The clinical differentiation of blood culture-positive and-negative sepsis in burn patients: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a potentially life-threatening condition that occurs when the body’s response to infection leads to widespread inflammation and tissue damage. Negative cultures can make it difficult for clinicians to make a diagnosis and may raise questions about the validity of the definition of sepsis. In addition, the clinical distinctions between burn patients with blood culture-positive and-negative sepsis are also poorly understood. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the clinical differences between blood culture-positive and-negative sepsis in burn patients in order to improve the understanding of the pathophysiology and epidemiology of sepsis in this population. Methods: This study had a retrospective design, and the participants were adults aged ≥18 years. Patients diagnosed with sepsis were divided into two groups based on their blood culture results within 1 week of sepsis diagnosis. Results: We enrolled 1643 patients admitted to our institution’s burn intensive care unit between January 2010 and December 2021. pH, platelet count, bicarbonate and haematocrit were significant in both the positive and negative groups. However, lymphocyte, red cell distribution width and blood urea nitrogen were significant only in the positive group, whereas lactate dehydrogenase was significant only in the negative group. Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumonia are common gram-negative bacterial species, and Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis are common gram-positive bacterial species seen in burn patients with positive blood cultures. Carbapenem resistance was found to be associated with an unfavourable prognosis in gram-negative bacteria, with the exception of P. aeruginosa. Conclusions: pH, platelet count, bicarbonate and haematocrit were routine biomarkers that demonstrated statistical significance in both groups. Lactate dehydrogenase was significant in the blood-negative group, while red cell distribution width, blood urea nitrogen and lymphocyte count were significant in the positive group. Furthermore, the most common causes of sepsis are gram-negative bacteria, including A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa. Additionally, resistance to carbapenems is associated with unfavourable outcomes.

Keywords

Sepsis / Blood culture / Longitudinal / Resistance / Antibiotics / k-Means clustering

References

[1] Manning J.Sepsis in the burn patient. Critical Care Nursing Clinics. 2018; 30: 423-30.

[2] Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Chest. 1992; 101: 1644-55.

[3] on Burn Sepsis ABACC, Group I, Greenhalgh DG, Saffle JR, Holmes IV JH, Gamelli RL, et al. American burn association consensus conference to define sepsis and infection in burns. Journal of burn care & research 2007; 28: 776-90.

[4] Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315: 801-10.

[5] Yan J, Hill WF, Rehou S, Pinto R, Shahrokhi S, Jeschke MG. Sepsis criteria versus clinical diagnosis of sepsis in burn patients: a validation of current sepsis scores. Surgery. 2018; 164: 1241-5.

[6] Meza-Escobar LE, Rehou S, Jeschke MG. Sepsis definitions in burns. Surg Infect. 2021; 22: 28-36.

[7] de Prost N, Razazi K, Brun-Buisson C. Unrevealing culture-negative severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2013; 17: 1-2.

[8] Li Y, Guo J, Yang H, Li H, Shen Y, Zhang D. Comparison of culture-negative and culture-positive sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2021; 25: 1-9.

[9] Kim Y, Kym D, Hur J, Jeon J, Yoon J, Yim H, et al. Development of a risk prediction model (Hangang) and comparison with clinical severity scores in burn patients. PLoS One. 2019; 14: e0211075.

[10] Genolini C, Lacombe A, Ecochard R, Subtil F. CopyMean: a new method to predict monotone missing values in longitudinal studies. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2016; 132: 29-44.

[11] Genolini C, Ecochard R, Benghezal M, Driss T, Andrieu S, Subtil F. kmlShape: an efficient method to cluster longitudinal data (time-series) according to their shapes. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0150738.

[12] Mitra B, Roman C, Charters KE, O’reilly G, Gantner D, Cameron PA. Lactate, bicarbonate and anion gap for evaluation of patients presenting with sepsis to the emergency department: a prospective cohort study. Emergency Medicine Australasia. 2020; 32: 20-4.

[13] Lee SM, Kim SE, Kim EB, Jeong HJ, Son YK, An WS. Lactate clearance and vasopressor seem to be predictors for mortality in severe sepsis patients with lactic acidosis supplementing sodium bicarbonate: a retrospective analysis. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0145181.

[14] Cato LD, Wearn CM, Bishop JR, Stone MJ, Harrison P, Moiemen N. Platelet count: a predictor of sepsis and mortality in severe burns. Burns. 2018; 44: 288-97.

[15] Girardot T, Rimmelé T, Venet F, Monneret G. Apoptosis-induced lymphopenia in sepsis and other severe injuries. Apoptosis. 2017; 22: 295-305.

[16] Hu ZD, Lippi G, Montagnana M. Diagnostic and prognostic value of red blood cell distribution width in sepsis: a narrative review. Clin Biochem. 2020; 77: 1-6.

[17] Wu H, Liao B, Cao T, Ji T, Huang J, Ma K. Diagnostic value of RDW for the prediction of mortality in adult sepsis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol. 2022; 13: 997853.

[18] Kumar RA, Channabasappa SM. A retrospective cohort study of perioperative prognostic factors associated with intra-abdominal sepsis. Anesth Essays Res. 2016; 10: 50.

[19] Lu J, Wei Z, Jiang H, Cheng L, Chen Q, Chen M, et al. Lactate dehydrogenase is associated with 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis: a retrospective observational study. J Surg Res. 2018; 228: 314-21.

[20] Duman A, Akoz A, Kapci M, Ture M, Orun S, Karaman K, et al. Prognostic value of neglected biomarker in sepsis patients with the old and new criteria: predictive role of lactate dehydrogenase. Am J Emerg Med. 2016; 34: 2167-71.

[21] Ronat JB, Kakol J, Khoury MN, Berthelot M, Yun O, Brown V, et al. Highly drug-resistant pathogens implicated in burn-associated bacteremia in an Iraqi burn care unit. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e101017.

[22] Harikumar G, Krishanan K. The growing menace of drug resistant pathogens and recent strategies to overcome drug resistance: a review. Journal of King Saud University-Science. 2022; 34: 101979.

[23] Alam MS, Kapur P, Pillai P, Pillai KK. Trends of antimicrobial resistance of sepsis pathogens at a university hospital in new Delhi. India Drug Research. 2020; 70: 463-71.