Interactions between tumor microenvironment and resistance to transarterial and systemic treatments for HCC
Maria Stella Franzè , Francesca Saffioti , Vasileios K. Mavroeidis
Cancer Drug Resistance ›› 2025, Vol. 8 : 33
Interactions between tumor microenvironment and resistance to transarterial and systemic treatments for HCC
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignant tumor originating from hepatocytes, often developing against a backdrop of chronic inflammation and liver fibrosis. The primary risk factor for HCC is cirrhosis, and early detection is crucial for improving outcomes. Despite advances in treatment, the prognosis remains poor, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 15%-38%. Growing evidence highlights the critical role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in modulating tumor initiation, growth, progression, and, in some cases, suppression. The TME is a complex ecosystem composed of immune cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, extracellular matrix components, and other factors such as growth factors and cytokines. By shaping tumor cell behavior, the TME facilitates immune evasion and contributes to resistance to treatment. Tumor-associated immune cells, including regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and tumor-associated macrophages, contribute to immune suppression and progression. On the other hand, immune activation via immune checkpoint inhibition has shown promise in improving outcomes, especially when combined with other treatments such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), and systemic therapies. Studies have demonstrated the potential of targeting the TME to enhance treatment efficacy, with immune modulation emerging as a key therapeutic strategy. This review explores the complex interactions within the TME in HCC, highlighting its role in therapy resistance and immune evasion. It also discusses current therapeutic approaches to target the TME to improve clinical outcomes in HCC patients.
Hepatocellular carcinoma / extracellular matrix / transarterial chemoembolization / selective internal radiation therapy / systemic therapy / drug resistance / immune evasion / immune checkpoint inhibitors
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma.J Hepatol2018;69:182-236 |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.J Hepatol2025;82:315-74 |
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
Ebeling Barbier C, Heindryckx F, Lennernäs H. Limitations and possibilities of transarterial chemotherapeutic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.Int J Mol Sci2021;22:13051 PMCID:PMC8658005 |
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
de Baere T, Plotkin S, Yu R, Sutter A, Wu Y, Cruise GM. An in vitro evaluation of four types of drug-eluting microspheres loaded with doxorubicin.J Vasc Interv Radiol2016;27:1425-31 |
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
Kudo M, Matsui O, Izumi N, et al; Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Transarterial chemoembolization failure/refractoriness: JSH-LCSGJ criteria 2014 update. Oncology. 2014;87 Suppl 1:22-31. |
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
|
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
Zhu AX, Finn RS, Edeline J, et al; KEYNOTE-224 investigators. Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib (KEYNOTE-224): a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:940-52. |
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
Finn RS, Ryoo BY, Merle P, et al; KEYNOTE-240 investigators. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:193-202. |
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, et al; IMbrave150 Investigators. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1894-905. |
| [115] |
|
| [116] |
|
| [117] |
|
| [118] |
|
| [119] |
|
| [120] |
|
| [121] |
|
| [122] |
|
| [123] |
|
| [124] |
|
| [125] |
|
| [126] |
|
| [127] |
|
| [128] |
|
| [129] |
|
| [130] |
|
| [131] |
|
| [132] |
|
| [133] |
|
| [134] |
|
| [135] |
|
| [136] |
|
| [137] |
|
| [138] |
|
| [139] |
|
| [140] |
|
| [141] |
|
| [142] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |