Hydrogels for the management of second-degree burns: currently available options and future promise

Abstract

Burn wounds result from exposure to hot liquids, chemicals, fire, electric discharge or radiation. Wound severity ranges from first-degree injury, which is superficial, to fourth-degree injury, which exposes bone, tendons and muscles. Rapid assessment of burn depth and accurate wound management in the outpatient setting is critical to prevent injury progression into deeper layers of the dermis. Injury progression is of particular pertinence to second-degree burns, which are the most common form of thermal burn. As our understanding of wound healing advances, treatment options and technologies for second-degree burn management also evolve. Polymeric hydrogels are a class of burn wound dressings that adhere to tissue, absorb wound exudate, protect from the environment, can be transparent facilitating serial wound evaluation and, in some cases, enable facile removal for dressing changes. This review briefly describes the burn level classification and common, commercially available dressings used to treat second-degree burns, and then focuses on new polymeric hydrogel burn dressings under preclinical development analyzing their design, structure and performance. The review presents the follow key learning points: (1) introduction to the integument system and the wound-healing process; (2) classification of burns according to severity and clinical appearance; (3) available dressings currently used for second-degree burns; (4) introduction to hydrogels and their preparation and characterization techniques; and (5) pre-clinical hydrogel burn wound dressings currently being developed.

Keywords

Burn / Wound / Hydrogel / Dressing / Second-degree

References

[1] Hall C, Hardin C, Corkins CJ, Jiwani AZ, Fletcher J, Carlsson A, et al. Pathophysiologic mechanisms and current treatments for cutaneous sequelae of burn wounds. Compr Physiol. 2017; 8: 371-405.

[2] Hassanshahi A, Hassanshahi M, Khabbazi S, Hosseini-Khah Z, Peymanfar Y, Ghalamkari S, et al. Adipose-derived stem cells for wound healing. J Cell Physiol. 2019; 234: 7903-14.

[3] Shingyochi Y, Orbay H, Mizuno H. Adipose-derived stem cells for wound repair and regeneration. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2015; 15: 1285-92.

[4] Lanham J, Nelson N, Hendren B, Jordan TS. Outpatient burn care: prevention and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2020; 101: 463-70.

[5] Takeo M, Lee W, Ito M. Wound healing and skin regeneration. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015; 5: 1-12.

[6] Deutsch CJ, Edwards DM, Myers S. Wound dressings. Br J Hosp Med. 2017; 78: C103-9.

[7] Lloyd ECO, Rodgers BC, Michener M, Williams MS. Outpatient burns: prevention and care. Am Fam Physician. 2012; 85: 25-32.

[8] Shu W, Wang Y, Zhang X, Li C, Le H, Chang F. Functional hydrogel dressings for treatment of burn wounds. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9: 788461.

[9] Clayton MC, Solem LD. No ice, no butter. Postgrad Med. 1995; 97: 151-65 159-60, 165.

[10] Ye H, De S. Thermal injury of skin and subcutaneous tissues: a review of experimental approaches and numerical models. Burns. 2017; 43: 909-32.

[11] Karim AS, Shaum K, Gibson ALF. Indeterminate-depth burn injury-exploring the uncertainty. J Surg Res. 2020; 245: 183-97.

[12] Markiewicz-Gospodarek A, Kozioł M, Tobiasz M, Baj J, Radzikowska-Büchner E, Przekora A. Burn wound healing: clinical complications, medical care, treatment, and dressing types: the current state of knowledge for clinical practice. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031338.

[13] Saied N, Harfoush A, Ayed T, Moustafa A, Hassan R, Eldolify E, et al. Team approach helps patient survive high-voltage electric burn. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017; 5: e1243.

[14] Oryan A, Alemzadeh E, Moshiri A. Burn wound healing: present concepts, treatment strategies and future directions. J Wound Care. 2017; 26: 5-19.

[15] Tiwari VK. Burn wound: how it differs from other wounds? Indian journal of plastic surgery: official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. 2012; 45: 364-73.

[16] Busche MN, Roettger A, Herold C, Vogt PM, Rennekampff HO. Evaporative water loss in superficial to full thickness burns. Ann Plast Surg. 2016; 77: 401-5.

[17] Moss LS. Outpatient management of the burn patient, 2004.

[18] Singh V, Devgan L, Bhat S, Milner SM. The pathogenesis of burn wound conversion. Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 59: 109-15.

[19] Chaganti P, Gordon I, Chao JH, Zehtabchi S. A systematic review of foam dressings for partial thickness burns, 2019.

[20] Skórkowska-Telichowska K, Czemplik M, Kulma A, Szopa J. The local treatment and available dressings designed for chronic wounds. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013; 68: e117-26.

[21] Broussard KC, Powers JG. Wound dressings: selecting the most appropriate type. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2013; 14: 449-59.

[22] Brown M, Coffee T, Adenuga P, Yowler CJ. Outcomes of outpatient Management of Pediatric Burns. J Burn Care Res. 2014; 35: 388-94.

[23] Wasiak J, Cleland H, Campbell F, Spinks A, Cochrane Wounds Group. Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002106.pub4.

[24] Sahin C, Kaplan P, Ozturk S, Alpar S, Karagoz H. Treatment of partial-thickness burns with a tulle-gras dressing and a hydrophilic polyurethane membrane: a comparative study. J Wound Care. 2019; 28: 24-8.

[25] Myers R, Lozenski J, Wyatt M, Peña M, Northrop K, Bhavsar D, et al. Sedation and analgesia for dressing change: a survey of American burn association burn Centers. J Burn Care Res. 2017; 38: e48-54.

[26] Khansa I, Schoenbrunner AR, Kraft CT, Janis JE. Silver in wound care-friend or foe?: a comprehensive review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019; 7: e2390.

[27] Baghel PS, Shukla S, Mathur RK, Randa R. A comparative study to evaluate the effect of honey dressing and silver sulfadiazene dressing on wound healing in burn patients. Indian J Plast Surg. 2009; 42: 176-81.

[28] Aziz Z, Abdul Rasool Hassan B. The effects of honey compared to silver sulfadiazine for the treatment of burns: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Burns. 2017; 43: 50-7.

[29] Genuino GA, Baluyut-Angeles KV, Espiritu AP, Lapitan MC, Buckley BS. Topical petrolatum gel alone versus topical silver sulfadiazine with standard gauze dressings for the treatment of superficial partial thickness burns in adults: a randomized controlled trial. Burns. 2014; 40: 1267-73.

[30] Khorasani G, Hosseinimehr SJ, Azadbakht M, Zamani A, Mahdavi MR. Aloe versus silver sulfadiazine creams for second-degree burns: a randomized controlled study. Surg Today. 2009; 39: 587-91.

[31] Malik KI, Malik MA, Aslam A. Honey compared with silver sulphadiazine in the treatment of superficial partial-thickness burns. Int Wound J. 2010; 7: 413-7.

[32] Shahzad MN, Ahmed N. Effectiveness of aloe Vera gel compared with 1% silver sulphadiazine cream as burn wound dressing in second degree burns. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013; 63: 225-30.

[33] Godhi AS, Ram P, Powar R. Efficacy of topical sucralfate vERSUs silver sulfadiazine in the management of burns: a 1-year randomized controlled trial. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2017; 7: 57-70.

[34] Gravante G, Caruso R, Sorge R, Nicoli F, Gentile P, Cervelli V. Nanocrystalline silver: a systematic review of randomized trials conducted on burned patients and an evidence-based assessment of potential advantages over older silver formulations. Ann Plast Surg. 2009; 63: 201-5.

[35] Muangman P, Chuntrasakul C, Silthram S, Suvanchote S, Benjathanung R, Kittidacha S, et al. Comparison of efficacy of 1% silver sulfadiazine and acticoat™for treatment of partial-thickness burn wounds. J Med Assoc Thail. 2006; 89: 953-8.

[36] Varas RP, O’Keeffe T, Namias N, Pizano LR, Quintana OD, Tellachea MH, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of acticoat versus silver sulfadiazine in the treatment of partial-thickness burns: which method is less painful? J Burn Care Rehabil. 2005; 26: 344-7.

[37] Tang H, Lv G, Fu J, Niu X, Li Y, Zhang M, et al. An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter investigation evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of Mepilex ag versus silver sulfadiazine in the treatment of deep partial-thickness burn injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015; 78: 1000-7.

[38] Yang B, Wang X, Li Z, Qu Q, Qiu Y. Beneficial effects of silver foam dressing on healing of wounds with ulcers and infection control of burn patients. Pak J Med Sci. 2015; 31: 1334-9.

[39] Silverstein P, Heimbach D, Meites H, Latenser B, Mozingo D, Mullins F, et al. An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, performance, tolerance, and safety of a silver-containing soft silicone foam dressing (intervention) vs silver sulfadiazine cream. J Burn Care Res. 2011; 32: 617-26.

[40] Fletcher J, Moore Z, Anderson I, Matsuzaki K. Hydrocolloids and pressure ulcers made easy. Wounds International. 2011; 2: 1-6.

[41] Phipps A, Lawrence JB. Comparison of hydrocolloid dressings and medicated tulle-gras in the treatment of outpatient burns. Beyond Occlusion: Wound Care Proceedings, Royal Society of Medicine Services International Congress and Symposium Series No. 136. 1988

[42] Thomas SS, Lawrence JC, Thomas A. Evaluation of hydrocolloids and topical medication in minor burns. J Wound Care. 1995; 4: 218-20.

[43] Wright A, MacKechnie DW, Paskins JR. Management of partial thickness burns with Granuflex ’E’ dressings. Burns. 1993; 19: 128-30.

[44] White R.Evidence for atraumatic soft silicone wound dressing use. Wounds UK. 2005.

[45] Feng JJ, Le See J, Choke A, Ooi A, Chong SJ. Biobrane for burns of the pubic region: minimizing dressing changes. Mil Med Res. 2018; 5: 29.

[46] Hansen SL, Voigt DW, Wiebelhaus P, Paul CN. Using skin replacement products to treat burns and wounds. Adv Skin Wound Care. 14: 37-46.

[47] Demling RH, DeSanti L. Management of partial thickness facial burns (comparison of topical antibiotics and bio-engineered skin substitutes). Burns. 1999; 25: 256-61.

[48] Murphy PS, Evans GR. Advances in wound healing: a review of current wound healing products. Plast Surg Int. 2012; 2012: 190436.

[49] Jones N, Ivins N, Ebdon V, Hagelstein S, Harding K. A case series evaluating the use of a gelling fibre dressing for moderate to highly exuding wounds. Wounds UK. 2017.

[50] Sood A, Granick MS, Tomaselli NL. Wound dressings and comparative effectiveness data. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2014; 3: 511-29.

[51] Jozsa G, Vajda P, Garami A, Csenkey A, Juhasz Z. Treatment of partial thickness hand burn injuries in children with combination of silver foam dressing and zinc-hyaluronic gel. Medicine (United States). 2018.

[52] Muangman P, Pundee C, Opasanon S, Muangman S. A prospective, randomized trial of silver containing hydrofiber dressing versus 1% silver sulfadiazine for the treatment of partial thickness burns. Int Wound J. 2010; 7: 271-6.

[53] Dhaliwal K, Lopez N. Hydrogel dressings and their application in burn wound care. Br J Community Nurs. 2018; 23: S24-7.

[54] Su J, Li J, Liang J, Zhang K, Li J. Hydrogel preparation methods and biomaterials for wound dressing. Life (Basel, Switzerland). 2021; 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11101016.

[55] Homann HH, Rosbach O, Moll W, Vogt PM, Germann G, Hopp M, et al. A liposome hydrogel with polyvinyl-pyrrolidone iodine in the local treatment of partial-thickness burn wounds. Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 59: 423-7.

[56] Patel H, Shah D. A comparative study of hydrogel dressing versus conventional dressing in burns. The Internet Journal of Surgery. 2012; 13: 1-5.

[57] Liang Y, He J, Guo B. Functional hydrogels as wound dressing to enhance wound healing. ACS Nano. 2021; 15: 12687-722.

[58] Atay HY. Antibacterial Activity of Chitosan-Based Systems, 2020, 457-89.

[59] Dang LH, Nguyen TH, Tran HLB, Doan VN, Tran NQ. Injectable Nanocurcumin-formulated chitosan-g-Pluronic hydrogel exhibiting a great potential for burn treatment. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2018; 2018: 1-14.

[60] Nguyen TBT, Dang LH, Nguyen TTT, Tran DL, Nguyen DH, Nguyen VT, et al. Green processing of thermosensitive nanocurcumin-encapsulated chitosan hydrogel towards biomedical application. Green Processing and Synthesis. 2016; 5: 511-20.

[61] Yan T, Kong S, Ouyang Q, Li C, Hou T, Chen Y, et al. Chitosan-gentamicin conjugate hydrogel promoting skin scald repair. Mar Drugs. 2020; 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18050233.

[62] Yan T, Li C, Ouyang Q, Zhang D, Zhong Q, Li P, et al. Synthesis of gentamicin-grafted-chitosa... solubility and antibacterial activity.pdf, 2019, 38-45.

[63] Raafat D, Sahl HG. Chitosan and its antimicrobial potential-a critical literature survey. Microb Biotechnol. 2009; 2: 186-201.

[64] Confederat LG, Tuchilus CG, Dragan M, Sha’at M. Preparation and antimicrobial activity of chitosan and its derivatives: a concise review. Molecules. 2021; 26.

[65] Sahariah P, Masson M. Antimicrobial chitosan and chitosan derivatives: a review of the structure-activity relationship. Biomacromolecules. 2017; 18: 3846-68.

[66] Rinehart S, Campbell T. Synthesis and characterization of a chitosan/PVA antimicrobial hydrogel nanocomposite for responsive wound management materials. Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology. 2016; 08: 65-70.

[67] Jackson J, Burt H, Lange D, Whang I, Evans R, Plackett D. The design, characterization and antibacterial activity of heat and silver crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel forming dressings containing silver nanoparticles. Nano. 2021; 11: 1-19.

[68] Boonkaew B, Suwanpreuksa P, Cuttle L, Barber PM, Supaphol P. Hydrogels containing silver nanoparticles for burn wounds show antimicrobial activity without cytotoxicity. J Appl Polym Sci. 2014; 131: 1-10.

[69] Kim MH, Park H, Nam HC, Park SR, Jung JY, Park WH. Injectable methylcellulose hydrogel containing silver oxide nanoparticles for burn wound healing. Carbohydr Polym. 2018; 181: 579-86.

[70] Huang Y, Bai L, Yang Y, Yin Z, Guo B. Biodegradable gelatin/silver nanoparticle composite cryogel with excellent antibacterial and antibiofilm activity and hemostasis for Pseudomonas aeruginosa-infected burn wound healing. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2022; 608: 2278-89.

[71] Maleki A, He J, Bochani S, Nosrati V, Shahbazi MA, Guo B. Multifunctional photoactive hydrogels for wound healing acceleration. ACS Nano. 2021; 15: 18895-930.

[72] Johnson K, Muzzin N, Toufanian S, Slick RA, Lawlor MW, Seifried B, et al. Drug-impregnated, pressurized gas expanded liquid-processed alginate hydrogel scaffolds for accelerated burn wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2020; 112: 101-11.

[73] Zheng Y, Yuan W, Liu H, Huang S, Bian L, Guo R. Injectable supramolecular gelatin hydrogel loading of resveratrol and histatin-1 for burn wound therapy. Biomater Sci. 2020; 8: 4810-20.

[74] Wang P, Huang S, Hu Z, Yang W, Lan Y, Zhu J, et al. In situ formed anti-inflammatory hydrogel loading plasmid DNA encoding VEGF for burn wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2019; 100: 191-201.

[75] Samadi A, Azandeh S, Orazizadeh M, Bayati V, Rafienia M, Karami MA. Fabrication and characterisation of chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol-based transparent hydrogel films loaded with silver nanoparticles and sildenafil citrate for wound dressing applications. Mater Technol. 2020; 37: 1-11.

[76] Konieczynska MD, Villa-Camacho JC, Ghobril C, Perez-Viloria M, Tevis KM, Blessing WA, et al. On-demand dissolution of a dendritic hydrogel-based dressing for second-degree burn wounds through thiol-thioester exchange reaction. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017; 55: 9984-7.

[77] Konieczynska MD, Grinstaff MW. On-demand dissolution of chemically cross-linked hydrogels. Acc Chem Res. 2017; 50: 151-60.

[78] Cook KA, Naguib N, Kirsch J, Hohl K, Colby AH, Sheridan R, et al. In situgelling and dissolvable hydrogels for use as on-demand wound dressings for burns. Biomater Sci. 2021; 9: 6842-50.

[79] Cook KA, Naguib N, Price C, Katharios S, Kirsch J, Fajardo-Cortes K, et al. TemporaryIn SituHydrogel dressings for colon polypectomies. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021; 7: 4362-70.

[80] Lu W, Xu X, Imbernon L, Zhu J, Hoogenboom R, Du Prez FE, et al. On-demand dissoluble Diselenide-containing hydrogel. Biomacromolecules. 2020; 21: 3308-17.

[81] Huang W, Wang Y, Huang Z, Wang X, Chen L, Zhang Y, et al. On-demand dissolvable self-healing hydrogel based on Carboxymethyl chitosan and cellulose nanocrystal for deep partial thickness burn wound healing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018; 10: 41076-88.