Immunotherapy resistance and strategies in malignant pleural mesothelioma
Wanyi Xia , Yulong Zhang , Juanzhi Zhao , Xiaoli Tan , Shaolong Ju , Wei Zou , Chaoqun Chen , Chunwei Li , Yanghua Xu , Yingming Peng , Shengqiao Li
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains one of the most aggressive thoracic malignancies, characterized by profound resistance to conventional modalities such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, resulting in persistently poor survival outcomes. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has fundamentally reshaped the therapeutic landscape of MPM. Notably, dual programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) blockade has demonstrated superior efficacy over monotherapy in multiple phase I/II trials and has been established as a novel first-line standard of care. Nevertheless, the high incidence of resistance continues to pose a major clinical challenge. This therapeutic bottleneck is largely attributed to the unique biology of MPM, including a profoundly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, aberrantly activated signaling pathways, and complex metabolic reprogramming, which together form a multilayered defense network against immune attack. In response to this intricate resistance architecture, recent research efforts have increasingly focused on the development of precision combination strategies. By rationally integrating ICIs with anti-angiogenic agents, chemotherapy, metabolic modulators, and next-generation cellular immunotherapies [e.g., chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T), chimeric antigen receptor-natural killer (CAR-NK)], these approaches aim to dismantle immune evasion barriers and reinvigorate antitumor immunity. Concurrently, the discovery of novel biomarkers and their integration with multi-omics data are enabling more precise patient stratification, signaling the advent of an era of personalized immunotherapy for MPM. This review provides a systematic synthesis of the latest clinical advances and fundamental breakthroughs in MPM immunotherapy, with a particular focus on dissecting the multifactorial mechanisms underlying therapeutic resistance. Its core contribution lies in constructing a forward-looking framework for next-generation treatment strategies. It critically evaluates the translational potential of emerging approaches, including arginine deprivation therapy for argininosuccinate synthase 1 (ASS1)-deficient tumors, CAR-T cells, T-cell receptor fusion constructs, and oncolytic virotherapy. By integrating these innovative modalities with biomarker-guided patient selection, this review delineates a roadmap for transitioning MPM management from empirical therapy toward precision immuno-oncology, with the ultimate goal of achieving durable disease control in this challenging malignancy.
Malignant pleural mesothelioma / immunotherapy / resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors / tumor microenvironment
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
Felip E, Popat S, Dafni U, et al.; ETOP 13-18 BEAT-meso Collaborators. A randomised phase III study of bevacizumab and carboplatin-pemetrexed chemotherapy with or without atezolizumab as first-line treatment for advanced pleural mesothelioma: results of the ETOP 13-18 BEAT-meso trial.Ann Oncol2025;36:548-60 |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Nivolumab with ipilimumab for untreated unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta818. [Last accessed on 16 Mar 2026] |
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Scherpereel A, Mazieres J, Greillier L, et al.; French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup. Nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma (IFCT-1501 MAPS2): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, non-comparative, phase 2 trial.Lancet Oncol2019;20:239-53 |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
Szlosarek PW, Creelan BC, Sarkodie T, et al.; ATOMIC-Meso Study Group. Pegargiminase plus first-line chemotherapy in patients with nonepithelioid pleural mesothelioma: the ATOMIC-Meso randomized clinical trial.JAMA Oncol2024;10:475-83 PMCID:PMC10870227 |
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
Aerts JG, Belderbos R, Baas P, et al.; DENIM team. Dendritic cells loaded with allogeneic tumour cell lysate plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone in patients with pleural mesothelioma as maintenance therapy after chemotherapy (DENIM): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2/3 study.Lancet Oncol2024;25:865-78 |
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
Pal RS, Wahlang J, Pal Y, Chaitanya M, Saxena S. Precision oncology: transforming cancer care through personalized medicine.Med Oncol2025;42:246 |
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
|
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
|
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
|
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
|
| [115] |
|
| [116] |
|
| [117] |
|
| [118] |
|
| [119] |
|
| [120] |
|
| [121] |
|
| [122] |
|
| [123] |
|
| [124] |
|
| [125] |
|
| [126] |
|
| [127] |
|
| [128] |
|
| [129] |
|
| [130] |
|
| [131] |
|
| [132] |
|
| [133] |
|
| [134] |
|
| [135] |
|
| [136] |
|
| [137] |
|
| [138] |
|
| [139] |
|
| [140] |
|
| [141] |
|
| [142] |
|
| [143] |
|
| [144] |
|
| [145] |
|
| [146] |
|
| [147] |
|
| [148] |
|
| [149] |
|
| [150] |
|
| [151] |
|
| [152] |
|
| [153] |
|
| [154] |
|
| [155] |
|
| [156] |
|
| [157] |
|
| [158] |
|
| [159] |
|
| [160] |
|
| [161] |
|
| [162] |
|
| [163] |
|
| [164] |
|
| [165] |
|
| [166] |
|
| [167] |
|
| [168] |
|
| [169] |
|
| [170] |
|
| [171] |
|
| [172] |
|
| [173] |
Popat S, Baas P, Faivre-Finn C, et al.; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.Ann Oncol2022;33:129-42 |
| [174] |
|
| [175] |
|
| [176] |
|
| [177] |
|
| [178] |
|
| [179] |
|
| [180] |
|
| [181] |
|
| [182] |
|
| [183] |
|
| [184] |
|
| [185] |
|
| [186] |
|
| [187] |
|
| [188] |
|
| [189] |
|
| [190] |
|
| [191] |
|
| [192] |
|
| [193] |
|
| [194] |
|
| [195] |
|
| [196] |
|
| [197] |
|
| [198] |
|
| [199] |
|
| [200] |
|
| [201] |
|
| [202] |
|
| [203] |
|
| [204] |
|
| [205] |
|
| [206] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |