Harnessing the power of machine learning into tissue engineering: current progress and future prospects

Abstract

Tissue engineering is a discipline based on cell biology and materials science with the primary goal of rebuilding and regenerating lost and damaged tissues and organs. Tissue engineering has developed rapidly in recent years, while scaffolds, growth factors, and stem cells have been successfully used for the reconstruction of various tissues and organs. However, time-consuming production, high cost, and unpredictable tissue growth still need to be addressed. Machine learning is an emerging interdisciplinary discipline that combines computer science and powerful data sets, with great potential to accelerate scientific discovery and enhance clinical practice. The convergence of machine learning and tissue engineering, while in its infancy, promises transformative progress. This paper will review the latest progress in the application of machine learning to tissue engineering, summarize the latest applications in biomaterials design, scaffold fabrication, tissue regeneration, and organ transplantation, and discuss the challenges and future prospects of interdisciplinary collaboration, with a view to providing scientific references for researchers to make greater progress in tissue engineering and machine learning.

Keywords

Tissue engineering / Biomaterials / Scaffolds / Artificial intelligence / Machine learning

References

[1] Ashammakhi N, GhavamiNejad A, Tutar R, Fricker A, Roy I, Chatzistavrou X. et al. Highlights on advancing frontiers in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2022; 28: 633-64. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2021.0012.

[2] Hassanzadeh P, Atyabi F, Dinarvand R. Tissue engineering: still facing a long way ahead. J Control Release 2018; 279: 181-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.04.024.

[3] Al-Kharusi G, Dunne NJ, Little S, Levingstone TJ. The role of machine learning and design of experiments in the advancement of biomaterial and tissue engineering research. Bioengineering (Basel) 2022; 9: 561-87. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9100561.

[4] Pearce HA, Mikos AG. Machine learning and medical devices: the next step for tissue engineering. Engineering 2021; 7: 1704-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.05.014.

[5] Berthiaume F, Maguire TJ, Yarmush ML. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: history, progress, and challenges. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng 2011; 2: 403-30. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114257.

[6] Vacanti CA. The history of tissue engineering. J Cell Mol Med 2006; 10: 569-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2006.tb00421.x.

[7] Altyar AE, El-Sayed A, Abdeen A, Piscopo M, Mousa SA, Najda A. et al. Future regenerative medicine developments and their therapeutic applications. Biomed Pharmacother 2023; 158: 114131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2022.114131.

[8] Saunders L, Ma PX. Self-healing supramolecular hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Macromol Biosci 2019; 19: e1800313. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201800313.

[9] Goldfracht I, Efraim Y, Shinnawi R, Kovalev E, Huber I, Gepstein A. et al. Engineered heart tissue models from hipsc-derived cardiomyocytes and cardiac ecm for disease modeling and drug testing applications. Acta Biomater 2019; 92: 145-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.016.

[10] Heo DN, Hospodiuk M, Ozbolat IT. Synergistic interplay between human mscs and huvecs in 3d spheroids laden in collagen/fibrin hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2019; 95: 348-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.046.

[11] Xu Y, Liu X, Cao X, Huang C, Liu E, Qian S. et al. Artificial intelligence: a powerful paradigm for scientific research. Innovation (Camb) 2021; 2: 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179.

[12] Castiglioni I, Rundo L, Codari M, di Leo G, Salvatore C, Interlenghi M. et al. Ai applications to medical images: from machine learning to deep learning. Phys Med 2021; 83: 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.006.

[13] Mamoshina P, Vieira A, Putin E, Zhavoronkov A. Applications of deep learning in biomedicine. Mol Pharm 2016; 13: 1445-54. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00982.

[14] Loh HW, Ooi CP, Seoni S, Barua PD, Molinari F, Acharya UR. Application of explainable artificial intelligence for healthcare: a systematic review of the last decade (2011-2022). Comput Methods Prog Biomed 2022; 226: 107161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107161.

[15] McDonald SM, Augustine EK, Lanners Q, Rudin C, Catherine Brinson L, Becker ML. Applied machine learning as a driver for polymeric biomaterials design. Nat Commun 2023; 14: 4838.

[16] Suwardi A, Wang F, Xue K, Han MY, Teo P, Wang P. et al. Machine learning-driven biomaterials evolution. Adv Mater 2022; 34: e2102703. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202102703.

[17] Issa NT, Stathias V, Schurer S, Dakshanamurthy S. Machine and deep learning approaches for cancer drug repurposing. Semin Cancer Biol 2021; 68: 132-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.12.011.

[18] Zhang L, Tan J, Han D, Zhu H. From machine learning to deep learning: progress in machine intelligence for rational drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 2017; 22: 1680-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2017.08.010.

[19] Reig B, Heacock L, Geras KJ, Moy L. Machine learning in breast mri. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 52: 998-1018. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26852.

[20] Kolossvary M, De Cecco CN, Feuchtner G, Maurovich-Horvat P. Advanced atherosclerosis imaging by ct: radiomics, machine learning and deep learning. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2019; 13: 274-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2019.04.007.

[21] Fu Y, Xue P, Li N, Zhao P, Xu Z, Ji H. et al. Fusion of 3d lung ct and serum biomarkers for diagnosis of multiple pathological types on pulmonary nodules. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 2021; 210: 106381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106381.

[22] Lei HJ, Huang ZW, Zhang J, Yang Z, Tan EL, Zhou F. et al. Joint detection and clinical score prediction in parkinson’s disease via multi-modal sparse learning. Expert Syst Appl 2017; 80: 284-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.038.

[23] Chaudhari AA, Vig K, Baganizi DR, Sahu R, Dixit S, Dennis V. et al. Future prospects for scaffolding methods and biomaterials in skin tissue engineering: a review. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17: 1974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121974.

[24] Alaribe FN, Manoto SL, Motaung SCKM. Scaffolds from biomaterials: advantages and limitations in bone and tissue engineering. Biologia 2016; 71: 353-66. https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2016-0056.

[25] Bakhshandeh B, Zarrintaj P, Oftadeh MO, Keramati F, Fouladiha H, Sohrabi-jahromi S. et al. Tissue engineering; strategies, tissues, and biomaterials. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 2017; 33: 144-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2018.1430464.

[26] Caballero Aguilar LM, Silva SM, Moulton SE. Growth factor delivery: defining the next generation platforms for tissue engineering. J Control Release 2019; 306: 40-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.05.028.

[27] Chen K, Rao Z, Dong S, Chen Y, Wang X, Luo Y. et al. Roles of the fibroblast growth factor signal transduction system in tissue injury repair. Burns Trauma 2022; 10: tkac005.

[28] Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zeng L, Liu Y, Sun H, Li S. et al. Amphibian-derived peptide homodimer oa-gl17d promotes skin wound regeneration through the miR-663a/TGF-β1/Smad axis. Burns Trauma 2022; 10: tkac032.

[29] Voga M, Adamic N, Vengust M, Majdic G. Stem cells in veterinary medicine-current state and treatment options. Front Vet Sci 2020; 7: 278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00278.

[30] Hu Z, Qin Z, Qu Y, Wang F, Huang B, Chen G. et al. Cell electrospinning and its application in wound healing: principles, techniques and prospects. Burns Trauma 2023; 11: tkad028.

[31] Griffith LG, Swartz MA. Capturing complex 3d tissue physiology in vitro. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7: 211-24. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1858.

[32] Karam JP, Muscari C, Montero-Menei CN. Combining adult stem cells and polymeric devices for tissue engineering in infarcted myocardium. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 5683-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.028.

[33] Ramzan F, Salim A, Khan I. Osteochondral tissue engineering dilemma: scaffolding trends in regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2023; 19: 1615-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-023-10545-x.

[34] Cosgriff-Hernandez E, Timmins LH. Model-directed design of tissue engineering scaffolds. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2022; 8: 4622-4. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01386.

[35] Amin N, Tan X, Ren Q, Zhu N, Botchway BOA, Hu Z. et al. Recent advances of induced pluripotent stem cells application in neurodegenerative diseases. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2019; 95: 109674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109674.

[36] Castagnoli R, Delmonte OM, Calzoni E, Notarangelo LD. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in primary immunodeficiency diseases: current status and future perspectives. Front Pediatr 2019; 7: 295. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00295.

[37] Bantounas I, Ranjzad P, Tengku F, Silajdžić E, Forster D, Asselin MC. et al. Generation of functioning nephrons by implanting human pluripotent stem cell-derived kidney progenitors. Stem Cell Rep 2018; 10: 766-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.01.008.

[38] Ebrahim N, Ahmed IA, Hussien NI, Dessouky A, Farid A, Elshazly A. et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes ameliorated diabetic nephropathy by autophagy induction through the mtor signaling pathway. Cells 2018; 7: 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells7120226.

[39] Zhang W, Yelick PC. Tooth repair and regeneration: potential of dental stem cells. Trends Mol Med 2021; 27: 501-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2021.02.005.

[40] Rognoni E, Watt FM. Skin cell heterogeneity in development, wound healing, and cancer. Trends Cell Biol 2018; 28: 709-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2018.05.002.

[41] Eguizabal C, Herrera L, Ingles-Ferrandiz M, Belmonte JCI. Treating primary immunodeficiencies with defects in nk cells: from stem cell therapy to gene editing. Stem Cell Res Ther 2020; 11: 453. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-01964-5.

[42] Wang Z, Ruan J, Cui D. Advances and prospect of nanotechnology in stem cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 2009; 4: 593-605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11671-009-9292-z.

[43] Nosrati H, Nosrati M. Artificial intelligence in regenerative medicine: applications and implications. Biomimetics (Basel) 2023; 8: 442. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8050442.

[44] Bao Z, Bufton J, Hickman RJ, Aspuru-Guzik A, Bannigan P, Allen C. Revolutionizing drug formulation development: the increasing impact of machine learning. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2023; 202: 115108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2023.115108.

[45] Baptista PM, Siddiqui MM, Lozier G, Rodriguez SR, Atala A, Soker S. The use of whole organ decellularization for the generation of a vascularized liver organoid. Hepatology 2011; 53: 604-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.24067.

[46] Sujeeun LY, Goonoo N, Moutou KM, Baichoo S, Bhaw-Luximon A. Predictive modeling as a tool to assess polymer-polymer and polymer-drug interactions for tissue engineering applications. Macromol Res 2023; 31: 379-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-023-00155-4.

[47] Entekhabi E, Haghbin Nazarpak M, Sedighi M, Kazemzadeh A. Predicting degradation rate of genipin cross-linked gelatin scaffolds with machine learning. Mater Sci Eng C 2020; 107: 110362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110362.

[48] Ning H, Zhou T, Joo SW. Machine learning boosts three-dimensional bioprinting. Int J Bioprint 2023; 9: 739. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.739.

[49] Wolpert DH, Macready WG. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE T Evolut Comput 1997; 1: 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.585893.

[50] Kolomenskaya E, Butova V, Poltavskiy A, Soldatov A, Butakova M. Application of artificial intelligence at all stages of bone tissue engineering. Biomedicines 2023; 12: 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12010076.

[51] Hook AL, Chang CY, Yang J, Luckett J, Cockayne A, Atkinson S. et al. Combinatorial discovery of polymers resistant to bacterial attachment. Nat Biotechnol 2012; 30: 868-75. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2316.

[52] Javaid S, Gorji HT, Soulami KB, Kaabouch N. Identification and ranking biomaterials for bone scaffolds using machine learning and promethee. Res Biomed Eng 2023; 39: 129-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42600-022-00257-5.

[53] Alharbi MT, Almutiq MM. Prediction of dental implants using machine learning algorithms. J Healthc Eng 2022; 2022: 7307675.

[54] Lyakhov PA, Dolgalev AA, Lyakhova UA, Muraev AA, Zolotayev KE, Semerikov DY. Neural network system for analyzing statistical factors of patients for predicting the survival of dental implants. Front Neuroinform 2022; 16: 1067040. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2022.1067040.

[55] Vishwakarma G, Sonpal A, Hachmann J. Metrics for benchmarking and uncertainty quantification: quality, applicability, and best practices for machine learning in chemistry. Trends Chem 2021; 3: 146-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2020.12.004.

[56] Torres JAG, Lau SH, Anchuri P, Stevens JM, Tabora JE, Li J. et al. A multi-objective active learning platform and web app for reaction optimization. J Am Chem Soc 2022; 144: 19999-20007. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c08592.

[57] Tamasi MJ, Patel RA, Borca CH, Kosuri S, Mugnier H, Upadhya R. et al. Machine learning on a robotic platform for the design of polymer-protein hybrids. Adv Mater 2022; 34: e2201809. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202201809.

[58] Peng B, Wei Y, Qin Y, Dai J, Li Y, Liu A. et al. Machine learning-enabled constrained multi-objective design of architected materials. Nat Commun 2023; 14: 6630. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42415-y.

[59] Olofsson S, Mehrian M, Calandra R, Geris L, Deisenroth MP, Misener R. Bayesian multiobjective optimisation with mixed analytical and black-box functions: application to tissue engineering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2019; 66: 727-39. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2018.2855404.

[60] Shi J, Song J, Song B, Lu WF. Multi-objective optimization design through machine learning for drop-on-demand bioprinting. Engineering 2019; 5: 586-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.12.009.

[61] Garner E, Wu J, Zadpoor AA. Multi-objective design optimization of 3d micro-architected implants. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2022; 396: 115102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.115102.

[62] Mehrian M, Geris L. Optimizing neotissue growth inside perfusion bioreactors with respect to culture and labor cost: a multi-objective optimization study using evolutionary algorithms. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2020; 23: 285-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2020.1719081.

[63] Forman EM, Kerrigan SG, Butryn ML, Juarascio AS, Manasse SM, Ontañón S. et al. Can the artificial intelligence technique of reinforcement learning use continuously-monitored digital data to optimize treatment for weight loss? J Behav Med 2019; 42: 276-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-018-9964-1.

[64] Jalalimanesh A, Haghighi HS, Ahmadi A, Hejazian H, Soltani M. Multi-objective optimization of radiotherapy: distributed q-learning and agent-based simulation. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 2017; 29: 1071-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2017.1292319.

[65] Liu XH, Ye K, van Vlijmen HWT, Emmerich MTM, Jzerman API, van Westen. Drugex v2: de novo design of drug molecules by pareto-based multi-objective reinforcement learning in polypharmacology. J Cheminform 2021; 13: 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00561-9.

[66] Choi J, Seo S, Choi S, Piao S, Park C, Ryu SJ. et al. Rebadd-se: multi-objective molecular optimisation using selfies fragment and off-policy self-critical sequence training. Comput Biol Med 2023; 157: 106721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106721.

[67] Kim J, McKee JA, Fontenot JJ, Jung JP. Engineering tissue fabrication with machine intelligence: generating a blueprint for regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019; 7: 443. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00443.

[68] Robles-Bykbaev Y, Naya S, Diaz-Prado S, Calle-López D, Robles-Bykbaev V, Garzón L. et al. An artificial-vision-and statistical-learning-based method for studying the biodegradation of type i collagen scaffolds in bone regeneration systems. PeerJ 2019; 7: e7233. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7233.

[69] Irrechukwu ON, Reiter DA, Lin PC, Roque RA, Fishbein KW, Spencer RG. Characterization of engineered cartilage constructs using multiexponential t(2) relaxation analysis and support vector regression. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2012; 18: 433-43. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2011.0509.

[70] Echezarreta-Lopez MM, Landin M. Using machine learning for improving knowledge on antibacterial effect of bioactive glass. Int J Pharm 2013; 453: 641-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.06.036.

[71] Kwaria RJ, Mondarte EAQ, Tahara H, Chang R, Hayashi T. Data-driven prediction of protein adsorption on self-assembled monolayers toward material screening and design. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020; 6: 4949-56. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01008.

[72] Epa VC, Yang J, Mei Y, Hook AL, Langer R, Anderson DG. et al. Modelling human embryoid body cell adhesion to a combinatorial library of polymer surfaces. J Mater Chem 2012; 22: 20902-6. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm34782b.

[73] Owh C, Ow V, Lin Q, Wong JHM, Ho D, Loh XJ. et al. Bottom-up design of hydrogels for programmable drug release. Biomater Adv 2022; 141: 213100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.213100.

[74] Li F, Han JS, Cao T, Lam W, Fan B, Tang W. et al. Design of self-assembly dipeptide hydrogels and machine learning via their chemical features. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2019; 116: 11259-64. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903376116.

[75] Rostam HM, Fisher LE, Hook AL, Burroughs L, Luckett JC, Figueredo GP. et al. Immune-instructive polymers control macrophage phenotype and modulate the foreign body response in vivo. Matter 2020; 2: 1564-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2020.03.018.

[76] Sujeeun LY, Goonoo N, Ramphul H, Chummun I, Gimié F, Baichoo S. et al. Correlating in vitro performance with physicochemical characteristics of nanofibrous scaffolds for skin tissue engineering using supervised machine learning algorithms. Royal Soc Open Sci 2020; 7: 15. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201293.

[77] Rafieyan S, Vasheghani-Farahani E, Baheiraei N, Keshavarz H. Mlate: machine learning for predicting cell behavior on cardiac tissue engineering scaffolds. Comput Biol Med 2023; 158: 106804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106804.

[78] Barrera MDB, Franco-Martinez F, Lantada AD. Artificial intelligence aided design of tissue engineering scaffolds employing virtual tomography and 3d convolutional neural networks. Materials 2021; 14: 21.

[79] Shin J, Lee Y, Li Z, Hu J, Park SS, Kim K. Optimized 3d bioprinting technology based on machine learning: a review of recent trends and advances. Micromachines (Basel) 2022; 13: 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13030363.

[80] Jovic TH, Combellack EJ, Jessop ZM, Whitaker IS. 3d bioprinting and the future of surgery. Front Surg 2020; 7: 609836. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.609836.

[81] Arjoca S, Robu A, Neagu M, Neagu A. Mathematical and computational models in spheroid-based biofabrication. Acta Biomater 2023; 165: 125-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.07.024.

[82] Datta P, Barui A, Wu Y, Ozbolat V, Moncal KK, Ozbolat IT. Essential steps in bioprinting: from pre-to post-bioprinting. Biotechnol Adv 2018; 36: 1481-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.06.003.

[83] Wang J, Cui Z, Maniruzzaman M. Bioprinting: a focus on improving bioink printability and cell performance based on different process parameters. Int J Pharm 2023; 640: 123020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123020.

[84] Naghieh S, Chen X. Printability-a key issue in extrusion-based bioprinting. J Pharm Anal 2021; 11: 564-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2021.02.001.

[85] Pushparaj K, Balasubramanian B, Pappuswamy M, Anand Arumugam V, Durairaj K, Liu WC. et al. Out of box thinking to tangible science: a benchmark history of 3d bio-printing in regenerative medicine and tissues engineering. Life (Basel) 2023; 13: 954. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13040954.

[86] Lee J, Oh SJ, An SH, Kim WD, Kim SH. Machine learning-based design strategy for 3d printable bioink: elastic modulus and yield stress determine printability. Biofabrication 2020; 12: 035018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab8707.

[87] Xu H, Liu Q, Casillas J, Mcanally M, Mubtasim N, Gollahon LS. et al. Prediction of cell viability in dynamic optical projection stereolithography-based bioprinting using machine learning. J Intell Manuf 2022; 33: 995-1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01708-5.

[88] Bone JM, Childs CM, Menon A, Póczos B, Feinberg AW, LeDuc PR. et al. Hierarchical machine learning for high-fidelity 3d printed biopolymers. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2020; 6: 7021-31. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00755.

[89] Tian S, Stevens R, McInnes BT, Lewinski N. Machine assisted experimentation of extrusion-based bioprinting systems. Micromachines (Basel) 2021; 12: 780. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12070780.

[90] Ruberu K, Senadeera M, Rana S, Gupta S, Chung J, Yue Z. et al. Coupling machine learning with 3d bioprinting to fast track optimisation of extrusion printing. Appl Mater Today 2021; 22: 100914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100914.

[91] Xu J, Ge HY, Zhou XL, Yan J, Chi Q, Zhang Z. Prediction of vascular tissue engineering results with artificial neural networks. J Biomed Inform 2005; 38: 417-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2005.03.002.

[92] Nguyen DC, Pham QV, Pathirana PN, Ding M, Seneviratne A, Lin Z. et al. Federated learning for smart healthcare: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 2023; 55: 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3501296.

[93] Zhao F, Zhao WD, Yao LB, Liu Y. Self-supervised feature adaptation for infrared and visible image fusion. Inf Fusion 2021; 76: 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.06.002.

[94] Wang N, Zhang Y, Wang W, Ye Z, Chen H, Hu G. et al. How can machine learning and multiscale modeling benefit ocular drug development? Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2023; 196: 114772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2023.114772.

[95] Menon D, Ranganathan R. A generative aproach to materials discovery, design, and optimization. ACS Omega 2022; 7: 25958-73. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03264.

[96] Vasudevan RK, Orozco E, Kalinin SV. Discovering mechanisms for materials microstructure optimization via reinforcement learning of a generative model. Mach learn: sci technol 2022; 3: 9. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/aca004.

[97] Sousa T, Correia J, Pereira V, Rocha M. Generative deep learning for targeted compound design. J Chem Inf Model 2021; 61: 5343-61. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01496.

[98] Devlin J, Chang M-W, Lee K, Toutanova K. Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint 2018; arXiv:1810.04805. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805.

[99] Brown TB, Mann B, Ryder N, Subbiah M, Kaplan J, Dhariwal P. et al. Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprint 2020; arXiv:2005.14165. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165.

[100] Ukwuoma CC, Qin ZG, Heyat MBB, Akhtar F, Bamisile O, Muaad AY. et al. Original a hybrid explainable ensemble transformer encoder for pneumonia identification from chest x-ray images. J Adv Res 2023; 48: 191-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2022.08.021.

[101] Huang XH, Deng ZF, Li DD, Yuan X, Fu Y. Miissformer: an effective transformer for 2d medical image segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2023; 42: 1484-94. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2022.3230943.

[102] Qureshi R, Shaughnessy D, Gill KAR, Robinson KA, Li T, Agai E. Are chatgpt and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? Syst Rev 2023; 12: 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02243-z.

[103] Zheng ZL, Zhang OF, Borgs C, Chayes JT, Yaghi OM. Chatgpt chemistry assistant for text mining and the prediction of mof synthesis. J Am Chem Soc 2023; 145: 18048-62. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c05819.

[104] Bran AM, Cox S, Schilter O, Baldassari C, White AD, Schwaller P. Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools. Nat Mach Intell. 2024; 6: 525-35. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-024-00832-8.

[105] Boiko DA, MacKnight R, Kline B, Gomes G. Autonomous chemical research with large language models. Nature 2023; 624: 570-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06792-0.