Optimising Wave Energy Plant Location Through Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making

Hafiz Muhammad Athar Farid , Ayesha Razzaq , Muhammad Riaz , Tapan Senapati , Sarbast Moslem

CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology ›› 2026, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 167 -189.

PDF (2007KB)
CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology ›› 2026, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) :167 -189. DOI: 10.1049/cit2.70058
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
research-article
Optimising Wave Energy Plant Location Through Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making
Author information +
History +
PDF (2007KB)

Abstract

The global shift towards sustainable energy has intensified research into renewable sources, particularly wave energy. Pakistan, with its long coastline, holds significant potential for wave energy development. However, identifying optimal locations for wave energy plants involves evaluating complex, multi-faceted criteria. This study employs a multi-criteria group decision- making (MCGDM) approach using single-valued neutrosophic numbers (SVNNs) to address both qualitative and quantita-tive uncertainties inherent in real-world scenarios. To enhance decision quality, we introduce two novel operators: the single- valued neutrosophic prioritised averaging (SVNPAd) operator and the single-valued neutrosophic prioritised geometric (SVNPGd) operator, both incorporating priority degrees. These tools allow decision-makers to express preferences better and handle ambiguous data. The proposed model is validated through comparative analysis with prior studies and demonstrates improved robustness in site selection. Furthermore, we analyse how variations in priority degrees infiuence decision outcomes, enabling a more dynamic and tailored decision-making process. Our method contributes a more holistic and adaptive framework for selecting locations for wave energy projects, ultimately supporting informed investments in renewable energy infrastructure and improving energy access in underserved coastal regions.

Keywords

aggregation operators / decision making / fuzzy set / priority degrees / sustainable energy

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hafiz Muhammad Athar Farid, Ayesha Razzaq, Muhammad Riaz, Tapan Senapati, Sarbast Moslem. Optimising Wave Energy Plant Location Through Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making. CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology, 2026, 11(1): 167-189 DOI:10.1049/cit2.70058

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Funding

This study was supported by Science foundation Ireland (22/NCF/DR/11309).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no confiicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The used data are confidential.

References

[1]

Z. Lu, L. Zhao, H. Fu, E. Yeatman, H. Ding, and L. Chen, “Ocean Wave Energy Harvesting With High Energy Density and Self-Powered Monitoring System,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 6513, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50926-5.

[2]

P. Li, J. Hu, L. Qiu, Y. Zhao, and B. K. Ghosh, “A Distributed Eco-nomic Dispatch Strategy for Power-Water Networks,” IEEE Trans-actions on Control of Network Systems 9, no. 1 (2021): 356-366, https://doi.org/10.1109/tcns.2021.3104103.

[3]

G. Chen, R. Kuang, W. Li, et al., “Numerical Study on Efficiency and Robustness of Wave Energy Converter-Power Take-Off System for Compressed Air Energy Storage,” Renewable Energy 232 (2024): 121080, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121080.

[4]

J. Dong, J. Hu, Y. Zhao, and Y. Peng, “Opinion Formation Analysis for Expressed and Private Opinions (EPOs) Models: Reasoning Private Opinions From Behaviors in Group Decision-Making Systems,” Expert Systems with Applications 236 (2024): 121292, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121292.

[5]

Renewable-Energy-In-Pakistan, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable-energy-in-Pakistan.

[6]

B. Cao, W. Dong, Z. Lv, Y. Gu, S. Singh, and P. Kumar, “Hybrid Microgrid Many-Objective Sizing Optimisation With Fuzzy Decision,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 28, no. 11 (2020): 2702-2710, https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.2020.3026140.

[7]

F. Flocard, D. Ierodiaconou, and I. R. Coghlan, “Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Wave Energy Projects on the South-East Australian Coast,” Renewable Energy 99 (2016): 80-94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.06.036.

[8]

M. Abid and M. Saqlain, “Utilizing Edge Cloud Computing and Deep Learning for Enhanced Risk Assessment in China’s International Trade and Investment,” International Journal of Knowledge and Innovation Studies 1, no. 1 (2023): 1-9, https://doi.org/10.56578/ijkis010101.

[9]

C. Jana and M. Pal, “Interval-Valued Picture Fuzzy Uncertain Lin-guistic Dombi Operators and Their Application in Industrial Fund Se-lection,” Journal of Industrial Intelligence 1, no. 2 (2023): 110-124, https://doi.org/10.56578/jii010204.

[10]

C. Zhu, “An Adaptive Agent Decision Model Based on Deep Rein-forcement Learning and Autonomous Learning,” Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science 10, no. 3 (2023): 107-118. https://doi.org/10.33168/JLISS.2023.0309.

[11]

L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy Sets,” Information and Control 8, no. 3 (1965): 338-353, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x.

[12]

K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 20, no. 1 (1986): 87-96, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0114(86)80034-3.

[13]

R. R. Yager and A. M. Abbasov, “Pythagorean Membership Grades, Complex Numbers, and Decision Making,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems 28, no. 5 (2013): 436-452, https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21584.

[14]

R. R. Yager, “Generalized Orthopair Fuzzy Sets,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 25, no. 5 (2016): 1222-1230, https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.2016.2604005.

[15]

F. Smarandache, “A unifying field in Logics:Neutrosophic Logic,” in Philosophy (American Research Press, 1998), 1-141.

[16]

H. Wang, F. Smarandache, R. Sunderraman, and Y. Q. Zhang, In-terval Neutrosophic Sets and Logic: Theory and Applications in Computing, Vol. 5 (Infinite Study, 2005).

[17]

J. J. Peng, J. Q. Wang, J. Wang, H. Y. Zhang, and X. H. Chen, “Simplified Neutrosophic Sets and Their Applications in multi-criteria Group decision-making Problems,” International Journal of Systems Science 47, no. 10 (2016): 2342-2358, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2014.994050.

[18]

H. Wang, F. Smarandache,R. Sunderraman, and Y. Q. Zhang, “Interval Neuotrosophic Sets and Logic: Theory and Applications in Computing: Theory and Applications in Computing,” Infinite Study, no. 5 (2005).

[19]

H. Garg and H. Garg, “An Improved Score Function for Ranking Neutrosophic Sets and Its Application to Decision-Making Process,” International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification 6, no. 5 (2016): 377-385, https://doi.org/10.1615/int.j.uncertaintyquantification.2016018441.

[20]

H. Garg and Nancy, “Some New Biparametric Distance Measures on Single-Valued Neutrosophic Sets With Applications to Pattern Recog-nition and Medical Diagnosis,” Information 8, no. 4 (2017): 162, https://doi.org/10.3390/info8040162.

[21]

J. Ye, “A Multicriteria Decision-Making Method Using Aggregation Operators for Simplified Neutrosophic Sets,” Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 26, no. 5 (2014): 2459-2466, https://doi.org/10.3233/ifs-130916.

[22]

A. Puška and I. Stojanovic, “Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Analyses on Green Supplier Selection in an Agri-Food Company,” Journal of Intelligent Management Decision 1, no. 1 (2022): 2-16, https://doi.org/10.56578/jimd010102.

[23]

D. Tesic, D. Bozanic, M. Radovanovic, and A. Petrovski, “Optimis-ing Assault Boat Selection for Military Operations: An Application of the DIBR II-BM-CoCoSo MCDM Model,” Journal of Intelligent Management Decision 2, no. 4 (2023): 160-171, https://doi.org/10.56578/jimd020401.

[24]

S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, F. Smarandache, and N. U. Amin, “Loga-rithmic Hybrid Aggregation Operators Based on Single Valued Neu-trosophic Sets and Their Applications in Decision Support Systems,” Symmetry 11, no. 3 (2019): 364, https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11030364.

[25]

D. Pamucar, M. Yazdani, R. Obradovic, A. Kumar, and M. Torres- Jiménez, “A Novel Fuzzy Hybrid Neutrosophic Decision-Making Approach for the Resilient Supplier Selection Problem,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems 35, no. 12 (2020): 1934-1986, https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22279.

[26]

M. Riaz and H. M. A. Farid, “Enhancing Green Supply Chain Ef-ficiency Through Linear Diophantine Fuzzy Soft-Max Aggregation Op-erators,” Journal of Industrial Intelligence 1, no. 1 (2023): 8-29, https://doi.org/10.56578/jii010102.

[27]

R. Kausar, H. M. A. Farid, and M. Riaz, “A Numerically Validated Approach to Modeling Water Hammer Phenomena Using Partial Dif-ferential Equations and Switched Differential-Algebraic Equations,” Journal of Industrial Intelligence 1, no. 2 (2023): 75-86, https://doi.org/10.56578/jii010201.

[28]

Y. Li, Q. Cai, and G. Wei, “PT-TOPSIS Methods for Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making Under Single-Valued Neutrosophic Sets,” In-ternational Journal of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Engineering Systems 27, no. 2 (2023): 149-166, https://doi.org/10.3233/kes-230039.

[29]

T. Senapati, “An Aczel-Alsina Aggregation-Based Outranking Method for Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Using Single-Valued Neutrosophic Numbers,” Complex & Intelligent Systems 10, no. 1 (2024): 1185-1199, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-023-01215-z.

[30]

S. Moslem, “A Novel Parsimonious Spherical Fuzzy Analytic Hier-archy Process for Sustainable Urban Transport Solutions,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 128 (2024): 107447, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107447.

[31]

V. Simic, S. Dabić-Miletić, E. B. Tirkolaee, Ž. Stević, M. Deveci, and T. Senapati, “Neutrosophic CEBOM-MACONT Model for Sustainable Management of End-of-Life Tires,” Applied Soft Computing 143 (2023): 110399, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110399.

[32]

I. Gokasar, V. Simic, M. Deveci, and T. Senapati, “Alternative Prior-itization of Freeway Incident Management Using Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed Traffic Using a Type-2 Neutrosophic Number Based Decision Support System,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 123 (2023): 106183, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106183.

[33]

R. Imran, K. Ullah, Z. Ali, M. Akram, and T. Senapati, “The Theory of Prioritized Muirhead Mean Operators Under the Presence of Com-plex Single-Valued Neutrosophic Values,” Decision Analytics Journal 7 (2023): 102214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100214.

[34]

Q. Iqbal and Z. U. Khan, “Efficacy of Induced Complex Aggregation Operators in Multi-Attribute Decision-Making With Confidence Levels,” Acadlore Transactions on Applied Mathematics and Statistics 2, no. 2 (2024): 64-71, https://doi.org/10.56578/atams020201.

[35]

M. Sarfraz, “Aczel-Alsina Aggregation Operators on Spherical Fuzzy Rough Set and Their Application Section of Solar Panel,” Journal of Operational and Strategic Analytics 2, no. 1 (2024): 21-35, https://doi.org/10.56578/josa020103.

[36]

X. H. Wu, J. Q. Wang, J. J. Peng, and X. H. Chen, “Cross-Entropy and Prioritized Aggregation Operator With Simplified Neutrosophic Sets and Their Application in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Prob-lems,” International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 18, no. 6 (2016): 1104-1116, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-016-0180-2.

[37]

B. Li and Z. Xu, “Prioritized Aggregation Operators Based on the Priority Degrees in Multicriteria Decision-Making,” International Jour-nal of Intelligent Systems 34, no. 9 (2019): 1985-2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22123.

[38]

B. Lin and M. Y. Raza, “Coal and Economic Development in Pakistan: A Necessity of Energy Source,” Energy 207 (2020): 118244, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118244.

[39]

E. Sánchez-Triana, S. Enriquez, J. Afzal, A. Nakagawa, and A. S. Khan, Cleaning Pakistan’s Air: Policy Options to Address the Cost of Outdoor Air Pollution (World Bank Publications, 2014).

[40]

Finance www. finance.gov. pk/survey/chapter20/PES-2019-20.pdf.

[41]

A. Rehman, H. Ma, I. Ozturk, M. Ahmad, A. Rauf, and M. Irfan, “Another Outlook to Sector-Level Energy Consumption in Pakistan From Dominant Energy Sources and Correlation With Economic Growth,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28, no. 26 (2021): 33735-33750, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09245-7.

[42]

F. Shaikh, Q. Ji, and Y. Fan, “The Diagnosis of an Electricity Crisis and Alternative Energy Development in Pakistan,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 52 (2015): 1172-1185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.009.

[43]

Wave Energy Pros and Cons www. solarreviews.com/blog/wave-ene rgy-pros-and-cons.

[44]

Renewable Energy on the Outer Continental Shelf, www. boem.gov/ renewable-energy/renewable-energy-program-overview.

[45]

Wave Energy openei.org/wiki/Wave-Energy.

[46]

Global Wave Energy Industry (2020 to 2025) —Increasing R&D In-vestment and Focus on Clean Energy Generation Presents Opportunities, www. globenewswire.com/news-release/2020/04/29/2024222/0/en/Glo bal-Wave-Energy-Industry-2020-to-2025-Increasing-R-D-Investment- and-Focus-on-Clean-Energy-Generation-Presents-Opportunities.html.

[47]

List-Of-Wave-Power-Stations en. wikipedia.org/wiki/List-of-wave- power-stations.

[48]

C. N. Wang, Y. T. Chen, and C. C. Tung, “Evaluation of Wave Energy Location by Using an Integrated MCDM Approach,” Energies 14, no. 7 (2021): 1840, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071840.

[49]

P. Rani and A. R. Mishra, “Multi-Criteria Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment Framework for Fuel Technology Selection Using q- rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets,” Sustainable Production and Consumption 24 (2020): 90-104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.06.015.

[50]

R. X. Nie, J. Q. Wang, and H. Y. Zhang, “Solving Solar-Wind Power Station Location Problem Using an Extended Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) Technique With Interval Neutrosophic Sets,” Symmetry 9, no. 7 (2017): 106, https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9070106.

[51]

J. F. Ding and C. C. Chou, “An Evaluation Model of Quantitative and Qualitative Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Location Selection of Transshipment Ports,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2013 (2013): 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/783105.

[52]

M. Azizi, “Strategic Model for Location Selection of Solar Wood Drying by Applying TOPSIS,” Economics, Management and Sustain-ability 2, no. 2 (2017): 15-23, https://doi.org/10.14254/jems.2017.2-2.2.

[53]

C. Rao, M. Goh, Y. Zhao, and J. Zheng, “Location Selection of City Logistics Centers Under Sustainability,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 36 (2015): 29-44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.008.

[54]

Y. A. Solangi, Q. Tan, M. W. A. Khan, N. H. Mirjat, and I. Ahmed, “The Selection of Wind Power Project Location in the Southeastern Corridor of Pakistan: A Factor Analysis, AHP, and Fuzzy-TOPSIS Application,” En-ergies 11, no. 8 (2018): 1940, https://doi.org/10.3390/en11081940.

[55]

B. Kizielewicz, J. Wątróbski, and W. Sałabun, “Identification of Relevant Criteria Set in the MCDA process—Wind Farm Location Case Study,” Energies 13, no. 24 (2020): 6548, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13246548.

[56]

H. Garg and Nancy, “Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method Based on Prioritized Muirhead Mean Aggregation Operator Under Neu-trosophic Set Environment,” Symmetry 10, no. 7 (2018): 280, https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10070280.

[57]

G. Wei and Y. Wei, “Some Single-Valued Neutrosophic Dombi Prioritized Weighted Aggregation Operators in Multiple Attribute De-cision Making,” Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 35, no. 2 (2018): 2001-2013, https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-171741.

[58]

B. Li, J. Wang, L. Yang, and X. Li, A Novel Generalized Simplified Neutrosophic Number Einstein Aggregation Operator, (Infinite Study, 2018).

[59]

S. Moslem, D. Farooq, D. Esztergár-Kiss, G. Yaseen, T. Senapati, and M. Deveci, “A Novel Spherical Decision-Making Model for Measuring the Separateness of Preferences for Drivers’ Behavior Factors Associated With Road Traffic Accidents,” Expert Systems With Applications 238 (2024): 122318, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122318.

[60]

P. Kakati, T. Senapati, S. Moslem, and F. Pilla, “Fermatean Fuzzy Archimedean Heronian Mean-Based Model for Estimating Sustainable Urban Transport Solutions,” Engineering Applications of Artificial In-telligence 127 (2024): 107349, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107349.

[61]

S. Moslem, “A Novel Parsimonious Best Worst Method for Evaluating Travel Mode Choice,” IEEE Access 11 (2023): 16768-16773, https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3242120.

PDF (2007KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/