbers With Ni Heazlewoodite Electrocatalysts

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The realization of practical solar hydrogen production relies on the development of efficient devices with nontoxic and low-cost materials. Since the predominant contributors for the performance and cost are the catalyst and the light absorber, it is imperative to develop cost-effective catalysts and absorbers that are compatible with each other for achieving high performance. In this study, a 10% efficient solar-to-hydrogen conversion device was developed through the meticulous integration of low-cost Ni Heazlewoodite-based catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and ternary bulk heterojunction organic semiconductor (OS)-based light absorbers. Se-incorporated Ni3S2 was synthesized using a simple one-step hydrothermal method, which demonstrated a low overpotential and Tafel slope, indicating superior HER activity compared to Ni3S2. The theoretical calculation results validate the enhanced HER performance of the Se-incorporated Ni3S2 catalyst in alkaline electrolytes. The ternary phase organic light absorber is designed to generate tailored photovoltage and maximized photocurrent, resulting in a photocurrent density of 8.24 mA cm−2 under unbiased conditions, which corresponds to 10% solar to hydrogen conversion. Low-temperature photoluminescence spectroscopy results revealed that the enhanced photocurrent density originates from a reduction in both phonon- and vibration-induced inter- and intramolecular non-radiative decay. Our results establish a new benchmark for the emerging OS-based efficient solar hydrogen production based on nontoxic and cost-effective materials.

Keywords

electrocatalyst / hydrogen / nickel sulfide / organic semiconductor / photoelectrochemical water splitting

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jaemin Park, Jin Hyeong Rhee, Youngeun Kim, Min Jae Kim, Junbeom Park, Sunil V. Barma, Jun Ho Seok, Sang Uck Lee, Eul-Yong Shin, Dong Su Kim, Hyung Koun Cho, Jin Young Kim, Sae Byeok Jo, Hae Jung Son, Wooseok Yang. 10% Efficient Solar-to-Hydrogen Conversion via Ternary-Phase Organic Light Absorbers With Ni Heazlewoodite Electrocatalysts. Carbon Energy, 2025, 7(6): e706 DOI:10.1002/cey2.706

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

M. G. Walter, E. L. Warren, J. R. McKone, et al., “Correction to Solar Water Splitting Cells,” Chemical Reviews 111, no. 9 (2011): 5815.

[2]

J. H. Kim, D. Hansora, P. Sharma, J. W. Jang, and J. S. Lee, “Toward Practical Solar Hydrogen Production—An Artificial Photosynthetic Leaf-to-Farm Challenge,” Chemical Society Reviews 48, no. 7 (2019): 1908-1971.

[3]

W. Yang, R. R. Prabhakar, J. Tan, S. D. Tilley, and J. Moon, “Strategies for Enhancing the Photocurrent, Photovoltage, and Stability of Photoelectrodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting,” Chemical Society Reviews 48, no. 19 (2019): 4979-5015.

[4]

M. Kumar, B. Meena, P. Subramanyam, D. Suryakala, and C. Subrahmanyam, “Recent Trends in Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: The Role of Cocatalysts,” NPG Asia Materials 14, no. 1 (2022): 88.

[5]

H. He, Q. Zhang, Z. Wang, S. Pan, Y. Zhao, and X. Zhang, “Advances and Practical Prospects for Bias-Free Photovoltaic-Driven Electrochemical Water Splitting Systems,” Advanced Energy Materials 14, no. 11 (2024): 2303713.

[6]

J. Park, H. Yoon, D. Y. Lee, et al., “Photovoltaic Powered Solar Hydrogen Production Coupled With Waste SO2 Valorization Enabled by MoP Electrocatalysts,” Applied Catalysis, B: Environmental 305, no. 15 (2022): 121045.

[7]

W. H. Cheng, M. H. Richter, M. M. May, et al., “Monolithic Photoelectrochemical Device for Direct Water Splitting With 19% Efficiency,” ACS Energy Letters 3, no. 8 (2018): 1795-1800.

[8]

P. Varadhan, H. C. Fu, Y. C. Kao, R. H. Horng, and J. H. He, “An Efficient and Stable Photoelectrochemical System With 9% Solar-to-Hydrogen Conversion Efficiency via InGaP/GaAs Double Junction,” Nature Communications 10, no. 1 (2019): 5282.

[9]

Y. Wang, Y. Wu, J. Schwartz, S. H. Sung, R. Hovden, and Z. Mi, “A Single-Junction Cathodic Approach for Stable Unassisted Solar Water Splitting,” Joule 3, no. 10 (2019): 2444-2456.

[10]

W. Yang, J. Park, H. C. Kwon, et al., “Solar Water Splitting Exceeding 10% Efficiency via Low-Cost Sb2Se3 Photocathodes Coupled With Semitransparent Perovskite Photovoltaics,” Energy & Environmental Science 13, no. 11 (2020): 4362-4370.

[11]

W. Yang, J. H. Kim, O. S. Hutter, et al., “Benchmark Performance of Low-Cost Sb2Se3 Photocathodes for Unassisted Solar Overall Water Splitting,” Nature Communications 11, no. 1 (2020): 861.

[12]

J. Park, W. Yang, J. Tan, et al., “Hierarchal Nanorod-Derived Bilayer Strategy to Enhance the Photocurrent Density of Sb2Se3 Photocathodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting,” ACS Energy Letters 5, no. 1 (2020): 136-145.

[13]

J. Park, K. H. Kim, D. Kim, J. K. Kim, and W. Yang, “Designing Idealised Devices for Bias-Free Solar Water Splitting,” Sustainable Energy & Fuels 8 (2024): 481-490.

[14]

S. Ye, W. Shi, Y. Liu, et al., “Unassisted Photoelectrochemical Cell With Multimediator Modulation for Solar Water Splitting Exceeding 4% Solar-to-Hydrogen Efficiency,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 143, no. 32 (2021): 12499-12508.

[15]

M. Dumortier and S. Haussener, “Design Guidelines for Concentrated Photo-Electrochemical Water Splitting Devices Based on Energy and Greenhouse Gas Yield Ratios,” Energy & Environmental Science 8, no. 11 (2015): 3069-3082.

[16]

X. Zou and Y. Zhang, “Noble Metal-Free Hydrogen Evolution Catalysts for Water Splitting,” Chemical Society Reviews 44, no. 15 (2015): 5148-5180.

[17]

P. Liu and J. A. Rodriguez, “Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution From the [NiFe] Hydrogenase to the Ni2P(001) Surface: The Importance of Ensemble Effect,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 127, no. 42 (2005): 14871-14878.

[18]

N. Jiang, Q. Tang, M. Sheng, B. You, D. Jiang, and Y. Sun, “Nickel Sulfides for Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Under Alkaline Conditions: A Case Study of Crystalline NiS, NiS2, and Ni3S2 Nanoparticles,” Catalysis Science & Technology 6, no. 4 (2016): 1077-1084.

[19]

Y. He, P. Zhang, H. Huang, et al., “Engineering Sulfur Vacancies of Ni3S2 Nanosheets as a Binder-Free Cathode for an Aqueous Rechargeable Ni-Zn Battery,” ACS Applied Energy Materials 3, no. 4 (2020): 3863-3875.

[20]

K. Wang, L. Yan, X. Mu, et al., “One-Step Hydrothermal Synthesis of Mo-Doped Ni3S2 Nanorods for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution Reaction,” ACS Applied Energy Materials 5, no. 5 (2022): 11498-11505.

[21]

L. Yao, A. Rahmanudin, N. Guijarro, and K. Sivula, “Organic Semiconductor Based Devices for Solar Water Splitting,” Advanced Energy Materials 8, no. 32 (2018): 1802585.

[22]

Y. Y. Wang, A. Vogel, M. Sachs, et al., “Publisher Correction: Current Understanding and Challenges of Solar-Driven Hydrogen Generation Using Polymeric Photocatalysts,” Nature Energy 5, no. 8 (2020): 633.

[23]

Y. Fang, Y. Hou, X. Fu, and X. Wang, “Semiconducting Polymers for Oxygen Evolution Reaction Under Light Illumination,” Chemical Reviews 122, no. 3 (2022): 4204-4256.

[24]

H. Bronstein, C. B. Nielsen, B. C. Schroeder, and I. McCulloch, “The Role of Chemical Design in the Performance of Organic Semiconductors,” Nature Reviews Chemistry 4, no. 2 (2020): 66-77.

[25]

J. Park, J. Lee, H. Lee, et al., “Hybrid Perovskite-Based Wireless Integrated Device Exceeding a Solar to Hydrogen Conversion Efficiency of 11%,” Small 19, no. 27 (2023): 2300174.

[26]

D. Hansora, J. W. Yoo, R. Mehrotra, et al., “All-Perovskite-Based Unassisted Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting System for Efficient, Stable and Scalable Solar Hydrogen Production,” Nature Energy 9 (2024): 272-284.

[27]

A. Facchetti, “Polymer Donor-Polymer Acceptor (All-Polymer) Solar Cells,” Materials Today 16, no. 4 (2013): 123-132.

[28]

J. Kosco, S. Gonzalez-Carrero, C. T. Howells, et al., “Generation of Long-Lived Charges in Organic Semiconductor Heterojunction Nanoparticles for Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution,” Nature Energy 7, no. 4 (2022): 340-351.

[29]

J. Kosco, M. Bidwell, H. Cha, et al., “Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution From Organic Semiconductor Heterojunction Nanoparticles,” Nature Materials 19, no. 5 (2020): 559-565.

[30]

H. H. Cho, L. Yao, J. H. Yum, et al., “A Semiconducting Polymer Bulk Heterojunction Photoanode for Solar Water Oxidation,” Nature Catalysis 4, no. 5 (2021): 431-438.

[31]

T. H. Lee, R. R. Rao, R. A. Pacalaj, A. A. Wilson, and J. R. Durrant, “A Dual Functional Polymer Interlayer Enables Near-Infrared Absorbing Organic Photoanodes for Solar Water Oxidation,” Advanced Energy Materials 12, no. 18 (2022): 2103698.

[32]

D. Zhang, H. H. Cho, J. H. Yum, M. Mensi, and K. Sivula, “An Organic Semiconductor Photoelectrochemical Tandem Cell for Solar Water Splitting,” Advanced Energy Materials 12, no. 42 (2022): 2202363.

[33]

Y. K. Kim, T. H. Lee, J. Yeop, et al., “Hetero-Tandem Organic Solar Cells Drive Water Electrolysis With a Solar-to-Hydrogen Conversion Efficiency Up to 10%,” Applied Catalysis, B: Environmental 309, no. 15 (2022): 121237.

[34]

W. He, R. Zhang, D. Cao, et al., “Super-Hydrophilic Microporous Ni(OH)x/Ni3S2 Heterostructure Electrocatalyst for Large-Current-Density Hydrogen Evolution,” Small 19, no. 2 (2023): 2205719.

[35]

J. Hu, S. Zhu, Y. Liang, et al., “Self-Supported Ni3Se2@NiFe Layered Double Hydroxide Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 587 (2021): 79-89.

[36]

C. Wagner, M. F. B. Green, M. Maiworm, et al., “Quantitative Imaging of Electric Surface Potentials With Single-Atom Sensitivity,” Nature Materials 18, no. 8 (2019): 853-859.

[37]

J. Lai, B. Huang, Y. Chao, X. Chen, and S. Guo, “Strongly Coupled Nickel-Cobalt Nitrides/Carbon Hybrid Nanocages With Pt-Like Activity for Hydrogen Evolution Catalysis,” Advanced Materials 31, no. 2 (2019): e1805541.

[38]

C. Yang, R. Zhao, H. Xiang, et al., “Ni-Activated Transition Metal Carbides for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution in Acidic and Alkaline Solutions,” Advanced Energy Materials 10, no. 37 (2020): 2002260.

[39]

J. Yin, J. Jin, H. Zhang, et al., “Atomic Arrangement in Metal-Doped NiS2 Boosts the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction in Alkaline Media,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 58, no. 51 (2019): 18676-18682.

[40]

B. You, Y. Zhang, Y. Jiao, K. Davey, and S. Z. Qiao, “Negative Charging of Transition-Metal Phosphides via Strong Electronic Coupling for Destabilization of Alkaline Water,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 58, no. 34 (2019): 11796-11800.

[41]

D. Y. Kuo, H. Paik, J. Kloppenburg, et al., “Measurements of Oxygen Electroadsorption Energies and Oxygen Evolution Reaction on RuO2(110): A Discussion of the Sabatier Principle and Its Role in Electrocatalysis,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 140, no. 50 (2018): 17597-17605.

[42]

A. B. Laursen, A. S. Varela, F. Dionigi, et al., “Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution: Sabatier's Principle and the Volcano Plot,” Journal of Chemical Education 89, no. 12 (2012): 1595-1599.

[43]

A. J. Medford, A. Vojvodic, J. S. Hummelshøj, et al., “From the Sabatier Principle to a Predictive Theory of Transition-Metal Heterogeneous Catalysis,” Journal of Catalysis 328 (2015): 36-42.

[44]

A. I. Inamdar, H. S. Chavan, J. H. Seok, et al., “Optimal Rule-of-Thumb Design of NiFeMo Layered Double Hydroxide Nanoflakes for Highly Efficient and Durable Overall Water-Splitting at Large Currents,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 10, no. 38 (2022): 20497-20508.

[45]

Y. Jo, S. Cho, J. Seo, et al., “Experimental and Theoretical Insights into the Borohydride-Based Reduction-Induced Metal Interdiffusion in Fe-Oxide@NiCo2O4 for Enhanced Oxygen Evolution,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13, no. 45 (2021): 53725-53735.

[46]

S. M. Pawar, A. T. Aqueel Ahmed, C. H. Lee, et al., “Experimental and Theoretical Insights into Transition-Metal (Mo, Fe) Codoping in a Bifunctional Nickel Phosphide Microsphere Catalyst for Enhanced Overall Water Splitting,” ACS Applied Energy Materials 4, no. 12 (2021): 14169-14179.

[47]

H. Chen, M. Zhang, T. Tran-Phu, et al., “Integrating Low-Cost Earth-Abundant Co-Catalysts With Encapsulated Perovskite Solar Cells for Efficient and Stable Overall Solar Water Splitting,” Advanced Functional Materials 31, no. 4 (2021): 2008245.

[48]

H. Lee, C. U. Lee, J. Yun, et al., “A Dual Spin-Controlled Chiral Two-/Three-Dimensional Perovskite Artificial Leaf for Efficient Overall Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 4672.

[49]

I. Papagiannis, E. Doukas, A. Kalarakis, G. Avgouropoulos, and P. Lianos, “Photoelectrocatalytic H2 and H2O2 Production Using Visible-Light-Absorbing Photoanodes,” Catalysts 9, no. 3 (2019): 243.

[50]

Y. Zhang, H. Lv, Z. Zhang, L. Wang, X. Wu, and H. Xu, “Stable Unbiased Photo-Electrochemical Overall Water Splitting Exceeding 3% Efficiency via Covalent Triazine Framework/Metal Oxide Hybrid Photoelectrodes,” Advanced Materials 33, no. 15 (2021): 2008264.

[51]

A. Alfano, A. Mezzetti, F. Fumagalli, et al., “Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting by Hybrid Organic-Inorganic Systems: Setting the Path From 2% to 20% Solar-to-Hydrogen Conversion Efficiency,” Iscience 24, no. 5 (2021): 102463.

[52]

D. Wang, J. Hu, B. D. Sherman, et al., “A Molecular Tandem Cell for Efficient Solar Water Splitting,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117, no. 24 (2020): 13256-13260.

[53]

A. Aoki, M. Naruse, and T. Abe, “Energy Conversion Into Hydrogen Gas Using Series Circuit of Organic Thin-Film Solar Cells,” Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals 538, no. 1 (2011): 182-186.

[54]

S. Esiner, H. van Eersel, M. M. Wienk, and R. A. J. Janssen, “Triple Junction Polymer Solar Cells for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting,” Advanced Materials 25, no. 21 (2013): 2932-2936.

[55]

S. Esiner, R. E. M. Willems, A. Furlan, W. Li, M. M. Wienk, and R. A. J. Janssen, “Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting in an Organic Artificial Leaf,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 3, no. 47 (2015): 23936-23945.

[56]

X. Elias, Q. Liu, C. Gimbert-Suriñach, et al., “Neutral Water Splitting Catalysis With a High FF Triple Junction Polymer Cell,” ACS Catalysis 6, no. 5 (2016): 3310-3316.

[57]

S. Esiner, G. W. P. van Pruissen, M. M. Wienk, and R. A. J. Janssen, “Optimized Light-Driven Electrochemical Water Splitting With Tandem Polymer Solar Cells,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 4, no. 14 (2016): 5107-5114.

[58]

Q. Wu, J. Guo, R. Sun, et al., “Slot-Die Printed Non-Fullerene Organic Solar Cells With the Highest Efficiency of 12.9% for Low-Cost PV-Driven Water Splitting,” Nano Energy 61 (2019): 559-566.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Carbon Energy published by Wenzhou University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

28

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/