Mechanical strategies to promote vascularization for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine

Abstract

Vascularization is a major challenge in the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Mechanical factors have been demonstrated to play a fundamental role in vasculogenesis and angiogenesis and can affect the architecture of the generated vascular network. Through the regulation of mechanical factors in engineered tissues, various mechanical strategies can be used to optimize the preformed vascular network and promote its rapid integration with host vessels. Optimization of the mechanical properties of scaffolds, including controlling scaffold stiffness, increasing surface roughness and anisotropic structure, and designing interconnected, hierarchical pore structures, is beneficial for the in vitro formation of vascular networks and the ingrowth of host blood vessels. The incorporation of hollow channels into scaffolds promotes the formation of patterned vascular networks. Dynamic stretching and perfusion can facilitate the formation and maturation of preformed vascular networks in vitro. Several indirect mechanical strategies provide sustained mechanical stimulation to engineered tissues in vivo, which further promotes the vascularization of implants within the body. Additionally, stiffness gradients, anisotropic substrates and hollow channels in scaffolds, as well as external cyclic stretch, boundary constraints and dynamic flow culture, can effectively regulate the alignment of vascular networks, thereby promoting better integration of prevascularized engineered tissues with host blood vessels. This review summarizes the influence and contribution of both scaffold-based and external stimulus-based mechanical strategies for vascularization in tissue engineering and elucidates the underlying mechanisms involved.

Keywords

Vascularization / Tissue engineering / Mechanical cues / Forces / Prevascularized tissue / Regeneration / Scaffold / Stretch

References

[1] Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science 1993; 260: 920-6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8493529.

[2] Paternoster JL, Vranckx JJ. State of the art of clinical applications of tissue engineering in 2021. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2022; 28: 592-612. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2021.0017.

[3] Zohar B, Blinder Y, Mooney DJ, Levenberg S. Flow-induced vascular network formation and maturation in three-dimensional engineered tissue. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018; 4: 1265-71. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00025.

[4] Balaji S, King A, Crombleholme TM, Keswani SG. The role of endothelial progenitor cells in postnatal Vasculogenesis: implications for therapeutic neovascularization and wound healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2013; 2: 283-95. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2012.0398.

[5] Patan S. Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. Cancer Treat Res 2004; 117: 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8871-3_1.

[6] Fraisl P, Mazzone M, Schmidt T, Carmeliet P. Regulation of angiogenesis by oxygen and metabolism. Dev Cell 2009; 16: 167-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2009.01.003.

[7] Amirsadeghi A, Jafari A, Eggermont LJ, Hashemi SS, Bencherif SA, Khorram M. Vascularization strategies for skin tissue engineering. Biomater Sci 2020; 8: 4073-94. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0BM00266F.

[8] Laschke MW, Menger MD. Prevascularization in tissue engineering: current concepts and future directions. Biotechnol Adv 2016; 34: 112-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.004.

[9] Wu P, Chen H, Jin R, Weng T, Ho JK, You C, et al. Non-viral gene delivery systems for tissue repair and regeneration. J Transl Med 2018; 16: 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1402-1.

[10] Simunovic F, Finkenzeller G. Vascularization strategies in bone tissue engineering. Cells 2021; 10: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10071749.

[11] Shafiee S, Shariatzadeh S, Zafari A, Majd A, Niknejad H. Recent advances on cell-based Co-culture strategies for Pre-vascularization in tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021; 9: 745314. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.745314.

[12] Wang K, Lin RZ, Melero-Martin JM. Bioengineering human vascular networks: trends and directions in endothelial and perivascular cell sources. Cell Mol Life Sci 2019; 76: 421-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-018-2939-0.

[13] Coyle RC, Barrs RW, Richards DJ, Ladd EP, Menick DR, Mei Y. Targeting HIF-α for robust prevascularization of human cardiac organoids. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2021; 15: 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.3165.

[14] Später T, Frueh FS, Nickels RM, Menger MD, Laschke MW. Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments. J Biol Eng 2018; 12: 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-018-0118-3.

[15] Hu Q, Tang H, Yao Y, Liu S, Zhang H, Ramalingam M. Rapid fabrication of gelatin-based scaffolds with prevascularized channels for organ regeneration. Biomed Mater 2021; 16: 045010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/abef7b.

[16] Rouwkema J, Khademhosseini A. Vascularization and angiogenesis in tissue engineering: beyond creating static networks. Trends Biotechnol 2016; 34: 733-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.002.

[17] Szklanny AA, Machour M, Redenski I, Chochola V, Goldfracht I, Kaplan B, et al. 3D bioprinting of engineered tissue flaps with hierarchical vessel networks (VesselNet) for direct host-to-implant perfusion. Adv Mater 2021; 33: e2102661. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202102661.

[18] Debbi L, Zohar B, Shuhmaher M, Shandalov Y, Goldfracht I, Levenberg S. Integrating engineered macro vessels with self-assembled capillaries in 3D implantable tissue for promoting vascular integration in-vivo. Biomaterials 2022; 280: 121286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121286.

[19] Rosenfeld D, Landau S, Shandalov Y, Raindel N, Freiman A, Shor E, et al. Morphogenesis of 3D vascular networks is regulated by tensile forces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016; 113: 3215-20. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522273113.

[20] Laschke MW, Vollmar B, Menger MD. Inosculation: connecting the life-sustaining pipelines. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2009; 15: 455-65. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0252.

[21] James BD, Allen JB. Vascular endothelial cell behavior in complex mechanical microenvironments. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2018; 4: 3818-42. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00628.

[22] Kretschmer M, Rudiger D, Zahler S. Mechanical aspects of angiogenesis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13: 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13194987.

[23] Flournoy J, Ashkanani S, Chen Y. Mechanical regulation of signal transduction in angiogenesis. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022; 10: 933474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.933474.

[24] Zanotelli MR, Reinhart-King CA. Mechanical forces in tumor angiogenesis. Adv Exp Med Biol 2018; 1092: 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95294-9_6.

[25] Mason BN, Starchenko A, Williams RM, Bonassar LJ, Reinhart-King CA. Tuning three-dimensional collagen matrix stiffness independently of collagen concentration modulates endothelial cell behavior. Acta Biomater 2013; 9: 4635-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.007.

[26] Kocherova I, Bryja A, Mozdziak P, Angelova Volponi A, Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska M, Piotrowska-Kempisty H, et al. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) Co-culture with osteogenic cells: from molecular communication to engineering Prevascularised bone grafts. J Clin Med 2019; 8: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101602.

[27] Xu M, Li J, Liu X, Long S, Shen Y, Li Q, et al. Fabrication of vascularized and scaffold-free bone tissue using endothelial and osteogenic cells differentiated from bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Cell 2019; 61: 21-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2019.08.003.

[28] Stratman AN, Davis GE. Endothelial cell-pericyte interactions stimulate basement membrane matrix assembly: influence on vascular tube remodeling, maturation, and stabilization. Microsc Microanal 2012; 18: 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927611012402.

[29] Evensen L, Micklem DR, Blois A, Berge SV, Aarsaether N, Littlewood-Evans A, et al. Mural cell associated VEGF is required for organotypic vessel formation. PLoS One 2009; 4: e5798. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005798.

[30] Hofmann A, Ritz U, Verrier S, Eglin D, Alini M, Fuchs S, et al. The effect of human osteoblasts on proliferation and neo-vessel formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells in a long-term 3D co-culture on polyurethane scaffolds. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 4217-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.07.024.

[31] Turturro MV, Christenson MC, Larson JC, Young DA, Brey EM, Papavasiliou G. MMP-sensitive PEG diacrylate hydrogels with spatial variations in matrix properties stimulate directional vascular sprout formation. PLoS One 2013; 8: e58897. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058897.

[32] Casale C, Imparato G, Mazio C, Netti PA, Urciuolo F. Geometrical confinement controls cell, ECM and vascular network alignment during the morphogenesis of 3D bioengineered human connective tissues. Acta Biomater 2021; 131: 341-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.06.022.

[33] Zieber L, Or S, Ruvinov E, Cohen S. Microfabrication of channel arrays promotes vessel-like network formation in cardiac cell construct and vascularization in vivo. Biofabrication 2014; 6: 024102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024102.

[34] Enrico A, Voulgaris D, Östmans R, Sundaravadivel N, Moutaux L, Cordier A, et al. 3D microvascularized tissue models by laser-based cavitation Molding of collagen. Adv Mater 2022; 34: e2109823. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202109823.

[35] Landau S, Ben-Shaul S, Levenberg S.Oscillatory strain promotes vessel stabilization and alignment through fibroblast YAP-mediated Mechanosensitivity. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2018; 5: 1800506. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201800506.

[36] Zhang G, Wang Z, Han F, Jin G, Xu L, Xu H, et al. Mechano-regulation of vascular network formation without branches in 3D bioprinted cell-laden hydrogel constructs. Biotechnol Bioeng 2021; 118: 3787-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27854.

[37] Ko PL, Wang CK, Hsu HH, Lee TA, Tung YC. Revealing anisotropic elasticity of endothelium under fluid shear stress. Acta Biomater 2022; 145: 316-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.03.040.

[38] Krishani M, Shin WY, Suhaimi H, Sambudi NS. Development of scaffolds from bio-based natural materials for tissue regeneration applications: a review. Gels 2023; 9: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9020100.

[39] Dado D, Levenberg S. Cell-scaffold mechanical interplay within engineered tissue. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2009; 20: 656-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.02.001.

[40] Vila-Parrondo C, García-Astrain C, Liz-Marzán LM. Colloidal systems toward 3D cell culture scaffolds. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 2020; 283: 102237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2020.102237.

[41] Lu X, Ding Z, Xu F, Lu Q, Kaplan DL. Subtle regulation of scaffold stiffness for the optimized control of cell behavior. ACS Appl Bio Mater 2019; 2: 3108-19. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.9b00445.

[42] Celie KB, Toyoda Y, Dong X, Morrison KA, Zhang P, Asanbe O, et al. Microstructured hydrogel scaffolds containing differential density interfaces promote rapid cellular invasion and vascularization. Acta Biomater 2019; 91: 144-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.027.

[43] Davidson CD, Jayco DKP, Wang WY, Shikanov A, Baker BM. Fiber crimp confers matrix mechanical nonlinearity, regulates endothelial cell Mechanosensing, and promotes microvascular network formation. J Biomech Eng 2020; 142. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4048191.

[44] Mokhtari N, Zargar Kharazi A. Blood compatibility and cell response improvement of poly glycerol sebacate/poly lactic acid scaffold for vascular graft applications. J Biomed Mater Res A 2021; 109: 2673-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37259.

[45] Liu Y, Yang S, Cao L, Zhang X, Wang J, Liu C. Facilitated vascularization and enhanced bone regeneration by manipulation hierarchical pore structure of scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2020; 110: 110622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110622.

[46] Li J, Jiang X, Li H, Gelinsky M, Gu Z. Tailoring materials for modulation of macrophage fate. Adv Mater 2021; 33: e2004172. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202004172.

[47] Song X, Yu Y, Leng Y, Ma L, Mu J, Wang Z, et al. Expanding tubular microvessels on stiff substrates with endothelial cells and pericytes from the same adult tissue. J Tissue Eng 2022; 13: 204173142211253. https://doi.org/10.1177/20417314221125310.

[48] Krishnan R, Klumpers DD, Park CY, Rajendran K, Trepat X, van Bezu J, et al. Substrate stiffening promotes endothelial monolayer disruption through enhanced physical forces. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2011; 300: C146-54. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00195.2010.

[49] Yi B, Xu Q, Liu W. An overview of substrate stiffness guided cellular response and its applications in tissue regeneration. Bioact Mater 2022; 15: 82-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.005.

[50] Yeh YT, Hur SS, Chang J, Wang KC, Chiu JJ, Li YS, et al. Matrix stiffness regulates endothelial cell proliferation through septin 9. PLoS One 2012; 7: e46889. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046889.

[51] Husain A, Khadka A, Ehrlicher A, Saint-Geniez M, Krishnan R. Substrate stiffening promotes VEGF-A functions via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2022; 586: 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.11.030.

[52] Guo Y, Mei F, Huang Y, Ma S, Wei Y, Zhang X, et al. Matrix stiffness modulates tip cell formation through the p-PXN-Rac1-YAP signaling axis. Bioact Mater 2022; 7: 364-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.033.

[53] Chang H, Liu XQ, Hu M, Zhang H, Li BC, Ren KF, et al. Substrate stiffness combined with hepatocyte growth factor modulates endothelial cell behavior. Biomacromolecules 2016; 17: 2767-76. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00318.

[54] Canver AC, Ngo O, Urbano RL, Clyne AM. Endothelial directed collective migration depends on substrate stiffness via localized myosin contractility and cell-matrix interactions. J Biomech 2016; 49: 1369-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.12.037.

[55] Jannatbabaei A, Tafazzoli-Shadpour M, Seyedjafari E. Effects of substrate mechanics on angiogenic capacity and nitric oxide release in human endothelial cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2020; 1470: 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14326.

[56] Mahmoud M, Mayer M, Cancel LM, Bartosch AM, Mathews R, Tarbell JM. The glycocalyx core protein Glypican 1 protects vessel wall endothelial cells from stiffness-mediated dysfunction and disease. Cardiovasc Res 2021; 117: 1592-605. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvaa201.

[57] Yu Y, Leng Y, Song X, Mu J, Ma L, Yin L, et al. Extracellular matrix stiffness regulates microvascular stability by controlling endothelial paracrine Signaling to determine Pericyte fate. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2023; 43: 1887-99. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.123.319119.

[58] Hanjaya-Putra D, Yee J, Ceci D, Truitt R, Yee D, Gerecht S. Vascular endothelial growth factor and substrate mechanics regulate in vitro tubulogenesis of endothelial progenitor cells. J Cell Mol Med 2010; 14: 2436-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00981.x.

[59] Cao H, Zhou Q, Liu C, Zhang Y, Xie M, Qiao W, et al. Substrate stiffness regulates differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells into heart valve endothelial cells. Acta Biomater 2022; 143: 115-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.02.032.

[60] Dessalles CA, Leclech C, Castagnino A, Barakat AI. Integration of substrate-and flow-derived stresses in endothelial cell mechanobiology. Commun Biol 2021; 4: 764. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02285-w.

[61] Bai S, Han H, Huang X, Xu W, Kaplan DL, Zhu H, et al. Silk scaffolds with tunable mechanical capability for cell differentiation. Acta Biomater 2015; 20: 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.04.004.

[62] Chu L, Jiang G, Hu XL, James TD, He XP, Li Y, et al. Biodegradable macroporous scaffold with nano-crystal surface microstructure for highly effective osteogenesis and vascularization. J Mater Chem B 2018; 6: 1658-67. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TB03353B.

[63] McLuckie M, Robotti F, Sanchez-Macedo N, Enderlin D, Frese L, Cheng PF, et al. Lipoconstruct surface topography grating size influences vascularization onset in the dorsal skinfold chamber model. Acta Biomater 2020; 106: 136-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.050.

[64] Isomursu A, Park KY, Hou J, Cheng B, Mathieu M, Shamsan GA, et al. Directed cell migration towards softer environments. Nat Mater 2022; 21: 1081-90. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-022-01294-2.

[65] Chung TW, Liu DZ, Wang SY, Wang SS. Enhancement of the growth of human endothelial cells by surface roughness at nanometer scale. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 4655-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00361-2.

[66] Han JH, Ko UH, Kim HJ, Kim S, Jeon JS, Shin JH. Electrospun microvasculature for rapid vascular network restoration. Tissue Eng Regen Med 2021; 18: 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-020-00292-2.

[67] Szczesny SE, Driscoll TP, Tseng HY, Liu PC, Heo SJ, Mauck RL, et al. Crimped Nanofibrous biomaterials mimic microstructure and mechanics of native tissue and Alter strain transfer to cells. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2017; 3: 2869-76. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00646.

[68] Li X, Wang X, Yao D, Jiang J, Guo X, Gao Y, et al. Effects of aligned and random fibers with different diameter on cell behaviors. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2018; 171: 461-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.07.045.

[69] Zhang L, Qian Z, Tahtinen M, Qi S, Zhao F. Prevascularization of natural nanofibrous extracellular matrix for engineering completely biological three-dimensional prevascularized tissues for diverse applications. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2018; 12: e1325-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2512.

[70] Yuan Y, Basu S, Lin MH, Shukla S, Sarkar D. Colloidal gels for guiding endothelial cell organization via microstructural morphology. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019; 11: 31709-28. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b11293.

[71] Sgarminato V, Tonda-Turo C, Ciardelli G. Reviewing recently developed technologies to direct cell activity through the control of pore size: from the macro-to the nanoscale. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2020; 108: 1176-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34467.

[72] Choi SW, Zhang Y, Macewan MR, Xia Y. Neovascularization in biodegradable inverse opal scaffolds with uniform and precisely controlled pore sizes. Adv Healthc Mater 2013; 2: 145-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201200106.

[73] Chiu YC, Cheng MH, Engel H, Kao SW, Larson JC, Gupta S, et al. The role of pore size on vascularization and tissue remodeling in PEG hydrogels. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 6045-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.066.

[74] Boire TC, Himmel LE, Yu F, Guth CM, Dollinger BR, Werfel TA, et al. Effect of pore size and spacing on neovascularization of a biodegradble shape memory polymer perivascular wrap. J Biomed Mater Res A 2021; 109: 272-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37021.

[75] Arnal-Pastor M, Martínez-Ramos C, Vallés-Lluch A, Pradas MM. Influence of scaffold morphology on co-cultures of human endothelial and adipose tissue-derived stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2016; 104: 1523-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35682.

[76] Lian M, Sun B, Han Y, Yu B, Xin W, Xu R, et al. A low-temperature-printed hierarchical porous sponge-like scaffold that promotes cell-material interaction and modulates paracrine activity of MSCs for vascularized bone regeneration. Biomaterials 2021; 274: 120841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120841.

[77] Song J, Chen Z, Murillo LL, Tang D, Meng C, Zhong X, et al. Hierarchical porous silk fibroin/poly(L-lactic acid) fibrous membranes towards vascular scaffolds. Int J Biol Macromol 2021; 166: 1111-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.266.

[78] Siddiqui Z, Sarkar B, Kim KK, Kumar A, Paul R, Mahajan A, et al. Self-assembling peptide hydrogels facilitate vascularization in two-component scaffolds. Chem Eng J 2021; 422: 130145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.130145.

[79] Li J, Zhang YJ, Lv ZY, Liu K, Meng CX, Zou B, et al. The observed difference of macrophage phenotype on different surface roughness of mineralized collagen. Regen Biomater 2020; 7: 203-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbz053.

[80] Tran KA, Kraus E, Clark AT, Bennett A, Pogoda K, Cheng X, et al. Dynamic tuning of viscoelastic hydrogels with carbonyl iron microparticles reveals the rapid response of cells to three-dimensional substrate mechanics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2021; 13: 20947-59. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c21868.

[81] Huang D, Huang Y, Xiao Y, Yang X, Lin H, Feng G, et al. Viscoelasticity in natural tissues and engineered scaffolds for tissue reconstruction. Acta Biomater 2019; 97: 74-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.013.

[82] Radisic M, Deen W, Langer R, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Mathematical model of oxygen distribution in engineered cardiac tissue with parallel channel array perfused with culture medium containing oxygen carriers. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005; 288: H1278-89. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00787.2004.

[83] Zhu M, Li W, Dong X, Yuan X, Midgley AC, Chang H, et al. In vivo engineered extracellular matrix scaffolds with instructive niches for oriented tissue regeneration. Nat Commun 2019; 10: 4620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12545-3.

[84] Ray A, Lee O, Win Z, Edwards RM, Alford PW, Kim DH, et al. Anisotropic forces from spatially constrained focal adhesions mediate contact guidance directed cell migration. Nat Commun 2017; 8: 14923. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14923.

[85] Zhang W, Wray LS, Rnjak-Kovacina J, Xu L, Zou D, Wang S, et al. Vascularization of hollow channel-modified porous silk scaffolds with endothelial cells for tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 2015; 56: 68-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.03.053.

[86] Wray LS, Rnjak-Kovacina J, Mandal BB, Schmidt DF, Gil ES, Kaplan DL. A silk-based scaffold platform with tunable architecture for engineering critically-sized tissue constructs. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 9214-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.017.

[87] Morgan JT, Shirazi J, Comber EM, Eschenburg C, Gleghorn JP. Fabrication of centimeter-scale and geometrically arbitrary vascular networks using in vitro self-assembly. Biomaterials 2019; 189: 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.021.

[88] Son J, Hong SJ, Lim JW, Jeong W, Jeong JH, Kang HW. Engineering tissue-specific, multiscale microvasculature with a capillary network for Prevascularized tissue. Small Methods 2021; 5: e2100632. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202100632.

[89] Kang Y, Chang J. Channels in a porous scaffold: a new player for vascularization. Regen Med 2018; 13: 705-15. https://doi.org/10.2217/rme-2018-0022.

[90] Placone JK, Engler AJ. Recent advances in extrusion-based 3D printing for biomedical applications. Adv Healthc Mater 2018; 7: e1701161. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201701161.

[91] Yu T, Dong C, Shen Z, Chen Y, Yu B, Shi H, et al. Vascularization of plastic calcium phosphate cement in vivo induced by in-situ-generated hollow channels. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2016; 68: 153-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.106.

[92] Zheng F, Derby B, Wong J. Fabrication of microvascular constructs using high resolution electrohydrodynamic inkjet printing. Biofabrication 2021; 13: 035006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/abd158.

[93] Sharma D, Ross D, Wang G, Jia W, Kirkpatrick SJ, Zhao F. Upgrading prevascularization in tissue engineering: a review of strategies for promoting highly organized microvascular network formation. Acta Biomater 2019; 95: 112-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.016.

[94] Sun Y, Zhang B, Xia L. Effect of low wall shear stress on the morphology of endothelial cells and its evaluation indicators. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 2021; 208: 106082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106082.

[95] Qi YX, Han Y, Jiang ZL. Mechanobiology and vascular Remodeling: from membrane to nucleus. Adv Exp Med Biol 2018; 1097: 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96445-4_4.

[96] Lu D, Kassab GS. Role of shear stress and stretch in vascular mechanobiology. J R Soc Interface 2011; 8: 1379-85. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0177.

[97] Fang Y, Wu D, Birukov KG. Mechanosensing and Mechanoregulation of endothelial cell functions. Compr Physiol 2019; 9: 873-904. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c180020.

[98] Lucci G, Giverso C, Preziosi L. Cell orientation under stretch: stability of a linear viscoelastic model. Math Biosci 2021; 337: 108630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2021.108630.

[99] Livne A, Bouchbinder E, Geiger B. Cell reorientation under cyclic stretching. Nat Commun 2014; 5: 3938. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4938.

[100] Yung YC, Chae J, Buehler MJ, Hunter CP, Mooney DJ. Cyclic tensile strain triggers a sequence of autocrine and paracrine signaling to regulate angiogenic sprouting in human vascular cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 15279-84. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905891106.

[101] Morrow D, Cullen JP, Cahill PA, Redmond EM. Cyclic strain regulates the notch/CBF-1 signaling pathway in endothelial cells: role in angiogenic activity. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2007; 27: 1289-96. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.142778.

[102] Milkiewicz M, Mohammadzadeh F, Ispanovic E, Gee E, Haas TL. Static strain stimulates expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and VEGF in microvascular endothelium via JNK-and ERK-dependent pathways. J Cell Biochem 2007; 100: 750-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.21055.

[103] Takemasa T, Sugimoto K, Yamashita K. Amplitude-dependent stress fiber reorientation in early response to cyclic strain. Exp Cell Res 1997; 230: 407-10. https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.1996.3428.

[104] Gupta V, Grande-Allen KJ. Effects of static and cyclic loading in regulating extracellular matrix synthesis by cardiovascular cells. Cardiovasc Res 2006; 72: 375-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.08.017.

[105] Krishnan L, Underwood CJ, Maas S, Ellis BJ, Kode TC, Hoying JB, et al. Effect of mechanical boundary conditions on orientation of angiogenic microvessels. Cardiovasc Res 2008; 78: 324-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvn055.

[106] Zheng W, Christensen LP, Tomanek RJ. Differential effects of cyclic and static stretch on coronary microvascular endothelial cell receptors and vasculogenic/angiogenic responses. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2008; 295: H794-800. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00343.2008.

[107] Morin KT, Smith AO, Davis GE, Tranquillo RT. Aligned human microvessels formed in 3D fibrin gel by constraint of gel contraction. Microvasc Res 2013; 90: 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2013.07.010.

[108] Underwood CJ, Edgar LT, Hoying JB, Weiss JA. Cell-generated traction forces and the resulting matrix deformation modulate microvascular alignment and growth during angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2014; 307: H152-64. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00995.2013.

[109] Zhang G, Varkey M, Wang Z, Xie B, Hou R, Atala A. ECM concentration and cell-mediated traction forces play a role in vascular network assembly in 3D bioprinted tissue. Biotechnol Bioeng 2020; 117: 1148-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27250.

[110] Liang J, Zhao J, Chen Y, Li B, Li Y, Lu F, et al. New insights and advanced strategies for in vitro construction of vascularized tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2023; 29: 692-709. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2023.0044.

[111] Zhou J, Li YS, Chien S. Shear stress-initiated signaling and its regulation of endothelial function. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2014; 34: 2191-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303422.

[112] He L, Zhang CL, Chen Q, Wang L, Huang Y. Endothelial shear stress signal transduction and atherogenesis: from mechanisms to therapeutics. Pharmacol Ther 2022; 235: 108152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108152.

[113] Fels B, Kusche-Vihrog K. It takes more than two to tango: mechanosignaling of the endothelial surface. Pflugers Arch 2020; 472: 419-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-020-02369-2.

[114] Campinho P, Vilfan A, Vermot J. Blood flow forces in shaping the vascular system: a focus on endothelial cell behavior. Front Physiol 2020; 11: 552. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00552.

[115] Nakajima H, Yamamoto K, Agarwala S, Terai K, Fukui H, Fukuhara S, et al. Flow-dependent endothelial YAP regulation contributes to vessel maintenance. Dev Cell 2017; 40: 523-36.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2017.02.019.

[116] Nakajima H, Mochizuki N. Flow pattern-dependent endothelial cell responses through transcriptional regulation. Cell Cycle 2017; 16: 1893-901. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2017.1364324.

[117] Luo JY, Cheng CK, He L, Pu Y, Zhang Y, Lin X, et al. Endothelial UCP2 is a mechanosensitive suppressor of atherosclerosis. Circ Res 2022; 131: 424-41. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.321187.

[118] Souilhol C, Serbanovic-Canic J, Fragiadaki M, Chico TJ, Ridger V, Roddie H, et al. Endothelial responses to shear stress in atherosclerosis: a novel role for developmental genes. Nat Rev Cardiol 2020; 17: 52-63. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-019-0239-5.

[119] Anwaier G, Lian G, Ma GZ, Shen WL, Lee CI, Lee PL, et al. Punicalagin attenuates disturbed flow-induced vascular dysfunction by inhibiting force-specific activation of Smad1/5. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021; 9: 697539. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.697539.

[120] Deng H, Min E, Baeyens N, Coon BG, Hu R, Zhuang ZW, et al. Activation of Smad2/3 signaling by low fluid shear stress mediates artery inward remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2021; 118: e2105339118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105339118.

[121] DeStefano JG, Williams A, Wnorowski A, Yimam N, Searson PC, Wong AD. Real-time quantification of endothelial response to shear stress and vascular modulators. Integr Biol (Camb) 2017; 9: 362-74. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7IB00023E.

[122] Lindner M, Laporte A, Elomaa L, Lee-Thedieck C, Olmer R, Weinhart M. Flow-induced glycocalyx formation and cell alignment of HUVECs compared to iPSC-derived ECs for tissue engineering applications. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022; 10: 953062. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.953062.

[123] Huang Y, Qian JY, Cheng H, Li XM. Effects of shear stress on differentiation of stem cells into endothelial cells. World J Stem Cells 2021; 13: 894-913. https://doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v13.i7.894.

[124] Kutikhin AG, Sinitsky MY, Yuzhalin AE, Velikanova EA. Shear stress: an essential driver of endothelial progenitor cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2018; 118: 46-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2018.03.007.

[125] Shi ZD, Tarbell JM. Fluid flow mechanotransduction in vascular smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts. Ann Biomed Eng 2011; 39: 1608-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0309-2.

[126] Nguyen BB, Moriarty RA, Kamalitdinov T, Etheridge JM, Fisher JP. Collagen hydrogel scaffold promotes mesenchymal stem cell and endothelial cell coculture for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 2017; 105: 1123-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36008.

[127] Mokhtari-Jafari F, Amoabediny G, Dehghan MM, Abbasi Ravasjani S, Jabbari Fakhr M, Zamani Y. Osteogenic and Angiogenic synergy of human adipose stem cells and human umbilical vein endothelial cells Cocultured in a modified perfusion bioreactor. Organ 2021; 17: 56-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476278.2021.1954769.

[128] Elomaa L, Lindner M, Leben R, Niesner R, Weinhart M. In vitro vascularization of hydrogel-based tissue constructs via a combined approach of cell sheet engineering and dynamic perfusion cell culture. Biofabrication 2022; 15: 015004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac9433.

[129] van Duinen V, Zhu D, Ramakers C, van Zonneveld AJ, Vulto P, Hankemeier T. Perfused 3D angiogenic sprouting in a high-throughput in vitro platform. Angiogenesis 2019; 22: 157-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-018-9647-0.

[130] Lee GH, Huang SA, Aw WY, Rathod ML, Cho C, Ligler FS, et al. Multilayer microfluidic platform for the study of luminal, transmural, and interstitial flow. Biofabrication 2022; 14: 025007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac48e5.

[131] Sego TJ, Prideaux M, Sterner J, McCarthy BP, Li P, Bonewald LF, et al. Computational fluid dynamic analysis of bioprinted self-supporting perfused tissue models. Biotechnol Bioeng 2020; 117: 798-815. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27238.

[132] Filippi M, Buchner T, Yasa O, Weirich S, Katzschmann RK. Microfluidic tissue engineering and bio-actuation. Adv Mater 2022; 34: e2108427. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202108427.

[133] Born G, Plantier E, Nannini G, Caimi A, Mazzoleni A, Asnaghi MA, et al. Mini-and macro-scale direct perfusion bioreactors with optimized flow for engineering 3D tissues. Biotechnol J 2023; 18: e2200405. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.202200405.

[134] Linville RM, Boland NF, Covarrubias G, Price GM, Tien J. Physical and chemical signals that promote vascularization of capillary-scale channels. Cell Mol Bioeng 2016; 9: 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-016-0429-8.

[135] Haase K, Kamm RD. Advances in on-chip vascularization. Regen Med 2017; 12: 285-302. https://doi.org/10.2217/rme-2016-0152.

[136] Li X, Xu S, He P, Liu Y. In vitro recapitulation of functional microvessels for the study of endothelial shear response, nitric oxide and [Ca2+]i. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0126797. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126797.

[137] Galassi VV, Wilke N. On the coupling between mechanical properties and electrostatics in biological membranes. Membranes (Basel) 2021; 11: 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11070478.

[138] Kim TH, Jeon WY, Ji Y, Park EJ, Yoon DS, Lee NH, et al. Electricity auto-generating skin patch promotes wound healing process by activation of mechanosensitive ion channels. Biomaterials 2021; 275: 120948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120948.

[139] Haselwandter CA, MacKinnon R. Piezo’s membrane footprint and its contribution to mechanosensitivity. elife 2018; 7: 7. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41968.

[140] Cunha F, Rajnicek AM, McCaig CD. Electrical stimulation directs migration, enhances and orients cell division and upregulates the chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CXCR2 in endothelial cells. J Vasc Res 2019; 56: 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1159/000495311.

[141] Bai H, McCaig CD, Forrester JV, Zhao M. DC electric fields induce distinct preangiogenic responses in microvascular and macrovascular cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004; 24: 1234-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000131265.76828.8a.

[142] Filippi M, Dasen B, Guerrero J, Garello F, Isu G, Born G, et al. Magnetic nanocomposite hydrogels and static magnetic field stimulate the osteoblastic and vasculogenic profile of adipose-derived cells. Biomaterials 2019; 223: 119468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119468.

[143] Tomás AR, Gonçalves AI, Paz E, Freitas P, Domingues RMA, Gomes ME. Magneto-mechanical actuation of magnetic responsive fibrous scaffolds boosts tenogenesis of human adipose stem cells. Nanoscale 2019; 11: 18255-71. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR04355A.

[144] Luo C, Yang X, Li M, Huang H, Kang Q, Zhang X, et al. A novel strategy for in vivo angiogenesis and osteogenesis: magnetic micro-movement in a bone scaffold. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 2018; 46: 636-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2018.1465947.

[145] Pardo A, Gómez-Florit M, Barbosa S, Taboada P, Domingues RMA, Gomes ME. Magnetic nanocomposite hydrogels for tissue engineering: design concepts and remote actuation strategies to control cell fate. ACS Nano 2021; 15: 175-209. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c08253.

[146] Sapir Y, Cohen S, Friedman G, Polyak B. The promotion of in vitro vessel-like organization of endothelial cells in magnetically responsive alginate scaffolds. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 4100-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.037.

[147] Shou Y, Le Z, Cheng HS, Liu Q, Ng YZ, Becker DL, et al. Mechano-activated cell therapy for accelerated diabetic wound healing. Adv Mater 2023; 35: e2304638. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202304638.

[148] Wang S, Hossack JA, Klibanov AL. From anatomy to functional and molecular biomarker imaging and therapy: ultrasound is safe, ultrafast, portable, and inexpensive. Investig Radiol 2020; 55: 559-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000675.

[149] Jiang X, Savchenko O, Li Y, Qi S, Yang T, Zhang W, et al. A review of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for therapeutic applications. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2019; 66: 2704-18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2018.2889669.

[150] Li J, Guo W, Yu F, Liu L, Wang X, Li L, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound promotes angiogenesis via the AKT pathway and DNA methylation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Ultrasonics 2022; 118: 106561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2021.106561.

[151] Xu XM, Xu TM, Wei YB, Gao XX, Sun JC, Wang Y, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment accelerates angiogenesis by activating YAP/TAZ in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Ultrasound Med Biol 2018; 44: 2655-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.07.007.

[152] McCarthy C, Camci-Unal G. Low intensity pulsed ultrasound for bone tissue engineering. Micromachines (Basel) 2021; 12: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12121488.

[153] Tanaka E, Kuroda S, Horiuchi S, Tabata A, El-Bialy T. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in dentofacial tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng 2015; 43: 871-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-015-1274-y.

[154] Imashiro C, Azuma T, Itai S, Kuribara T, Totani K, Onoe H, et al. Travelling ultrasound promotes vasculogenesis of three-dimensional-monocultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 2021; 118: 3760-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27852.

[155] Kang PL, Huang HH, Chen T, Ju KC, Kuo SM. Angiogenesis-promoting effect of LIPUS on hADSCs and HUVECs cultured on collagen/hyaluronan scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2019; 102: 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.045.