Interfacial Ru–O–W Orbital Coupling Enables Lattice Oxygen Stabilization for Enhanced Acidic OER

Tongzhou Wang , Shoujian Duan , Junyu Pan , Jihong Li , Li Shao , Lei Shi , Yuhan Sun , Jingming Ran , Huaiyu Shao , Yida Deng

Carbon Energy ›› 2026, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (5) : e70167

PDF (3859KB)
Carbon Energy ›› 2026, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (5) :e70167 DOI: 10.1002/cey2.70167
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Interfacial Ru–O–W Orbital Coupling Enables Lattice Oxygen Stabilization for Enhanced Acidic OER
Author information +
History +
PDF (3859KB)

Abstract

Ruthenium dioxide (RuO2) is highly active for acidic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) but suffers from instability due to lattice oxygen oxidation. Herein, we construct a RuO2/WO3 heterostructure that leverages strong Ru–O–W interfacial bridge bonding to fundamentally modulate electronic structure and reaction pathways. Density functional theory calculations reveal pronounced orbital hybridization at the interface, resulting in a simultaneous downshift of the Ru d-band and O p-band centers. This modulation weakens the Ru–O* interaction while strengthening the Ru–O bonds, effectively suppressing the lattice oxygen mechanism. Benefiting from this electronic structure regulation strategy, the RuO2/WO3 electrode delivers a substantially low overpotential of 203 mV at 10 mA cm−2 and maintains exceptional structural and electrochemical integrity over 200 h of continuous acidic OER operation. This work unveils a new paradigm of orbital-level interface engineering for stabilizing noble-metal catalysts under harsh acidic conditions.

Keywords

acidic oxygen evolution reaction / orbital hybridization / robust Ru–O–W bond / supported catalyst

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tongzhou Wang, Shoujian Duan, Junyu Pan, Jihong Li, Li Shao, Lei Shi, Yuhan Sun, Jingming Ran, Huaiyu Shao, Yida Deng. Interfacial Ru–O–W Orbital Coupling Enables Lattice Oxygen Stabilization for Enhanced Acidic OER. Carbon Energy, 2026, 8 (5) : e70167 DOI:10.1002/cey2.70167

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Y. Lin, Y. Dong, X. Wang, and L. Chen, “Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Acidic Media,” Advanced Materials 35 (2023): 2210565.

[2]

Q. Wang, Y. Cheng, H. B. Tao, et al., “Long-Term Stability Challenges and Opportunities in Acidic Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62 (2023): e202216645.

[3]

K. Zhang, X. Liang, L. Wang, et al., “Status and Perspectives of Key Materials for PEM Electrolyzer,” Nano Research Energy 1 (2022): e9120032.

[4]

C. Z. Yuan, H. Zhao, S. Huang, et al., “Designing and Regulating catalysts for Enhanced Oxygen Evolution in Acid Electrolytes,” Carbon Neutralization 2 (2023): 467–493.

[5]

J. U. Jang, A. Gaur, S. Mhin, and H. Han, “Fabrication of Self-Supported Catalysts via Electrodeposition for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis: Emphasizing on the Porous Transport Layers,” EcoEnergy 2 (2024): 381–399.

[6]

X. Cao, T. Wang, and L. Jiao, “Transition-Metal (Fe, Co, and Ni)-Based Nanofiber Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting,” Advanced Fiber Materials 3 (2021): 210–228.

[7]

Z. Lei, T. Wang, B. Zhao, et al., “Recent Progress in Electrocatalysts for Acidic Water Oxidation,” Advanced Energy Materials 10 (2020): 2000478.

[8]

L. Li, P. Wang, Q. Shao, and X. Huang, “Recent Progress in Advanced Electrocatalyst Design for Acidic Oxygen Evolution Reaction,” Advanced Materials 33 (2021): 2004243.

[9]

T. Wang, X. Cao, and L. Jiao, “PEM Water Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production: Fundamentals, Advances, and Prospects,” Carbon Neutrality 1 (2022): 21.

[10]

Z. Q. Jiang, C. Z. Fan, J. Y. Pan, et al., “Recent Advances in Ir/Ru-Based Perovskite Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction,” Rare Metals 43 (2024): 2891–2912.

[11]

D. Yan, C. Mebrahtu, S. Wang, and R. Palkovits, “Innovative Electrochemical Strategies for Hydrogen Production: From Electricity Input to Electricity Output,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62 (2023): e202214333.

[12]

Z. Chen, X. Duan, W. Wei, S. Wang, and B. J. Ni, “Electrocatalysts for Acidic Oxygen Evolution Reaction: Achievements and Perspectives,” Nano Energy 78 (2020): 105392.

[13]

S. Chen, H. Huang, P. Jiang, et al., “Mn-Doped RuO2 Nanocrystals as Highly Active Electrocatalysts for Enhanced Oxygen Evolution in Acidic Media,” ACS Catalysis 10 (2020): 1152–1160.

[14]

H. Song, X. Yong, G. I. N. Waterhouse, et al., “RuO2–CeO2 Lattice Matching Strategy Enables Robust Water Oxidation Electrocatalysis in Acidic Media via Two Distinct Oxygen Evolution Mechanisms,” ACS Catalysis 14 (2024): 3298–3307.

[15]

H. Jin, X. Liu, P. An, et al., “Dynamic Rhenium Dopant Boosts Ruthenium Oxide for Durable Oxygen Evolution,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 354.

[16]

L. Shi, W. Zhang, J. Li, et al., “Recent Development of Non-Iridium-Based Electrocatalysts for Acidic Oxygen Evolution Reaction,” Carbon Neutralization 3 (2024): 1101–1130.

[17]

X. Cao, H. Qin, J. Zhang, X. Chen, and L. Jiao, “Regulation of Oxide Pathway Mechanism for Sustainable Acidic Water Oxidation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146 (2024): 32049–32058.

[18]

L. Hou, Z. Li, H. Jang, et al., “Electronic and Lattice Engineering of Ruthenium Oxide Towards Highly Active and Stable Water Splitting,” Advanced Energy Materials 13 (2023): 2300177.

[19]

H. Yan, Z. Jiang, B. Deng, et al., “Ultrathin Carbon Coating and Defect Engineering Promote RuO2 as an Efficient Catalyst for Acidic Oxygen Evolution Reaction With Super-High Durability,” Advanced Energy Materials 13 (2023): 2300152.

[20]

D. Zhang, M. Li, X. Yong, et al., “Construction of Zn-doped RuO2 Nanowires for Efficient and Stable Water Oxidation in Acidic Media,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 2517.

[21]

Z.-Y. Wu, F.-Y. Chen, B. Li, et al., “Non-Iridium-Based Electrocatalyst for Durable Acidic Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis,” Nature Materials 22 (2023): 100–108.

[22]

J. Wang, H. Yang, F. Li, et al., “Single-Site Pt-Doped RuO2 Hollow Nanospheres With Interstitial C for High-Performance Acidic Overall Water Splitting,” Science Advances 8 (2022): eabl9271.

[23]

Y. Wang, R. Yang, Y. Ding, et al., “Unraveling Oxygen Vacancy Site Mechanism of Rh-Doped RuO2 Catalyst for Long-Lasting Acidic Water Oxidation,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 1412.

[24]

L. Deng, H. Chen, S. F. Hung, et al., “Lewis Acid-Mediated Interfacial Water Supply for Sustainable Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146 (2024): 35438–35448.

[25]

Y. Wu, C. Guo, R. Yao, K. Zhang, J. Li, and G. Liu, “Modulating Carrier Oxygen Vacancies to Enhance Strong Oxide-Support Interaction in IrO2/Nb2O5−x Catalysts for Promoting Acidic Oxygen Evolution Reaction,” Advanced Functional Materials 34 (2024): 2410193.

[26]

Y. Wang, Z. Zhao, X. Liang, et al., “Supported IrO2 Nanocatalyst With Multilayered Structure for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis,” Advanced Materials 36 (2024): 2407717.

[27]

D. Wu, H. Du, Z. Liu, G. A. Bagliu, J. Lai, and L. Wang, “Construction of High-Loading WO3−x Sub-Nanometer Clusters via Orderly-Anchored Top–Down Strategy Boost Acidic Hydrogen Evolution,” EcoEnergy 2 (2024): 724–735.

[28]

S. Sun, H. Jiang, Z. Chen, et al., “Bifunctional WC-Supported RuO2 Nanoparticles for Robust Water Splitting in Acidic Media,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61 (2022): e202202519.

[29]

Y. Wang, M. Zhang, Z. Kang, et al., “Nano-Metal Diborides-Supported Anode Catalyst With Strongly Coupled TaOx/IrO2 Catalytic Layer for Low-Iridium-Loading Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyzer,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 5119.

[30]

X. Teng, D. Si, L. Chen, and J. Shi, “Synergetic Catalytic Effects by Strong Metal–Support Interaction for Efficient Electrocatalysis,” eScience 4 (2024): 100272.

[31]

Y. Wen, P. Chen, L. Wang, et al., “Stabilizing Highly Active Ru Sites by Suppressing Lattice Oxygen Participation in Acidic Water Oxidation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 143 (2021): 6482–6490.

[32]

T. Wang, L. Miao, S. Zheng, et al., “Interfacial Engineering of Ni3N/Mo2N Heterojunctions for Urea Assisted Hydrogen Evolution Reaction,” ACS Catalysis 13 (2023): 4091–4100.

[33]

H. Wu, J. Chang, J. Yu, et al., “Atomically Engineered Interfaces Inducing Bridging Oxygen-Mediated Deprotonation for Enhanced Oxygen Evolution in Acidic Conditions,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 10315.

[34]

L. Deng, S.-F. Hung, Z.-Y. Lin, et al., “Valence Oscillation of Ru Active Sites for Efficient and Robust Acidic Water Oxidation,” Advanced Materials 35 (2023): 2305939.

[35]

J. Xu, Z. Lian, B. Wei, et al., “Strong Electronic Coupling Between Ultrafine Iridium−Ruthenium Nanoclusters and Conductive, Acid-Stable Tellurium Nanoparticle Support for Efficient and Durable Oxygen Evolution in Acidic and Neutral Media,” ACS Catalysis 10 (2020): 3571–3579.

[36]

X. Wang, H. Jang, S. Liu, et al., “Enhancing the Catalytic Kinetics and Stability of Ru Sites for Acidic Water Oxidation by Forming Brønsted Acid Sites in Tungsten Oxide Matrix,” Advanced Energy Materials 13 (2023): 2301673.

[37]

L. Xiao, G. Li, Z. Yang, et al., “Engineering of Amorphous PtOx Interface on Pt/WO3 Nanosheets for Ethanol Oxidation Electrocatalysis,” Advanced Functional Materials 31 (2021): 2100982.

[38]

J. Chen, C. Chen, M. Qin, et al., “Reversible Hydrogen Spillover in Ru-WO3−x Enhances Hydrogen Evolution Activity in Neutral pH Water Splitting,” Nature Communications 13 (2022): 5382.

[39]

Y.-R. Zheng, J. Vernieres, Z. Wang, et al., “Monitoring Oxygen Production on Mass-Selected Iridium–Tantalum Oxide Electrocatalysts,” Nature Energy 7 (2021): 55–64.

[40]

X. Ping, Y. Liu, L. Zheng, et al., “Locking the Lattice Oxygen in RuO2 to Stabilize Highly Active Ru Sites in Acidic Water Oxidation,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 2501.

[41]

Z. Shi, J. Li, Y. Wang, et al., “Customized Reaction Route for Ruthenium Oxide Towards Stabilized Water Oxidation in High-Performance PEM Electrolyzers,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 843.

[42]

L. Shao, X. Han, L. Shi, et al., “In Situ Generation of Molybdate-Modulated Nickel-Iron Oxide Electrodes With High Corrosion Resistance for Efficient Seawater Electrolysis,” Advanced Energy Materials 14 (2024): 2303261.

[43]

T. Wang, X. Cao, H. Qin, et al., “P-Block Atomically Dispersed Antimony Catalyst for Highly Efficient Oxygen Reduction Reaction,” Angewandte Chemie 133 (2021): 21407–21411.

[44]

J. Li, G. Fu, X. Sheng, et al., “A Comprehensive Review on Catalysts for Seawater Electrolysis,” Advanced Powder Materials 3 (2024): 100227.

[45]

Z. Xie, X. Liang, Z. Kang, et al., “High-Porosity, Layered Iridium Oxide as an Efficient, Durable Anode Catalyst for Water Splitting,” CCS Chemistry 7 (2025): 216–228.

[46]

Y. Wang, X. Lei, B. Zhang, et al., “Breaking the Ru-O-Ru Symmetry of a RuO2 Catalyst for Sustainable Acidic Water Oxidation,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63 (2024): e202316903.

[47]

J. Chang, Y. Shi, H. Wu, et al., “Oxygen Radical Coupling on Short-Range Ordered Ru Atom Arrays Enables Exceptional Activity and Stability for Acidic Water Oxidation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146 (2024): 12958–12968.

[48]

X. Fan, C. Liu, B. Gao, et al., “Electronic Structure Engineering of Pt Species Over Pt/WO3 Toward Highly Efficient Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution,” Small 19 (2023): 2301178.

[49]

K. Du, L. Zhang, J. Shan, et al., “Interface Engineering Breaks Both Stability and Activity Limits of RuO2 for Sustainable Water Oxidation,” Nature Communications 13 (2022): 5448.

[50]

H. Liu, Z. Zhang, J. Fang, et al., “Eliminating Over-Oxidation of Ruthenium Oxides by Niobium for Highly Stable Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution in Acidic Media,” Joule 7 (2023): 558–573.

[51]

B. Jin, J. Gao, Y. Zhang, and M. Shao, “Deprotonated of Layered Double Hydroxides During Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation for Multi-Cations Intercalation,” Smart Molecules 2 (2024): e20230026.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2026 The Authors. Carbon Energy published by Wenzhou University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF (3859KB)

6

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/