Sequential treatment of infectious bone defects with three dimensional-printed body temperature-responsive shape memory scaffold coated with metal-polyphenol layers

Abstract

Background: Infectious bone defects are characterized by persistent bacterial invasion and an immune microenvironment imbalance, which significantly hinders bone regeneration. Recently, numerous bone repair materials have been developed to address the complex pathological microenvironment associated with infectious bone defects. However, dynamic changes in the defect size after infectious debridement pose a significant challenge for achieving effective bone integration of artificial bone grafts. Therefore, there is a need to develop an integrated scaffold with antibacterial, immunomodulatory, and osteogenic properties to achieve filling of irregular bone defects. Methods: Using low-temperature printing combined with the freeze-drying technology, a shape-memory scaffold with a biomimetic porous structure of cancellous bones was fabricated by compositing left-handed poly(L-lactic acid)-trimethylene carbonate (PLLA-TMC) with citric acid-modified hydroxyapatite (CHA). The scaffold (PT/CHA) was further coated with a metal-polyphenol network tannic acid-magnesium (TA-Mg) on its surface through the “mussel” effect, enabling the sequential treatment of infectious bone defects. Results: The scaffold can adaptively integrate with defect interfaces at the physiological temperature (37°C), achieving superior bone integration performance. The incorporation of citric-acid-modified hydroxyapatite effectively optimizes the polymer-inorganic phase printing ink system, significantly enhancing the mechanical strength and mineralization capacity of the scaffold. Meanwhile, the external tannic-acid-magnesium metal-polyphenol coating (TA-Mg) demonstrates excellent pathogen clearance properties both in vitro and in vivo. It also influences macrophage polarization to regulate the immune microenvironment, ultimately promoting bone regeneration in infectious bone defects. Conclusions: The PT/CHA@TA-Mg scaffold achieves bone integration through adaptive filling and enables the multi-stage treatment of infectious bone defects via antibacterial, immune-regulatory, and osteogenic differentiation.

Keywords

Infectious bone defect / Low-temperature 3D printing / Shape memory / Osseointegration / Antibacterial / Anti-inflamation / Scaffolds

References

[1] Ou Z, Wei J, Lei J, Wu D, Tong B, Liang H, et al. Biodegradable Janus sonozyme with continuous reactive oxygen species regulation for treating infected critical-sized bone defects. Nat Commun 2024; 15:10525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54894-8.

[2] Qin L, Yang S, Zhao C, Yang J, Li F, Xu Z, et al. Prospects and challenges for the application of tissue engineering technologies in the treatment of bone infections. Bone Research 2024; 12:28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-024-00332-w.

[3] Zheng F, Wan X, Zhang Y, Yue Y, Li Q, Zhang Z, et al. A multimodal defect-rich nanoreactor triggers sono-piezoelectric tandem catalysis and iron metabolism disruption for implant infections. Science Advances 2025; 11:eads8694. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ads8694.

[4] Hu X, Chen J, Yang S, Zhang Z, Wu H, He J, et al. 3D printed multifunctional biomimetic bone scaffold combined with TP-Mg nanoparticles for the infectious bone defects repair. Small 2024; 20:2403681. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202403681.

[5] Masters EA, Ricciardi BF, Bentley KLM, Moriarty TF, Schwarz EM, Muthukrishnan G. Skeletal infections: microbial pathogenesis, immunity and clinical management. Nat Rev Microbiol 2022; 20:385-400. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-022-00686-0.

[6] Lee J, Byun H, Madhurakkat Perikamana SK, Lee S, Shin H. Current advances in immunomodulatory biomaterials for bone regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater 2019; 8:e1801106. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201801106.

[7] Chen J, Zhou H, Fan Y, Gao G, Ying Y, Li J. 3D printing for bone repair: coupling infection therapy and defect regeneration. Chem Eng J 2023; 471:144537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.144537.

[8] Su N, Villicana C, Yang F. Immunomodulatory strategies for bone regeneration: a review from the perspective of disease types. Biomaterials 2022; 286:121604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121604.

[9] He Y, Zeng F, Quan H, Liu L, Dai J, Jiang H, et al. Strontium-loaded multifunctional gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels for type-H vascularized bone regeneration under osteoporotic conditions. Mater Today Bio 2025; 32:101909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101909.

[10] Yin B, Dodda JM, Wong SHD, Deen GR, Bate JS, Pachauri A, et al. Smart injectable hydrogels for periodontal regeneration: recent advancements in biomaterials and biofabrication strategies. Mater Today Bio 2025; 32:101855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101855.

[11] Feng P, Zhao R, Tang W, Yang F, Tian H, Peng S, et al. Structural and functional adaptive artificial bone: materials, fabrications, and properties. Adv Funct Mater 2023; 33:2214726. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202214726.

[12] Zhou J, Georgas E, Su Y, Zhou J, Kröger N, Benn F, et al. Evolution from bioinert to bioresorbable: in vivo comparative study of additively manufactured metal bone scaffolds. Adv Sci 2023; 10:e2302702. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202302702.

[13] Li J, Fan M, Jiao Z, Chan YK, Cheng L, Li J, et al. Glucose-gated nanocoating endowing polyetheretherketone implants for enzymatic gas therapy to boost infectious diabetic osseointegration. Nano Today 2024; 59:102541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2024.102541.

[14] Wu H, Yang S, Li J, Ma T, Yang K, Liao T, et al. Current status and challenges of shape memory scaffolds in biomedical applications. MedComm-Biomaterials and Applications 2024; 3:e95. https://doi.org/10.1002/mba2.95.

[15] Xia Y, He Y, Zhang F, Liu Y, Leng J. A review of shape memory polymers and composites: mechanisms, materials, and applications. Adv Mater 2021; 33:2000713. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202000713.

[16] Jiang Y, Leng J, Zhang J. A high-efficiency way to improve the shape memory property of 4D-printed polyurethane/polylactide composite by forming in situ microfibers during extrusion-based additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 2021; 38:101718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101718.

[17] Rosli NA, Karamanlioglu M, Kargarzadeh H, Ahmad I. Comprehensive exploration of natural degradation of poly(lactic acid) blends in various degradation media: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 2021; 187:732-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.196.

[18] Hu X, Zhao W, Zhang Z, Xie J, He J, Cao J, et al. Novel 3D printed shape-memory PLLA-TMC/GA-TMC scaffolds for bone tissue engineering with the improved mechanical properties and degradability. Chin Chem Lett 2023; 34:107451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2022.04.049.

[19] Hu X, Cheng S, Liu S, Zhou M, Liu J, Wei J, et al. Fast shape memory function and personalized PLTMC/SIM/MBG composite scaffold for bone regeneration. Materials Today Bio 2025; 32:101791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101791.

[20] Li C, Zhang W, Nie Y, Du X, Huang C, Li L, et al. Time-sequential and multi-functional 3D printed MgO2/PLGA scaffold developed as a novel biodegradable and bioactive bone substitute for challenging postsurgical osteosarcoma treatment. Adv Mater 2024; 36:e2308875. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202308875.

[21] Wang G, Lv Z, Wang T, Hu T, Bian Y, Yang Y, et al. Surface functionalization of hydroxyapatite scaffolds with MgAlEu-LDH nanosheets for high-performance bone regeneration. Adv Sci 2023; 10:e2204234. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202204234.

[22] Qin D, Zhao Y, Cheng R, Liu Y, Guo S, Sun L, et al. Mussel-inspired immunomodulatory and osteoinductive dual-functional hydroxyapatite nanoplatform for promoting bone regeneration. J Nanobiotechnology 2024; 22:320. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-024-02593-3.

[23] Xu H, Yan S, Gerhard E, Xie D, Liu X, Zhang B, et al. Citric acid: a nexus between cellular mechanisms and biomaterial innovations. Adv Mater 2024; 36:e2402871. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202402871.

[24] Martin V, Ribeiro IA, Alves MM, Gonçalves L, Claudio RA, Grenho L, et al. Engineering a multifunctional 3D-printed PLA-collagen-minocycline-nanoHydroxyapatite scaffold with combined antimicrobial and osteogenic effects for bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 2019; 101:15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.056.

[25] Ruiz-Agudo E, Ruiz-Agudo C, Di Lorenzo F, Alvarez-Lloret P, Ibañez-Velasco A, Rodriguez-Navarro C. Citrate stabilizes hydroxylapatite precursors: implications for bone mineralization. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2021; 7:2346-57. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00196.

[26] Xu N, Gao Y, Li Z, Chen Y, Liu M, Jia J, et al. Immunoregulatory hydrogel decorated with tannic acid/ferric ion accelerates diabetic wound healing via regulating macrophage polarization. Chem Eng J 2023; 466:143173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.143173.

[27] Song R, Wang X, Johnson M, Milne C, Lesniak-Podsiadlo A, Li Y, et al. Enhanced strength for double network hydrogel adhesive through cohesion-adhesion balance. Adv Funct Mater 2024; 34:2313322. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202313322.

[28] Luo H, Xie J, Su X, Wang P, Chen H, Kuang X, et al. Tannic acid-based metal-phenolic networks as a versatile platform to mediate cell therapy. Sci China Mater 2024; 67:1-16.

[29] Qiao W, Wong KH, Shen J, Wang W, Wu J, Li J, et al. TRPM7 kinase-mediated immunomodulation in macrophage plays a central role in magnesium ion-induced bone regeneration. Nat Commun 2021; 12:2885. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23005-2.

[30] Hu X-L, Mi S, Lu J-L, Cao J-F, Xing L-Y, Lin Z-D, et al. In vitro degradation behavior of shape memory PLLA-TMC random copolymers. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2021; 615:126220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126220.

[31] Wu X, Xia Y, Dai H, Hong C, Zhao Y, Wei W, et al. Metabolic control during macrophage polarization by a citrate-functionalized scaffold for maintaining bone homeostasis. Adv Healthc Mater 2024; 13:e2400770. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202400770.

[32] Dong Z, Cui H, Zhang H, Wang F, Zhan X, Mayer F, et al. 3D printing of inherently nanoporous polymers via polymerization-induced phase separation. Nat Commun 2021; 12:247. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20498-1.

[33] Hu Z, Li M, Lyu Q, Chen X, Zhang X, Yu Y, et al. Supramolecular 3D printing enabling one-step generation of healable and recyclable structurally colored objects. Adv Funct Mater 2024; 34:2410921. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202410921.

[34] Liu X, Wang Z. Chitosan-calcium carbonate scaffold with high mineral content and hierarchical structure for bone regeneration. Smart Mater Med 2023; 4:552-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smaim.2023.04.004.

[35] Zhang Q-Y, Tan J, Huang K, Nie R, Feng Z-Y, Zou C-Y, et al. Polyphenolic-modified cellulose acetate membrane for bone regeneration through immunomodulation. Carbohydr Polym 2023; 305:120546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120546.

[36] Zou YP, Liang HF, Wang B, Zhang QC, Su DH, Lu SY, et al. Precipitation-based silk fibroin fast gelling, highly adhesive, and magnetic nanocomposite hydrogel for repair of irregular bone defects. Adv Funct Mater 2023; 33:2302442. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202302442.

[37] Xie L, Wang G, Wu Y, Liao Q, Mo S, Ren X, et al. Programmed surface on poly(aryl-ether-ether-ketone) initiating immune mediation and fulfilling bone regeneration. Innovation 2021; 2:100148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100148.

[38] Zhang B, Yao R, Li L, Wang Y, Luo R, Yang L, et al. Green tea polyphenol induced Mg(2+)-rich multilayer conversion coating: toward enhanced corrosion resistance and promoted in situ endothelialization of AZ31 for potential cardiovascular applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019; 11:41165-77. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b17221.

[39] Yuan X, Zhu W, Yang Z, He N, Chen F, Han X, et al. Recent advances in 3D printing of smart scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and regeneration. Adv Mater 2024; 36:e2403641. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202403641.

[40] Zhang W, Yu M, Cao Y, Zhuang Z, Zhang K, Chen D, et al. An anti-bacterial porous shape memory self-adaptive stiffened polymer for alveolar bone regeneration after tooth extraction. Bioact Mater 2023; 21:450-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.08.030.

[41] Zhang Y, Li C, Zhang W, Deng J, Nie Y, Du X, et al. 3D-printed NIR-responsive shape memory polyurethane/magnesium scaffolds with tight-contact for robust bone regeneration. Bioact Mater 2022; 16:218-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.032.

[42] Duan Y, Li Y, Wang Y, Su L, Li Q, Jiang F, et al. An all-in-one “multifunctional hydrogel”: through antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and angiogenic to promoting MRSA-infected bone defect repair. Chem Eng J 2025; 503:158132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.158132.

[43] Ye Y, Zheng Q, Wang Z, Wang S, Lu Z, Chu Q, et al. Metal-phenolic nanoparticles enhance low temperature photothermal therapy for bacterial biofilm in superficial infections. J Nanobiotechnology 2024; 22:713. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-024-02985-5.

[44] Li Z, He D, Guo B, Wang Z, Yu H, Wang Y, et al. Self-promoted electroactive biomimetic mineralized scaffolds for bacteria-infected bone regeneration. Nat Commun 2023; 14:6963. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42598-4.

[45] Yu C, Ying X, Shahbazi M-A, Yang L, Ma Z, Ye L, et al. A nano-conductive osteogenic hydrogel to locally promote calcium influx for electro-inspired bone defect regeneration. Biomaterials 2023; 301:122266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122266.

[46] Chen Q, Ma J, Yu S, Su Y, Guo H, Jiang H, et al. “Small dots, multiple functions”: unveiling the veil of a bioactive quercetin carbon dot and its multifaceted antibacterial and osteogenesis mechanisms for infectious bone defect repair. Adv Funct Mater 2025;2507840. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202507840.

[47] Lyu J, Chen H, Luo J, Lin S, Yang G, Zhou M, et al. Shape memory and hemostatic silk-laponite scaffold for alveolar bone regeneration after tooth extraction trauma. Int J Biol Macromol 2024; 260:129454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129454.

[48] Xiao L, Wang Y, Cai J, Hu J, Dou H, Zhu Y, et al. MXene and near-infrared carbon dots co-encapsulated hydrogel facilitates infected bone defect reconstruction. Adv Healthc Mater 2025; 14:e2500248. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202500248.

[49] Xu J, Zhou F, Cao L, Wang H, Hu J, Qiu S, et al. ROS-balancing-engineered bio-heterojunction hydrogel accelerated the infected bone regeneration based on Sono-chemodynamic therapy. Bioact Mater 2025; 52:440-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.05.031.

[50] Xu K, Wu X, Zhang X, Xing M. Bridging wounds: tissue adhesives’ essential mechanisms, synthesis and characterization, bioinspired adhesives and future perspectives. Burns Trauma 2022; 10:tkac033. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkac033.

[51] Hosseini M, Moghaddam L, Barner L, Cometta S, Hutmacher DW, Savi FM. The multifaceted role of tannic acid: from its extraction and structure to antibacterial properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci 2025; 160:101908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2024.101908.

[52] Li S, Li Z, Yang J, Ha Y, Zhou X, He C. Inhibition of sympathetic activation by delivering calcium channel blockers from a 3D printed scaffold to promote bone defect repair. Adv Healthc Mater 2022; 11:e2200785. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202200785.

[53] Jin S, Wen J, Zhang Y, Mou P, Luo Z, Cai Y, et al. M2 macrophage-derived exosome-functionalized topological scaffolds regulate the foreign body response and the coupling of angio/osteoclasto/osteogenesis. Acta Biomater 2024; 177:91-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2024.01.043.

[54] Sun M, Xu C, Wu R, Yang Q, Ding X, Zhao N, et al. Surface-engineered orthopedic implant to break the antimicrobial-osteogenic paradox at biointerfaces in the “race for the surface”. Adv Mater 2025; 37:2506113. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202506113.

[55] Qin Y, Jing Z, Zou D, Wang Y, Yang H, Chen K, et al. A meta-material scaffold beyond modulus limits: enhanced osteogenesis and angiogenesis of critical bone defects. Nat Commun 2025; 16:2180. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57609-9.