On a continuum model for random genetic drift: a dynamic boundary condition approach

Chun Liu , Jan-Eric Sulzbach , Yiwei Wang

Communications in Analysis and Mechanics ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3) : 829 -848.

PDF (1078KB)
Communications in Analysis and Mechanics ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3) :829 -848. DOI: 10.3934/cam.2025033
Research article
research-article
On a continuum model for random genetic drift: a dynamic boundary condition approach
Author information +
History +
PDF (1078KB)

Abstract

We propose a new continuum model for random genetic drift by employing a dynamic boundary condition approach. The model can be viewed as a regularized version of the Kimura equation and admits a continuous solution. We establish existence and uniqueness of a strong solution to the regularized system. Numerical experiments illustrate that, for sufficiently small regularization parameters, the model can capture key phenomena of the original Kimura equation, such as gene fixation and conservation of the first moment.

Keywords

genetic drift / Kimura equation / Wright–Fisher model / dynamic boundary condition / fixation probability / energetic variational approach

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chun Liu, Jan-Eric Sulzbach, Yiwei Wang. On a continuum model for random genetic drift: a dynamic boundary condition approach. Communications in Analysis and Mechanics, 2025, 17 (3) : 829-848 DOI:10.3934/cam.2025033

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

W. J. Ewens, Mathematical population genetics: theoretical introduction , volume 27. Springer, 2004.

[2]

R. A. Fisher, XXI.-on the dominance ratio, Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh, 42 (1923), 321-341. http://doi.org/10.1017/s0370164600023993

[3]

S. Wright, Evolution in mendelian populations, Genetics, 16 (1931), 97. http://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/16.3.290

[4]

M. Kimura, On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population, Genetics, 47 (1962), 713. http://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/47.6.713

[5]

S. Wright, The differential equation of the distribution of gene frequencies, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 31 (1945), 382-389. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.31.12.382

[6]

C. L. Epstein, R. Mazzeo, Wright-Fisher diffusion in one dimension, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 42 (2010), 568-608. http://doi.org/10.1137/090766152

[7]

C. L. Epstein, R. Mazzeo, Degenerate diffusion operators arising in population biology , Number 185. Princeton University Press, 2013.

[8]

W. Feller, Diffusion processes in genetics, In Proceedings of the second Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, volume 2, University of California Press, 227-247, 1951.

[9]

A. N. Kolmogorov, Transition of branching processes to diffusion processes and related genetic problems, In A. N. Shiryayev, editor, Selected Works of AN Kolmogorov: Volume II Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics, Springer, 466-469, 1992.

[10]

F. A. Chalub, M. O. Souza, A non-standard evolution problem arising in population genetics, Commun. Math. Sci., 7 (2009), 489-502. http://doi.org/10.4310/cms.2009.v7.n2.a11

[11]

A. J. McKane, D. Waxman, Singular solutions of the diffusion equation of population genetics, J. Theor. Biol., 247 (2007), 849-858. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.04.016

[12]

C. Duan, C. Liu, C. Wang, X. Yue, Numerical complete solution for random genetic drift by energetic variational approach, SAIM: Math. Modell. Numer. Anal., 53 (2019), 615-634. http://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2018058

[13]

J. B. Casteras, L. Monsaingeon, Hidden dissipation and convexity for kimura equations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.15361, 2022. http://doi.org/10.1137/22m1529270

[14]

S. Xu, M. Chen, C. Liu, R. Zhang, X. Yue, Behavior of different numerical schemes for random genetic drift, BIT Numer. Math., 59 (2019), 797-821. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-019-00749-4

[15]

L. Zhao, X. Yue, D. Waxman, Complete numerical solution of the diffusion equation of random genetic drift, Genetics, 194 (2013), 973-985. http://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.152017

[16]

J. A. Carrillo, L. Chen, Q. Wang, An optimal mass transport method for random genetic drift, SIAM J. Numeri. Anal., 60 (2022), 940-969. http://doi.org/10.1137/20m1389431

[17]

C. E. Dangerfield, D. Kay, S. Macnamara, K. Burrage, A boundary preserving numerical algorithm for the Wright-Fisher model with mutation, BIT Numer. Math., 52 (2012), 283-304. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-011-0351-3

[18]

P. A. Jenkins, D. Spano, Exact simulation of the Wright-Fisher diffusion, Ann. Appl. Probab., 27 (2017), 1478-1509. http://doi.org/10.1214/16-aap1236

[19]

S. N. Ethier, M. F. Norman, Error estimate for the diffusion approximation of the Wright-Fisher model, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 74 (1977), 5096-5098. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.11.5096

[20]

T. D. Tran, J. Hofrichter, J. Jost, An introduction to the mathematical structure of the Wright-Fisher model of population genetics, Theory Biosci., 132 (2013), 73-82. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-012-0170-3

[21]

F. A. Chalub, L. Monsaingeon, A. M. Ribeiro, M. O. Souza, Gradient flow formulations of discrete and continuous evolutionary models: a unifying perspective, Acta Appl. Math., 171 (2021), 24. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10440-021-00391-9

[22]

T. D. Tran, J. Hofrichter, J. Jost, The free energy method and the Wright-Fisher model with 2 alleles, Theory Biosci., 134 (2015), 83-92. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-015-0218-2

[23]

P. Knopf, K. F. Lam, C. Liu, S. Metzger, Phase-field dynamics with transfer of materials: the cahn-hilliard equation with reaction rate dependent dynamic boundary conditions, ESAIM: Math. Modell. Numer. Anal., 55 (2021), 229-282. http://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2020090

[24]

L. Monsaingeon, A new transportation distance with bulk/interface interactions and flux penalization, Calc. Var., 60 (2021), 101. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-021-01946-2

[25]

Y. Wang, C. Liu, Some recent advances in energetic variational approaches, Entropy, 24 (2022), 721. http://doi.org/10.3390/e24050721

[26]

G. F. Oster, A. S. Perelson, Chemical reaction dynamics: Part i: Geometrical structure, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 55 (1974), 230-274. http://doi.org/10.1007/bf00281751

[27]

Y. Wang, C. Liu, P. Liu, B. Eisenberg, Field theory of reaction-diffusion: Law of mass action with an energetic variational approach. Phys. Rev. E, 102 (2020), 062147. http://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.102.062147

[28]

A. Friedman, Partial Differential Equations of Parabolic Type , Prentice-Hall, NJ, 1964.

[29]

B. Hu, H. M. Yin, Critical exponents for a system of heat equations coupled in a non-linear boundary condition, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 19 (1996), 1099-1120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1476(19960925)19:14<1099::aid-mma780>3.0.co;2-j

[30]

J. Anderson, K. Deng, Z. Dong, Global solvability for the heat equation with boundary flux governed by nonlinear memory, Q. Appl. Math., 69 (2011), 759-770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/s0033-569x-2011-01238-x

[31]

K. Deng, Z. Dong, Blow-up for the heat equation with a general memory boundary condition, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 11 (2012), 2147. http://doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.2147

[32]

M. Marras, S. V. Piro, Continuous dependence results for parabolic problems under robin boundary conditions, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim., 30 (2009), 121-135. http://doi.org/10.1080/01630560902735249

[33]

J. Choi, S. Kim, Green’s functions for elliptic and parabolic systems with robin-type boundary conditions, J. Funct. Anal., 267 (2014), 3205-3261. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2014.08.011

[34]

K. Deng, M. K. Kwong, H. A. Levine, The influence of nonlocal nonlinearities on the long time behavior of solutions of burgers’ equation, Q. Appl. Math., 50 (1992), 173-200. http://doi.org/10.1090/qam/1146631

[35]

K. Deng, M. Xu, On solutions of a singular diffusion equation, Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl., 41 (2000), 489-500. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0362-546x(98)00292-2

PDF (1078KB)

8

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉