Resolution of Singularities of Quasitoric Orbifolds and Equivariant Cobordism of Certain T-manifolds

Koushik Brahma , Soumen Sarkar , Subhankar Sau

Chinese Annals of Mathematics, Series B ›› : 1 -16.

PDF
Chinese Annals of Mathematics, Series B ›› :1 -16. DOI: 10.1007/s11401-026-0038-3
Article
research-article
Resolution of Singularities of Quasitoric Orbifolds and Equivariant Cobordism of Certain T-manifolds
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Quasitoric orbifolds and locally 1-standard T-manifolds are the topological generalizations of simplicial projective toric varieties and good contact toric manifolds respectively. In this paper, the authors show that there is a resolution of singularities of a quasitoric orbifold. Then, they give an explicit construction of a (2n + 1)-dimensional smooth orientable manifold with Tn+1-action whose boundary is a given locally 1-standard T-manifold. Moreover, they conclude that good contact toric manifolds and generalized lens spaces are equivariantly cobordant to zero.

Keywords

Resolution of singularity / Quasitoric orbifold / Torus action / Locally 1-standard T-manifold / Equivariant cobordism / 14E15 / 57R85 / 52B11 / 57S12

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Koushik Brahma, Soumen Sarkar, Subhankar Sau. Resolution of Singularities of Quasitoric Orbifolds and Equivariant Cobordism of Certain T-manifolds. Chinese Annals of Mathematics, Series B 1-16 DOI:10.1007/s11401-026-0038-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abhyankar S S. Resolution of Singularities of Embedded Algebraic Surfaces, 1966. New York-London, Academic Press. 24

[2]

Adem A, Leida J, Ruan Y. Orbifolds and Stringy Topology, 2007. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 171

[3]

Boyer C P, Galicki K. A note on toric contact geometry. J. Geom. Phys., 2000, 35(4): 288-298.

[4]

Brahma K, Sarkar S, Sau S. Torsion in the cohomology of blowups of quasitoric orbifolds. Topology Appl., 2021, 295: 107666. 23 pp.

[5]

Buchstaber V M, Panov T E. Toric Topology, 2015. Providence, RI, American Mathematical Society. 204

[6]

Chen W. Resolving symplectic orbifolds with applications to finite group actions. J. Gökova Geom. Topol. GGT, 2018, 12: 1-39

[7]

Cox D A, Little J B, Schenck H K. Toric Varieties, 2011. Providence, RI, American Mathematical Society. 124

[8]

Cutkosky S D. Resolution of Singularities, 2004. Providence, RI, American Mathematical Society. 63

[9]

Davis M W, Januszkiewicz T. Convex polytopes, Coxeter orbifolds and torus actions. Duke Math. J., 1991, 62(2): 417-451.

[10]

Fulton W. Introduction to Toric Varieties, 1993. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. The William H. Roever Lectures in Geometry. 131

[11]

Ganguli S. On Hodge structures of quasitoric orbifolds. J. Korean Math. Soc., 2017, 54(3): 733-748.

[12]

Ganguli S, Poddar M. Blowdowns and McKay correspondence on four dimensional quasitoric orbifolds. Osaka J. Math., 2013, 50(2): 397-415

[13]

Ganguli S, Poddar M. Almost complex structure, blowdowns and McKay correspondence in quasitoric orbifolds. Osaka J. Math., 2013, 50(4): 977-1005

[14]

Gromov M. Partial Differential Relations, 1986. Berlin, Springer-Verlag. Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)]. 9

[15]

Hanke B. Geometric versus homotopy theoretic equivariant bordism. Math. Ann., 2005, 332(3): 677-696.

[16]

Hironaka H. Resolution of singularities of an algebraic variety over a field of characteristic zero I, II. Ann. of Math. (2), 1964, 79: 109-203. 205–326.

[17]

Hook E C. Equivariant cobordism and homotopy type. Duke Math. J., 1973, 40: 805-814.

[18]

Hook E C. Equivariant cobordism and duality. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 1973, 178: 241-258.

[19]

Kollár J. Lectures on Resolution of Singularities, 2007. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. 166

[20]

Lerman E. Contact toric manifolds. J. Symplectic Geom., 2003, 1(4): 785-828.

[21]

Löffler P. Equivariant unitary cobordism and classifying spaces. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Topology and its Applications (Budva, 1972), 1973. Belgrade, Savez Društava Matematičara, Fizičara i Astronoma: 158-160

[22]

Luo S. Cohomology of contact toric manifolds and Hard Lefschetz Property of Hamiltonian GKM manifolds, 2013. Ithaca, New York, Cornell University

[23]

Milnor J W, Stasheff J D. Characteristic Classes, 1974. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. 76

[24]

Olds C D, Lax A, Davidoff G P. The Geometry of Numbers, 2000. Washington, DC, Mathematical Association of America. Appendix I by Peter D. Lax. 41

[25]

Poddar M, Sarkar S. On quasitoric orbifolds. Osaka J. Math., 2010, 47(4): 1055-1076

[26]

Pontryagin L S. Characteristic cycles on differentiable manifolds. Mat. Sbornik N. S., 1947, 21(63): 233-284

[27]

Sarkar S, Song J. Equivariant cohomological rigidity of certain T-manifolds. Algebr. Geom. Topol., 2021, 21(7): 3601-3622.

[28]

Sarkar S, Suh D Y. A new construction of lens spaces. Topology Appl., 2018, 240: 1-20.

[29]

Satake I. On a generalization of the notion of manifold. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1956, 42: 359-363.

[30]

Thom R. Quelques propriétés globales des variétés différentiables. Comment. Math. Helv., 1954, 28: 17-86.

[31]

Thurston W P. The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds, 1980

[32]

Wang Z Z, Zaffran D. A remark on the hard Lefschetz theorem for Kähler orbifolds. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 2009, 137(8): 2497-2501.

[33]

Ziegler G M. Lectures on Polytopes, 1995. New York, Springer-Verlag. 152

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Editorial Office of CAM and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/