Photon energy loss in ternary polymer solar cells based on nonfullerene acceptor as a third component

Abstract

Understanding photon energy loss caused by the charge recombination in ternary blend polymer solar cells based on nonfullerene acceptors (NFAs) is crucial for achieving further improvements in their device performance. In such a ternary system, however, the two types of donor/acceptor interface coexist, making it more difficult to analyze the photon energy loss. Here, we have focused on the origin of the voltage loss behind a high open-circuit voltage (V_OC) in ternary blend devices based on one donor polymer (poly(2,5-bis(3-(2-butyloctyl)thiophen-2-yl)-thiazolo [5,4-d]thiazole) [PTzBT]) and two acceptors, including a fullerene derivative ([6,6]- phenyl-C₆₁-butyric acid methyl ester [PCBM]) and an NFA ((2,2′-((2Z,2′Z)- (((4,4,9,9-tetrakis(4-hexylphenyl)-4,9-dihydro-sindaceno[1,2-b:5,6-b′]dithiophene- 2,7-diyl)bis(4-((2-ethylhexyl)oxy)thiophene-5,2-diyl))bis(methanylylidene))bis(5,6- difluoro-3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-indene-2,1-diylidene))dimalononitrile) [IEICO- 4F]), which exhibit V_OC similar to that of fullerene-based PTzBT/PCBM binary devices. From the temperature-dependent V_OC, we found that the effective interfacial bandgap is the same between them: the PTzBT/PCBM/IEICO-4F ternary blend device is the same as the PTzBT/PCBM fullerene-based binary device rather than the PTzBT/IEICO-4F nonfullerene-based binary device. This means that the recombination center of the ternary blend device is still the interface of PTzBT/ PCBM regardless of the incorporation of a small amount of NFA. On the basis of detailed balance theory, we found that the radiative and nonradiative recombination voltage losses for PTzBT/PCBM/IEICO-4F ternary devices significantly reduced compared to those of fullerene-based PTzBT/PCBM binary counterparts. This is ascribed to the disappearance of charge transfer absorption due to overlap with the absorption of NFA and the reduction of energetic disorder due to the incorporation of NFA. Through this study, the role of NFAs in voltage loss is once again emphasized, and a ternary system capable of achieving high V_OC resulting from significantly reduced voltage loss in ternary blend solar cells is proposed. Therefore, we believe that this research proposes the guidelines that can further enhance the power conversion efficiency of polymer solar cells.

Keywords

charge transfer state / ternary polymer solar cells / voltage loss

References

[1] SøndergaardR, Hösel M, AngmoD, Larsen-OlsenTT, KrebsFC. Roll-to-roll fabrication of polymer solar cells. Mater Today. 2012;15:36-49.

[2] KaltenbrunnerM, WhiteMS, GłowackiED, et al. Ultrathin and lightweight organic solar cells with high flexibility. Nat Commun. 2012;3:770.

[3] KangH, KimG, KimJ, KwonS, KimH, LeeK. Bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells: five core technologies for their commercialization. Adv Mater. 2016;28:7821-7861.

[4] KimT, KimJH, KangTE, et al. Flexible, highly efficient all-polymer solar cells. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8547.

[5] ScharberMC. On the efficiency limit of conjugated polymer:fullerene-based bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv Mater. 2016;28:1994-2001.

[6] ZhaoJ, LiY, YangG, et al. Efficient organic solar cells processed from hydrocarbon solvents. Nat Energy. 2016;1:15027.

[7] CuiY, XuY, YaoH, et al. Single-junction organic photovoltaic cell with 19%efficiency. Adv Mater. 2021;33:2102420.

[8] WeiY, ChenZ, LuG, et al. Binary organic solar cells breaking 19%via manipulating the vertical component distribution. Adv Mater. 2022;34:2204718.

[9] SunR, WuY, YangX, et al. Single-junction organic solar cells with 19.17%efficiency enabled by introducing one asymmetric guest acceptor. Adv Mater. 2022;34:2110147.

[10] JiaT, ZhangJ, ZhangK, et al. All-polymer solar cells with efficiency approaching 16%enabled using a dithieno[3′ 2′:3, 4;2″ 3″:5, 6]benzo[1, 2-c][1, 2, 5]thiadiazole (fDTBT)-based polymer donor. J Mater Chem A. 2021;9:8975-8983.

[11] GreenMA, DunlopED, YoshitaM, et al. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 62). Prog Photovolt Res Appl. 2023;31:651-663.

[12] XuC, WrightM, PingD, et al. Ternary blend organic solar cells with a non-fullerene acceptor as a third component to synergistically improve the efficiency. Org Electron. 2018;62:261-268.

[13] SongJ, LiC, ZhuL, et al. Ternary organic solar cells with efficiency >16.5%based on two compatible nonfullerene acceptors. Adv Mater. 2019;31:1905645.

[14] LiuX, YanY, YaoY, LiangZ. Ternary blend strategy for achieving high-efficiency organic solar cells with nonfullerene acceptors involved. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:1802004.

[15] WangY, QianD, CuiY, et al. Optical gaps of organic solar cells as a reference for comparing voltage losses. Adv Energy Mater. 2018;8:1801352.

[16] LiW, Hendriks KH, FurlanA, WienkMM, Janssen RAJ. High quantum efficiencies in polymer solar cells at energy losses below 0.6 eV. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:2231-2234.

[17] AnN, CaiY, WuH, et al. Solution-processed organic solar cells with high open-circuit voltage of 1.3 V and low non-radiative voltage loss of 0.16 V. Adv Mater. 2020;32:20022122.

[18] FuJ, FongPWK, LiuH, et al. 19.31%binary organic solar cell and low non-radiative recombination enabled by non-monotonic intermediate state transition. Nat Commun. 2023;14:1760.

[19] OsakaI, SaitoM, KoganezawaT, Takimiya K. Thiophene-thiazolothiazole copolymers: significant impact of side chain composition on backbone orientation and solar cell performances. Adv Mater. 2014;26:331-338.

[20] SaitoM, Koganezawa T, OsakaI. Correlation between distribution of polymer orientation and cell structure in organic photovoltaics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:32420-32425.

[21] SaitoM, Koganezawa T, OsakaI. Understanding comparable charge transport between edge-on and face-on polymers in a thiazolothiazole polymer system. ACS Appl Polym Mater. 2019;1:1257-1262.

[22] RauU, BlankB, MüllerTCM, KirchartzT. Efficiency potential of photovoltaic materials and devices unveiled by detailed-balance analysis. Phys Rev Appl. 2017;7:044016.

[23] QiB, WangJ. Fill factor in organic solar cells. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013;15:8972-8982.

[24] WehenkelDJ, KosterLJA, WienkMM, Janssen RAJ. Influence of injected charge carriers on photocurrents in polymer solar cells. Phys Rev B. 2012;85:125203.

[25] ZhongY, IzawaS, HashimotoK, Tajima K, KoganezawaT, YoshidaH. Crystallization induced energy level change of [6, 6]-phenyl-C₆1-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) film: impact of electronic polarization energy. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119:23-28.

[26] SaitoM, TamaiY, IchikawaH, Yoshida H, et al. Significantly sensitized ternary blend polymer solar cells with a small content of the narrow-band gap third component that utilize optical interference. Macromolecules. 2020;53:10623-10635.

[27] VandewalK, Tvingstedt K, GadisaA, InganäsO, MancaJV. Relating the open-circuit voltage to interface molecular properties of donor:acceptor bulk heterojunction solar cells. Phys Rev B. 2010;81:125204.

[28] GruberM, WagnerJ, KleinK, et al. Thermodynamic efficiency limit of molecular donor-acceptor solar cells and its application to diindenoperylene/C₆0-based planar heterojunction devices. Adv Energy Mater. 2012;2:1100-1108.

[29] HörmannU, KrausJ, GruberM, et al. Quantification of energy losses in organic solar cells from temperature-dependent device characteristics. Phys Rev B. 2013;88:235307.

[30] KawashimaK, TamaiY, OhkitaH, Osaka I, TakimiyaK. High-efficiency polymer solar cells with small photon energy loss. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10085.

[31] TamaiY, OhkitaH, NamatameM, et al. Light-induced degradation mechanism in poly(3-hexylthiophene)/fullerene blend solar cells. Adv Energy Mater. 2016;6:1600171.

[32] ShockleyW, Queisser HJ. Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p-n junction solar cells. J Appl Phys. 1961;32:510-519.

[33] KirchartzT, RauU, KurthM, Mattheis J, WernerJH. Comparative study of electroluminescence from Cu(In, Ga)Se2 and Si solar cells. Thin Solid Films. 2007;515:6238-6242.

[34] GreenMA. Radiative efficiency of state-of-the-art photovoltaic cells. Prog Photovolt Res Appl. 2012;20:472-476.

[35] TvingstedtK, Malinkiewicz O, BaumannA, et al. Radiative efficiency of lead iodide based perovskite solar cells. Sci Rep. 2014;4:6071.

[36] YaoJ, Kirchartz T, VezieMS, et al. Quantifying losses in open-circuit voltage in solution processable solar cells. Phys Rev Appl. 2015;4:014020.

[37] KuikM, KosterLJA, WetzelaerGAH, BlomPWM. Trap-assisted recombination in disordered organic semiconductor. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;107:256805.

[38] RanNA, LoveJA, TakacsCJ, et al. Harvesting the full potential of photons with organic solar cells. Adv Mater. 2016;28:1482-1488.

[39] KirchartzT, Pieters BE, KirkpatrickJ, RauU, NelsonJ. Recombination via tail states in polythiophene:fullerene solar cells. Phys Rev B. 2011;83:115209.

[40] KirchartzT, NelsonJ. Meaning of reaction orders in polymer:fullerene solar cells. Phys Rev B. 2012;86:165201.

[41] UrbachF. The long-wavelength edge of photographic sensitivity and of the electronic absorption of solids. Phys Rev. 1953;92:1324.

[42] GongW, FaistMA, Ekins-DaukesNJ, et al. Influence of energetic disorder on electroluminescence emission in polymer:fullerene solar cells. Phys Rev B. 2012;86:024201.

[43] GuerraJA, AnguloJR, GomezS, et al. The Urbach focus and optical properties of amorphous hydrogenated Sic thin films. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2016;49:195102.

[44] ZhangC, Mahadevan S, YuanJ, et al. Unraveling urbach tail effects in high-performance organic photovoltaics: dynamic vs static disorder. ACS Energy Lett. 2022;7:1971-1979.

[45] ChangY, ZhangX, TangY, et al. 14%-efficiency fullerene-free ternary solar cell enabled by designing a short side-chain substituted small-molecule acceptor. Nano Energy. 2019;64:103934.

[46] WangW, ZhaoB, CongZ, et al. Nonfullerene polymer solar cells based on a main-chain twisted low-bandgap acceptor with power conversion efficiency of 13.2%. ACS Energy Lett. 2018;3:1499-1507.

[47] VandewalK, Benduhn J, SchellhammerKS, et al. Absorption tails of donor:C₆0 blends provide insight into thermally activated charge-transfer processes and polaron relaxation. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:1699-1704.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors(s). Battery Energy published by Xijing University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.