Stable immobilization of lithium polysulfides using three-dimensional ordered mesoporous Mn2O3 as the host material in lithium–sulfur batteries

Sung Joon Park , Yun Jeong Choi , Hyun-seung Kim , Min Joo Hong , Hongjun Chang , Janghyuk Moon , Young-Jun Kim , Junyoung Mun , Ki Jae Kim

Carbon Energy ›› 2024, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (6) : 487

PDF
Carbon Energy ›› 2024, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (6) : 487 DOI: 10.1002/cey2.487
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Stable immobilization of lithium polysulfides using three-dimensional ordered mesoporous Mn2O3 as the host material in lithium–sulfur batteries

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) have drawn significant attention owing to their high theoretical discharge capacity and energy density. However, the dissolution of long-chain polysulfides into the electrolyte during the charge and discharge process (“shuttle effect”) results in fast capacity fading and inferior electrochemical performance. In this study, Mn2O3 with an ordered mesoporous structure (OM-Mn2O3) was designed as a cathode host for LSBs via KIT-6 hard templating, to effectively inhibit the polysulfide shuttle effect. OM-Mn2O3 offers numerous pores to confine sulfur and tightly anchor the dissolved polysulfides through the combined effects of strong polar–polar interactions, polysulfides, and sulfur chain catenation. The OM-Mn2O3/S composite electrode delivered a discharge capacity of 561 mA h g−1 after 250 cycles at 0.5 C owing to the excellent performance of OM-Mn2O3. Furthermore, it retained a discharge capacity of 628 mA h g−1 even at a rate of 2 C, which was significantly higher than that of a pristine sulfur electrode (206 mA h g−1). These findings provide a prospective strategy for designing cathode materials for high-performance LSBs.

Keywords

host material / lithium–sulfur battery / ordered mesoporous structure / shuttle effect / transition-metal oxides

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Sung Joon Park, Yun Jeong Choi, Hyun-seung Kim, Min Joo Hong, Hongjun Chang, Janghyuk Moon, Young-Jun Kim, Junyoung Mun, Ki Jae Kim. Stable immobilization of lithium polysulfides using three-dimensional ordered mesoporous Mn2O3 as the host material in lithium–sulfur batteries. Carbon Energy, 2024, 6(6): 487 DOI:10.1002/cey2.487

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Choi JW, Aurbach D. Promise and reality of post-lithium-ion batteries with high energy densities. Nat Rev Mater. 2016; 1 (4): 16013.

[2]

Armand M, Tarascon JM. Building better batteries. Nature. 2008; 451 (7179): 652- 657.

[3]

Qiao Y, Deng H, He P, Zhou H. A 500 Wh/kg lithium-metal cell based on anionic redox. Joule. 2020; 4 (7): 1445- 1458.

[4]

Manthiram A. Materials challenges and opportunities of lithium ion batteries. J Phys Chem Lett. 2011; 2 (3): 176- 184.

[5]

Goodenough JB, Park KS. The Li-ion rechargeable battery: a perspective. J Am Chem Soc. 2013; 135 (4): 1167- 1176.

[6]

Kim JH. Grand challenges and opportunities in batteries and electrochemistry. Front Batter Electrochem. 2022; 1: 1066276.

[7]

Yim T, Han SH, Park NH, et al. Effective polysulfide rejection by dipole-aligned BaTiO3 coated separator in lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater. 2016; 26 (43): 7817- 7823.

[8]

Bhargav A, He J, Gupta A, Manthiram A. Lithium-sulfur batteries: attaining the critical metrics. Joule. 2020; 4 (2): 285- 291.

[9]

Manthiram A, Chung SH, Zu C. Lithium-sulfur batteries: progress and prospects. Adv Mater. 2015; 27 (12): 1980- 2006.

[10]

Zhou G, Chen H, Cui Y. Formulating energy density for designing practical lithium-sulfur batteries. Nat Energy. 2022; 7 (4): 312- 319.

[11]

Gao N, Li B, Zhang Y, et al. CoFe alloy-decorated interlayer with a synergistic catalytic effect improves the electrochemical kinetics of polysulfide conversion. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021; 13 (48): 57193- 57203.

[12]

Seh ZW, Sun Y, Zhang Q, Cui Y. Designing high-energy lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem Soc Rev. 2016; 45 (20): 5605- 5634.

[13]

Xiao M, Xing Z. Recent progress of lithium-sulfur batteries. Batteries. (2023; 9 (2): 79.

[14]

Manthiram A, Fu Y, Chung SH, Zu C, Su YS. Rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem Rev. 2014; 114 (23): 11751- 11787.

[15]

Kou Y, Jia J, Mi B, Yuan G, Wang Z. Rational design of 3DOM porous TiO2 matrix decorated with Co nanoparticles as novel sulfur hosts for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Mater Lett. 2022; 327: 133008.

[16]

Cui G, Li G, Luo D, et al. Three-dimensionally ordered macro-microporous metal organic frameworks with strong sulfur immobilization and catalyzation for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Energy. 2020; 72: 104685.

[17]

Zhang W, Xu Y, Liu J, et al. Waxberry-shaped ordered mesoporous P-TiO2−x microspheres as high-performance cathodes for lithium-sulfur batteries. Small Sci. 2023; 3 (1): 2200032.

[18]

Pan H, Cheng Z, Zhou Z, et al. Boosting lean electrolyte lithium-sulfur battery performance with transition metals: a comprehensive review. Nano-Micro Lett. 2023; 15 (1): 165.

[19]

Cheng Z, Pan H, Wu Z, Wübbenhorst M, Zhang Z. Cu-Mo bimetal modulated multifunctional carbon nanofibers promoting the polysulfides conversion for high-sulfur-loading lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022; 14 (40): 45688- 45696.

[20]

Cheng Z, Chen Y, Yang Y, et al. Metallic MoS2 nanoflowers decorated graphene nanosheet catalytically boosts the volumetric capacity and cycle life of lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater. 2021; 11 (12): 2003718.

[21]

Cheng Z, Wu Z, Chen J, et al. Mo2N-ZrO2 heterostructure engineering in freestanding carbon nanofibers for upgrading cycling stability and energy efficiency of Li-CO2 batteries. Small. 2023; 19 (28): 2301685.

[22]

Cheng Z, Lian J, Chen Y, et al. Robust in-Zr metal-organic framework nanosheets as ultrathin interlayer toward high-rate and long-cycle lithium-sulfur batteries. CCS Chem. 2023; 1- 11.

[23]

Cheng Z, Pan H, Chen J, Meng X, Wang R. Separator modified by cobalt-embedded carbon nanosheets enabling chemisorption and catalytic effects of polysulfides for high-energy-density lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater. 2019; 9 (32): 1901609.

[24]

Manthiram A, Fu Y, Su YS. Challenges and prospects of lithium-sulfur batteries. Acc Chem Res. 2013; 46 (5): 1125- 1134.

[25]

Deng C, Wang Z, Wang S, Yu J. Inhibition of polysulfide diffusion in lithium-sulfur batteries: mechanism and improvement strategies. J Mater Chem A. 2019; 7 (20): 12381- 12413.

[26]

Hofmann AF, Fronczek DN, Bessler WG. Mechanistic modeling of polysulfide shuttle and capacity loss in lithium-sulfur batteries. J Power Sources. 2014; 259: 300- 310.

[27]

Qie L, Zu C, Manthiram A. A high energy lithium-sulfur battery with ultrahigh-loading lithium polysulfide cathode and its failure mechanism. Adv Energy Mater. 2016; 6 (7): 1502459.

[28]

Li Z, Zhang J, Guan B, Wang D, Liu LM, Lou XW. A sulfur host based on titanium monoxide@carbon hollow spheres for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. Nat Commun. 2016; 7: 13065.

[29]

Zheng M, Chi Y, Hu Q, et al. Carbon nanotube-based materials for lithium-sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A. 2019; 7 (29): 17204- 17241.

[30]

Liu X, Xiao Z, Lai C, et al. Three-dimensional carbon framework as high-proportion sulfur host for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. J Mater Sci Technol. 2020; 48: 84- 91.

[31]

Ren J, Xia L, Zhou Y, Zheng Q, Liao J, Lin D. A reduced graphene oxide/nitrogen, phosphorus doped porous carbon hybrid framework as sulfur host for high performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Carbon. 2018; 140: 30- 40.

[32]

Zhang Y, Sun K, Liang Z, Wang Y, Ling L. N-doped yolk-shell hollow carbon sphere wrapped with graphene as sulfur host for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Appl Surf Sci. 2018; 427: 823- 829.

[33]

Xiao Q, Li G, Li M, et al. Biomass-derived nitrogen-doped hierarchical porous carbon as efficient sulfur host for lithium-sulfur batteries. J Energy Chem. 2020; 44: 61- 67.

[34]

Wang M, Xia X, Zhong Y, et al. Porous carbon hosts for lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem Eur J. 2019; 25 (15): 3710- 3725.

[35]

Liu YT, Liu S, Li GR, Yan TY, Gao XP. High volumetric energy density sulfur cathode with heavy and catalytic metal oxide host for lithium-sulfur battery. Adv Sci. 2020; 7 (12): 1903693.

[36]

Liang X, Kwok CY, Lodi-Marzano F, et al. Tuning transition metal oxide-sulfur interactions for long life lithium sulfur batteries: the “Goldilocks”. Adv Energy Mater. 2016; 6 (6): 1501636.

[37]

Liu X, Huang JQ, Zhang Q, Mai L. Nanostructured metal oxides and sulfides for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Mater. 2017; 29 (20): 1601759.

[38]

Wang H, Zhang W, Xu J, Guo Z. Advances in polar materials for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater. 2018; 28 (38): 1707520.

[39]

Ma F, Liang J, Wang T, et al. Efficient entrapment and catalytic conversion of lithium polysulfides on hollow metal oxide submicro-spheres as lithium-sulfur battery cathodes. Nanoscale. 2018; 10 (12): 5634- 5641.

[40]

Ding B, Shen L, Xu G, Nie P, Zhang X. Encapsulating sulfur into mesoporous TiO2 host as a high performance cathode for lithium-sulfur battery. Electrochim Acta. 2013; 107: 78- 84.

[41]

Dang R, Ma X, Liu J, Chen M, Zhang Y, Luo J. MnO2/rGO/CNTs framework as a sulfur host for high-performance Li-S batteries. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2018; 25 (8): 1989.

[42]

Zhu Y, Wang S, Miao Z, Liu Y, Chou SL. Novel non-carbon sulfur hosts based on strong chemisorption for lithium-sulfur batteries. Small. 2018; 14 (40): 1801987.

[43]

Choi DH, Ryoo R. Template synthesis of ordered mesoporous organic polymeric materials using hydrophobic silylated KIT-6 mesoporous silica. J Mater Chem. 2010; 20 (26): 5544- 5550.

[44]

Qian X, Jin L, Zhao D, et al. Ketjen black-MnO composite coated separator for high performance rechargeable lithium-sulfur battery. Electrochim Acta. 2016; 192: 346- 356.

[45]

Li Y, Zhu J, Shi R, et al. Ultrafine and polar ZrO2-inlaid porous nitrogen-doped carbon nanofiber as efficient polysulfide absorbent for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries with long lifespan. Chem Eng J. 2018; 349: 376- 387.

[46]

Pudukudy M, Yaakob Z. Sol-gel synthesis, characterisation, and photocatalytic activity of porous spinel Co3O4 nanosheets. Chem Pap. 2014; 68 (8): 1087- 1096.

[47]

Yan X, Tong X, Wang J, Gong C, Zhang M, Liang L. Rational synthesis of hierarchically porous NiO hollow spheres and their supercapacitor application. Mater Lett. 2013; 95: 1- 4.

[48]

Svidrytski A, Hlushkou D, Thommes M, Monson PA, Tallarek U. Modeling the impact of mesoporous silica microstructures on the adsorption hysteresis loop. J Phys Chem C. 2020; 124 (39): 21646- 21655.

[49]

Häcker J, Nguyen DH, Rommel T, Zhao-karger Z, Wagner N, Friedrich KA. Operando UV/vis spectroscopy providing insights into the sulfur and polysulfide dissolution in magnesium-sulfur batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2022; 7 (1): 1- 9.

[50]

Liang X, Hart C, Pang Q, Garsuch A, Weiss T, Nazar LF. A highly efficient polysulfide mediator for lithium-sulfur batteries. Nat Commun. 2015; 6: 5682.

[51]

Ren Y, Bhargav A, Shin W, Sul H, Manthiram A. Anode-free lithium-sulfur cells enabled by rationally tuning lithium polysulfide molecules. Angew Chem. 2022; 134 (55): e202207907.

[52]

Zhao M, Li BQ, Chen X, Xie J, Yuan H, Huang JQ. Redox comediation with organopolysulfides in working lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. 2020; 6 (12): 3297- 3311.

[53]

Wen G, Sui Y, Zhang X, et al. Mn3O4 anchored polypyrrole nanotubes as an efficient sulfur host for high performance lithium-sulfur batteries. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2021; 589: 208- 216.

[54]

Li S, Fan Z. Encapsulation methods of sulfur particles for lithium-sulfur batteries: a review. Energy Storage Mater. 2021; 34: 107- 127.

[55]

Shankar S, Pangeni R, Park JW, Rhim JW. Preparation of sulfur nanoparticles and their antibacterial activity and cytotoxic effect. Mater Sci Eng C. 2018; 92: 508- 517.

[56]

Liu X, Qian T, Liu J, Tian J, Zhang L, Yan C. Greatly improved conductivity of double-chain polymer network binder for high sulfur loading lithium-sulfur batteries with a low electrolyte/sulfur ratio. Small. 2018; 14 (33): 1801536.

[57]

Huang X, Wang Z, Knibbe R, et al. Cyclic voltammetry in lithium-sulfur batteries—challenges and opportunities. Energy Technol. 2019; 7 (8): 1801001.

[58]

Wild M, O'Neill L, Zhang T, et al. Lithium sulfur batteries, a mechanistic review. Energy Environ Sci. 2015; 8 (12): 3477- 3494.

[59]

Song JK, Kim M, Park S, Kim YJ. LiTFSI salt concentration effect to digest lithium polysulfides for high-loading sulfur electrodes. J Energy Chem. 2023; 78: 574- 581.

[60]

Park SJ, Yang SY, Han SA, et al. Two-in-one separator capturing and reutilizing polysulfides for high performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem Eng J. 2023; 460: 141620.

[61]

Zerrin T, Shang R, Dong B, et al. An overlooked parameter in Li-S batteries: the impact of electrolyte-to-sulfur ratio on capacity fading. Nano Energy. 2022; 104: 107913.

[62]

Chen Y, Wu J, Li Y. A “catalysis-immobilization-deposition” stepwise strategy toward dynamic equilibrium of polysulfides conversion and diffusion in lithium-sulfur batteries. Small Methods. 2023; 7 (7): 2300086.

[63]

Duffner F, Kronemeyer N, Tübke J, Leker J, Winter M, Schmuch R. Post-lithium-ion battery cell production and its compatibility with lithium-ion cell production infrastructure. Nat Energy. 2021; 6 (2): 123- 134.

[64]

Zha C, Wang S, Liu C, et al. Single-atom tailoring of Li2S to form Li2S2 for building better lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Stor Mater. 2022; 47: 79- 86.

[65]

Wu, Y , Momma, T , Ahn, S , Yokoshima, T , Nara, H , Osaka, T On-site chemical pre-lithiation of S cathode at room temperature on a 3D nano-structured current collector. J Power Sources 2017; 366: 65- 71.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. Carbon Energy published by Wenzhou University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

245

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/