Robot-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty: trauma maker or trauma savior? A prospective, randomized cohort study

Zhonghua Xu , Hua Li , Zaiyang Liu , Jie Li , Jun Zhang , Min Wang , Yuan Zhang

Burns & Trauma ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : tkac034

PDF (1098KB)
Burns & Trauma ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) :tkac034 DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkac034
Research Article
research-article
Robot-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty: trauma maker or trauma savior? A prospective, randomized cohort study
Author information +
History +
PDF (1098KB)

Abstract

Background: Robotic assistance has been increasingly employed to improve the operative precision in modern knee surgery. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the trauma effect of one of the first domestically developed orthopedic surgical robots in China in a clinical trial of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA). Methods: A total of 33 patients who underwent unilateral TKA for end-stage osteoarthritis were randomized to receive RA-TKA (17 cases) or conventional manual TKA (CM-TKA) in our institution in 2020. The trauma effects of the 4 main indicators with 48 sub-indicators in terms of subsectional operative time, inflammation and coagulation markers, physical and radiographical analyses of osteotomy deviation, and postoperative comfort were analyzed. Results: Subsectional operative time analysis showed that the times for bone cutting and gap balancing with RA-TKA were 5.3 and 2.2 min shorter than those with CM-TKA (p = 0.010, p = 0.02), respectively. Arterial blood gas indicators (partial pressure of carbon dioxide, partial pressure of oxygen and SO2) 24 h after RA-TKA, as well as the white blood cell count and neutrophil ratio, were significantly lower than those after CM-TKA (p < 0.05). Inflammatory markers at 72 h after surgery showed the increments of C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and D-dimer of RA-TKA declined by 180.7, 22.0 and 1050.0% (p < 0.05), respectively, referenced to the preoperative baseline values, as compared to CM-TKA. Mechanical deviation distribution exhibited percentages of region I errors for RA-TKA and CM-TKA of 76.5% and 27.1% (p = 0.000), respectively, and the success rates of one-time osteotomy were 94.1% and 62.5% (p = 0.039), respectively. Radiographical verification showed RA-TKA was more conducive to achieving mechanical alignment and ideal tibial component azimuths. Postoperative efficacy showed that patients were more comfortable after RA-TKA in terms of reduced administration of tranexamic acid, hydrocortisone and the utilization rate of temporary intensive opioid analgesics. No statistical difference in patient-reported outcome measures and complications were recorded between the two groups during continuous observation. Conclusions: Compared with CM-TKA, RA-TKA decreases rather than increases trauma. It might shorten the time required for bone cutting and gap balancing, reduce mechanical errors related to the osteotomy and prosthesis position, and improve the accuracy of the mechanical alignment reconstruction. RA-TKA is also favorable in promoting postoperative comfort and minimizing inflammatory response and drug consumption. Trial registration: The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000031282) approved registration on 26 March 2020.

Keywords

Robot / Knee osteoarthritis / Arthroplasty / Trauma / Error / Surgery / Robot-assist / Total keen arthroplasty

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhonghua Xu, Hua Li, Zaiyang Liu, Jie Li, Jun Zhang, Min Wang, Yuan Zhang. Robot-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty: trauma maker or trauma savior? A prospective, randomized cohort study. Burns & Trauma, 2022, 10 (1) : tkac034 DOI:10.1093/burnst/tkac034

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Feng B, Zhu W, Bian YY, Chang X, Cheng KY, Weng XS. China artificial joint annual data report. Chin Med J. 2020; 134: 752-3.

[2]

Springer BD, Levine BR, Golladay GJ. Highlights of the 2020 American joint replacement registry annual report. Arthroplasty Today. 2021; 9: 141-2.

[3]

Bian YY, Cheng KY, Chang X, Weng XS. Reports and analysis of amount of hip and knee arthroplasty in China from 2011 to 2019. Chin J Orthop 2020; 40: 1453-60.

[4]

Matsuda S, Kawahara S, Okazaki K, et al. Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471: 127-33.

[5]

Ritter MA.The anatomical graduated component total knee replacement: a long-term evaluation with 20-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91: 745-9.

[6]

Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Park SD. The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop. 2014; 38: 379-85.

[7]

Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplast. 2007; 22: 1097-106.

[8]

Lee DH, Park JH, Song DI, Padhy D, Jeong WK, Han SB. Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in TKA: comparison between navigation-assisted gap balancing and conventional measured resection. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18: 381-7.

[9]

Ripollés-Melchor J, Abad-Motos A, Díez-Remesal Y, Aseguinolaza-Pagola M, Padin-Barreiro L, Sánchez-Martín R, et al. Association between use of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and postoperative complications in Total hip and knee arthroplasty in the postoperative outcomes within enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in elective Total hip and knee arthroplasty study (POWER2). JAMA Surg. 2020; 155:e196024.

[10]

Liu Z, Zhang J, He K, Zhang Y, Zhang Y. Optimized clinical practice for superaged patients with hip fracture: significance of damage control and enhanced recovery program. Burns Trauma. 2019; 7: 21.

[11]

Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, Heeckt PF. Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee. 2002; 9: 173-80.

[12]

Liow M, Chin PL, Pang HN, Tay DK, Yeo SJ. THINK surgical TSolution-one((R)) (Robodoc) total knee arthroplasty. SICOT J. 2017; 3: 63.

[13]

Karthik K, Colegate-Stone T, Dasgupta P, Tavakkolizadeh A, Sinha J. Robotic surgery in trauma and orthopaedics: a systematic review. Bone Joint J. 2015; 97-B: 292-9.

[14]

Kayani B, Tahmassebi J, Ayuob A, Konan S, Oussedik S, Haddad FS. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the systemic inflammatory response in conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty versus robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2021; 103-B: 113-22.

[15]

Burbul M, Tomaszewski D, Rogalska A, Gawroński K, Literacki S, Wąsko M. Thrombotic activation before and after total hip arthroplasty. A prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22: 691-97.

[16]

Oelsner WK, Engstrom SM, Benvenuti MA, An TJ, Jacobson RA, Polkowski GG, et al. Characterizing the acute phase response in healthy patients following Total joint arthroplasty: predictable and consistent. J Arthroplast. 2017; 32: 309-14.

[17]

An TJ, Engstrom SM, Oelsner WK, Benvenuti MA, Polkowski GG, Schoenecker JG. Elevated d-dimer is not predictive of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis after Total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2016; 31: 2269-72.

[18]

Chai W, Xie J, Zang XG, Yan TF, Zhao YL, He CA, et al. Animal experimental study on domestic robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Chin J of Reparative Reconstr Surg. 2020; 34: 1376-81.

[19]

Chai W, Xie J, Zang XG, He C, Yan TF, Liu L, et al. A cadaveric experimental study on domestic robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Chin J of Reparative Reconstr Surg. 2021; 35: 409-13.

[20]

Liu ZY, Zhang J, Li J, He K, Zhang YM, Zhang Y. The role of continuous optimization program in damage control of perioperative blood loss during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Trauma Surg. 2020; 22: 94-100.

[21]

Heim CE, Yamada KJ, Fallet R, Odvody J, Schwarz DM, Lyden ER, et al. Orthopaedic surgery elicits a systemic anti-inflammatory signature. J Clin Med. 2020; 9: 2123.

[22]

Langkilde A, Jakobsen TL, Bandholm TQ, Eugen-Olsen J, Blauenfeldt T, Petersen J, et al. Inflammation and post-operative recovery in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty-secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2017; 25: 1265-73.

[23]

Kayani B, Konan S, Huq SS, Tahmassebi J, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27: 1132-41.

[24]

Tanavalee A, Honsawek S, Rojpornpradit T, Sakdinakiattikoon M, Ngarmukos S. Inflammation related to synovectomy during total knee replacement in patients with primary osteoarthritis: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93: 1065-70.

[25]

Vaidya NV, Deshpande AN, Panjwani T, Patil R, Jaysingani T, Patil P. Robotic-assisted TKA leads to a better prosthesis alignment and a better joint line restoration as compared to conventional TKA: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 30: 621-6.

[26]

Liow MH, Xia Z, Wong MK, Tay KJ, Yeo SJ, Chin PL. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately restores the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised study. J Arthroplast. 2014; 29: 2373-7.

[27]

Song EK, Seon JK, Yim JH, Netravali NA, Bargar WL. Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471: 118-26.

[28]

Moon YW, Ha CW, Do KH, Kim CY, Han JH, Na SE, et al. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment. Comput Aided Surg. 2012; 17: 86-95.

[29]

Held MB, Grosso MJ, Gazgalis A, Sarpong NO, Boddapati V, Neuwirth A, et al. Improved compartment balancing using a robot-assisted Total knee arthroplasty. Arthroplasty Today. 2021; 7: 130-4.

[30]

Cheng B, Tian J, Peng Y, Fu X. Iatrogenic wounds: a common but often overlooked problem. Burns Trauma. 2019; 7: 18.

[31]

Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Hampp EL, Scholl LY, Prieto M, Chang TC, et al. Robotic-arm assisted Total knee arthroplasty demonstrated soft tissue protection. Surg Technol Int. 2017; 30: 441-6.

[32]

Xu ZH, Zhang Y. What’s New in Artificially Intelligent Joint Surgery in China? A Conference Record from the 2021 IEEE ICRA and Literature Review. Arthroplasty, 2022; 4: 10-20.

[33]

Rice DA, Kluger MT, McNair PJ, Lewis GN, Somogyi AA, Borotkanics R, et al. Persistent postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study of potential risk factors. Br J Anaesth. 2018; 121: 804-12.

[34]

Bhimani SJ, Bhimani R, Smith A, Eccles C, Smith L, Malkani A. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrates decreased postoperative pain and opioid usage compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt Open. 2020; 1: 8-12.

[35]

Sun M, Yang L, He R. Application and research progress of robotic-arm in total knee arthroplasty. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021; 35: 913-7.

PDF (1098KB)

39

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉