Multi-omic analysis of jaw-bone periosteum identifies the role of macrophage-derived SPP1 in Ctsk+Fmod+ periosteal cells

Zumu Yi , Yeyu Liu , Jing Wang , Chen Deng , Yixin Jin , Yili Qu , Chen Hu , Yi Man

Bone Research ›› 2026, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1) : 101

PDF
Bone Research ›› 2026, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1) :101 DOI: 10.1038/s41413-026-00585-7
Article
research-article
Multi-omic analysis of jaw-bone periosteum identifies the role of macrophage-derived SPP1 in Ctsk+Fmod+ periosteal cells
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Periosteal cells (PCs) play a crucial role in bone regeneration. Currently, the spatial landscapes of jaw-bone periosteum during bone grafting remains unclear. In this study, we propose a modified guided bone regeneration (GBR) model and integrate single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and spatial transcriptomics (ST) to dissect its spatial characteristics. We identify a functional subset of Ctsk+Fmod+ PCs within the jaw-bone periosteum of rat and human. In addition, we describe a spatial niche around the bone graft substitute, characterized by massive infiltration of macrophages interacting with Ctsk+Fmod+ PCs. Notably, SPP1 secreted by macrophages attenuates the osteogenic capacity of Ctsk+Fmod+ PCs. The discovery of this Ctsk+Fmod+ subcluster, characterized by osteoprogenitor features and close interactions with macrophages, sheds light on the composition of the subperiosteal microenvironment and the heterogeneity of jaw-bone PCs.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zumu Yi, Yeyu Liu, Jing Wang, Chen Deng, Yixin Jin, Yili Qu, Chen Hu, Yi Man. Multi-omic analysis of jaw-bone periosteum identifies the role of macrophage-derived SPP1 in Ctsk+Fmod+ periosteal cells. Bone Research, 2026, 14 (1) : 101 DOI:10.1038/s41413-026-00585-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Seeman EPeriosteal bone formation-a neglected determinant of bone strength. N. Engl. J. Med., 2003, 349: 320-323.

[2]

Lin Z, Fateh A, Salem DM, Intini GPeriosteum: biology and applications in craniofacial bone regeneration. J. Dent. Res., 2014, 93: 109-116.

[3]

Deng, R. X. et al. Periosteal CD68+ F4/80+ macrophages are mechanosensitive for cortical bone formation by secretion and activation of TGF-beta 1. Adv. Sci.9, 2103343 (2022).

[4]

Chang H, Knothe Tate MLConcise review: the periosteum: tapping into a reservoir of clinically useful progenitor cells. Stem Cells Transl. Med., 2012, 1: 480-491.

[5]

Matthews, B. G. et al. Heterogeneity of murine periosteum progenitors involved in fracture healing. eLife10, e58534 (2021).

[6]

Jeffery EC, Mann TLA, Pool JA, Zhao Z, Morrison SJBone marrow and periosteal skeletal stem/progenitor cells make distinct contributions to bone maintenance and repair. Cell Stem Cell, 2022, 29: 1547-1561.e1546.

[7]

Tsukasaki M, et al.Periosteal stem cells control growth plate stem cells during postnatal skeletal growth. Nat. Commun., 2022, 134166

[8]

Chen R, et al.Sfrp4 is required to maintain Ctsk-lineage periosteal stem cell niche function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2023, 120e2312677120

[9]

Debnath S, et al.Discovery of a periosteal stem cell mediating intramembranous bone formation. Nature, 2018, 562: 133.

[10]

Ortinau LC, et al.Identification of functionally distinct Mx1+alpha SMA plus periosteal skeletal stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 2019, 25784.

[11]

Roelofs AJ, et al.Identification of the skeletal progenitor cells forming osteophytes in osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 2020, 791625-1634.

[12]

Zhu J, et al.Endochondral repair of jawbone defects using periosteal cell spheroids. J. Dent. Res., 2024, 103: 31-41.

[13]

Xu, J. J. et al. PDGFR alpha reporter activity identifies periosteal progenitor cells critical for bone formation and fracture repair. Bone Res.10, 7 (2022).

[14]

Rindone AN, et al.Quantitative 3D imaging of the cranial microvascular environment at single-cell resolution. Nat. Commun., 2021, 126219

[15]

Mo, C. Y. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of LepR-positive skeletal cells reveals heterogeneous stress-dependent stem and progenitor pools. EMBO J.41, EMBJ2021108415 (2022).

[16]

Cao Y, et al.Characterization of adult human skeletal cells in different tissues reveals a CD90+ CD34+ periosteal stem/progenitor population. Bone, 2024, 178116926

[17]

Ding, Y., Mo, C., Geng, J., Li, J. & Sun, Y. Identification of periosteal osteogenic progenitors in jawbone. J. Dental Res.101, 1101–1109 (2022).

[18]

Hsiao HY, Yang CY, Liu JW, Brey EM, Cheng MHPeriosteal osteogenic capacity depends on tissue source. Tissue Eng. Part A, 2018, 24: 1733-1741.

[19]

He, F., Umrath, F., von Ohle, C., Reinert, S. & Alexander, D. Analysis of the influence of jaw periosteal cells on macrophages phenotype using an innovative horizontal coculture system. Biomedicines9, 1753 (2021).

[20]

Xu Y, et al.Site-specific periosteal cells with distinct osteogenic and angiogenic characteristics. Clin. Oral. Investig., 2023, 27: 7437-7450.

[21]

Marcucio RS, Miclau T3rdBahney CSA shifting paradigm: transformation of cartilage to bone during bone repair. J. Dent. Res., 2023, 102: 13-20.

[22]

Gao B, et al.Macrophage-lineage TRAP+ cells recruit periosteum-derived cells for periosteal osteogenesis and regeneration. J. Clin. Investig., 2019, 129: 2578-2594.

[23]

Coulis G, et al.Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics identify a macrophage population associated with skeletal muscle fibrosis. Sci. Adv., 2023, 9eadd9984

[24]

Morse, C. et al. Proliferating SPP1/MERTK-expressing macrophages in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J.54, 1802441 (2019).

[25]

Fabre T, et al.Identification of a broadly fibrogenic macrophage subset induced by type 3 inflammation. Sci. Immunol., 2023, 8eadd8945

[26]

Hulsmans M, et al.Recruited macrophages elicit atrial fibrillation. Science, 2023, 381: 231-239.

[27]

Nakamura K, et al.The periosteum provides a stromal defence against cancer invasion into the bone. Nature, 2024, 634: 474-481.

[28]

Liu R, et al.Mechanosensitive protein polycystin-1 promotes periosteal stem/progenitor cells osteochondral differentiation in fracture healing. Theranostics, 2024, 14: 2544-2559.

[29]

Moses L, Pachter LMuseum of spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Methods, 2022, 19: 534-546.

[30]

Trombelli L, Pramstraller M, Severi M, Simonelli A, Farina RPeri-implant tissue conditions at implants treated with sub-periosteal peri-implant augmented layer technique: a retrospective case series. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 2020, 31: 992-1001.

[31]

Severi M, et al.Effect of lateral bone augmentation procedures in correcting peri-implant bone dehiscence and fenestration defects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res., 2022, 24: 251-264.

[32]

Deng C, Yi Z, Xiong C, Man Y, Qu YUsing the intact periosteum for horizontal bone augmentation of peri-implant defects: a retrospective cohort study. Br. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg., 2022, 60: 1325-1331.

[33]

Liu Y, Lan D, Gao J, Deng C, Man YGuided bone regeneration for peri-implant augmentation: a retrospective study comparing two surgical techniques with a mean follow-up of 26 months. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 2024, 35: 573-584.

[34]

Mouraret S, et al.The potential for vertical bone regeneration via maxillary periosteal elevation. J. Clin. Periodontol., 2014, 41: 1170-1177.

[35]

Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija RIntegrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat. Biotechnol., 2018, 36: 411-420.

[36]

Colnot CSkeletal cell fate decisions within periosteum and bone marrow during bone regeneration. J. Bone Miner. Res., 2009, 24: 274-282.

[37]

Perrin, S. et al. Single-nucleus transcriptomics reveal the differentiation trajectories of periosteal skeletal/stem progenitor cells in bone regeneration. eLife13, RP92519 (2024).

[38]

Dondossola, E. & Friedl, P. Host responses to implants revealed by intravital microscopy. Nat. Rev. Mater.7, 6–22 (2022).

[39]

Padmanabhan, J. et al. Allometrically scaling tissue forces drive pathological foreign-body responses to implants via Rac2-activated myeloid cells. Nat. Biomed. Eng.7, 1419–1436 (2023).

[40]

Halasi, M. et al. Melanocyte-secreted fibromodulin constrains skin inflammation in mice injected with lupus serum. ClinImmunol.241, 109055 (2022).

[41]

Reeves, J. et al. Rejuvenating aged osteoprogenitors for bone repair. eLife13, RP104068 (2024).

[42]

Jeong, Y. et al. Identification of LRP1+CD13+ human periosteal stem cells that require LRP1 for bone repair. JCI Insight9, e173831 (2024).

[43]

Li Y, et al.EGR1 promotes craniofacial bone regeneration via activation of ALPL⁺PDGFD⁺ periosteal stem cells. Adv. Sci., 2025, 12e10243

[44]

Qiu X, et al.Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories. Nat. Methods, 2017, 14: 979-982.

[45]

Vi L, et al.Macrophage cells secrete factors including LRP1 that orchestrate the rejuvenation of bone repair in mice. Nat. Commun., 2018, 95191

[46]

Hu, C. et al. Dissecting the microenvironment around biosynthetic scaffolds in murine skin wound healing. Sci. Adv.7, eabf0787 (2021).

[47]

Qi J, et al.Single-cell and spatial analysis reveal interaction of FAP+ fibroblasts and SPP1(+) macrophages in colorectal cancer. Nat. Commun., 2022, 131742

[48]

Yang Y, et al.Tracing immune cells around biomaterials with spatial anchors during large-scale wound regeneration. Nat. Commun., 2023, 145995

[49]

Hou, J. et al. TREM2 sustains macrophage-hepatocyte metabolic coordination in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and sepsis. J. Clin. Invest.131, e135197 (2021).

[50]

Ramachandran P, et al.Resolving the fibrotic niche of human liver cirrhosis at single-cell level. Nature, 2019, 575: 512-518.

[51]

Cable DM, et al.Robust decomposition of cell type mixtures in spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Biotechnol., 2022, 40: 517-526.

[52]

Rajachandran S, et al.Dissecting the spermatogonial stem cell niche using spatial transcriptomics. Cell Rep., 2023, 42112737

[53]

Moncada R, et al.Integrating microarray-based spatial transcriptomics and single-cell RNA-seq reveals tissue architecture in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Nat. Biotechnol., 2020, 38: 333-342.

[54]

Konieczny P, et al.Interleukin-17 governs hypoxic adaptation of injured epithelium. Science, 2022, 377eabg9302

[55]

Castillo RL, et al.Spatial transcriptomics stratifies psoriatic disease severity by emergent cellular ecosystems. Sci. Immunol., 2023, 8eabq7991

[56]

Ji AL, et al.Multimodal analysis of composition and spatial architecture in human squamous cell carcinoma. Cell, 2020, 182: 497-514.e422.

[57]

Elosua-Bayes M, Nieto P, Mereu E, Gut I, Heyn HSPOTlight: seeded NMF regression to deconvolute spatial transcriptomics spots with single-cell transcriptomes. Nucleic Acids Res., 2021, 49: e50.

[58]

Tanevski J, Flores ROR, Gabor A, Schapiro D, Saez-Rodriguez JExplainable multiview framework for dissecting spatial relationships from highly multiplexed data. Genome Biol., 2022, 2397

[59]

Almet AA, Cang Z, Jin S, Nie QThe landscape of cell-cell communication through single-cell transcriptomics. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol., 2021, 2612-23.

[60]

Jin S, et al.Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat. Nat. Commun., 2021, 121088

[61]

Cang Z, et al.Screening cell-cell communication in spatial transcriptomics via collective optimal transport. Nat. Methods, 2023, 20: 218-228.

[62]

Rosin JM, Sinha S, Biernaskie J, Kurrasch DMA subpopulation of embryonic microglia respond to maternal stress and influence nearby neural progenitors. Dev. Cell, 2021, 56: 1326-1345.e1326.

[63]

Xiong X, et al.Cannabis suppresses antitumor immunity by inhibiting JAK/STAT signaling in T cells through CNR2. Signal Transduct. Target Ther., 2022, 7: 99.

[64]

Eun JW, et al.Cancer-associated fibroblast-derived secreted phosphoprotein 1 contributes to resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma to sorafenib and lenvatinib. Cancer Commun., 2023, 43455-479.

[65]

Yang W, et al.Succinic acid-induced macrophage endocytosis promotes extracellular vesicle-based integrin Beta1 transfer accelerating fibroblast activation and sepsis-associated pulmonary fibrosis. Adv. Sci., 2025, 12e07411

[66]

Duchamp de Lageneste O, et al.Periosteum contains skeletal stem cells with high bone regenerative potential controlled by Periostin. Nat. Commun., 2018, 9773

[67]

Kalamajski S, Oldberg ÅFibromodulin binds collagen type I via Glu-353 and Lys-355 in leucine-rich repeat 11. J. Biol. Chem., 2007, 282: 26740-26745.

[68]

Li CJ, et al.Long noncoding RNA Bmncr regulates mesenchymal stem cell fate during skeletal aging. J. Clin. Invest., 2018, 128: 5251-5266.

[69]

Qian H, Xiao Y, Bartold PMImmunohistochemical localization and expression of fibromodulin in adult rat periodontium and inflamed human gingiva. Oral. Dis., 2004, 10: 233-239.

[70]

Matsushita Y, et al.The fate of early perichondrial cells in developing bones. Nat. Commun., 2022, 137319

[71]

Kim YS, et al.Different molecular features of epithelioid and giant cells in foreign body reaction identified by single-cell RNA sequencing. J. Invest. Dermatol., 2022, 142: 3232-3242.e3216.

[72]

Wang KX, Denhardt DTOsteopontin: role in immune regulation and stress responses. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev., 2008, 19: 333-345.

[73]

Nilsson SK, et al.Osteopontin, a key component of the hematopoietic stem cell niche and regulator of primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood, 2005, 106: 1232-1239.

[74]

Guidi N, et al.Osteopontin attenuates aging-associated phenotypes of hematopoietic stem cells. EMBO J., 2017, 36: 840-853.

[75]

Coombes JD, et al.Osteopontin neutralisation abrogates the liver progenitor cell response and fibrogenesis in mice. Gut, 2015, 64: 1120-1131.

[76]

Yue B, et al.SPP1 induces idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and NSCLC progression via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Respir. Res., 2024, 25362

[77]

Qin W, Cao L, Massey IYRole of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in cardiac fibrosis. Mol. Cell. Biochem., 2021, 476: 4045-4059.

[78]

Li X, et al.Duvelisib attenuates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis via inhibiting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signalling pathway. J. Cell. Mol. Med., 2023, 27: 422-434.

[79]

Tanaka Y, et al.Suppression of AKT-mTOR signal pathway enhances osteogenic/dentinogenic capacity of stem cells from apical papilla. Stem cell Res. Ther., 2018, 9: 334.

[80]

Lou F, et al.Activation of autophagy mediated by PI3K/Akt/mTOR signalling cascade alleviates impaired adipose-derived stem cell osteogenesis in a diabetic microenvironment. Br. J. Pharmacol., 2025, 1823522-3538.

[81]

Pantovic A, et al.Coordinated time-dependent modulation of AMPK/Akt/mTOR signaling and autophagy controls osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Bone, 2013, 52: 524-531.

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant 82271015

the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant 82201106; Research Funding from West China School/Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University (No. RCDWJS2023-8).

Rights & permissions

The Author(s)

PDF

1

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉