Altered sensorimotor neuroplasticity in subacute patients with non-severe burn injury

Grant Rowe , Mark Fear , Dale W. Edgar , Aleksandra Miljevic , Tyler Osborne , Natalie Morellini , Merrilee Needham , Ann-Maree Vallence , Fiona Wood

Burns & Trauma ›› 2026, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1) : tkag034

PDF (2025KB)
Burns & Trauma ›› 2026, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1) :tkag034 DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkag034
Research Article
research-article
Altered sensorimotor neuroplasticity in subacute patients with non-severe burn injury
Author information +
History +
PDF (2025KB)

Abstract

Background: Burn injuries affect the central nervous system, and evidence suggests they induce changes in cortical excitability related to motor dysfunction. The current study investigated markers of neuroplasticity in the motor cortex and motor performance in the subacute period following burn injury. Methods: Thirty-four patients with a non-severe burn injury (total body surface area: 1.0 ± 2.0%; 16 females; age: 46.0 ± 14.0 years) participated in a longitudinal study with assessments ranging from ~1 to ~17 weeks post-injury. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to evaluate motor cortex excitability and short-and long-intracortical inhibition (SICI; LICI) before and after application of paired associative stimulation (PAS) to induce neuroplasticity. Motor performance was assessed using the Purdue Pegboard. Results: Patients showed improvements in bilateral motor performance from ~3 to ~6 weeks post-injury. PAS did not induce any change in net motor cortex excitability or SICI but increased LICI, which was greatest ~6 weeks post-injury. Adjusted modeling showed that greater PAS-induced increase in LICI was associated with better bilateral motor performance, suggesting an association between PAS-induced neuroplasticity of long-acting inhibitory circuits in the primary motor cortex and motor function following burn injury. Conclusions: The data provide a neurophysiological basis to test whether targeting inhibitory networks in the subacute period after burn injury can enhance or expedite functional recovery.

Keywords

Burn injury / Subacute / Motor performance / Neuroplasticity / Intracortical inhibition

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Grant Rowe, Mark Fear, Dale W. Edgar, Aleksandra Miljevic, Tyler Osborne, Natalie Morellini, Merrilee Needham, Ann-Maree Vallence, Fiona Wood. Altered sensorimotor neuroplasticity in subacute patients with non-severe burn injury. Burns & Trauma, 2026, 14 (1) : tkag034 DOI:10.1093/burnst/tkag034

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Spronk I, Legemate C, Oen I, van Loey N, Polinder S, van Baar M. Health related quality of life in adults after burn injuries: a systematic review. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0197507. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197507.

[2]

Holavanahalli RK, Helm PA, Kowalske KJ. Long-term outcomes in patients surviving large burns: the musculoskeletal system. J Burn Care Res 2016; 37: 243-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0000000000000257.

[3]

Wu A, Edgar DW, Wood FM. The QuickDASH is an appropriate tool for measuring the quality of recovery after upper limb burn injury. Burns 2007; 33: 843-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2007.03.015.

[4]

Ryan MJ, Raby E, Whiley L, Masuda R, Lodge S, Nitschke P, et al. Nonsevere burn induces a prolonged systemic metabolic phenotype indicative of a persistent inflammatory response postinjury. J Proteome Res 2024; 23: 2893-907. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00516.

[5]

Stanojcic M, Abdullahi A, Rehou S, Parousis A, Jeschke MG. Pathophysiological response to burn injury in adults. Ann Surg 2018; 267: 576-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002097.

[6]

Morellini NM, Fear MW, Rea S, West AK, Wood FM, Dunlop SA. Burn injury has a systemic effect on reinnervation of skin and restoration of nociceptive function. Wound Repair Regen 2012; 20: 367-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00787.x.

[7]

Lim JY, Lum CH, Tan AJ, Jackson T, Burrows S, Edgar DW, et al. Long term sensory function after minor partial thickness burn: a pilot study to determine if recovery is complete or incomplete. Burns 2014; 40: 1538-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2014.03.019.

[8]

Chang Y-W, Tan A, Saab C, Waxman S. Unilateral focal burn injury is followed by long-lasting bilateral allodynia and neuronal hyperexcitability in spinal cord dorsal horn. J Pain 2010; 11: 119-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.009.

[9]

Chang Y-W, Waxman SG. Minocycline attenuates mechanical allodynia and central sensitization following peripheral second-degree burn injury. J Pain 2010; 11: 1146-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.010.

[10]

Ong RCS, Beros JL, Fuller K, Wood FM, Melton PE, Rodger J, et al. Non-severe thermal burn injuries induce long-lasting downregulation of gene expression in cortical excitatory neurons and microglia. Front Mol Neurosci 2024; 17: 1368905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2024.1368905.

[11]

Allahham A, Rowe G, Stevenson A, Fear MW, Vallence AM, Wood FM. The impact of burn injury on the central nervous system. Burns Trauma 2024; 12: tkad037. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkad037.

[12]

Rowe G, Allahham A, Edgar DW, Rurak BK, Fear MW, Wood FM, et al. Functional brain changes following burn injury: a narrative review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2024; 38: 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683231215331.

[13]

Cramer SC, Sur M, Dobkin BH, O’Brien C, Sanger TD, Trojanowski JQ, et al. Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications. Brain 2011; 134: 1591-609. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr039.

[14]

Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1985; 1: 1106-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92413-4.

[15]

Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer. Neuron 2007; 55: 187-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.026.

[16]

Jannati A, Oberman LM, Rotenberg A, Pascual-Leone A. Assessing the mechanisms of brain plasticity by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychopharmacology 2023; 48: 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-022-01453-8.

[17]

Carson RG, Kennedy NC. Modulation of human corticospinal excitability by paired associative stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 823.

[18]

Player MJ, Taylor JL, Weickert CS, Alonzo A, Sachdev P, Martin D, et al. Neuroplasticity in depressed individuals compared with healthy controls. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013; 38: 2101-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2013.126.

[19]

Sanes JN, Donoghue JP. Plasticity and primary motor cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 2000; 23: 393-415. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.393.

[20]

Fuhr P, Agostino R, Hallett M. Spinal motor neuron excitability during the silent period after cortical stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 81: 257-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(91)90011-L.

[21]

Inghilleri M, Berardelli A, Cruccu G, Manfredi M. Silent period evoked by transcranial stimulation of the human cortex and cervicomedullary junction. J Physiol 1993; 466: 521-34. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019732.

[22]

Chen R, Lozano AM, Ashby P. Mechanism of the silent period following transcranial magnetic stimulation evidence from epidural recordings: evidence from epidural recordings. Exp Brain Res 1999; 128: 539-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050878.

[23]

Paulus W, Classen J, Cohen LG, Large CH, di Lazzaro V, Nitsche M, et al. State of the art: pharmacologic effects on cortical excitability measures tested by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Stimul 2008; 1: 151-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.002.

[24]

Stetkarova I, Kofler M. Differential effect of baclofen on cortical and spinal inhibitory circuits. Clin Neurophysiol 2013; 124: 339-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2012.07.005.

[25]

McDonnell MN, Orekhov Y, Ziemann U. The role of GABA(B) receptors in intracortical inhibition in the human motor cortex. Exp Brain Res 2006; 173: 86-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0365-2.

[26]

Tremblay S, Beaulé V, Lepage JF, Théoret H. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation modulates GABAB-related intracortical inhibition in the M1 of healthy individuals. Neuroreport 2013; 24: 46-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835c36b8.

[27]

Ziemann U, Reis J, Schwenkreis P, Rosanova M, Strafella A, Badawy R, et al. TMS and drugs revisited 2014. Clin Neurophysiol 2015; 126: 1847-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.08.028.

[28]

Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Thompson PD, Ferbert A, et al. Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol 1993; 471: 501-19. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019912.

[29]

Di Lazzaro V, Restuccia D, Oliviero A, Profice P, Ferrara L, Insola A, et al. Magnetic transcranial stimulation at intensities below active motor threshold activates intracortical inhibitory circuits. Exp Brain Res 1998; 119: 265-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050341.

[30]

Ziemann U, Lönnecker S, Steinhoff BJ, Paulus W. Effects of antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Ann Neurol 1996; 40: 367-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410400306.

[31]

Ilić TV, Meintzschel F, Cleff U, Ruge D, Kessler KR, Ziemann U. Short-interval paired-pulse inhibition and facilitation of human motor cortex: the dimension of stimulus intensity. J Physiol 2002; 545: 153-67. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2002.030122.

[32]

Garside T, Wood FM, Vallence AM. Case series investigating the cortical silent period after burns using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Burns 2018; 44: 1195-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.04.010.

[33]

Rowe GS, Wood A, Fear M, Edgar DW, Miljevic A, Osborne T, et al. Characterising manual dexterity, motor cortex neuroplasticity and Intracortical inhibition long after burn injury. Burns, 2026, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2026.108009.

[34]

Whife CJ, Vallence AM, Edgar DW, Wood FM. No difference observed in short-interval intracortical inhibition in older burn-injury survivors compared to non-injured older adults: a pilot study. Burns 2019; 45: 1131-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2019.02.020.

[35]

Jeschke MG, van Baar ME, Choudhry MA, Chung KK, Gibran NS, Logsetty S. Burn injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2020; 6: 11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-0145-5.

[36]

Dudek SM, Bear MF. Bidirectional long-term modification of synaptic effectiveness in the adult and immature hippocampus. J Neurosci 1993; 13: 2910-8. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-07-02910.1993.

[37]

Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 2005; 45: 201-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.033.

[38]

Vallence AM, Ridding MC. Non-invasive induction of plasticity in the human cortex: uses and limitations. Cortex 2014; 58: 261-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.12.006.

[39]

Chen R, Classen J, Gerloff C, Celnik P, Wassermann EM, Hallett M, et al. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1997; 48: 1398-403. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.48.5.1398.

[40]

Berardelli A, Inghilleri M, Rothwell JC, Romeo S, Currà A, Gilio F, et al. Facilitation of muscle evoked responses after repetitive cortical stimulation in man. Exp Brain Res 1998; 122: 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050493.

[41]

Whife CJ, Vallence AM, Edgar DW, Wood FM. Decreased neuroplasticity in minor burn injury survivors compared to non-injured adults: a pilot study in burn injury survivors aged 45 years and older. Burns 2021; 47: 327-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2020.10.024.

[42]

ISBI practice guidelines for burn care. Burns 2016; 42: 953-1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2016.05.013.

[43]

Barrett LW, Fear VS, Waithman JC, Wood FM, Fear MW. Understanding acute burn injury as a chronic disease. Burns Trauma 2019; 7: 23.

[44]

Rossi S, Antal A, Bestmann S, Bikson M, Brewer C, Brockmöller J, et al. Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: expert guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol 2021; 132: 269-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003.

[45]

Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A. Screening questionnaire before TMS: an update. Clin Neurophysiol 2011; 122: 1686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2010.12.037.

[46]

Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R, Cohen LG, Daskalakis Z, di Iorio R, et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2015; 126: 1071-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001.

[47]

Zipp P. Recommendations for the standardization of lead positions in surface electromyography. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1982; 50: 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00952243.

[48]

Fried PJ, Santarnecchi E, Antal A, Bartres-Faz D, Bestmann S, Carpenter LL, et al. Training in the practice of noninvasive brain stimulation: recommendations from an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2021; 132: 819-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2020.11.018.

[49]

Müller-Dahlhaus JFM, Liu Y, Ziemann U. Inhibitory circuits and the nature of their interactions in the human motor cortex-a pharmacological TMS study. J Physiol 2008; 586: 495-514. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.142059.

[50]

Player MJ, Taylor JL, Alonzo A, Loo CK. Paired associative stimulation increases motor cortex excitability more effectively than theta-burst stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2012; 123: 2220-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2012.03.081.

[51]

Stefan K, Kunesch E, Cohen LG, Benecke R, Classen J . Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain 2000; 123: 572-84. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.3.572.

[52]

Standring S. Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 2703.

[53]

Stefan K, Wycislo M, Classen J . Modulation of associative human motor cortical plasticity by attention. J Neurophysiol 2004; 92: 66-72. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00383.2003.

[54]

Kaida K, Takahashi M, Åkerstedt T, Nakata A, Otsuka Y, Haratani T, et al. Validation of the Karolinska sleepiness scale against performance and EEG variables. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117: 1574-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006.03.011.

[55]

Agnew J, Bolla-Wilson K, Kawas C, Bleecker M. Purdue pegboard age and sex norms for people 40 years old and older. Dev Neuropsychol 1988; 4: 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565648809540388.

[56]

Reddon JR, Gill DM, Gauk SE, Maerz MD. Purdue pegboard: test-retest estimates. Percept Mot Skills 1988; 66: 503-6. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1988.66.2.503.

[57]

Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ 1993; 306: 1437-40. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1437.

[58]

Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales, Vol. 1994. Boston, MA: A user’s manual, 2001.

[59]

Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992; 305: 160-4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160.

[60]

Emadi, Andani M, Braga M, da Dalt F, Piedimonte A, Carlino E, Fiorio M. Premovement activity in the corticospinal tract is amplified by the placebo effect: an active inference account. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2025; 20. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaf014.

[61]

RAND Corporation . 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Scoring Instructions. Santa Monica CA: RAND Health, [cited 2025 July 2]; Available from: https://www.rand.org/health-care/surveys_tools/mos/36-item-short-form/scoring.html.

[62]

Team, R.C., R language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020.

[63]

Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 2015; 67: 1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.

[64]

Lüdecke D, Makowski D, Ben-Shachar D, Patil I, Waggoner P, Wiernik BM, et al. Performance: assessment of regression models performance. CRAN: Contributed Packages 2019.

[65]

Lenth R. _emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means_ 2022.

[66]

Knief U, Forstmeier W. Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils. Behav Res Methods 2021; 53: 2576-90. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01587-5.

[67]

Wickham H, François R, Henry L, Müller K, Vaughan D, Software P, et al. dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. R package version 1.1.2. Computer Software, 2023.

[68]

Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan L, François R. et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J Open Source Softw 2019; 4: 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686.

[69]

Wickham H, Wickham H. Data analysis. Springer, 2016.

[70]

Pedersen TL. Package ‘patchwork’. R package http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=patchwork. Cran, 2019.

[71]

Umraw N, Chan Y, Gomez M, Cartotto RC, Fish JS. Effective hand function assessment after burn injuries. J Burn Care Rehabil 2004; 25: 134-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BCR.0000105050.53263.30.

[72]

Schneider JC, Qu HD, Lowry J, Walker J, Vitale E, Zona M. Efficacy of inpatient burn rehabilitation: a prospective pilot study examining range of motion, hand function and balance. Burns 2012; 38: 164-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2011.11.002.

[73]

Ryan CM, Lee A, Kazis LE, Schneider JC, Shapiro GD, Sheridan RL, et al. Recovery trajectories after burn injury in young adults: does burn size matter? J Burn Care Res 2015; 36: 118-29. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0000000000000214.

[74]

Liuzzi G, Horniss V, Zimerman M, Gerloff C, Hummel FC. Coordination of uncoupled bimanual movements by strictly timed interhemispheric connectivity. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 9111-7. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0046-11.2011.

[75]

Serrien DJ, Brown P. The functional role of interhemispheric synchronization in the control of bimanual timing tasks. Exp Brain Res 2002; 147: 268-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1253-z.

[76]

Spronk I, van Loey NEE, Sewalt C, Nieboer D, Renneberg B, Moi AL, et al. Recovery of health-related quality of life after burn injuries: an individual participant data meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0226653. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226653.

[77]

Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD . The MOS 36-ltem short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.

[78]

Enzenbach C, Wicklein B, Wirkner K, Loeffler M. Evaluating selection bias in a population-based cohort study with low baseline participation: the LIFE-adult-study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019; 19: 135. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0779-8.

[79]

Ziemann U, Lönnecker S, Steinhoff BJ, Paulus W. The effect of lorazepam on the motor cortical excitability in man. Exp Brain Res 1996; 109: 127-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228633.

[80]

Werhahn KJ, Kunesch E, Noachtar S, Benecke R, Classen J. Differential effects on motorcortical inhibition induced by blockade of GABA uptake in humans. J Physiol 1999; 517: 591-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0591t.x.

[81]

Marneweck M, Loftus A, Hammond G. Short-interval intracortical inhibition and manual dexterity in healthy aging. Neurosci Res 2011; 70: 408-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2011.04.004.

[82]

Ackerley R, Ionta S, Ackerley R, Oddo CM. Insights and perspectives on sensory-motor integration and rehabilitation. Multisens Res 2016; 29: 607-33.

[83]

Struppler A, Weindl A. Clinical aspects of sensory motor integration, Vol. 4. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.

[84]

Vallence AM, Kurylowicz L, Ridding MC. A comparison of neuroplastic responses to non-invasive brain stimulation protocols and motor learning in healthy adults. Neurosci Lett 2013; 549: 151-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2013.05.064.

[85]

Voytovych H, Krivanekova L, Ziemann U. Lithium: a switch from LTD-to LTP-like plasticity in human cortex. Neuropharmacology 2012; 63: 274-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.03.023.

[86]

Cirillo J, Lavender AP, Ridding MC, Semmler JG. Motor cortex plasticity induced by paired associative stimulation is enhanced in physically active individuals. J Physiol 2009; 587: 5831-42. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2009.181834.

[87]

Sale MV, Ridding MC, Nordstrom MA. Factors influencing the magnitude and reproducibility of corticomotor excitability changes induced by paired associative stimulation. Exp Brain Res 2007; 181: 615-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-0960-x.

[88]

Stefan K, Kunesch E, Benecke R, Cohen LG, Classen J . Mechanisms of enhancement of human motor cortex excitability induced by interventional paired associative stimulation. J Physiol 2002; 543: 699-708. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2002.023317.

[89]

Cirillo J, Ward CR, Gant N, Reading SA, Ren A, Byblow WD. Modulation of primary motor cortex after experimentally induced and use-dependent plasticity in young and older adults. Exp Brain Res 2025; 243: 159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07107-7.

[90]

Meunier S, Russmann H, Shamim E, Lamy JC, Hallett M. Plasticity of cortical inhibition in dystonia is impaired after motor learning and paired-associative stimulation. Eur J Neurosci 2012; 35: 975-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08034.x.

[91]

Sanger TD, Garg RR, Chen R. Interactions between two different inhibitory systems in the human motor cortex. J Physiol 2001; 530: 307-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0307l.x.

[92]

van Rooij SJH, Arulpragasam AR, McDonald WM, Philip NS. Accelerated TMS-moving quickly into the future of depression treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology 2024; 49: 128-37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-023-01599-z.

[93]

Ziemann U, Iliać TV, Pauli C, Meintzschel F, Ruge D. Learning modifies subsequent induction of long-term potentiation-like and long-term depression-like plasticity in human motor cortex. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 1666-72. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5016-03.2004.

[94]

Khan AA, Rawlins J, Shenton AF, Sharpe DT. The Bradford burn study: the epidemiology of burns presenting to an inner city emergency department. Emerg Med J 2007; 24: 564-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2005.027730.

[95]

Alder G, Signal N, Olsen S, Taylor D. A systematic review of paired associative stimulation (PAS) to modulate lower limb corticomotor excitability: implications for stimulation parameter selection and experimental design. Front Neurosci 2019; 13: 895. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00895.

[96]

Lodovichi C, Ratto GM. Control of circadian rhythm on cortical excitability and synaptic plasticity. Front Neural Circuits 2023; 17: 1099598. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2023.1099598.

[97]

Pergolizzi JV Jr, Varrassi G, Magnusson P, Breve F, Raffa RB, Christo PJ, et al. Pharmacologic agents directed at the treatment of pain associated with maladaptive neuronal plasticity. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23: 105-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2021.1970135.

[98]

Lundborg G. Brain plasticity and hand surgery: an overview. J Hand Surg Br 2000; 25: 242-52. https://doi.org/10.1054/jhsb.1999.0339.

PDF (2025KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉