Global research status and trends in the AI-driven anticancer drug design: a bibliometric analysis of 2011–2025

Mengyao Sun , Yue Yin , Zejun Jia

Clinical Cancer Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 8

PDF
Clinical Cancer Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) :8 DOI: 10.1007/s44272-026-00060-8
Original Research
research-article
Global research status and trends in the AI-driven anticancer drug design: a bibliometric analysis of 2011–2025
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Purpose

To provide a comprehensive overview of research in AI-driven anticancer drug design and to recommend future research directions for both researchers and clinicians.

Methods

A thorough literature search was conducted across the Web of Science Core Collection databases. Analysis was conducted using Excel 2025, CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and R.

Results

This bibliometric analysis encompassed a total of 15,554 publications. China emerged as the leading contributor in terms of total publication output, followed by the United States, India, and South Korea. Harvard University produced the highest volume of publications. Professor Alex Zhavoronkov was identified as the most prolific author in this domain, while Professor Michael Patrick Menden received the highest number of citations. The terms “artificial intelligence,” “immunotherapy,” and “breast cancer” were the most frequently mentioned, with significant attention given to breast, prostate, lung, and liver cancers.

Conclusion

AI-driven anticancer drug design emphasizes both established and novel targets, particularly for high-prevalence cancers. To enhance translational impact, future initiatives should focus on clinically oriented innovations. Key priorities must include the integration of multi-omics data, development of specialized cohorts, improved accessibility to data, and the combination of wet and dry lab tests. It will also be crucial to address data compliance and regulatory challenges to ensure sustained progress in this field.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence / Anticancer drug / Bibliometric analysis / Clinical trial

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Mengyao Sun, Yue Yin, Zejun Jia. Global research status and trends in the AI-driven anticancer drug design: a bibliometric analysis of 2011–2025. Clinical Cancer Bulletin, 2026, 5(1): 8 DOI:10.1007/s44272-026-00060-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

The Lancet Public Health. Inequalities in cancer: a major public health concern. Lancet Public Health, 2024, 9(3): e147

[2]

Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3): 229-263

[3]

Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr, 2017, 11(4): 959-975

[4]

Ng JY, Liu H, Masood M, Syed N, Stephen D, Ayala AP, et al. . Guidance for the reporting of bibliometric analyses: a scoping review. Quantitative Science Studies, 2025, 6: 988-1001

[5]

Harrer S, Shah P, Antony B, Hu J. Artificial intelligence for clinical trial design. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2019, 40(8): 577-591

[6]

AlphaFold and beyond. Nat Methods, 2023, 20(2): 163

[7]

Li Q, Wan J, Liu J, Shang J, Yu J, Zhu W, et al. Abstract 1656: ISM6331, a novel and potent pan-TEAD inhibitor, exhibits strong anti-tumor activity in preclinical models of Hippo pathway-dysregulated cancers. Cancer Res. 2024;84(6_Supplement):1656.

[8]

Wang J, Frietsch R, Neuhäusler P, Hooi R. International collaboration leading to high citations: Global impact or home country effect?. J Informetr, 2024, 18(4): 101565

[9]

Wang J, Lu Q, Chen X, Aifantis I. Targeting MHC-I inhibitory pathways for cancer immunotherapy. Trends Immunol, 2024, 45(3): 177-187

[10]

Chen X, Lu Q, Zhou H, Liu J, Nadorp B, Lasry A, et al. . A membrane-associated MHC-I inhibitory axis for cancer immune evasion. Cell, 2023, 186(18): 3903-20.e21

[11]

Kaur A, Baldwin J, Brar D, Salunke DB, Petrovsky N. Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists as a driving force behind next-generation vaccine adjuvants and cancer therapeutics. Curr Opin Chem Biol, 2022, 70: 102172

[12]

Bai X, Guo YR, Zhao ZM, Li XY, Dai DQ, Zhang JK, et al. . Macrophage polarization in cancer and beyond: from inflammatory signaling pathways to potential therapeutic strategies. Cancer Lett, 2025, 625: 217772

[13]

Adrover JM, McDowell SAC, He XY, Quail DF, Egeblad M. NET working with cancer: the bidirectional interplay between cancer and neutrophil extracellular traps. Cancer Cell, 2023, 41(3): 505-526

[14]

Hu Y, Dong Z, Liu K. Unraveling the complexity of STAT3 in cancer: molecular understanding and drug discovery. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2024, 43(1): 23

[15]

Yi M, Li T, Niu M, Zhang H, Wu Y, Wu K, et al. . Targeting cytokine and chemokine signaling pathways for cancer therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2024, 9(1): 176

[16]

American Socitey of Cancer. The cancer atlas. https://canceratlas.cancer.org/.

[17]

Kim J, Harper A, McCormack V, Sung H, Houssami N, Morgan E, et al. . Global patterns and trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality across 185 countries. Nat Med, 2025, 31(4): 1154-1162

[18]

Chakrabarti D, Albertsen P, Adkins A, Kishan A, Murthy V, Parker C, et al. . The contemporary management of prostate cancer. CA Cancer J Clin, 2025, 75(6): 552-586

[19]

Klimberg VS. Breast cancer: a success story for women. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2026, 52(5): 111491

[20]

Lin J, Nousome D, Jiang J, Chesnut GT, Shriver CD, Zhu K. Five-year survival of patients with late-stage prostate cancer: comparison of the Military Health System and the U.S. general population. Br J Cancer, 2023, 128(6): 1070-1076

[21]

Chen S, Cao Z, Prettner K, Kuhn M, Yang J, Jiao L, et al. . Estimates and projections of the global economic cost of 29 cancers in 204 countries and territories from 2020 to 2050. JAMA Oncol, 2023, 9(4): 465-472

[22]

Ginsburg O, Vanderpuye V, Beddoe AM, Bhoo-Pathy N, Bray F, Caduff C, et al. . Women, power, and cancer: a Lancet commission. Lancet, 2023, 402(10417): 2113-2166

[23]

Eigentler T, Thomas I, Samoylenko I, Erdmann M, Heinzerling L, Ochsenreither S, et al. Phase Ⅰ study of intratumoral administration of CV8102 in patients with advanced melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, or adenoid cystic carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2025;13(2):e009352.

[24]

Hulse M, Wang M, Xu C, Carter J, Agarwal A, Lu L, et al. . PRT3789 is a first-in-human SMARCA2-selective degrader that induces synthetic lethality in SMARCA4-mutated cancers. Cancer Res, 2026, 86(1): 213-235

[25]

Cai X, Cheng X, Qin L, Zhang M, Qiao J, Bavadekar S, et al. Abstract PO2–05–08: ISM5043, a novel, selective KAT6 inhibitor for the treatment of advanced and refractory ER+ breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2024;84(9_Supplement):PO2–05–8.

[26]

Khot S, Krishnaveni A, Gharat S, Momin M, Bhavsar C, Omri A. Innovative drug delivery strategies for targeting glioblastoma: overcoming the challenges of the tumor microenvironment. Expert Opin Drug Deliv, 2024, 21(12): 1837-1857

[27]

Mestrallet G. Prediction of glioma resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors based on mutation profile. Neuroglia, 2024, 5(2): 145-154

[28]

Hanahan D. Hallmarks of cancer—then and now, and beyond. Cell. 2026. ahead of online.

[29]

Gupta PB, Pastushenko I, Skibinski A, Blanpain C, Kuperwasser C. Phenotypic plasticity: driver of cancer initiation, progression, and therapy resistance. Cell Stem Cell, 2019, 24(1): 65-78

[30]

Laughney AM, Hu J, Campbell NR, Bakhoum SF, Setty M, Lavallée VP, et al. . Regenerative lineages and immune-mediated pruning in lung cancer metastasis. Nat Med, 2020, 26(2): 259-269

[31]

Malinova A, Veghini L, Real FX, Corbo V. Cell lineage infidelity in PDAC progression and therapy resistance. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2021, 9: 795251

[32]

Pytlarz M, Wojnicki K, Pilanc P, Kaminska B, Crimi A. Deep learning glioma grading with the tumor microenvironment analysis protocol for comprehensive learning, discovering, and quantifying microenvironmental features. Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine, 2024, 37(4): 1711-1727

[33]

Gold ER, Cook-Deegan R. AI drug development’s data problem. Science, 2025, 388(6743): 131

[34]

Gholap AD, Uddin MJ, Faiyazuddin M, Omri A, Gowri S, Khalid M. Advances in artificial intelligence for drug delivery and development: a comprehensive review. Comput Biol Med, 2024, 178: 108702

[35]

Tyler M, Gavish A, Barbolin C, Tschernichovsky R, Hoefflin R, Mints M, et al. . The curated cancer cell atlas provides a comprehensive characterization of tumors at single-cell resolution. Nat Cancer, 2025, 6(6): 1088-1101

[36]

Chen Y, Zhang L, Zhong C, Li S, Li R, Jia Z, et al. . Rare cancer explorer 1.0 (RaCE 1.0): a dedicated database and analytical platform focused on rare cancers. Nucleic Acids Res., 2026, 54(D1): D1590-d607

[37]

Chen M, Zhang M, Yan G, Wang G, Qu C. MRHGNN: enhanced multimodal relational hypergraph neural network for synergistic drug combination forecasting. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 2025, 36(9): 17086-17098

[38]

Zhu W, Zhang L, Jiang X, Zhou P, Xie X, Wang H. A method combining LDA and neural networks for antitumor drug efficacy prediction. DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 10: 20552076241280103

[39]

Wei S-S, Jhang W-E, Liu Y-C, Chuang C-C, Ou Y-Y. RTK_RAG: leveraging retrieval augmented generation with multi-window convolutional neural networks for superior ATP binding site prediction in receptor tyrosine kinases. J Chem Inf Model, 2025, 65(13): 7277-7284

[40]

Alkuhlani A, Gad W, Roushdy M, Salem ABM. PUStackNGly: positive-unlabeled and stacking learning for n-linked glycosylation site prediction. IEEE Access, 2022, 10: 12702-12713

[41]

Xia Y, Li J, Chu Y, Rao J, Chen J, Hua C, et al. . Deciphering RNA–ligand binding specificity with GerNA-Bind. Nat Mach Intell, 2025, 7(12): 1996-2008

[42]

Wu K, Jiang H, Hicks DR, Liu C, Muratspahić E, Ramelot TA, et al. . Design of intrinsically disordered region binding proteins. Science, 2025, 389(6757): eadr8063

[43]

Wang Q, Liu Y, Li C, Xu B, Xu S, Liu B. Machine learning-enhanced nanoparticle design for precision cancer drug delivery. Adv Sci, 2025, 12(30): e03138

[44]

Bhujel R, Enkmann V, Burgstaller H, Maharjan R. Artificial intelligence-driven strategies for targeted delivery and enhanced stability of RNA-based lipid nanoparticle cancer vaccines. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(8):992.

[45]

Wu X, Meng Y, Yao Z, Lin X, Hu M, Cai S, et al. . Extracellular vesicles as nature's nano carriers in cancer therapy: insights toward preclinical studies and clinical applications. Pharmacol Res, 2025, 217: 107751

[46]

He Y, Song T, Ning J, Wang Z, Yin Z, Jiang P, et al. . Lactylation in cancer: mechanisms in tumour biology and therapeutic potentials. Clin Transl Med, 2024, 14(11): e70070

[47]

Pan X, Cracan V. Translocation renal cell carcinoma says no to the Warburg effect. Nat Metab, 2025, 7(3): 438-440

[48]

Subramanian P, Aravindan N, Aravindan S. Abstract B045: Breaking the Warburg code: RD3 redefines energetics in metastatic neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 2025;85(18_Supplement_2):B045.

[49]

Kornberg MD. The immunologic Warburg effect: evidence and therapeutic opportunities in autoimmunity. WIREs Syst Biol Med, 2020, 12(5): e1486

[50]

de Leon-Oliva D, González-Prieto P, de Castro-Martinez P, Boaru DL, Laguna-Hernández P, Fraile-Martinez O, et al. . Revisiting the biological role of the Warburg effect: Evolving perspectives on cancer metabolism. Pathol Res Pract, 2025, 273: 156151

[51]

Zhang J, Pan T, Lee J, Goldberg S, King SA, Tang E, et al. . Enabling tumor-specific drug delivery by targeting the Warburg effect of cancer. Cell Rep Med, 2025, 6(1): 101920

[52]

Fu C, Chen Q. The future of pharmaceuticals: artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. J Pharm Anal, 2025, 15(8): 101248

[53]

Neal JW, Gainor JF, Shaw AT. Developing biomarker-specific end points in lung cancer clinical trials. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2015, 12(3): 135-146

[54]

Maeda H, Kurokawa T. Acceptance of surrogate end points in clinical trials supporting approval of drugs for cancer treatment by the Japanese regulatory agency. Ann Oncol, 2015, 26(1): 211-216

[55]

Adjei AA, Christian M, Ivy P. Novel designs and end points for phase Ⅱ clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res, 2009, 15(6): 1866-1872

[56]

Rahib L, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM, Berlin JD. Evaluation of pancreatic cancer clinical trials and benchmarks for clinically meaningful future trials: a systematic review. JAMA Oncol, 2016, 2(9): 1209-1216

[57]

Meehl MM, Immadisetty K, Trivedi VD, Glowacki P, Prinzing B, Anido AA, et al. . Computational structural optimization enhances IL13Rα2-B7-H3 tandem CAR T cells to overcome antigen-heterogeneity-mediated tumor escape. Mol Ther, 2025, 33(10): 4968-4987

[58]

Badani A, de Moraes FY, Vollmuth P, Chung C, Mansouri A. AI and innovation in clinical trials. npj Digit Med, 2025, 8(1): 683

[59]

Salas M, Petracek J, Yalamanchili P, Aimer O, Kasthuril D, Dhingra S, et al. . The use of artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance: a systematic review of the literature. Pharmaceut Med, 2022, 36(5): 295-306

Funding

Financial Support for Cultural and Creative Industry Development Projects in Shanghai(2024360267)

Shanghai Leading Talent Program of Eastern Talent Plan(QNZH2024092)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

2

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/