Bioadhesive hydrogels as immunomodulatory interfaces for chronic wound healing: from microenvironmental regulation mechanism to engineering strategies

Abstract

Chronic wounds represent a major and growing clinical burden, particularly among aging populations and individuals with diabetes, in whom persistent inflammation and immune dysregulation delay normal tissue repair. Addressing this challenge requires functional materials that do more than passively cover the wound and instead actively regulate the wound microenvironment. Advances in hydrogel chemistry and bioengineering have enabled the development of bioadhesive interfaces that maintain stable contact with wound tissue while modulating immune and regenerative responses. In this Review, we present bioadhesive hydrogels as immunomodulatory interfaces rather than simple wound coverings and systematically examine their mechanisms of action, including the reduction of microbial and inflammatory stimuli; modulation of macrophage polarization; regulation of NF-κB-, NLRP3-, and STAT-associated signaling; and control of mechanobiological signaling at the material–tissue interface. Through these mechanisms, bioadhesive hydrogels can alleviate excessive inflammation and support a regenerative microenvironment that promotes angiogenesis, re-epithelialization, and extracellular matrix remodeling. We classify the engineering approaches used to achieve these functions into four complementary strategies. Structural and protective hydrogels stabilize the wound and protect it from contamination and mechanical disruption. Bioactive and regenerative systems deliver therapeutic molecules or cells to regulate inflammation and promote repair. Externally activated platforms provide spatiotemporal control over therapeutic activity, whereas sensing-integrated systems monitor wound conditions and support adaptive or closed-loop treatment. We also discuss major translational barriers, including unstable adhesion under exudative and mechanically dynamic conditions, limited long-term safety data, insufficient standardization, manufacturing challenges, and unclear regulatory pathways. Future progress will require disease-specific material design, clinically relevant validation, and the reliable integration of sensing and therapeutic functions.

Keywords

Chronic wounds / Macrophage regulation / Bioadhesive hydrogel / Immunomodulatory hydrogels / Multifunctional hydrogels / Bioactive material

References

[1] Mieczkowski M, Mrozikiewicz-Rakowska B, Kowara M, Kleibert M, Czupryniak L. The problem of wound healing in diabetes-from molecular pathways to the design of an animal model. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23147930.

[2] Falanga V, Isseroff RR, Soulika AM, Romanelli M, Margolis D, Kapp S, et al. Chronic wounds. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2022; 8:50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-022-00377-3.

[3] Zhao R, Liang H, Clarke E, Jackson C, Xue M. Inflammation in chronic wounds. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17:2085. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17122085.

[4] Shi Z, Yao C, Shui Y, Li S, Yan H. Research progress on the mechanism of angiogenesis in wound repair and regeneration. Front Physiol 2023;14:14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1284981.

[5] Riaz M, Iqbal MZ, Klar AS, Biedermann T. Immunomodulatory mechanisms of chronic wound healing: translational and clinical relevance. MedComm 2020; 6:e70378. https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.70378.

[6] Liu X, Hu Y, Ju Y, Yang P, Shen N, Yang A, et al. Immunomodulatory hydrogels for tissue repair and regeneration. APL Mater 2024; 12:080603. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0228692.

[7] Pastar I, Balukoff NC, Marjanovic J, Chen VY, Stone RC, Tomic-Canic M. Molecular pathophysiology of chronic wounds: current state and future directions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2023;15:15. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a041243.

[8] Ahmad N. In vitro and in vivo characterization methods for evaluation of modern wound dressings. Pharmaceutics 2022;15:15. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15010042.

[9] Pérez S, Rius-Pérez S. Macrophage polarization and reprogramming in acute inflammation: a redox perspective. Antioxidants (Basel) 2022;11:11. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11071394.

[10] Chen S, Saeed AFUH, Liu Q, Jiang Q, Xu H, Xiao GG, et al. Macrophages in immunoregulation and therapeutics. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023; 8:207. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01452-1.

[11] Zhao X, Xu H, Sun Y, Yang Y, Guo B. Self-adaptive wound dressings for wound healing and repair. Adv Mater 2025; 38:e15854. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202515854.

[12] Nuutila K, Eriksson E. Moist wound healing with commonly available dressings. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2021; 10:685-98. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2020.1232.

[13] Tang J, Li X, Wang H, Mai R, Xie M, Tang Y, et al. Application and prospects of smart dressings in wound healing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2025; 17:55808-32. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5c16246.

[14] Bal-Ozturk A, Cecen B, Avci-Adali M, Topkaya SN, Alarcin E, Yasayan G, et al. Tissue adhesives: from research to clinical translation. Nano Today 2021; 36:101049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2020.101049.

[15] Geckil H, Xu F, Zhang X, Moon S, Demirci U. Engineering hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics. Nanomedicine 2010; 5:469-84. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.10.12.

[16] Calderon-Moreno J, Chelu M, Popa M . Biocompatible stimuli-sensitive natural hydrogels: recent advances in biomedical applications. Gels 2025; 11:993. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11120993.

[17] Pintilei PS, Binaymotlagh R, Chronopoulou L, Palocci C. The role of natural hydrogels in enhancing wound healing: from biomaterials to bioactive therapies. Pharmaceutics 2025;17:17. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17101243.

[18] Segneanu A-E, Bejenaru LE, Bejenaru C, Blendea A, Mogoşanu GD, Biţă A, et al. Advancements in hydrogels: a comprehensive review of natural and synthetic innovations for biomedical applications. Polymers 2025; 17:2026. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17152026.

[19] Nezhad-Mokhtari P, Hasany M, Kohestanian M, Dolatshahi-Pirouz A, Milani M, Mehrali M. Recent advancements in bioadhesive self-healing hydrogels for effective chronic wound care. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 2024; 334:103306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2024.103306.

[20] Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 2008; 453:314-21. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07039.

[21] Eming SA, Martin P, Tomic-Canic M. Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Sci Transl Med 2014;6:265sr6-6. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337.

[22] Wynn TA, Vannella KM. Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity 2016; 44:450-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015.

[23] Chen GY, Nuñez G. Sterile inflammation: sensing and reacting to damage. Nat Rev Immunol 2010; 10:826-37. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2873.

[24] Kawai T, Akira S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol 2010; 11:373-84. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.1863.

[25] Wong SL, Demers M, Martinod K, Gallant M, Wang Y, Goldfine AB, et al. Diabetes primes neutrophils to undergo netosis, which impairs wound healing. Nat Med 2015; 21:815-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3887.

[26] Zhao G, Usui ML, Lippman SI, James GA, Stewart PS, Fleckman P, et al. Biofilms and inflammation in chronic wounds. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2013; 2:389-99. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2012.0381.

[27] Murray PJ, Wynn TA. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol 2011; 11:723-37. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3073.

[28] Mantovani A, Sica A, Sozzani S, Allavena P, Vecchi A, Locati M. The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol 2004; 25:677-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015.

[29] Nathan C. Neutrophils and immunity: challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Immunol 2006; 6:173-82. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1785.

[30] Chen L, Wang S, Wang Y, Zhang W, Ma K, Hu C et al. Il-6 influences the polarization of macrophages and the formation and growth of colorectal tumor. Oncotarget 2018; 9:17443-54. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24734.

[31] Long M, Rojo de la Vega M, Wen Q, Bharara M, Jiang T, Zhang R, et al. An essential role of nrf2 in diabetic wound healing. Diabetes 2016; 65:780-93. https://doi.org/10.2337/db15-0564.

[32] Nosbaum A, Prevel N, Truong H-A, Mehta P, Ettinger M, Scharschmidt TC et al. Cutting edge: regulatory t cells facilitate cutaneous wound healing. J Immunol 2016; 196:2010-4. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1502139.

[33] Takeuchi O, Akira S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell 2010; 140:805-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.022.

[34] Fullerton JN, Gilroy DW. Resolution of inflammation: a new therapeutic frontier. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2016; 15:551-67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2016.39.

[35] Elliott MR, Ravichandran KS . Clearance of apoptotic cells: implications in health and disease. J Cell Biol 2010; 189:1059-70. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201004096.

[36] Greenlee-Wacker MC. Clearance of apoptotic neutrophils and resolution of inflammation. Immunol Rev 2016; 273:357-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12453.

[37] Botusan IR, Sunkari VG, Savu O, Catrina AI, Grünler J, Lindberg S, et al. Stabilization of hif-1α is critical to improve wound healing in diabetic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2008; 105:19426-31. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805230105.

[38] Barrientos S, Stojadinovic O, Golinko MS, Brem H, Tomic-Canic M. Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 2008; 16:585-601. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00410.x.

[39] Boniakowski AE, Kimball AS, Jacobs BN, Kunkel SL, Gallagher KA. Macrophage-mediated inflammation in normal and diabetic wound healing. J Immunol 2017; 199:17-24. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1700223.

[40] Novak ML, Koh TJ. Macrophage phenotypes during tissue repair. J Leukoc Biol 2013; 93:875-81. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.1012512.

[41] Zhuang Z-M, Guo K, Wu Z-R, Wang Y, Zhong X-C, Chen C-Y, et al. Skin regeneration axis under metal-based nanozymes: from chronic wound healing to structural and functional restoration. J Adv Res 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2026.01.068.

[42] Krzyszczyk P, Schloss R, Palmer A, Berthiaume F. The role of macrophages in acute and chronic wound healing and interventions to promote pro-wound healing phenotypes. Front Physiol 2018; 9:419. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00419.

[43] Caley MP, Martins VL, O’Toole EA. Metalloproteinases and wound healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2015; 4:225-34. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2014.0581.

[44] Veiseh O, Vegas AJ. Domesticating the foreign body response: recent advances and applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2019; 144:148-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2019.08.010.

[45] Mervis JS. The impact of chronic wound exudate on the patient, clinician and payer: addressing the challenges with foam dressings. Int Wound J 2025; 22:e70369. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70369.

[46] Brumberg V, Astrelina T, Malivanova T, Samoilov A. Modern wound dressings: hydrogel dressings. Biomedicines 2021;9:9. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9091235.

[47] Mohr VD, Spelter H, Schmidt J, Zirngibl H. Wound dressings in chronic wounds. Zentralbl Chir 1999; 124:56-64.

[48] Nielsen J, Fogh K. Clinical utility of foam dressings in wound management: a review. Chronic Wound Care Manag Res 2015; 2:31-8. https://doi.org/10.2147/CWCMR.S50832.

[49] Weller CD, Team V, Sussman G. First-line interactive wound dressing update: a comprehensive review of the evidence. Front Pharmacol 2020;11:11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00155.

[50] Sa G, DiPietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res 2010; 89:219-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034509359125.

[51] Ahadian S, Sadeghian RB, Salehi S, Ostrovidov S, Bae H, Ramalingam M, et al. Bioconjugated hydrogels for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Bioconjug Chem 2015; 26:1984-2001. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00360.

[52] Caló E, Khutoryanskiy VV. Biomedical applications of hydrogels: a review of patents and commercial products. Eur Polym J 2015; 65:252-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.11.024.

[53] Lee BP, Messersmith PB, Israelachvili JN, Waite JH. Mussel-inspired adhesives and coatings. Annu Rev Mater Res 2011; 41:99-132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100429.

[54] Sun J-Y, Zhao X, Illeperuma WR, Chaudhuri O, Oh KH, Mooney DJ, et al. Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature 2012; 489:133-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11409.

[55] Zhao X. Multi-scale multi-mechanism design of tough hydrogels: building dissipation into stretchy networks. Soft Matter 2014; 10:672-87. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3SM52272E.

[56] Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE. Biomaterials science: An introduction to materials in medicine. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004.

[57] Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol 2008; 20:86-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004.

[58] Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelialization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature 1962; 193:293-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/193293a0.

[59] Liechty WB, Kryscio DR, Slaughter BV, Peppas NA. Polymers for drug delivery systems. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng 2010; 1:149-73. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-073009-100847.

[60] Hoare TR, Kohane DS. Hydrogels in drug delivery: progress and challenges. Polymer 2008; 49:1993-2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Polymer.2008.01.027.

[61] Dawi J, Tumanyan K, Tomas K, Misakyan Y, Gargaloyan A, Gonzalez E, et al. Diabetic foot ulcers: pathophysiology, immune dysregulation, and emerging therapeutic strategies. Biomedicines 2025; 13:1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13051076.

[62] Coelho GA, Secretan P-H, Tortolano L, Charvet L, Yagoubi N. Evolution of the chronic venous leg ulcer microenvironment and its impact on medical devices and wound care therapies. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5605. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175605.

[63] Velozo BC, Hong MV, Bernardo LC, EC MCN, Contreras-Ruiz J, LPF A . Pressure injury: update on general concepts, clinical aspects, and laboratory findings-part i. An Bras Dermatol 2025; 100:501187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abd.2025.501187.

[64] Ouma GO, Zafrir B, Mohler ER 3rd, Flugelman MY. Therapeutic angiogenesis in critical limb ischemia. Angiology 2013; 64:466-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003319712464514.

[65] Mukasheva F, Adilova L, Dyussenbinov A, Yernaimanova B, Abilev M, Akilbekova D. Optimizing scaffold pore size for tissue engineering: insights across various tissue types. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2024; 12:1444986. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1444986.

[66] Morgan MJ, Liu Z-G. Crosstalk of reactive oxygen species and nf-κb signaling. Cell Res 2011; 21:103-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2010.178.

[67] Süntar I, Çetinkaya S, Panieri E, Saha S, Buttari B, Profumo E, et al. Regulatory role of nrf2 signaling pathway in wound healing process. Molecules 2021;26:26. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092424.

[68] Liu Y, Yang X, Liu Y, Jiang T, Ren S, Chen J et al. Nrf2 signalling pathway: new insights and progress in the field of wound healing. J Cell Mol Med 2021; 25:5857-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.16597.

[69] Di X, Gao X, Peng L, Ai J, Jin X, Qi S et al. Cellular mechanotransduction in health and diseases: from molecular mechanism to therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023; 8:282. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01501-9.

[70] Panciera T, Azzolin L, Cordenonsi M, Piccolo S. Mechanobiology of yap and taz in physiology and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2017; 18:758-70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2017.87.

[71] Tang Y, Zhao C, Zhuang Y, Zhong A, Wang M, Zhang W et al. Mechanosensitive piezo1 protein as a novel regulator in macrophages and macrophage-mediated inflammatory diseases. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1149336. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1149336.

[72] Bonnici L, Suleiman S, Schembri-Wismayer P, Cassar A. Targeting signalling pathways in chronic wound healing. Int J Mol Sci 2023;25:25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010050.

[73] Achneck HE, Sileshi B, Jamiolkowski RM, Albala DM, Shapiro ML, Lawson JH. A comprehensive review of topical hemostatic agents: efficacy and recommendations for use. Ann Surg 2010; 251:217-28. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c3bcca.

[74] Liu S, Xiang Y, Liu Z, Li L, Dang R, Zhang H, et al. A nature-derived, hetero-structured, pro-healing bioadhesive patch for high-performance sealing of wet tissues. Adv Mater 2024; 36:e2309774. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202309774.

[75] Yuan K, He C, Che Z, Zhong X, Chen Y, Yu M, et al. Press-to-seal hydrogel patches with spatiotemporally controllable blood repulsion for acute hemostasis and enhanced healing of deep incisive wounds. Adv Mater 2025; 38:e16490. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202516490.

[76] Gong Y, Wang P, Cao R, Wu J, Ji H, Wang M, et al. Exudate absorbing and antimicrobial hydrogel integrated with multifunctional curcumin-loaded magnesium polyphenol network for facilitating burn wound healing. ACS Nano 2023; 17:22355-70. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c04556.

[77] Liu X, Sun Y, Wang J, Kang Y, Wang Z, Cao W, et al. A tough, antibacterial and antioxidant hydrogel dressing accelerates wound healing and suppresses hypertrophic scar formation in infected wounds. Bioact Mater 2024; 34:269-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.12.019.

[78] Fadhilah G, Su C-Y, Fang H-W. Addressing current challenges in hydrogel wound dressing strategies for chronic wound management: advances and future directions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2026; 114:e70044. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.70044.

[79] Moon YE, Jeong J-O, Choi H. Inflammation-responsive hydrogels in perioperative pain and wound management: design strategies and emerging potential. Gels 2025; 11:691. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11090691.

[80] Park J, Kim TY, Kim Y, An S, Kim KS, Kang M, et al. A mechanically resilient and tissue-conformable hydrogel with hemostatic and antibacterial capabilities for wound care. Adv Sci 2023; 10:e2303651. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202303651.

[81] Kim TY, Son K, Moon C-H, Yook K-Y, Kim SA, Ham H, et al. Quinone-mediated, tissue-adaptive double-network hydrogel for instant hemostasis and wet-tissue adhesion. Nat Commun 2026; 17:5526. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-72068-6.

[82] Xia X, Xu X, Wang B, Zhou D, Zhang W, Xie X, et al. Adhesive hemostatic hydrogel with ultrafast gelation arrests acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in pigs. Adv Funct Mater 2022; 32:2109332. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202109332.

[83] Yang Y, Liang Y, Chen J, Duan X, Guo B. Mussel-inspired adhesive antioxidant antibacterial hemostatic composite hydrogel wound dressing via photo-polymerization for infected skin wound healing. Bioact Mater 2022; 8:341-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.014.

[84] Cheng J, Wang H, Gao J, Liu X, Li M, Wu D, et al. First-aid hydrogel wound dressing with reliable hemostatic and antibacterial capability for traumatic injuries. Adv Healthc Mater 2023; 12:e2300312. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202300312.

[85] Guo S, Ren Y, Chang R, He Y, Zhang D, Guan F, et al. Injectable self-healing adhesive chitosan hydrogel with antioxidative, antibacterial, and hemostatic activities for rapid hemostasis and skin wound healing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2022; 14:34455-69. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c08870.

[86] Ye R, Zhu Z, Gu T, Cao D, Jiang K, Dai Q, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps-inspired DNA hydrogel for wound hemostatic adjuvant. Nat Commun 2024; 15:5557. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49933-3.

[87] Cao C, Gu J, Zhu W, Li H, Liu R, Zhang W, et al. Highly adhesive liquid metal interface-enabled stretchable bioelectronics with enhanced radiative cooling for wound management. Adv Funct Mater 2025; 36:e16990. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202516990.

[88] Skardal A, Murphy SV, Crowell K, Mack D, Atala A, Soker S. A tunable hydrogel system for long-term release of cell-secreted cytokines and bioprinted in situ wound cell delivery. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2017; 105:1986-2000. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33736.

[89] Yoon H-J, Lee S, Kim TY, Yu SE, Kim H-S, Chung YS, et al. Sprayable nanomicelle hydrogels and inflammatory bowel disease patient cell chips for development of intestinal lesion-specific therapy. Bioact Mater 2022; 18:433-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.03.031.

[90] Wu SD, Dai NT, Liao CY, Kang LY, Tseng YW, Hsu S. Planar−/curvilinear-bioprinted tri-cell-laden hydrogel for healing irregular chronic wounds. Adv Healthc Mater 2022; 11:2201021. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202201021.

[91] Lei Z, Singh G, Min Z, Shixuan C, Xu K, Pengcheng X, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells laden novel thermo-sensitive hydrogel for the management of severe skin wound healing. Mater Sci Eng C 2018; 90:159-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.045.

[92] Wang H, Sun D, Lin W, Fang C, Cheng K, Pan Z, et al. One-step fabrication of cell sheet-laden hydrogel for accelerated wound healing. Bioact Mater 2023; 144:148-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2019.08.010.

[93] Ming Z, Han L, Bao M, Zhu H, Qiang S, Xue S. et al. Living bacterial hydrogels for accelerated infected wound healing. Adv Sci 2021; 8:e2102545. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202102545.

[94] Chen G, Wang F, Zhang X, Shang Y, Zhao Y. Living microecological hydrogels for wound healing. Sci Adv 2023; 9:eadg3478. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg3478.

[95] Chen S, Shi J, Zhang M, Chen Y, Wang X, Zhang L, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-laden anti-inflammatory hydrogel enhances diabetic wound healing. Sci Rep 2015; 5:18104. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18104 2015.

[96] Shin J, Choi S, Kim JH, Cho JH, Jin Y, Kim S, et al. Tissue tapes-phenolic hyaluronic acid hydrogel patches for off-the-shelf therapy. Adv Funct Mater 2019; 29:1903863. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201903863.

[97] Zhang M, Huang Y, Pan W, Tong X, Zeng Q, Su T, et al. Polydopamine-incorporated dextran hydrogel drug carrier with tailorable structure for wound healing. Carbohydr Polym 2021; 253:117213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117213.

[98] Tao G, Wang Y, Cai R, Chang H, Song K, Zuo H, et al. Design and performance of sericin/poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel as a drug delivery carrier for potential wound dressing application. Mater Sci Eng C 2019; 101:341-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.111.

[99] Yang X, Zhang C, Deng D, Gu Y, Wang H, Zhong Q. Multiple stimuli-responsive mxene-based hydrogel as intelligent drug delivery carriers for deep chronic wound healing. Small 2022; 18:e2104368. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202104368.

[100] Yang J, Zeng W, Xu P, Fu X, Yu X, Chen L, et al. Glucose-responsive multifunctional metal-organic drug-loaded hydrogel for diabetic wound healing. Acta Biomater 2022; 140:206-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.11.043.

[101] He C, Yuan K, Sun Y, Chen Y, Zhong X, Yu M, et al. Bioadhesive hydrogel with co2-induced water repulsion and tissue anchoring for drug delivery and wound management. Adv Funct Mater 2025; 36:e13408. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202513408.

[102] Kim YE, Jung HY, Park N, Kim J. Adhesive composite hydrogel patch for sustained transdermal drug delivery to treat atopic dermatitis. Chem Mater 2023; 35:1209-17. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c03234.

[103] Wu Y, Hu C, Li Y, Wang Y, Gong H, Zheng C, et al. A versatile composite hydrogel with spatiotemporal drug delivery of mesoporous zno and recombinant human collagen for diabetic infected wound healing. Biomacromolecules 2024; 25:7878-93. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.4c01155.

[104] Xiong Y, Chen L, Liu P, Yu T, Lin C, Yan C, et al. All-in-one: multifunctional hydrogel accelerates oxidative diabetic wound healing through timed-release of exosome and fibroblast growth factor. Small 2022; 18:e2104229. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202104229.

[105] Siebert L, Luna-Cerón E, García-Rivera LE, Oh J, Jang J, Rosas-Gómez DA, et al. Light-controlled growth factors release on tetrapodal zno-incorporated 3d-printed hydrogels for developing smart wound scaffold. Adv Funct Mater 2021; 31:2007555. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202007555.

[106] Ghosal D, Majumder N, Das P, Chaudhary S, Dey S, Banerjee P, et al. Enhancing wound healing with sprayable hydrogel releasing multimetallic ions: inspired by the body’s endogenous healing mechanism. Adv Healthc Mater 2024; 13:e2402024. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202402024.

[107] Wang S, Wu W-Y, Yeo JCC, Soo XYD, Thitsartarn W, Liu S, et al. Responsive hydrogel dressings for intelligent wound management. BMEMat 2023; 1:e12021. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmm2.12021.

[108] Preetam S, Ghosh A, Mishra R, Pandey A, Roy DS, Rustagi S, et al. Electrical stimulation: a novel therapeutic strategy to heal biological wounds. RSC Adv 2024; 14:32142-73. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ra04258a.

[109] Cho MR, Thatte HS, Silvia MT, Golan DE. Transmembrane calcium influx induced by ac electric fields. FASEB J 1999; 13:677-83. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.13.6.677.

[110] Peng L, Fu C, Wang L, Zhang Q, Liang Z, He C, et al. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on angiogenesis. Bioelectromagnetics 2021; 42:250-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22330.

[111] Fang Y, Xu K, Lu X, Feng X, Wang Y, Lin J, et al. Bioactive self-adaptive hydrogel platform for integrated electrical stimulation therapy and clinical monitoring of postoperative wound. ACS Sens 2025; 10:7757-77. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.5c02154.

[112] Wang C, Jiang X, Kim H-J, Zhang S, Zhou X, Chen Y, et al. Flexible patch with printable and antibacterial conductive hydrogel electrodes for accelerated wound healing. Biomaterials 2022; 285:121479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121479.

[113] Kim JH, Kim SA, Lee SH, Jeon YM, Park K, Kang M, et al. Optimized electrical stimulation using a spray-printed conductive electroceutical patch for accelerated wound healing in diabetic mice. Adv Healthc Mater 2026; 15:e04939. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202504939.

[114] Lai L, Han X, Tang Y, Zhou J, Cui W. Advances in ultrasound-assisted drug delivery and clinical application. Ultrason Sonochem 2026; 124:107557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2025.107557.

[115] Devi SG, Thiyagarajan K, Amalan AJ, Pius A. Injectable, self-healing, ultrasonic-triggered piezocatalytic hydrogels for enhanced antibacterial efficacy and wound healing: An in vitro study. ACS Appl Eng Mater 2025; 3:2672-82. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaenm.5c00469.

[116] Roy S, Fan Z, Ullah Z, Madni M, Shyamal S, Roy J, et al. Ultrasound-powered piezoelectric hydrogel enables dual piezodynamic-chemodynamic therapy and immunomodulation against bacteria-infected burn wounds. Nano Energy 2025; 146:111535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2025.111535.

[117] Chi S, Li Y, Ye T, Kang J, Xiang Z, Kuang X, et al. Energy reconversion of ultrasound on a piezoelectric hydrogel promotes ros/co generation and wound self-closure for infected chronic wound healing. Matter 2025; 8:101989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2025.101989.

[118] Chen X, Lin Z, Cheng N, Mo Y, Lu L, Hou J, et al. Recent advances in nir-ii photothermal and photodynamic therapies for drug-resistant wound infections. Mater Today Bio 2025; 32:101871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101871.

[119] Serrage H, Heiskanen V, Palin WM, Cooper PR, Milward MR, Hadis M, et al. Under the spotlight: mechanisms of photobiomodulation concentrating on blue and green light. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2019; 18:1877-909. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9pp00089e.

[120] Wu J, Wang W, Shen J, Zhou N, Li Y, Tang BZ, et al. A thermosensitive hydrogel with efficient nir photothermal conversion as injectable wound dressing for accelerating skin wound healing. Adv Funct Mater 2024; 34:2312374. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202312374.

[121] Li M, Wang C, Yu Q, Chen H, Ma Y, Wei L, et al. A wearable and stretchable dual-wavelength led device for home care of chronic infected wounds. Nat Commun 2024; 15:9380. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53579-6.

[122] Patel S, Ershad F, Zhao M, Isseroff RR, Duan B, Zhou Y, et al. Wearable electronics for skin wound monitoring and healing. Soft Sci 2022; 2:9. https://doi.org/10.20517/ss.2022.13.

[123] Zheng K, Tong Y, Zhang S, He R, Xiao L, Iqbal Z, et al. Flexible bicolorimetric polyacrylamide/chitosan hydrogels for smart real-time monitoring and promotion of wound healing. Adv Funct Mater 2021; 31:2102599. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202102599.

[124] Liu J, Li Z, Sun M, Zhou L, Wu X, Lu Y, et al. Flexible bioelectronic systems with large-scale temperature sensor arrays for monitoring and treatments of localized wound inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2024; 121:e2412423121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2412423121.

[125] Zhu Z, Liu L, Xie Q, Chen S, Sun Y, Huang C, et al. Smart wound management with sustainable ph sensing and dynamic electrotherapy. Acta Biomater 2025; 204:354-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2025.08.033.

[126] Niu Y, Zhao Z, Yang L, Lv D, Sun R, Zhang T, et al. Towards intelligent wound care: hydrogel-based wearable monitoring and therapeutic platforms. Polymers 2025; 17:1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17131881.

[127] Yang G, Xie B, Tian J, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Gong H, et al. A wireless hydrogels thermotherapy system with adhesion-customizable interfaces for accelerating wound healing. Adv Mater 2026; 38:e13302. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202513302.

[128] Tricou LP, Al-Hawat ML, Cherifi K, Manrique G, Freedman BR, Matoori S. Wound ph-modulating strategies for diabetic wound healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2024; 13:446-62. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0129.

[129] Mirani B, Pagan E, Currie B, Siddiqui MA, Hosseinzadeh R, Mostafalu P, et al. An advanced multifunctional hydrogel-based dressing for wound monitoring and drug delivery. Adv Healthc Mater 2017;6:6. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700718.

[130] Zhang H, Li W-X, Tang S, Chen Y, Lan L-M, Li S, et al. A boron-based probe driven theranostic hydrogel dressing for visual monitoring and matching chronic wound healing. Adv Funct Mater 2023; 33:2305580. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202305580.

[131] Xu G, Lu Y, Cheng C, Li X, Xu J, Liu Z, et al. Battery-free and wireless smart wound dressing for wound infection monitoring and electrically controlled on-demand drug delivery. Adv Funct Mater 2021; 31:2100852. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202100852.

[132] Shin Y, Lee HS, Kim J-U, An Y-H, Kim Y-S, Hwang NS, et al. Functional-hydrogel-based electronic-skin patch for accelerated healing and monitoring of skin wounds. Biomaterials 2025; 314:122802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122802.

[133] Jiang Y, Trotsyuk AA, Niu S, Henn D, Chen K, Shih C-C, et al. Wireless, closed-loop, smart bandage with integrated sensors and stimulators for advanced wound care and accelerated healing. Nat Biotechnol 2023; 41:652-62. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01528-3.

[134] Elliot S, Wikramanayake TC, Jozic I, Tomic-Canic M . A modeling conundrum: murine models for cutaneous wound healing. J Invest Dermatol 2018; 138:736-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2017.12.001.

[135] Galiano RD, Jt M, Dobransky M, Levine JP, Gurtner GC. Quantitative and reproducible murine model of excisional wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 2004; 12:485-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.12404.x.

[136] Sullivan TP, Eaglstein WH, Davis SC, Mertz P. The pig as a model for human wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 2001; 9:66-76. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475x.2001.00066.x.

[137] Daré RG, Lopes LB, Petri-Fink A, Rothen-Rutishauser B. Advancing preclinical research with reconstructed in vitro skin models mimicking non-healing wounds. Int J Pharm X 2026; 11:100518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpx.2026.100518.

[138] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Product classification: dressing, wound, hydrogel without drug and/or biologic (product code NAE) . Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Food and Drug Administration . FDA Product Classification Database. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfPCD/classification.cfm?ID=NAE (accessed July 26, 2026).

[139] Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. 21 CFR §878.4022-Hydrogel wound dressing and burn dressing. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-H/part-878/subpart-E/section-878.4022 (accessed July 26, 2026).

[140] U.S. Food and Drug Administration . Medical devices; general and plastic surgery devices; classification of certain solid wound dressings; wound dressings formulated as a gel, cream, or ointment; and liquid wound washes. Fed Regist 2023; 88:83050-108. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/11/30/2023-26209/medical-devices-general-and-plastic-surgery-devices-classification-of-certain-solid-wound-dressings (accessed July 26, 2026).

[141] Zhou X, Yu X, You T, Zhao B, Dong L, Huang C. et al. 3d printing-based hydrogel dressings for wound healing. Adv Sci 2024; 11:e2404580. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202404580.