Bone adhesive with temporally-synchronized degradation for enhanced osteointegration

Abstract

Bone adhesives have emerged as promising alternatives for complex fracture fixation. However, discrepancies between material degradation rates and the physiological timeline of bone healing remain a critical limitation. Here, a polyurethane-based adhesive (TNC) was developed, synthesized from trimeric hexamethylene diisocyanate, nano-hydroxyapatite, and type I collagen. The TNC demonstrates strong initial adhesion to both wet and blood-contaminated bone surfaces and exhibits excellent biocompatibility. A distinguishing feature of TNC is its capacity to synchronize degradation with the stages of bone healing. During degradation, TNC forms a mineralized surface layer that releases calcium ions. The calcium ions activate cathepsin K, an enzyme integral to bone remodeling. This calcium-mediated mechanism accelerates TNC degradation by 1.9-fold during the remodeling phase compared to the initial phase. In a rat skull fracture model, TNC supported effective fracture stabilization and achieved favorable bone regeneration at 8 weeks after implantation. These findings demonstrate that TNC combines early mechanical stability with phase-specific degradability to facilitate bone regeneration in a temporally-controlled manner. The present work provides a framework for the development of bio-responsive bone adhesives that synchronize degradation behavior with healing phases for orthopedic applications.

References

[1] Donkerwolcke M, Burny F, Muster D. Tissues and bone adhesives-historical aspects. Biomaterials, 1998, 19: 1461-1466

[2] Fedak PW, et al. . Kryptonite bone cement prevents pathologic sternal displacement. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 2010, 90: 979-985

[3] Bingol HB, Bender JCME, Opsteen JA, Leeuwenburgh SCG. Bone adhesive materials: from bench to bedside. Mater. Today Bio., 2023, 19: 100599

[4] Liu C, et al. . Design and improvement of bone adhesive in response to clinical needs. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 2024, 13: 2401687

[5] Yu L, et al. . Sequential-crosslinking fibrin glue for rapid and reinforced hemostasis. Adv. Sci., 2024, 11: 2308171

[6] Kwant AN, et al. . Sticky science: using complex coacervate adhesives for biomedical applications. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 2024, 14: 2402340

[7] Bai S, et al. . Bioinspired mineral–organic bone adhesives for stable fracture fixation and accelerated bone regeneration. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2020, 30: 1-12

[8] Shokri M, et al. . Strong and bioactive bioinspired biomaterials, next generation of bone adhesives. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2022, 305: 102706

[9] He G, et al. . An injectable and coagulation-independent tetra-peg hydrogel bioadhesive for post-extraction hemostasis and alveolar bone regeneration. Bioact. Mater., 2024, 37: 106-118

[10] Yang R, et al. . Degradable nanohydroxyapatite-reinforced superglue for rapid bone fixation and promoted osteogenesis. ACS Nano, 2024, 18: 8517-8530

[11] Lv X, Gao F, Cao X. Skeletal interoception in bone homeostasis and pain. Cell metab., 2022, 34: 1914-1931

[12] Deng R, et al. . Periosteal CD68⁺ F4/80⁺ macrophages are mechanosensitive for cortical bone formation by secretion and activation of TGF-β1. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.)., 2022, 9e2103343

[13] Koo S, et al. . Real-time live imaging of osteoclast activation via cathepsin K activity in bone diseases. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2023, 63: 202318459

[14] Aguda AH, et al. . Structural basis of collagen fiber degradation by cathepsin K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2014, 111: 17474-17479

[15] Xu L, et al. . Bioactive pore-forming bone adhesives facilitating cell ingrowth for fracture healing. Adv. Mat., 2020, 32: 1-7

[16] Li Z, et al. . The crystal and molecular structures of a cathepsin K: chondroitin sulfate complex. J. Mol. Biol., 2008, 383: 78-91

[17] Zhao X, et al. . Bioactive strong biodegradable bone cement for rapid osteointegration and osteogenesis. Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 474: 145609

[18] Wendels S, Avérous L. Biobased polyurethanes for biomedical applications. Bioact. Mater., 2021, 6: 1083-1106

[19] Kamińska K, et al. . The effect of a chemical foaming agent and the isocyanate index on the properties of open-cell polyurethane foams. Materials, 2022, 15: 6087

[20] Hernandez JL, Woodrow KA. Medical applications of porous biomaterials: features of porosity and tissue-specific implications for biocompatibility. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 2023, 11: 1-50

[21] Sultan S, et al. . The design of 3D-printed polylactic acid-bioglass composite scaffold: a potential implant material for bone tissue engineering. Molecules, 2022, 27: 7214

[22] Musthaq MA, Dhakal HN, Zhang Z, Barouni A, Zahari R. The effect of various environmental conditions on the impact damage behaviour of natural-fibre-reinforced composites (NFRCs)-a critical review. Polymers, 2023, 15: 1229

[23] Huang X, et al. . Biomaterial scaffolds in maxillofacial bone tissue engineering: a review of recent advances. Bioact. Mater., 2024, 33: 129-156

[24] Wei X, et al. . Magnesium surface-activated 3D printed porous PEEK scaffolds for in vivo osseointegration by promoting angiogenesis and osteogenesis. Bioact. Mater., 2023, 20: 16-28

[25] Ma Y, et al. . Recent advances in macroporous hydrogels for cell behavior and tissue engineering. Gels, 2022, 8: 606

[26] Hu S, et al. . A mechanically reinforced super bone glue makes a leap in hard tissue strong adhesion and augmented bone regeneration. Adv. Sci., 2023, 10: 2206450

[27] Yu F, et al. . A novel dentin bonding scheme based on extrafibrillar demineralization combined with covalent adhesion using a dry-bonding technique. Bioact. Mater., 2021, 6: 3557-3567

[28] Moazami S, Kharaziha M, Emadi R, Dinari M. Multifunctional bioinspired bredigite-modified adhesive for bone fracture healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2023, 15: 6499-6513

[29] Yang ZY, et al. . Evaluation of a novel primer containing isocyanate group on dentin bonding durability. Dent. Mater., 2023, 39: 455-462

[30] Candan M, Altinay Karaca FK, Öznurhan F. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of immediate and delayed restorations of various calcium silicate-based materials with fiber-reinforced composite resin materials. Polymers, 2023, 15: 3971

[31] Tsuji Y. Molecular understanding of the distinction between adhesive failure and cohesive failure in adhesive bonds with epoxy resin adhesives. Langmuir, 2024, 40: 7479-7491

[32] Li C, et al. . A strain-reinforcing elastomer adhesive with superior adhesive strength and toughness. Mater. horiz., 2023, 10: 4183-4191

[33] Su Y, et al. . Improved mechanical, degradation, and biological performances of Zn–Fe alloys as bioresorbable implants. Bioact. Mater., 2021, 17: 334-343

[34] Sun K, et al. . Osteogenesis and angiogenesis of a bulk metallic glass for biomedical implants. Bioact. Mater., 2021, 8: 253-266

[35] Yuan M, et al. . GelMA/PEGDA microneedles patch loaded with HUVECs-derived exosomes and tazarotene promote diabetic wound healing. J. Nanobiotechnol., 2022, 20 147

[36] Zhang M, et al. . Functional Macromolecular Adhesives for Bone Fracture Healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2022, 14: 1-19

[37] He Y, et al. . Fabrication of A bio-instructive scaffold conferred with A favorable microenvironment allowing for superior implant osseointegration and accelerated in situ vascularized bone regeneration via type H vessel formation. Bioact. Mater., 2021, 9: 491-507

[38] Gu JT, et al. . Polyphosphate-crosslinked collagen scaffolds for hemostasis and alveolar bone regeneration after tooth extraction. Bioact. Mater., 2021, 15: 68-81

[39] Wei S, Ma JX, Xu L, Gu XS, Ma XL. Biodegradable materials for bone defect repair. Mil. Med. Res., 2020, 7: 54

[40] de la Vega RE, et al. . Efficient healing of large osseous segmental defects using optimized chemically modified messenger RNA encoding BMP-2. Sci. Adv., 2022, 8 eabl6242

[41] Siddiqui JA, et al. . GDF15 promotes prostate cancer bone metastasis and colonization through osteoblastic CCL2 and RANKL activation. Bone Res, 2022, 10: 6

[42] Cherney MM, et al. . Structure-activity analysis of cathepsin K/Chondroitin 4-sulfate interactions. J. Biol. Chem., 2011, 286: 8988-8998

[43] Zhang X, et al. . Msx1+ stem cells recruited by bioactive tissue engineering graft for bone regeneration. Nat. Commun., 2022, 13 5211

[44] Bao F, et al. . Free or fixed State of Nhap differentially regulates HBMSC morphology and osteogenesis through the valve role of ITGA7. Bioact. Mater., 2022, 18: 539

[45] Zhu L, Luo D, Liu Y. Effect of the nano/microscale structure of biomaterial scaffolds on bone regeneration. Int. J. Oral. Sci., 2020, 12: 1-15

[46] Xing Z, et al. . Altered surface hydrophilicity on copolymer scaffolds stimulate the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Polymers (Basel), 2022, 12: 539-551

[47] Li L, et al. . Bioactive Zn-V-Si-Ca glass nanoparticle hydrogel microneedles with antimicrobial and antioxidant properties for bone regeneration in diabetic periodontitis. ACS Nano, 2025, 19: 7981-7995

[48] Wang Y, et al. . Biodegradable and electroactive cryogel microspheres for neurovascularized bone regeneration. Matter, 2025, 8: 102366

[49] Okesola BO, et al. . Growth-factor free multicomponent nanocomposite hydrogels that stimulate bone formation. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2020, 30: 1906205

[50] Moon DO. Review of cathepsin k inhibitor development and the potential role of phytochemicals. Molecules, 2024, 30: 91

[51] Lindström E, et al. . Nonclinical and clinical pharmacological characterization of the potent and selective cathepsin K inhibitor MIV-711. J. Transl. Med., 2018, 16: 1-14

[52] Dang GP, et al. . Multifunctional polyurethane materials in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. Cell Rep. Phy. Sci., 2024, 5: 102053

[53] Shokri M, et al. . Engineering wet-resistant and osteogenic nanocomposite adhesive to control bleeding and infection after median sternotomy. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 2024, 13: 1-20

[54] Cai Y, et al. . A room temperature self-healing and thermally reprocessable cross-linked elastomer with unprecedented mechanical properties for ablation-resistant applications. Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 436: 135156

[55] Zou F, et al. . A novel bioactive polyurethane with controlled degradation and L-Arg release used as strong adhesive tissue patch for hemostasis and promoting wound healing. Bioact. Mater., 2022, 17: 471-487

[56] Guo X, et al. . Bioinspired injectable polyurethane underwater adhesive with fast bonding and hemostatic properties. Adv. Sci., 2024, 11: 2308538

[57] Lei K, Zhu Q, Wang X, Xiao H, Zheng Z. In vitro and in vivo characterization of a foam-like polyurethane bone adhesive for promoting bone tissue growth. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 2019, 5: 5489-5497

[58] Yu J, et al. . Robust hydrogel adhesives for emergency rescue and gastric perforation repair. Bioact. Mater., 2022, 19: 703-716

[59] Chen X, Zhu M, Tang Y, Xie H, Fan X. Methine initiated polypropylene-based disposable face masks aging validated by micromechanical properties loss of atomic force microscopy. J. Hazard. Mater., 2022, 441: 129831

[60] Yao Y, et al. . Crystallinity and dissolution-recrystallization mechanism controlled As(V) retention by calcium phosphate. J. Hazard. Mater., 2025, 481: 136517

[61] Kang JY, Kang N, Yang YM, Hong JH, Shin DM. The Role of Ca²⁺-NFATc1 Signaling and Its Modulation on Osteoclastogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2020, 21: 3646

[62] Bian Q, et al. . Mechanosignaling activation of TGFβ maintains intervertebral disc homeostasis. Bone Res., 2017, 5: 17008

[63] Feng P, et al. . Shape/properties collaborative intelligent manufacturing of artificial bone scaffold: structural design and additive manufacturing process. Biofabrication, 2024, 17: 12005

[64] Yang F, et al. . Composition and layered co-continuous structure co-regulate shape memory properties. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2025, 15: 110187

[65] Xu R, et al. . Enhancing bioactivity and stability of polymer-based material-tissue interface through coupling multiscale interfacial interactions with atomic-thin TiO₂ nanosheets. Nano Res., 2023, 16: 5247-5255

[66] Muñoz-Torres M, et al. . Serum cathepsin K as a marker of bone metabolism in postmenopausal women treated with alendronate. Maturitas, 2009, 64: 188-192

[67] Cupp-Enyard C, Aldrich S. Sigma’s non-specific protease activity assay-Casein as a substrate. J. Vis. Exp., 2008, 17: 899

[68] Guo Y, et al. . Remote-controllable bone-targeted delivery of estradiol for the treatment of ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in rats. J. Nanobiotechnol., 2021, 19 248

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)(82325012)

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(GZC20233582)

Young Elite Scientist Support Program by CSA (2024PYRC001), Young Talent Support Program of Shaanxi Province (20240304)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)