Recent advances in smart stimuli-responsive biomaterials for bone therapeutics and regeneration

Abstract

Bone defects combined with tumors, infections, or other bone diseases are challenging in clinical practice. Autologous and allogeneic grafts are two main traditional remedies, but they can cause a series of complications. To address this problem, researchers have constructed various implantable biomaterials. However, the original pathological microenvironment of bone defects, such as residual tumors, severe infection, or other bone diseases, could further affect bone regeneration. Thus, the rational design of versatile biomaterials with integrated bone therapy and regeneration functions is in great demand. Many strategies have been applied to fabricate smart stimuli-responsive materials for bone therapy and regeneration, with stimuli related to external physical triggers or endogenous disease microenvironments or involving multiple integrated strategies. Typical external physical triggers include light irradiation, electric and magnetic fields, ultrasound, and mechanical stimuli. These stimuli can transform the internal atomic packing arrangements of materials and affect cell fate, thus enhancing bone tissue therapy and regeneration. In addition to the external stimuli-responsive strategy, some specific pathological microenvironments, such as excess reactive oxygen species and mild acidity in tumors, specific pH reduction and enzymes secreted by bacteria in severe infection, and electronegative potential in bone defect sites, could be used as biochemical triggers to activate bone disease therapy and bone regeneration. Herein, we summarize and discuss the rational construction of versatile biomaterials with bone therapeutic and regenerative functions. The specific mechanisms, clinical applications, and existing limitations of the newly designed biomaterials are also clarified.

References

[1] Zhang Y et al. Advancements in hydrogel-based drug sustained release systems for bone tissue engineering. Front. Pharmacol., 2020, 11: 622

[2] Wang P et al. Bone tissue engineering via nanostructured calcium phosphate biomaterials and stem cells. Bone Res., 2014, 2: 14017

[3] Zhang K et al. Advanced smart biomaterials and constructs for hard tissue engineering and regeneration. Bone Res., 2018, 6: 31

[4] Dang M, Saunders L, Niu X, Fan Y, Ma PX. Biomimetic delivery of signals for bone tissue engineering. Bone Res., 2018, 6: 25

[5] Sun W et al. Injectable nano-structured silicon-containing hydroxyapatite microspheres with enhanced osteogenic differentiation and angiogenic factor expression. Ceram. Int., 2018, 44: 20457-20464

[6] Shang F et al. Advancing application of mesenchymal stem cell-based bone tissue regeneration. Bioact. Mater., 2021, 6: 666-683

[7] Turnbull G et al. 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bioact. Mater., 2018, 3: 278-314

[8] Leppik L et al. Combining electrical stimulation and tissue engineering to treat large bone defects in a rat model. Sci. Rep., 2018, 8

[9] Mallick S et al. Strategies towards orthopaedic tissue engineered graft generation: current scenario and application. Biotechnol. Bioproc. E., 2019, 24: 854-869

[10] Eivazzadeh‐Keihan R et al. Metal‐based nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. M., 2020, 14: 1687-1714

[11] Nikolova MP, Chavali MS. Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: a review. Bioact. Mater., 2019, 4: 271-292

[12] Islam MM, Shahruzzaman M, Biswas S, Nurus Sakib M, Rashid TU. Chitosan based bioactive materials in tissue engineering applications–a review. Bioact. Mater., 2020, 5: 164-183

[13] Wang C et al. 3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Bioact. Mater., 2020, 5: 82-91

[14] Sadowska JM, Ginebra MP. Inflammation and biomaterials: role of the immune response in bone regeneration by synthetic bone grafts. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2020, 8: 9404-9427

[15] Lin K et al. Enhanced osteoporotic bone regeneration by strontium-substituted calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials, 2013, 34: 10028-10042

[16] Wang C et al. Strontium released bi-lineage scaffolds with immunomodulatory properties induce a pro-regenerative environment for osteochondral regeneration. Mat. Sci. Eng. C., 2019, 103: 109833

[17] Marsh AC et al. Fabrication and multiscale characterization of 3D silver containing bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds. Bioact. Mater., 2019, 4: 215-223

[18] Yi H, Ur Rehman F, Zhao C, Liu B, He N. Recent advances in nano scaffolds for bone repair. Bone Res., 2016, 4: 16050

[19] Xuzhu W et al. Near-infrared light-triggered drug delivery system based on black phosphorus for invivo bone regeneration. Biomaterials, 2018, 179: 164-174

[20] Jiang W et al. Bioinspired tissue-compliant hydrogels with multifunctions for synergistic surgery–photothermal therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2020, 8: 10117-10125

[21] Liu Y, Yu Q, Chang J, Wu C. Nanobiomaterials: from 0D to 3D for tumor therapy and tissue regeneration. Nanoscale, 2019, 11: 13678-13708

[22] Chen B et al. Advanced theragenerative biomaterials with therapeutic and regeneration multifunctionality. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2020, 30: 2002621

[23] Chen J et al. Palladium nanocrystals-engineered metal–organic frameworks for enhanced tumor inhibition by synergistic hydrogen/photodynamic therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31: 2006853

[24] Dong S, Chen Y, Yu L, Lin K, Wang X. Magnetic hyperthermia–synergistic H₂O₂ self-sufficient catalytic suppression of osteosarcoma with enhanced bone-regeneration bioactivity by 3D-printing composite scaffolds. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2020, 30: 1907071

[25] Jin X et al. Self-adaptive antibacterial porous implants with sustainable responses for infected bone defect therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2019, 29: 1807915

[26] Deng Y, Shi X, Chen Y, Yang W, Chen ZG. Bacteria-triggered pH-responsive osteopotentiating coating on 3D-printed polyetheretherketone scaffolds for infective bone defect repair. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2020, 59: 12123-12135

[27] Pourhajibagher M, Rokn AR, Barikani HR, Bahador A. Photo-sonodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy via chitosan nanoparticles-indocyanine green against polymicrobial periopathogenic biofilms: ex vivo study on dental implants. Photodiagn. Photodyn., 2020, 31: 101834

[28] Liu Y et al. Built‐in electric fields dramatically induce enhancement of osseointegration. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2017, 27: 173771

[29] Lui YS, Sow WT, Tan LP, Wu Y, Li H. 4D printing and stimuli-responsive materials in biomedical aspects. Acta Biomater., 2019, 92: 19-36

[30] Du Y, Guo JL, Wang J, Mikos AG, Zhang S. Hierarchically designed bone scaffolds: from internal cues to external stimuli. Biomaterials, 2019, 218: 119334

[31] Su K, Tan L, Liu X, Cui Z, Wu S. Rapid photo-sonotherapy for clinical treatment of bacterial infected bone implants by creating oxygen deficiency using sulfur doping. ACS Nano, 2020, 14: 2077-2089

[32] Jain AK, Jain S. Instrumented stabilization in spinal tuberculosis. Int. Orthop., 2012, 36: 285-292

[33] Hu J, Zhang G, Liu S. Enzyme-responsive polymeric assemblies, nanoparticles and hydrogels. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41: 5933

[34] Chen J et al. Biodegradable hollow mesoporous organosilica-based nanosystems with dual stimuli-responsive drug delivery for efficient tumor inhibition by synergistic chemo- and photothermal therapy. Appl. Mater. Today, 2020, 19: 100655

[35] Safari J, Zarnegar Z. Advanced drug delivery systems: nanotechnology of health design—a review. J. Saudi Chem. Soc., 2014, 18: 85-99

[36] Zeng Y, Hoque J, Varghese S. Biomaterial-assisted local and systemic delivery of bioactive agents for bone repair. Acta Biomater., 2019, 93: 152-168

[37] Montoya C et al. On the road to smart biomaterials for bone research: definitions, concepts, advances, and outlook. Bone Res., 2021, 9: 12

[38] Kumar S et al. Nanotechnology-based biomaterials for orthopaedic applications: recent advances and future prospects. Mat. Sci. Eng. C., 2020, 106: 110154

[39] Fu Q et al. Stimuli-responsive plasmonic assemblies and their biomedical applications. Nano Today, 2021, 36: 101014

[40] Jin A, Wang Y, Lin K, Jiang L. Nanoparticles modified by polydopamine: working as “drug” carriers. Bioact. Mater., 2020, 5: 522-541

[41] Dong S, Wang X, Shen G, Wang X, Kai L. Research progress on functional modifications and applications of bioceramic scaffolds. J. Inorg. Mater., 2020, 35: 867-881

[42] Zhang H, Fan T, Chen W, Li Y, Wang B. Recent advances of two-dimensional materials in smart drug delivery nano-systems. Bioact. Mater., 2020, 5: 1071-1086

[43] Escudero JSB, Perez MGB, Rosso MPDO, Buchaim DV, Buchaim RL. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) in bone repair: a systematic review. Injury, 2019, 50: 1853-1867

[44] Liao J, Han R, Wu Y, Qian Z. Review of a new bone tumor therapy strategy based on bifunctional biomaterials. Bone Res., 2021, 9: 18

[45] Dang W et al. LaB6 surface chemistry-reinforced scaffolds for treating bone tumors and bone defects. Appl. Mater. Today, 2019, 16: 42-55

[46] Shen A et al. Adhesive graphene grown on bioceramics with photothermal property. Mater. Today Chem., 2020, 17: 100322

[47] Yang B et al. 2D-black-phosphorus-reinforced 3D-printed scaffolds: a stepwise countermeasure for osteosarcoma. Adv. Mater., 2018, 30: 1705611

[48] Zhao PP et al. Ordered arrangement of hydrated GdPO₄ nanorods in magnetic chitosan matrix promotes tumor photothermal therapy and bone regeneration against breast cancer bone metastases. Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 381: 122694

[49] Dong S et al. A novel multifunctional carbon aerogel-coated platform for osteosarcoma therapy and enhanced bone regeneration. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2020, 8: 368-379

[50] Zhao C, Shen A, Zhang L, Lin K, Wang X. Borocarbonitrides nanosheets engineered 3D-printed scaffolds for integrated strategy of osteosarcoma therapy and bone regeneration. Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 401: 125989

[51] An D et al. Progress in the therapeutic applications of polymer-decorated black phosphorus and black phosphorus analog nanomaterials in biomedicine. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2020, 8: 7076-7120

[52] Lin C, Hao H, Mei L, Wu M. Metal-free two-dimensional nanomaterial-mediated photothermal tumor therapy. Smart Mater. Med., 2020, 1: 150-167

[53] Fu S, Hu H, Chen J, Zhu Y, Zhao S. Silicone resin derived larnite/C scaffolds via 3D printing for potential tumor therapy and bone regeneration. Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 382: 122928

[54] Tonga L, Liaoa Q, Zhaoa Y, Huanga H, Gaoa A. Near-infrared light control of bone regeneration with biodegradable photothermal osteoimplant. Biomaterials, 2019, 193: 1-11

[55] Ma L et al. A novel photothermally controlled multifunctional scaffold for clinical treatment of osteosarcoma and tissue regeneration. Mater. Today, 2020, 36: 48-62

[56] Zeng J et al. A novel biocompatible PDA/IR820/DAP coating for antibiotic/photodynamic/photothermal triple therapy to inhibit and eliminate Staphylococcus aureus biofilm. Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 394: 125017

[57] Cao Z et al. Effect of nanoheat stimulation mediated by magnetic nanocomposite hydrogel on the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Sci. China Life Sci., 2018, 61: 448-456

[58] Zhu Y et al. Magnetic mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds: preparation, physicochemistry and biological properties. J. Mater. Chem. B., 2013, 1: 1279-1288

[59] Zhang J et al. 3D-printed magnetic Fe₃O₄/MBG/PCL composite scaffolds with multifunctionality of bone regeneration, local anticancer drug delivery and hyperthermia. J. Mater. Chem. B., 2014, 2: 7583-7595

[60] Wu C et al. Multifunctional magnetic mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds with a hierarchical pore structure. Acta Biomat., 2011, 7: 3563-3572

[61] Yan F et al. Biphasic injectable bone cement with Fe₃O₄/GO nanocomposites for the minimally invasive treatment of tumor-induced bone destruction. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 2019, 5: 5833-5843

[62] Sun D, Zhang Z, Chen M, Zhang Y, Chen M. Co-immobilization of Ce6 sono/photosensitizer and protonated graphitic-carbon nitride on PCL/gelation fibrous scaffolds for combined sono-photodynamic cancer therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter., 2020, 12: 40728-40739

[63] Fan B et al. Electroactive barium titanate coated titanium scaffold improves osteogenesis and osseointegration with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for large segmental bone defects. Bioact. Mater., 2020, 5: 1087-1101

[64] Moonga SS, Qin YX. MC3T3 infiltration and proliferation in bovine trabecular scaffold regulated by dynamic flow bioreactor and augmented by low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. J. Orthop. Transl., 2018, 14: 16-22

[65] Ouyang L et al. Graphene-oxide-decorated microporous polyetheretherketone with superior antibacterial capability and in vitro osteogenesis for orthopedic Iimplant. Macromol. Biosci., 2018, 18: 1800036

[66] Crasto GJ et al. Controlled bone formation using ultrasound-triggered release of BMP-2 from liposomes. J. Control. Release, 2016, 10: 99-108

[67] Leppik L, Oliveira KMC, Bhavsar MB, Barker JH. Electrical stimulation in bone tissue engineering treatments. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. S., 2020, 46: 231-244

[68] Aleem IS et al. Efficacy of electrical stimulators for bone healing: a meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6

[69] Zhao C, Lin K, Wang X. Maintenance and modulation of stem cells stemness based on biomaterial designing via chemical and physical signals. Appl. Mater. Today, 2020, 19: 100614

[70] Ferrigno B et al. Bioactive polymeric materials and electrical stimulation strategies for musculoskeletal tissue repair and regeneration. Bioact. Mater., 2020, 5: 468-485

[71] Balint R, Cassidy NJ, Cartmell SH. Conductive polymers: towards a smart biomaterial for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater., 2014, 10: 2341-2353

[72] Wang K, Parekh U, Ting JK, Yamamoto NAD, Ng TN. A platform to study the effects of electrical stimulation on immune cell activation during wound healing. Adv. Biosyst., 2019, 3: 1900106

[73] Yan H et al. An electrically and magnetically responsive nanocomposite of GdPO₄·H₂O/P3HT/PLGA with electrical stimulation for synergistically enhancing the proliferation and differentiation of pre-osteoblasts. N. J. Chem., 2019, 43: 17315-17326

[74] Deng Z et al. Stimuli-responsive conductive nanocomposite hydrogels with high stretchability, self-healing, adhesiveness, and 3D printability for human motion sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter., 2019, 11: 6796-6808

[75] Kapat K, Shubhra QTH, Zhou M, Leeuwenburgh S. Piezoelectric nano‐biomaterials for biomedicine and tissue regeneration. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2020, 30: 1909045

[76] Zhu B et al. Promotion of the osteogenic activity of an antibacterial polyaniline coating by electrical stimulation. Biomater. Sci., 2019, 7: 4730-4737

[77] Zhou T et al. A mussel-inspired persistent ROS-scavenging, electroactive, and osteoinductive scaffold based on electrochemical-driven in situ nanoassembly. Small, 2019, 15: 1805440

[78] Kim D et al. Biomolecular piezoelectric materials: from amino acids to living tissues. Adv. Mater., 2020, 32: 1906989

[79] Ribeiro C et al. In vivo demonstration of the suitability of piezoelectric stimuli for bone reparation. Mater. Lett., 2017, 209: 118-121

[80] Przekora A. Current trends in fabrication of biomaterials for bone and cartilage regeneration: materials modifications and biophysical stimulations. Inter. J. Mol. Sci., 2019, 20: 435

[81] Kohata K et al. Enhancement of fracture healing by electrical stimulation in the comminuted intraarticular fracture of distal radius. Bio-med. Mater. Eng., 2013, 23: 485-493

[82] Reis J et al. A new piezoelectric actuator induces bone formation in vivo: a preliminary study. J. Biomed. Biotechnol., 2012, 2012: 613403

[83] Jacob J, More N, Kalia K, Kapusetti G. Piezoelectric smart biomaterials for bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Inflamm. Regen., 2018, 38: 2

[84] Khare D, Basu B, Dubey AK. Electrical stimulation and piezoelectric biomaterials for bone tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials, 2020, 258: 120280

[85] Tang Y et al. Fabrication and in vitro biological properties of piezoelectric bioceramics for bone regeneration. Sci. Rep., 2017, 7

[86] Bai Y et al. Biomimetic piezoelectric nanocomposite membranes synergistically enhance osteogenesis of deproteinized bovine bone grafts. Int. J. Nanomed., 2019, 14: 3015-3026

[87] Zhao F et al. Periosteum structure/function-mimicking bioactive scaffolds with piezoelectric/chem/nano signals for critical-sized bone regeneration. Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 402: 126203

[88] Frith JE et al. Mechanically-sensitive miRNAs bias human mesenchymal stem cell fate via mTOR signalling. Nat. Commun., 2018, 9

[89] Tschumperlin DJ, Liu F, Tager AM. Biomechanical regulation of mesenchymal cell function. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol., 2013, 25: 92-100

[90] Weyts FAA, Bosmans B, Niesing R, Leeuwen JPTM, Weinans H. Mechanical control of human osteoblast apoptosis and proliferation in relation to differentiation. Calcif. Tissue Int., 2003, 72: 505-512

[91] Ahdjoudj S, Lasmoles F, Holy X, Zerath E, Marie PJ. Transforming growth factor beta2 inhibits adipocyte differentiation induced by skeletal unloading in rat bone marrow stroma. J. Bone Miner. Res., 2010, 17: 668-677

[92] Duncan RL, Turner CH. Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain. Calcif. Tissue Int., 1995, 57: 344-358

[93] Panciera T, Azzolin L, Cordenonsi M, Piccolo S. Mechanobiology of YAP and TAZ in physiology and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Bio., 2017, 18: 758-770

[94] Ouyang N et al. Mechanical strain promotes osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells from ovariectomized rats via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway. Mol. Med. Rep., 2018, 17: 1855-1862

[95] Eichholz KF et al. Human bone marrow stem/stromal cell osteogenesis is regulated via mechanically activated osteocyte-derived extracellular vesicles. Stem Cell. Transl. Med., 2020, 9: 1431-1447

[96] Puwanun S et al. A simple rocker-induced mechanical stimulus upregulates mineralization by human osteoprogenitor cells in fibrous scaffolds. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 2018, 12: 370-381

[97] Mohanraj B et al. Mechanically-activated microcapsules for ‘on-demand’ drug delivery in dynamically loaded musculoskeletal tissues. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2019, 29: 1807909

[98] Hung BP, Hutton DL, Grayson WL. Mechanical control of tissue-engineered bone. Stem Cell Res. Ther., 2013, 4: 1-7

[99] Tuan HS, Hutmacher DW. Application of micro CT and computation modeling in bone tissue engineering. Comput. Aided Des., 2005, 37: 1151-1161

[100] Hayyan M, Hashim MA, Alnashef IM. Superoxide ion: generation and chemical implications. Chem. Rev., 2017, 116: 3029-3085

[101] Jiang S, Lin K, Cai M. ZnO nanomaterials: current advancements in antibacterial mechanisms and applications. Front. Chem., 2020, 8: 580

[102] Sun C et al. ROS-initiated chemiluminescence-driven payload release from macrocycle-based Azo-containing polymer nanocapsules. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2020, 8: 8878-8883

[103] Wang X et al. Polydopamine nanoparticles as dual-task platform for osteoarthritis therapy: a scavenger for reactive oxygen species and regulator for cellular powerhouses. Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 417: 129284

[104] Wang D et al. Butyrate-inserted Ni–Ti layered double hydroxide film for H₂O₂-mediated tumor and bacteria killing. Mater. Today, 2017, 20: 238-257

[105] Ma H et al. 3D printing of high-strength bioscaffolds for the synergistic treatment of bone cancer. Npg Asia Mater., 2018, 10

[106] Zhang J, Liu L, Wang L, Zhu W, Wang H. pH responsive zwitterionic-to-cationic transition for safe self-defensive antibacterial application. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2020, 8: 8908-8913

[107] Li K et al. Calcium-mineralized polypeptide nanoparticle for intracellular drug delivery in osteosarcoma chemotherapy. Bioact. Mater., 2020, 5: 721-731

[108] Gisbert-Garzarán M, Vallet-Regí. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for the treatment of complex bone diseases: bone cancer, bone infection and osteoporosis. Pharmaceutics, 2020, 12: 83

[109] Chen H et al. Cartilage-targeting and dual MMP-13/pH responsive theranostic nanoprobes for osteoarthritis imaging and precision therapy. Biomaterials, 2019, 225: 119520

[110] Jin T et al. Intra-articular delivery of celastrol by hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles for pH-sensitive anti-inflammatory therapy against knee osteoarthritis. J. Nanobiotechnol., 2020, 18: 94

[111] Lin X et al. Smart nanosacrificial layer on the bone surface prevents osteoporosis through acid-base neutralization regulated biocascade effects. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142: 17543-17556

[112] Zhang X et al. Nanocomposite membranes enhance bone regeneration through restoring physiological electric microenvironment. ACS Nano, 2016, 10: 7279-7286

[113] Lu Y, Aimetti AA, Langer R, Gu Z. Bioresponsive materials. Nat. Rev. Mater., 2016, 2: 16075

[114] Krishna AS, Radhakumary C, Sreenivasan K. Calcium ion modulates protein release from chitosan-hyaluronic acid poly electrolyte gel. Polym. Eng. Sci., 2015, 55: 2089-2097

[115] Tan LL et al. Ca²⁺, pH and thermo triple-responsive mechanized Zr-based MOFs for on-command drug release in bone diseases. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2015, 4: 135-140

[116] Galuska SP, Geyer R, Gerardy-Schahn R, Mühlenhoff M, Geyer H. Enzyme-dependent variations in the polysialylation of the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) in vivo. J. Biol. Chem., 2008, 283: 17-28

[117] Qu M et al. Stimuli-responsive delivery of growth factors for tissue engineering. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 2020, 9: e1901714

[118] Paiva KBS, Granjeiro JM. Bone tissue remodeling and development: focus on matrix metalloproteinase functions. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 2014, 561: 74-87

[119] Zhang W, Ouyang H, Dass CR, Xu J. Current research on pharmacologic and regenerative therapies for osteoarthritis. Bone Res., 2016, 4: 15040

[120] Hu Q, Katti PS, Gu Z. Enzyme-responsive nanomaterials for controlled drug delivery. Nanoscale, 2014, 6: 12273-12286

[121] Arrighi I et al. Bone healing induced by local delivery of an engineered parathyroid hormone prodrug. Biomaterials, 2009, 30: 1763-1771

[122] Patterson J, Hubbell JA. Enhanced proteolytic degradation of molecularly engineered PEG hydrogels in response to MMP-1 and MMP-2. Biomaterials, 2010, 31: 7836-7845

[123] Li N et al. An enzyme-responsive membrane for antibiotic drug release and local periodontal treatment. Colloid Surf. B, 2019, 183: 110454

[124] Holloway JL, Ma H, Rai R, Burdick JA. Modulating hydrogel crosslink density and degradation to control bone morphogenetic protein delivery and in vivo bone formation. J. Control. Release, 2014, 191: 63-70

[125] Anjum F et al. Enzyme responsive GAG-based natural-synthetic hybrid hydrogel for tunable growth factor delivery and stem cell differentiation. Biomaterials, 2016, 87: 104-117

[126] Ding Y et al. A dual-functional implant with an enzyme-responsive effect for bacterial infection therapy and tissue regeneration. Biomater. Sci., 2020, 8: 1840-1854

[127] Qi H et al. Systemic administration of enzyme-responsive growth factor nanocapsules for promoting bone repair. Biomater. Sci., 2019, 7: 1675-1685

[128] Lee J, Byun H, Madhurakkat Perikamana SK, Lee S, Shin H. Current advances in immunomodulatory biomaterials for bone regeneration. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 2019, 8: 1801106

[129] Liu L et al. The synergistic promotion of osseointegration by nanostructure design and silicon substitution of hydroxyapatite coatings in a diabetic model. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2020, 8: 2754

[130] Zhang X, Cui J, Cheng L, Lin K. Enhancement of osteoporotic bone regeneration by strontium-substituted 45S5 bioglass via time-dependent modulation of autophagy and the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2021, 9: 3489

[131] Yin X, Zhou C, Li J, Liu R, Shi B. Autophagy in bone homeostasis and the onset of osteoporosis. Bone Res., 2019, 7: 16-31

[132] Sang W, Zhang Z, Dai Y, Chen X. Recent advances in nanomaterial-based synergistic combination cancer immunotherapy. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2019, 48: 3771-3810

[133] Chen Z et al. Osteoimmunomodulation for the development of advanced bone biomaterials. Mater. Today, 2016, 19: 304-321

[134] Loi F et al. Inflammation, fracture and bone repair. Bone, 2016, 86: 119-130

[135] Schmidt-Bleek K et al. Initial immune reaction and angiogenesis in bone healing. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. M., 2014, 8: 120-130

[136] Niu Y, Wang Z, Shi Y, Dong L, Wang C. Modulating macrophage activities to promote endogenous bone regeneration: biological mechanisms and engineering approaches. Bioact. Mater., 2021, 6: 244-261

[137] Liu R et al. Immunomodulation-based strategy for improving soft tissue and metal implant integration and its implications in the development of metal soft tissue materials. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2020, 30: 1910672

[138] Freytes DO, Kang JW, Marcos-Campos I, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Macrophages modulate the viability and growth of human mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell. Biochem., 2013, 114: 220-229

[139] Koh TJ, DiPietro LA. Inflammation and wound healing: the role of the macrophage. Expert Rev. Mol. Med., 2011, 13: e23

[140] Bastidas-Coral AP et al. IL-6 counteracts the inhibitory effect of IL-4 on osteogenic differentiation of human adipose stem cells. J. Cell. Physiol., 2019, 234: 20520-20532

[141] Giorgio M, Patrizia D, Roberta F, Giacomina B. The interplay between the bone and the immune system. Clin. Dev. Immunol., 2013, 2013: 720504

[142] Chen L et al. Multi-faceted effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) determined by immune microenvironment and their implications on MSC/biomaterial-based inflammatory disease therapy. Appl. Mater. Today, 2020, 18: 100485

[143] Xie Y et al. Osteoimmunomodulatory effects of biomaterial modification strategies on macrophage polarization and bone regeneration. Regen. Biomater., 2020, 7: 233-245

[144] Ou Q et al. Nanosilver-incorporated halloysite nanotubes/gelatin methacrylate hybrid hydrogel with osteoimmunomodulatory and antibacterial activity for bone regeneration. Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 382: 123019

[145] Sadowska JM, Ginebra MP. Inflammation and biomaterials: role of the immune response in bone regeneration by inorganic scaffolds. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2020, 8: 9404-9427

[146] Lourenco AH et al. Osteogenic, anti-osteoclastogenic and immunomodulatory properties of a strontium-releasing hybrid scaffold for bone repair. Mat. Sci. Eng. C., 2019, 99: 1289-1303

[147] Tsukasaki M, Takayanagi H. Osteoimmunology: evolving concepts in bone-immune interactions in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol., 2019, 19: 626-642

[148] Ota Y et al. Generation mechanism of RANKL+ effector memory B cells: relevance to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther., 2016, 18: 67

[149] Garash R, Bajpai A, Marcinkiewicz BM, Spiller KL. Drug delivery strategies to control macrophages for tissue repair and regeneration. Exp. Biol. Med., 2016, 241: 1054-1063

[150] Zhou P et al. Calcium silicate bioactive ceramics induce osteogenesis through oncostatin M. Bioact. Mater., 2021, 6: 810-822

[151] Chen Z et al. Osteoimmunomodulatory properties of magnesium scaffolds coated with beta-tricalcium phosphate. Biomaterials, 2014, 35: 8553-8565

[152] Lin J et al. Gd@C₈₂(OH)₂₂ harnesses inflammatory regeneration for osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells through JNK/STAT3 signaling pathway. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2018, 6: 5802-5811

[153] Yang C et al. Stimulation of osteogenesis and angiogenesis by micro/nano hierarchical hydroxyapatite via macrophage immunomodulation. Nanoscale, 2019, 11: 17699-17708

[154] Jia X et al. EZH1 is associated with TCP-induced bone regeneration through macrophage polarization. Stem. Cells Int., 2018, 2018: 6310560

[155] Hu Z, Ma C, Rong X, Zou S, Liu X. Immunomodulatory ECM-like microspheres for accelerated bone regeneration in diabetes mellitus. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter., 2018, 10: 2377-2390

[156] Li M et al. Controllable release of interleukin-4 in double-layer sol–gel coatings on TiO2 nanotubes for modulating macrophage polarization. Biomed. Mater., 2018, 13: 045008

[157] He C, Yu L, Yao H, Chen Y, Hao Y. Combinatorial photothermal 3D-printing scaffold and checkpoint blockade inhibits growth/metastasis of breast cancer to bone and accelerates osteogenesis. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31: 2006214

[158] Kim J, Kim J, Jeong C, Kim WJ. Synergistic nanomedicine by combined gene and photothermal therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 2016, 98: 99-112

[159] Lu JW, Yang F, Ke QF, Xie XT, Guo YP. Magnetic nanoparticles modified-porous scaffolds for bone regeneration and photothermal therapy against tumors. Nanomed-nanotechnol., 2018, 14: 811-822

[160] Rodrigues AFM et al. Effective production of multifunctional magnetic-sensitive biomaterial by an extrusion-based additive manufacturing technique. Biomed. Mater., 2021, 16: 015011

[161] Mushtaq A et al. Magnetic hydroxyapatite nanocomposites: the advances from synthesis to biomedical applications. Mater. Des., 2021, 197: 109269

[162] Ribeiro C, Correia DM, Ribeiro S, Fernandes MM, Lanceros-Mendez S. Piezo- and magnetoelectric polymers as biomaterials for novel tissue engineering strategies. MRS Adv., 2018, 3: 1-6

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)(82072396)

Double Hundred Plan (20191819), Program of Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader (19XD1434500), the Interdisciplinary Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (YG2021ZD12), Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center for Translational Medicine (TM202010), and Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases (SKLOD2021OF01).

Program of Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader (20XD1433100).