Stiffness-mediated mesenchymal stem cell fate decision in 3D-bioprinted hydrogels

Abstract

Background: Hydrogels with tuneable mechanical properties are an attractive material platform for 3D bioprinting. Thus far, numerous studies have confirmed that the biophysical cues of hydrogels, such as stiffness, are known to have a profound impact on mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) differentiation; however, their differentiation potential within 3D-bioprinted hydrogels is not completely understood. Here, we propose a protocol for the exploration of how the stiffness of alginate–gelatin (Alg-Gel) composite hydrogels (the widely used bioink) affects the differentiation of MSCs in the presence or absence of differentiation inducing factors. Methods: Two types of Alg-Gel composite hydrogels (Young’s modulus: 50 kPa vs. 225 kPa) were bioprinted independently of porosity. Then, stiffness-induced biases towards adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of the embedded MSCs were analysed by co-staining with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and oil red O. The expression of specific markers at the gene level was detected after a 3-day culture. Results: Confocal microscopy indicated that all tested hydrogels supported MSC growth and viability during the culture period. Higher expression of adipogenic and osteogenic markers (ALP and lipoprotein lipase (LPL)) in stiffer 3D-bioprinted matrices demonstrated a more significant response of MSCs to stiffer hydrogels with respect to differentiation, which was more robust in differentiation-inducing medium. However, the LPL expression in stiffer 3D-bioprinted constructs was reduced at day 3 regardless of the presence of differentiation-inducing factors. Although MSCs embedded in softer hydrogels to some extent proceeded toward adipogenic and osteogenic lineages within a few days, their differentiation seemed to be slower and more limited. Interestingly, the hydrogel itself (without differentiation-inducing factors) exhibited a slight effect on whether MSCs differentiated towards an adipogenic or an osteogenic fate. Considering that the mechano-regulated protein Yes-associated protein (YAP) is involved in MSC fate decisions, we further found that inhibition of YAP significantly downregulated the expression of ALP and LPL in MSCs in stiffer constructs regardless of the induced growth factors present. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that the differentiation of MSCs in 3D-bioprinted matrices is dependent on hydrogel stiffness, which emphasizes the importance of biophysical cues as a determinant of cellular behaviour.

Keywords

mesenchymal stem cells / Stiffness / Adipogenesis / Osteogenesis / Differentiation / 3D-bioprinting

References

[1] Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 32: 773-85.

[2] Sasai Y. Next-generation regenerative medicine: organogenesis from stem cells in 3D culture. Cell Stem Cell. 2013; 12: 520-30.

[3] Varkey M, Visscher DO, van Zuijlen P, Atala A, Yoo JJ. Skin bioprinting: the future of burn wound reconstruction. Burns Trauma. 2019; 7: 4.

[4] Gleadall A, Visscher D, Yang J, Thomas D, Segal J. Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance. Burns Trauma. 2018; 6: 19.

[5] Wang Y, Wang R, Yao B, Hu T, Li Z, Liu Y, et al. TNF-α suppresses sweat gland differentiation of MSCs by reducing FTO-mediated m6A-demethylation of Nanog mRNA. Sci China Life Sci. 2020; 63: 80-91.

[6] Yao B, Wang R, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Hu T, Song W, et al. Biochemical and structural cues of 3D-printed matrix synergistically direct MSC differentiation for functional sweat gland regeneration. Sci Adv. 2020; 6: eaaz1094.

[7] Jang J, Park JY, Gao G, Cho DW. Biomaterials-based 3D cell printing for next-generation therapeutics and diagnostics. Biomaterials. 2018; 156: 88-106.

[8] Li Z, Huang S, Liu Y, Yao B, Hu T, Shi H, et al. Tuning alginate-Gelatin bioink properties by varying solvent and their impact on stem cell behavior. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 8020.

[9] Wang R, Wang Y, Yao B, Hu T, Li Z, Liu Y, et al. Redirecting differentiation of mammary progenitor cells by 3D bioprinted sweat gland microenvironment. Burns Trauma. 2019; 7: 29.

[10] Cheng L, Yao B, Hu T, Cui X, Shu X, Tang S, et al. Properties of an alginate-gelatin-based bioink and its potential impact on cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019; 135: 1107-13.

[11] Liu P, Shen H, Zhi Y, Si J, Shi J, Guo L, et al. 3D bioprinting and in vitro study of bilayered membranous construct with human cells-laden alginate/gelatin composite hydrogels. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2019; 181: 1026-34.

[12] Giuseppe MD, Law N, Webb B, A Macrae R, Liew LJ, Sercombe TB, et al. Mechanical behaviour of alginate-gelatin hydrogels for 3D bioprinting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018; 79: 150-7.

[13] Ouyang L, Yao R, Zhao Y, Sun W. Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells. Biofabrication. 2016; 8: 035020.

[14] Yu H, Zhang X, Song W, Pan T, Wang H, Ning T, et al. Effects of 3-dimensional bioprinting alginate/Gelatin hydrogel scaffold extract on proliferation and differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells. J Endod. 2019; 45: 706-15.

[15] Engler AJ, Carag-Krieger C, Johnson CP, Raab M, Tang HY, Speicher DW, et al. Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating. J Cell Sci. 2008; 121: 3794-802.

[16] Vite A, Zhang C, Yi R, Emms S, Radice GL. α-Catenin-dependent cytoskeletal tension controls yap activity in the heart. Development. 2018; 145: dev149823.

[17] Chopra A, Tabdanov E, Patel H, Janmey PA, Kresh JY. Cardiac myocyte remodeling mediated by N-cadherin-dependent mechanosensing. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011; 300: H1252-66.

[18] Jacot JG, McCulloch AD, Omens JH. Substrate stiffness affects the functional maturation of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. Biophys J. 2008; 95: 3479-87.

[19] Pankova D, Jiang Y, Chatzifrangkeskou M, Vendrell I, Buzzelli J, Ryan A, et al. RASSF1A controls tissue stiffness and cancer stem-like cells in lung adenocarcinoma. EMBO J. 2019; 38: e100532.

[20] Lui C, Lee K, Nelson CM. Matrix compliance and RhoA direct the differentiation of mammary progenitor cells. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2012; 11: 1241-9.

[21] Paszek MJ, Zahir N, Johnson KR, Lakins JN, Rozenberg GI, Gefen A, et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell. 2005; 8: 241-54.

[22] Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006; 126: 677-89.

[23] Park JS, Chu JS, Tsou AD, Diop R, Tang Z, Wang A, et al. The effect of matrix stiffness on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in response to TGF-β. Biomaterials. 2011; 32: 3921-30.

[24] Huebsch N, Arany PR, Mao AS, Shvartsman D, Ali OA, Bencherif SA, et al. Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nat Mater. 2010; 9: 518-26.

[25] Steward AJ, Wagner DR, Kelly DJ. The pericellular environment regulates cytoskeletal development and the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and determines their response to hydrostatic pressure. Eur Cell Mater. 2013; 25: 167-78.

[26] Dupont S, Morsut L, Aragona M, Enzo E, Giulitti S, Cordenonsi M, et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature. 2011; 474: 179-83.

[27] Yuan H, Zhou Y, Lee MS, Zhang Y, Li WJ. A newly identified mechanism involved in regulation of human mesenchymal stem cells by fibrous substrate stiffness. Acta Biomater. 2016; 42: 247-57.

[28] Yao B, Hu T, Cui X, Song W, Fu X, Huang S. Enzymatically degradable alginate/gelatin bioink promotes cellular behavior and degradation in vitro and in vivo. Biofabrication. 2019; 11: 045020.

[29] Wei DX, Dao JW, Chen GQ. A micro-ark for cells: highly open porous Polyhydroxyalkanoate microspheres as injectable scaffolds for tissue regeneration. Adv Mater. 2018; 30: e1802273.

[30] Wu Y, Huang S, Enhe J, Ma K, Yang S, Sun T, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell attenuates skin fibrosis development in mice. Int Wound J. 2014; 11: 701-10.

[31] Kretlow JD, Jin YQ, Liu W, Zhang WJ, Hong TH, Zhou G, et al. Donor age and cell passage affects differentiation potential of murine bone marrow-derived stem cells. BMC Cell Biol. 2008; 9: 60.

[32] Ouyang L, Yao R, Mao S, Chen X, Na J, Sun W. Three-dimensional bioprinting of embryonic stem cells directs highly uniform embryoid body formation. Biofabrication. 2015; 7: 044101.

[33] Rammensee S, Kang MS, Georgiou K, Kumar S, Schaffer DV. Dynamics of Mechanosensitive neural stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells. 2017; 35: 497-506.

[34] Meng Y, Ren Z, Xu F, Zhou X, Song C, Wang VY, et al. Nicotinamide promotes cell survival and differentiation as kinase inhibitor in human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2018; 11: 1347-56.

[35] Khetan S, Guvendiren M, Legant WR, Cohen DM, Chen CS, Burdick JA. Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels. Nat Mater. 2013; 12: 458-65.

[36] Parmentier L, Riffault M, Hoey DA. Utilizing osteocyte derived factors to enhance cell viability and Osteogenic matrix deposition within IPN hydrogels. Materials (Basel). 2020; 13: 1690.

[37] Ruiz SA, Chen CS. Emergence of patterned stem cell differentiation within multicellular structures. Stem Cells. 2008; 26: 2921-7.

[38] Deng J, Zheng H, Zheng X, Yao M, Li Z, Gao C. Gold nanoparticles with surface-anchored chiral poly(acryloyl-L(D)-valine) induce differential response on mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis. Nano Research. 2016; 9: 3683-3694.

[39] Yuan L, Qi X, Qin G, Liu Q, Zhang F, Song Y, et al. Effects of gold nanostructures on differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2019; 184: 110494.

[40] Huang S, Yao B, Xie J, Fu X. 3D bioprinted extracellular matrix mimics facilitate directed differentiation of epithelial progenitors for sweat gland regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2016; 32: 170-7.

[41] Yang C, Frei H, Rossi FM, Burt HM. The differential in vitro and in vivo responses of bone marrow stromal cells on novel porous gelatin-alginate scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2009; 3: 601-14.

[42] Singh D, Tripathi A, Zo S, Singh D, Han SS. Synthesis of composite gelatin-hyaluronic acid-alginate porous scaffold and evaluation for in vitro stem cell growth and in vivo tissue integration. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2014; 116: 502-9.

[43] Olami H, Zilberman M. Microstructure and in vitro cellular response to novel soy protein-based porous structures for tissue regeneration applications. J Biomater Appl. 2016; 30: 1004-15.

[44] Cuadros TR, Erices AA, Aguilera JM. Porous matrix of calcium alginate/gelatin with enhanced properties as scaffold for cell culture. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015; 46: 331-42.

[45] Meng Z, Qiu Y, Lin KC, Kumar A, Placone JK, Fang C, et al. RAP2 mediates mechanoresponses of the hippo pathway. Nature. 2018; 560: 655-60.

[46] Gouveia RM, Vajda F, Wibowo JA, Figueiredo F, Connon CJ. YAP, 1Np63, and β-catenin Signaling pathways are involved in the modulation of corneal epithelial stem cell phenotype induced by substrate stiffness. Cells. 2019; 8: 347.

[47] Chu G, Yuan Z, Zhu C, Zhou P, Wang H, Zhang W, et al. Substrate stiffness-and topography-dependent differentiation of annulus fibrosus-derived stem cells is regulated by yes-associated protein. Acta Biomater. 2019; 92: 254-64.