Mechanical stretching enhances the cellular and paracrine effects of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on diabetic wound healing

Abstract

Background: Diabetic wounds present persistent clinical challenges characterized by disrupted extracellular matrix (ECM) homeostasis, which critically impedes tissue regeneration. While bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) exhibit therapeutic potential through ECM remodeling, conventional transplantation strategies are limited by suboptimal cell retention and transient therapeutic effects. Methods: BMSCs cultured on Flexcell plates were subjected to programmable mechanical stretching using a custom-built spherical cell-stretching system. Strain rate-and duration-dependent effects on paracrine signaling and ECM secretion were longitudinally assessed through western blotting and ELISA. The optimized mechanical parameters (15% deformation, 1440 cycles, 5-s vertex residence time) were subsequently applied to generate BMSC sheets. Comparative analyses of biological activity and mechanical properties were performed between non-stretched controls and mechanically optimized groups. In vivo therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in diabetic rat models through wound closure kinetics, Masson’s trichrome staining, and immunofluorescence detection of neovascularization markers. Mechanistic insights were obtained via transcriptomic profiling of stretch-activated signaling pathways. Results: Mechanical stretching significantly upregulated type I collagen, type III collagen, vascular endothelial growth factor, and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) secretion in BMSCs. The optimized stretching parameters (15% deformation, 1440 cycles, and 5-s vertex residence time) promoted BMSC proliferation while reducing apoptosis without compromising stemness. Mechanical stretching facilitated the formation of layered cell sheets with more organized collagen deposition and higher mechanical strength, expediting wound healing in diabetic rats through enhanced re-epithelialization and neovascularization. RNA sequencing analysis revealed that mechanical stretching significantly upregulated mechanosensitive molecules, mechanical stimulation signaling pathways, and cellular behavior regulatory pathways, particularly those associated with mechanical stimuli response, integrin binding, ECM secretion, and intercellular adhesion. Conclusions: Mechanically stretched BMSC cell sheets can promote diabetic wound healing by enhancing cellular activity, paracrine of growth factors, and ECM components.

Keywords

Diabetic wound healing / Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells / Programmable mechanical stretching / Paracrine effect

References

[1] Rice JB, Desai U, Cummings AK, Birnbaum HG, Skornicki M, Parsons NB. Burden of diabetic foot ulcers for medicare and private insurers. Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 651-8. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-2176.

[2] Laura M, Maja O, Ram B, Michael S, Zee U, Artur S. et al. Prevalence of chronic wounds in the general population: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Epidemiol 2019; 29: 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.10.005.

[3] Maja O, Krister J, Ushashree D, Ram B, Zee U, Artur S. The humanistic and economic burden of chronic wounds: a systematic review. Wound Repair Regen 2019; 27: 114-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12683.

[4] Armstrong DG, Swerdlow MA, Armstrong AA, Conte MS, Padula WV, Bus SA. Five year mortality and direct costs of care for people with diabetic foot complications are comparable to cancer. J Foot Ankle Res 2020; 13: 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00383-2.

[5] Singh N, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. JAMA 2005; 293: 217-28. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.2.217.

[6] Veith AP, Henderson K, Spencer A, Sligar AD, Baker AB. Therapeutic strategies for enhancing angiogenesis in wound healing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2019; 146: 97-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.09.010.

[7] Davis FM, Kimball A, Boniakowski A, Gallagher K. Dysfunctional wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers: new crossroads. Curr Diab Rep 2018; 18: 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-018-0970-z.

[8] Thomas B, Klaus K, Peter ØJ, Kit GM, Richard P, Karen K. et al. Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis. Wound Repair Regen 2008; 16: 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00283.x.

[9] Barrientos S, Brem H, Stojadinovic O, Tomic CM. Clinical application of growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 2014; 22: 569-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12205.

[10] Chen S, Mienaltowski MJ, Birk DE. Regulation of corneal stroma extracellular matrix assembly. Exp Eye Res 2015; 133: 69-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2014.08.001.

[11] Rodrigues M, Kosaric N, Bonham CA, Gurtner GC. Wound healing: a cellular perspective. Physiol Rev 2019; 99: 665-706. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00067.2017.

[12] Li Y, Liu A, Wang J, Yang C, Lv K, He W. et al. Suture-anchored cutaneous tension induces persistent hypertrophic scarring in a novel murine model. Burns Trauma 2024; 12:tkae051. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkae051.

[13] Das P, Manna S, Roy S, Nandi SK, Basak P. Polymeric biomaterials-based tissue engineering for wound healing: a systemic review. Burns Trauma 2023; 11: tkac058. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkac058.

[14] Przekora A. A concise review on tissue engineered artificial skin grafts for chronic wound treatment: can we reconstruct functional skin tissue In vitro? Cells 2020; 9: 1622. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9071622.

[15] Jianhua W, Jiang L, Ming C, Yusheng S, Jianwen H, Suanao L. et al. Synthesis and characterization of photo-cross-linkable silk fibroin Methacryloyl hydrogel for biomedical applications. ACS Omega 2023; 8: 30888-97. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c01483.

[16] Bahmad HF, Poppiti R, Alexis J. Nanotherapeutic approach to treat diabetic foot ulcers using tissue-engineered nanofiber skin substitutes: a review. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2021; 15: 487-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2021.02.025.

[17] Li Y, Bi X, Wu M, Chen X, Zhan W, Dong Z. et al. Adjusting the stiffness of a cell-free hydrogel system based on tissue-specific extracellular matrix to optimize adipose tissue regeneration. Burns Trauma 2023; 11: tkad002. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkad002.

[18] Yamakawa S, Hayashida K. Advances in surgical applications of growth factors for wound healing. Burns Trauma 2019; 7: 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-019-0148-1.

[19] Gnecchi M, Danieli P, Malpasso G, Ciuffreda MC. Paracrine mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cells in tissue repair. Methods Mol Biol 2016; 1416: 123-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3584-0_7.

[20] Huang YZ, Gou M, Da LC, Zhang WQ, Xie HQ. Mesenchymal stem cells for chronic wound healing: current status of preclinical and clinical studies. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2020; 26: 555-70. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2019.0351.

[21] Lara L, Ocean S, Afsha A, Shirley L, Haidi H, Toshihiko I, et al. Stem cell therapy for diabetic foot ulcers: a review of preclinical and clinical research. Stem Cell Res Ther 2018; 9: 188. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0938-6.

[22] Kanji S, Das H. Advances of stem cell therapeutics in cutaneous wound healing and regeneration. Mediat Inflamm 2017; 2017: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5217967.

[23] Kwon DS, Gao X, Liu YB, Deborah D, Andrew D, Mona B. et al. Treatment with bone marrow-derived stromal cells accelerates wound healing in diabetic rats. Int Wound J 2008; 5: 453-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00408.x.

[24] Lee DE, Ayoub N, Agrawal DK. Mesenchymal stem cells and cutaneous wound healing: novel methods to increase cell delivery and therapeutic efficacy. Stem Cell Res Ther 2016; 7: 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-016-0303-6.

[25] Nammian P, Asadi-Yousefabad SL, Daneshi S, Sheikhha MH, Tabei SMB, Razban V. Comparative analysis of mouse bone marrow and adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells for critical limb ischemia cell therapy. Stem Cell Res Ther 2021; 12: 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-02110-x.

[26] Fathke C, Wilson L, Hutter J, Vishal K, Andria S, Anne H. et al. Contribution of bone marrow-derived cells to skin: collagen deposition and wound repair. Stem Cells 2004; 22: 812-22. https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.22-5-812.

[27] Donà E, Barry JD, Valentin G, Quirin C, Khmelinskii A, Kunze A. et al. Directional tissue migration through a self-generated chemokine gradient. Nature 2013; 503: 285-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12635.

[28] Ji S, Liu X, Huang J, Bao J, Chen Z, Han C. et al. Consensus on the application of negative pressure wound therapy of diabetic foot wounds. Burns Trauma 2021; 9: tkab018. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkab018.

[29] Huang R, Xu L, Wang Y, Yuheng Z, Bin L, Zhixiao L. et al. Efficient fabrication of stretching hydrogels with programmable strain gradients as cell sheet delivery vehicles. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2021; 129: 112415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112415.

[30] Spees JL, Lee RH, Gregory CA. Mechanisms of mesenchymal stem/stromal cell function. Stem Cell Res Ther 2016; 7: 125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-016-0363-7.

[31] Du HC, Jiang L, Geng WX, Jing L, Rui Z, Jin-Ge D. et al. Evaluation of xenogeneic extracellular matrix fabricated from CuCl2-conditioned mesenchymal stem cell sheets as a bioactive wound dressing material. J Biomater Appl 2017; 32: 472-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328217731951.

[32] Liu FD, Pishesha N, Poon Z, Kaushik T, Van Vliet KJ. Material viscoelastic properties modulate the mesenchymal stem cell Secretome for applications in hematopoietic recovery. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2017; 3: 3292-306. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00644.

[33] Lou J, Stowers R, Nam S, Xia Y, Chaudhuri O. Stress relaxing hyaluronic acid-collagen hydrogels promote cell spreading, fiber remodeling, and focal adhesion formation in 3D cell culture. Biomaterials 2018; 154: 213-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.004.

[34] Jaalouk DE, Lammerding J. Mechanotransduction gone awry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10: 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2597.

[35] Leckband DE, le Duc Q, Wang N, de Rooij J. Mechanotransduction at cadherin-mediated adhesions. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2011; 23: 523-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2011.08.003.

[36] Wolfenson H, Yang B, Sheetz MP. Steps in Mechanotransduction pathways that control cell morphology. Annu Rev Physiol 2019; 81: 585-605. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-021317-121245.

[37] Melincovici CS, Boşca AB, Şuşman S, Mariana M, Carina M, Mihnea I. et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-key factor in normal and pathological angiogenesis. Romanian J Morphol Embryol 2018; 59: 455-67.

[38] Zhang X, Kang X, Jin L, Bai J, Liu W, Wang Z. Stimulation of wound healing using bioinspired hydrogels with basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). Int J Nanomedicine 2018; 13: 3897-906. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S168998.

[39] Mandla S, Davenport Huyer L, Radisic M. Review: multimodal bioactive material approaches for wound healing. APL Bioeng 2018; 2: 021503. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5026773.

[40] Wang L, Hu L, Zhou X, Zehuan X, Chenguang Z, Hassan S. et al. Exosomes secreted by human adipose mesenchymal stem cells promote scarless cutaneous repair by regulating extracellular matrix remodelling. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 7066. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24991-y.

[41] Larson BJ, Longaker MT, Lorenz HP. Scarless fetal wound healing: a basic science review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 1172-80. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181eae781.

[42] Li M, Ma J, Gao Y, Yang L. Cell sheet technology: a promising strategy in regenerative medicine. Cytotherapy 2019; 21: 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.10.013.

[43] Ashok K, Thomas B, Manjappa AB, Jayaprakasha S, Shama R, Mohana KB. et al. Characterization and evaluation of ascorbic acid-induced cell sheet formation in human periodontal ligament stem cells: an in vitro study. J Oral Biosci 2021; 63: 429-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.job.2021.10.002.

[44] Pratsinis H, Mavrogonatou E, Kletsas D. Scarless wound healing: from development to senescence. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2019; 146: 325-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.04.011.

[45] Zhang Z, Sha B, Zhao L, Huan Z, Jinteng F, Cheng Z. et al. Programmable integrin and N-cadherin adhesive interactions modulate mechanosensing of mesenchymal stem cells by cofilin phosphorylation. Nat Commun 2022; 13: 6854. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34424-0.

[46] Yoshihara T, Morimoto A, Kuroda H, Imamura T, Ishida H, Tsunamoto K. et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia after isolated central nervous system relapse: our experiences and review of the literature. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 37: 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1705202.

[47] Suresh A, Biswas A, Perumal S, Khurana S. Periostin and integrin Signaling in stem cell regulation. Adv Exp Med Biol 2019; 1132: 163-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6657-4_16.

[48] Slack RJ, Macdonald SJF, Roper JA, Jenkins RG, Hatley RJD. Emerging therapeutic opportunities for integrin inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2022; 21: 60-78. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-021-00284-4.

[49] Pardo-Pastor C, Rosenblatt J. Piezo1 activates noncanonical EGFR endocytosis and signaling. Sci Adv 2023; 9: 39. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi1328.

[50] Hammerman M, Blomgran P, Dansac A, Eliasson P, Aspenberg P. Different gene response to mechanical loading during early and late phases of rat Achilles tendon healing. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2017; 123: 800-15. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00323.2017.

[51] Koo JH, Plouffe SW, Meng Z, Da-Hye L, Di Y, Dae-Sik L. et al. Induction of AP-1 by YAP/TAZ contributes to cell proliferation and organ growth. Genes Dev 2020; 34: 72-86. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.331546.119.