The evolving role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cervical and endometrial cancer
Bertha Alejandra Martinez-Cannon , Ilaria Colombo
Cancer Drug Resistance ›› 2024, Vol. 7 : 23
The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment landscape for numerous tumor types, including cervical and endometrial cancers. Multiple ICIs against programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) have demonstrated encouraging outcomes in controlled clinical studies for advanced cervical and endometrial cancers. For advanced cervical cancer, approved ICIs as second-line treatment include cemiplimab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab as single agents. In the first-line treatment setting, options include pembrolizumab alone or in combination with bevacizumab, as well as atezolizumab combined with a backbone platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Additionally, for locally advanced cervical cancer, pembrolizumab is recommended alongside concurrent chemoradiotherapy. For endometrial cancer, pembrolizumab monotherapy, pembrolizumab in combination with lenvatinib, and dostarlimab are currently approved as second-line treatment options. Moreover, either dostarlimab or pembrolizumab can be added to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy for mismatch repair deficient malignancies. Although the inclusion of these agents in clinical practice has led to improved overall response rates and survival outcomes, many patients still lack benefits, possibly due to multiple intrinsic and adaptive resistance mechanisms to immunotherapy. This review aims to highlight the rationale for utilizing ICIs and their current role, while also delineating the proposed mechanisms of resistance to ICIs in cervical and endometrial cancer.
Immunotherapy / cervical cancer / endometrial cancer / immune checkpoint inhibitors
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, et al; CheckMate 214 Investigators. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1277-90. PMCID:PMC5972549 |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
Allemani C, Weir HK, Carreira H, et al; CONCORD Working Group. Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2). Lancet 2015;385:977-1010. PMCID:PMC4588097 |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
Tewari KS, Monk BJ, Vergote I, et al; Investigators for GOG Protocol 3016 and ENGOT Protocol En-Cx9. Survival with cemiplimab in recurrent cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2022;386:544-55. |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Cervical cancer (Version 3.2024). Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cervical.pdf. [Last accessed on 7 Jun 2024] |
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
Colombo N, Dubot C, Lorusso D, et al; KEYNOTE-826 Investigators. Pembrolizumab for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2021;385:1856-67. |
| [28] |
Monk BJ, Colombo N, Tewari KS, et al; KEYNOTE-826 Investigators. First-line pembrolizumab + chemotherapy versus placebo + chemotherapy for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer: final overall survival results of KEYNOTE-826. J Clin Oncol 2023;41:5505-11. |
| [29] |
Oaknin A, Gladieff L, Martínez-García J, et al; ENGOT-Cx10–GEICO 68-C–JGOG1084–GOG-3030 Investigators. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy for metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical cancer (BEATcc): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2024;403:31-43. |
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
Lorusso D, Xiang Y, Hasegawa K, et al; ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18 investigators. Pembrolizumab or placebo with chemoradiotherapy followed by pembrolizumab or placebo for newly diagnosed, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer (ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial. Lancet 2024;403:1341-50. |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
National Cancer Institute. Cancer stat facts: uterine cancer. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/corp.html. [Last accessed on 7 Jun 2024] |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
Levine DA; The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature 2013;497:67-73. PMCID:PMC3704730 |
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
Makker V, Colombo N, Casado Herráez A, et al; Study 309–KEYNOTE-775 Investigators. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for advanced endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med 2022;386:437-48. |
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
Mirza MR, Chase DM, Slomovitz BM, et al; RUBY Investigators. Dostarlimab for primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med 2023;388:2145-58. |
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
Westin SN, Moore K, Chon HS, et al; DUO-E Investigators. Durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by maintenance durvalumab with or without olaparib as first-line treatment for advanced endometrial cancer: the phase III DUO-E trial. J Clin Oncol 2024;42:283-99. PMCID:PMC10824389 |
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
RAINBO Research Consortium. Refining adjuvant treatment in endometrial cancer based on molecular features: the RAINBO clinical trial program.Int J Gynecol Cancer2022;33:109-17 PMCID:PMC9811074 |
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
Dou Y, Kawaler EA, Cui Zhou D, et al; Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium. Proteogenomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Cell 2020;180:729-48.e26. PMCID:PMC7233456 |
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |