Tackling the proton limit under industrial electrochemical CO₂ reduction by a local proton shuttle

Abstract

Industrial CO₂ electroreduction has received tremendous attentions for resolution of the current energy and environmental crisis, but its performance is greatly limited by mass transport at high current density. In this work, an ion-polymer-modified gas-diffusion electrode is used to tackle this proton limit. It is found that gas diffusion electrode-Nafion shows an impressive performance of 75.2% Faradaic efficiency in multicarbon products at an industrial current density of 1.16 A/cm². Significantly, in-depth electrochemical characterizations combined with in situ Raman have been used to determine the full workflow of protons, and it is found that HCO₃^- acts as a proton pool near the reaction environment, and HCO₃^- and H₃O⁺ are local proton donors that interact with the proton shuttle -SO₃^- from Nafion. With rich proton hopping sites that decrease the activation energy, a “Grotthuss” mechanism for proton transport in the above system has been identified rather than the “Vehicle” mechanism with a higher energy barrier. Therefore, this work could be very useful in terms of the achievement of industrial CO₂ reduction fundamentally and practically.

Keywords

industrial CO ₂ electroreduction / proton donor / proton pool / proton shuttle / proton transport mechanism

References

[1] Cai W-J, Jiao N. Wastewater alkalinity addition as a novel approach for ocean negative carbon emissions. Innov. 2022; 3 (4): 100272.

[2] Zhang W, Hu Y, Ma L, et al. Progress and perspective of electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction for renewable carbonaceous fuels and chemicals. Adv Sci. 2018; 5 (1): 1700275.

[3] Kibria MG, Edwards JP, Gabardo CM, et al. Electrochemical CO₂ reduction into chemical feedstocks: from mechanistic electrocatalysis models to system design. Adv Mater. 2019; 31 (31): 1807166.

[4] Ross MB, De Luna P, Li Y, et al. Designing materials for electrochemical carbon dioxide recycling. Nat Catal. 2019; 2 (8): 648- 658.

[5] Birdja YY, Pérez-Gallent E, Figueiredo MC, Göttle AJ, Calle-Vallejo F, Koper M. Advances and challenges in understanding the electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to fuels. Nat Energy. 2019; 4 (9): 732- 745.

[6] Xu D, Li K, Jia B, et al. Electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction towards industrial applications. Carbon Energy. 2023; 5 (1): e230.

[7] Hui S, Shaigan N, Neburchilov V, et al. Three-dimensional cathodes for electrochemical reduction of CO₂: from macro-to nano-engineering. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10 (9): 1884.

[8] Fan L, Xia C, Yang F, Wang J, Wang H, Lu Y. Strategies in catalysts and electrolyzer design for electrochemical CO₂ reduction toward C₂₊ products. Sci Adv. 2020; 6 (8): eaay3111.

[9] Nguyen TN, Dinh CT. Gas diffusion electrode design for electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Chem Soc Rev. 2020; 49 (21): 7488- 7504.

[10] Rabiee H, Ge L, Zhang X, Hu S, Li M, Yuan Z. Gas diffusion electrodes (GDEs) for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and dinitrogen to valueadded products: a review. Energy Environ Sci. 2021; 14 (4): 1959- 2008.

[11] Hui SR, De Luna P. How increasing proton and electron conduction benefits electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction. Matter. 2021; 4 (5): 1555- 1577.

[12] Nam D-H, De Luna P, Rosas-Hernández A, et al. Molecular enhancement of heterogeneous CO₂ reduction. Nat Mater. 2020; 19 (3): 266- 276.

[13] Escorihuela J, Olvera-Mancilla J, Alexandrova L, del Castillo LF, Compañ V. Recent progress in the development of composite membranes based on polybenzimidazole for high temperature proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell applications. Polymers. 2020; 12 (9): 1861.

[14] Soucy TL, Dean WS, Zhou J, Rivera Cruz KE, McCrory C. Considering the influence of polymer-catalyst interactions on the chemical microenvironment of electrocatalysts for the CO₂ reduction reaction. Acc Chem Res. 2022; 55 (3): 252- 261.

[15] Liu Y, McCrory CCL. Modulating the mechanism of electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction by cobalt phthalocyanine through polymer coordination and encapsulation. Nat Commun. 2019; 10: 1683.

[16] García de Arquer FP, Dinh C-T, Ozden A, et al. CO₂ electrolysis to multicarbon products at activities greater than 1 A cm^-2. Science. 2020; 367 (6478): 661- 666.

[17] Shi S, Weber AZ, Kusoglu A. Structure-transport relationship of perfluorosulfonic-acid membranes in different cationic forms. Electrochim Acta. 2016; 220: 517- 528.

[18] Mauritz KA, Moore RB. State of understanding of Nafion. Chem Rev. 2004; 104 (10): 4535- 4586.

[19] Zhou L, Li C, Lv JJ, et al. Synergistic regulation of hydrophobicity and basicity for copper hydroxide-derived copper to promote the CO₂ electroreduction reaction. Carbon Energy. In press;

[20] Liu W, Zhai P, Li A, et al. Electrochemical CO₂ reduction to ethylene by ultrathin CuO nanoplate arrays. Nat Commun. 2022; 13: 1877.

[21] Pham THM, Zhang J, Li M, et al. Enhanced electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction to C₂₊ products by adjusting the local reaction environment with polymer binders. Adv Energy Mater. 2022; 12 (9): 2103663.

[22] Wang X, Klingan K, Klingenhof M, et al. Morphology and mechanism of highly selective Cu(II) oxide nanosheet catalysts for carbon dioxide electroreduction. Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 794.

[23] Ma W, Xie S, Liu T, et al. Electrocatalytic reduction of CO₂ to ethylene and ethanol through hydrogen-assisted C-C coupling over fluorine-modified copper. Nat Catal. 2020; 3 (6): 478- 487.

[24] Nwabara UO, Hernandez AD, Henckel DA, et al. Binderfocused approaches to improve the stability of cathodes for CO₂ electroreduction. ACS Appl Energy Mater. 2021; 4 (5): 5175- 5186.

[25] Barnes AM, Liu B, Buratto SK. Humidity-dependent surface structure and hydroxide conductance of a model quaternary ammonium anion exchange membrane. Langmuir. 2019; 35 (44): 14188- 14193.

[26] Chen X, Henckel DA, Nwabara UO, et al. Controlling speciation during CO₂ reduction on Cu-alloy electrodes. ACS Catal. 2019; 10 (1): 672- 682.

[27] Herzog A, Bergmann A, Jeon HS, et al. Operando investigation of Ag-decorated Cu₂O nanocube catalysts with enhanced CO₂ electroreduction toward liquid products. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2021; 60 (13): 7426- 7435.

[28] Gao J, Zhang H, Guo X, et al. Selective C-C coupling in carbon dioxide electroreduction via efficient spillover of intermediates as supported by operando Raman spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc. 2019; 141 (47): 18704- 18714.

[29] Li F, Li YC, Wang Z, et al. Cooperative CO₂-to-ethanol conversion via enriched intermediates at molecule-metal catalyst interfaces. Nat Catal. 2020; 3 (1): 75- 82.

[30] Ross MB, Dinh CT, Li Y, et al. Tunable Cu enrichment enables designer syngas electrosynthesis from CO₂. J Am Chem Soc. 2017; 139 (27): 9359- 9363.

[31] Niu Z-Z, Gao F-Y, Zhang X-L, et al. Hierarchical copper with inherent hydrophobicity mitigates electrode flooding for high-rate CO₂ electroreduction to multicarbon products. J Am Chem Soc. 2021; 143 (21): 8011- 8021.

[32] Li J, Chang X, Zhang H, et al. Electrokinetic and in situ spectroscopic investigations of CO electrochemical reduction on copper. Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 3264.

[33] Zhao Y, Chang X, Malkani AS, et al. Speciation of Cu surfaces during the electrochemical CO reduction reaction. J Am Chem Soc. 2020; 142 (21): 9735- 9743.

[34] Chang X, Zhao Y, Xu B. pH dependence of Cu surface speciation in the electrochemical CO reduction reaction. ACS Catal. 2020; 10 (23): 13737- 13747.

[35] Govindarajan N, Kastlunger G, Heenen HH, Chan K. Improving the intrinsic activity of electrocatalysts for sustainable energy conversion: where are we and where can we go? Chem Sci. 2021; 13 (1): 14- 26.

[36] Cheng Q, Wang M, Ni J, et al. Comprehensive understanding and rational regulation of microenvironment for gas-involving electrochemical reactions. Carbon Energy. In press;

[37] Chang S, Xuan Y, Duan J, Zhang K. High-performance electroreduction CO₂ to formate at Bi/Nafion interface. Appl Catal B. 2022; 306 (306): 121135.

[38] Yao D, Tang C, Vasileff A, Zhi X, Jiao Y, Qiao S. The controllable reconstruction of Bi-MOFs for electrochemical CO₂ reduction through electrolyte and potential mediation. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2021; 60 (33): 18178- 18184.

[39] Wuttig A, Yoon Y, Ryu J, Surendranath Y. Bicarbonate is not a general acid in Au-catalyzed CO₂ electroreduction. J Am Chem Soc. 2017; 139 (47): 17109- 17113.

[40] Zhu Q, Murphy CJ, Baker LR. Opportunities for electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction enabled by surface ligands. J Am Chem Soc. 2022; 144 (7): 2829- 2840.

[41] Koshy DM, Akhade SA, Shugar A, et al. Chemical modifications of Ag catalyst surfaces with imidazolium ionomers modulate H₂ evolution rates during electrochemical CO₂ reduction. J Am Chem Soc. 2021; 143 (36): 14712- 14725.

[42] Nitopi S, Bertheussen E, Scott SB, et al. Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO₂ reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem Rev. 2019; 119 (12): 7610- 7672.

[43] Deng B, Huang M, Zhao X, Mou S, Dong F. Interfacial electrolyte effects on electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction. ACS Catal. 2021; 12 (1): 331- 362.

[44] Lu X, Zhu C, Wu Z, Xuan J, Francisco JS, Wang H. In situ observation of the pH gradient near the gas diffusion electrode of CO₂ reduction in alkaline electrolyte. J Am Chem Soc. 2020; 142 (36): 15438- 15444.

[45] Chen X, Chen J, Alghoraibi NM, et al. Electrochemical CO₂-to-ethylene conversion on polyamine-incorporated Cu electrodes. Nat Catal. 2020; 4 (1): 20- 27.

[46] Henckel DA, Counihan MJ, Holmes HE, et al. Potential dependence of the local pH in a CO₂ reduction electrolyzer. ACS Catal. 2021; 11 (1): 255- 263.

[47] Li X-M, Dong L-Z, Liu J, Ji WX, Li SL, Lan YQ. Intermediatetemperature anhydrous high proton conductivity triggered by dynamic molecular migration in trinuclear cluster lattice. Chem. 2020; 6 (9): 2272- 2282.

[48] Lu Z, Yang C, He L, et al. Asymmetric hydrophosphonylation of imines to construct highly stable covalent organic frameworks with efficient intrinsic proton conductivity. J Am Chem Soc. 2022; 144 (22): 9624- 9633.

[49] Li G-F, Yang D, Abel Chuang P-Y. Defining Nafion ionomer roles for enhancing alkaline oxygen evolution electrocatalysis. ACS Catal. 2018; 8 (12): 11688- 11698.

[50] Kim C, Bui JC, Luo X, et al. Tailored catalyst microenvironments for CO₂ electroreduction to multicarbon products on copper using bilayer ionomer coatings. Nat Energy. 2021; 6 (11): 1026- 1034.

[51] Rahbari A, Hartkamp R, Moultos OA, et al. Electro-osmotic drag and thermodynamic properties of water in hydrated nafion membranes from molecular dynamics. J Phys Chem C. 2022; 126 (18): 8121- 8133.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 The Authors. Carbon Energy published by Wenzhou University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.