The cartilage matrisome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Abstract

The human spinal column is a dynamic, segmented, bony, and cartilaginous structure that protects the neurologic system and simultaneously provides balance and flexibility. Children with developmental disorders that affect the patterning or shape of the spine can be at risk of neurologic and other physiologic dysfunctions. The most common developmental disorder of the spine is scoliosis, a lateral deformity in the shape of the spinal column. Scoliosis may be part of the clinical spectrum that is observed in many developmental disorders, but typically presents as an isolated symptom in otherwise healthy adolescent children. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has defied understanding in part due to its genetic complexity. Breakthroughs have come from recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and next generation sequencing (NGS) of human AIS cohorts, as well as investigations of animal models. These studies have identified genetic associations with determinants of cartilage biogenesis and development of the intervertebral disc (IVD). Current evidence suggests that a fraction of AIS cases may arise from variation in factors involved in the structural integrity and homeostasis of the cartilaginous extracellular matrix (ECM). Here, we review the development of the spine and spinal cartilages, the composition of the cartilage ECM, the so-called “matrisome” and its functions, and the players involved in the genetic architecture of AIS. We also propose a molecular model by which the cartilage matrisome of the IVD contributes to AIS susceptibility.

References

[1] Herring J. (ed.) Tachdjian’s Pediatric Orthopaedics. 5th edn. (WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 2013).

[2] Martirosyan NL et al. Genetic alterations in intervertebral disc disease. Front Surg., 2016, 3:59

[3] Waldrop R et al. The burden of spinal disorders in the elderly. Neurosurgery, 2015, 77 Suppl 4 S46-S50

[4] Rogala EJ, Drummond DS, Gurr J. Scoliosis: incidence and natural history. A prospective epidemiological study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 1978, 60:173-176

[5] Herring Tony. Preface. Tachdjian's Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2008 ix

[6] Little DG, Song KM, Katz D, Herring JA. Relationship of peak height velocity to other maturity indicators in idiopathic scoliosis in girls. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 2000, 82:685-693

[7] Katz DE, Herring JA, Browne RH, Kelly DM, Birch JG. Brace wear control of curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 2010, 92:1343-1352

[8] Weinstein, S. L., Dolan, L. A., Wright, J. G. & Dobbs, M. B. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N . Engl. J. Med. 369, 1515–1521 (2013).

[9] Sanders JO et al. Maturity assessment and curve progression in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 2007, 89:64-73

[10] Wise, C. A. The genetic architecture of idiopathic scoliosis. in Molecular Genetics of Pediatric Orthopaedic Disorders. (eds Carol, A. & Wise, J. J. R.) 71–90 (Springer, New York, 2014).

[11] Riseborough EJ, Wynne-Davies R. A genetic survey of idiopathic scoliosis in Boston, Massachusetts. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 1973, 55:974-982

[12] Connor JM et al. Genetic aspects of early childhood scoliosis. Am. J. Med. Genet., 1987, 27:419-424

[13] Tang NL et al. Genetic epidemiology and heritability of AIS: A study of 415 Chinese female patients. J. Orthop. Res., 2012, 30:1464-1469

[14] Hresko MT. Clinical practice. Idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. N. Engl. J. Med., 2013, 368:834-841

[15] Carter CO, Evans KA. Inheritance of congenital pyloric stenosis. J. Med. Genet., 1969, 6:233-254

[16] Kruse LM, Buchan JG, Gurnett CA, Dobbs MB. Polygenic threshold model with sex dimorphism in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the Carter effect. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 2012, 94:1485-1491

[17] Antonarakis SE, Chakravarti A, Cohen JC, Hardy J. Mendelian disorders and multifactorial traits: the big divide or one for all? Nat. Rev. Genet., 2010, 11:380-384

[18] Pourquie O. Vertebrate segmentation: from cyclic gene networks to scoliosis. Cell, 2011, 145:650-663

[19] Dunwoodie SaSD. Genetic and environmental interaction in malformation of the vertebral column. in Molecular genetics of pediatric orthopaedic disorders. (eds Carol, A. & Wise, J. J. R.) 131–151 (Springer, New York, 2015).

[20] Turnpenny, P. D. Classification and etiologic dissection of vertebral segmentation anomalies. in Molecular genetics of pediatric orthopaedic disorders. (eds Carol, A. & Wise, J. J. R.) 105–130 (Springer, New York, 2015).

[21] Liao BK, Oates AC. Delta-Notch signalling in segmentation. Arthropod Struct. Dev., 2017, 46:429-447

[22] Goto H, Kimmey SC, Row RH, Matus DQ, Martin BL. FGF and canonical Wnt signaling cooperate to induce paraxial mesoderm from tailbud neuromesodermal progenitors through regulation of a two-step epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Development, 2017, 144:1412-1424

[23] Smith LJ, Nerurkar NL, Choi KS, Harfe BD, Elliott DM. Degeneration and regeneration of the intervertebral disc: lessons from development. Dis. Model Mech., 2011, 4:31-41

[24] Chan WC, Au TY, Tam V, Cheah KS, Chan D. Coming together is a beginning: the making of an intervertebral disc. Birth Defects Res C. Embryo Today, 2014, 102:83-100

[25] Aszodi A, Chan D, Hunziker E, Bateman JF, Fassler R. Collagen II is essential for the removal of the notochord and the formation of intervertebral discs. J. Cell Biol., 1998, 143:1399-1412

[26] Sivakamasundari V et al. A developmental transcriptomic analysis of Pax1 and Pax9 in embryonic intervertebral disc development. Biol. Open., 2017, 6:187-199

[27] Balling R, Deutsch U, Gruss P. undulated, a mutation affecting the development of the mouse skeleton, has a point mutation in the paired box of Pax 1. Cell, 1988, 55:531-535

[28] Wallin J et al. The role of Pax-1 in axial skeleton development. Development, 1994, 120:1109-1121

[29] Wilm B, Dahl E, Peters H, Balling R, Imai K. Targeted disruption of Pax1 defines its null phenotype and proves haploinsufficiency. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA., 1998, 95:8692-8697

[30] Adham IM et al. The scoliosis (sco) mouse: a new allele of Pax1. Cytogenet Genome Res., 2005, 111:16-26

[31] Kokubu C et al. A transposon-based chromosomal engineering method to survey a large cis-regulatory landscape in mice. Nat. Genet., 2009, 41:946-952

[32] Takimoto A et al. Differential transactivation of the upstream aggrecan enhancer regulated by PAX1/9 depends on SOX9-driven transactivation. Sci. Rep., 2019, 9

[33] Lefebvre V, Angelozzi M, Haseeb A. SOX9 in cartilage development and disease. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 2019, 61:39-47

[34] Rodrigo I, Hill RE, Balling R, Munsterberg A, Imai K. Pax1 and Pax9 activate Bapx1 to induce chondrogenic differentiation in the sclerotome. Development, 2003, 130:473-482

[35] Panda DK, Miao D, Lefebvre V, Hendy GN, Goltzman D. The transcription factor SOX9 regulates cell cycle and differentiation genes in chondrocytic CFK2 cells. J. Biol. Chem., 2001, 276:41229-41236

[36] Bi W et al. Haploinsufficiency of Sox9 results in defective cartilage primordia and premature skeletal mineralization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA., 2001, 98:6698-6703

[37] Henry SP, Liang S, Akdemir KC, de Crombrugghe B. The postnatal role of Sox9 in cartilage. J. Bone Min. Res., 2012, 27:2511-2525

[38] Bi W, Deng JM, Zhang Z, Behringer RR, de Crombrugghe B. Sox9 is required for cartilage formation. Nat. Genet., 1999, 22:85-89

[39] Liu CF, Lefebvre V. The transcription factors SOX9 and SOX5/SOX6 cooperate genome-wide through super-enhancers to drive chondrogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res., 2015, 43:8183-8203

[40] Han Y, Lefebvre V. L-Sox5 and Sox6 drive expression of the aggrecan gene in cartilage by securing binding of Sox9 to a far-upstream enhancer. Mol. Cell Biol., 2008, 28:4999-5013

[41] Lefebvre V, Li P, de Crombrugghe B. A new long form of Sox5 (L-Sox5), Sox6 and Sox9 are coexpressed in chondrogenesis and cooperatively activate the type II collagen gene. EMBO J., 1998, 17:5718-5733

[42] Lefebvre V, Behringer RR, de Crombrugghe B. L-Sox5, Sox6 and Sox9 control essential steps of the chondrocyte differentiation pathway. Osteoarthr. Cartil., 2001, 9 Suppl A S69-S75

[43] Smits P, Lefebvre V. Sox5 and Sox6 are required for notochord extracellular matrix sheath formation, notochord cell survival and development of the nucleus pulposus of intervertebral discs. Development, 2003, 130:1135-1148

[44] Smits P et al. The transcription factors L-Sox5 and Sox6 are essential for cartilage formation. Dev. Cell., 2001, 1:277-290

[45] Lefebvre V. Toward understanding the functions of the two highly related Sox5 and Sox6 genes. J. Bone Min. Metab., 2002, 20:121-130

[46] Smits P, Dy P, Mitra S, Lefebvre V. Sox5 and Sox6 are needed to develop and maintain source, columnar, and hypertrophic chondrocytes in the cartilage growth plate. J. Cell Biol., 2004, 164:747-758

[47] Ikeda T et al. The combination of SOX5, SOX6, and SOX9 (the SOX trio) provides signals sufficient for induction of permanent cartilage. Arthritis Rheum., 2004, 50:3561-3573

[48] Akiyama H, Chaboissier MC, Martin JF, Schedl A, de Crombrugghe B. The transcription factor Sox9 has essential roles in successive steps of the chondrocyte differentiation pathway and is required for expression of Sox5 and Sox6. Genes Dev., 2002, 16:2813-2828

[49] Sivakamasundari V, Kraus P, Jie S, Lufkin T. Pax1(EGFP): new wildtype and mutant EGFP mouse lines for molecular and fate mapping studies. Genesis, 2013, 51:420-429

[50] Dimeglio A, Canavese F. The growing spine: how spinal deformities influence normal spine and thoracic cage growth. Eur. Spine J., 2012, 21:64-70

[51] Yu J et al. Microfibrils, elastin fibres and collagen fibres in the human intervertebral disc and bovine tail disc. J. Anat., 2007, 210:460-471

[52] Roughley PJ. Biology of intervertebral disc aging and degeneration: involvement of the extracellular matrix. Spine., 2004, 29:2691-2699

[53] Roughley PJ, Alini M, Antoniou J. The role of proteoglycans in aging, degeneration and repair of the intervertebral disc. Biochem. Soc. Trans., 2002, 30 Pt 6 869-874

[54] Cappello R, Bird JL, Pfeiffer D, Bayliss MT, Dudhia J. Notochordal cell produce and assemble extracellular matrix in a distinct manner, which may be responsible for the maintenance of healthy nucleus pulposus. Spine., 2006, 31:873-882

[55] Bruehlmann SB, Hulme PA, Duncan NA. In situ intercellular mechanics of the bovine outer annulus fibrosus subjected to biaxial strains. J. Biomech., 2004, 37:223-231

[56] Mouw JK, Ou G, Weaver VM. Extracellular matrix assembly: a multiscale deconstruction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2014, 15:771-785

[57] Frantz C, Stewart KM, Weaver VM. The extracellular matrix at a glance. J. Cell Sci., 2010, 123 Pt 24 4195-4200

[58] Hynes RO, Naba A. Overview of the matrisome-an inventory of extracellular matrix constituents and functions. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 2012, 4:a004903

[59] Wu JJ, Weis MA, Kim LS, Carter BG, Eyre DR. Differences in chain usage and cross-linking specificities of cartilage type V/XI collagen isoforms with age and tissue. J. Biol. Chem., 2009, 284:5539-5545

[60] Aspberg A. The different roles of aggrecan interaction domains. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 2012, 60:987-996

[61] Urban JP, Winlove CP. Pathophysiology of the intervertebral disc and the challenges for MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2007, 25:419-432

[62] Wang Z, Weitzmann MN, Sangadala S, Hutton WC, Yoon ST. Link protein N-terminal peptide binds to bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type II receptor and drives matrix protein expression in rabbit intervertebral disc cells. J. Biol. Chem., 2013, 288:28243-28253

[63] McKenna LA, Liu H, Sansom PA, Dean MF. An N-terminal peptide from link protein stimulates proteoglycan biosynthesis in human articular cartilage in vitro. Arthritis Rheum., 1998, 41:157-162

[64] Mecham RP, Gibson MA. The microfibril-associated glycoproteins (MAGPs) and the microfibrillar niche. Matrix Biol., 2015, 47:13-33

[65] Craft CS. MAGP1, the extracellular matrix, and metabolism. Adipocyte, 2015, 4:60-64

[66] Altshuler D, Daly MJ, Lander ES. Genetic mapping in human disease. Science, 2008, 322:881-888

[67] Khanshour AM et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis and replication studies in multiple ethnicities identify novel adolescent idiopathic scoliosis susceptibility loci. Hum. Mol. Genet., 2018, 27:3986-3998

[68] Sharma S et al. A PAX1 enhancer locus is associated with susceptibility to idiopathic scoliosis in females. Nat. Commun., 2015, 6

[69] Langenhan T, Aust G, Hamann J. Sticky signaling-adhesion class g protein-coupled receptors take the stage. Sci. Signal., 2013, 6:re3

[70] Kou Ikuyo, Takahashi Yohei, Johnson Todd A, Takahashi Atsushi, Guo Long, Dai Jin, Qiu Xusheng, Sharma Swarkar, Takimoto Aki, Ogura Yoji, Jiang Hua, Yan Huang, Kono Katsuki, Kawakami Noriaki, Uno Koki, Ito Manabu, Minami Shohei, Yanagida Haruhisa, Taneichi Hiroshi, Hosono Naoya, Tsuji Taichi, Suzuki Teppei, Sudo Hideki, Kotani Toshiaki, Yonezawa Ikuho, Londono Douglas, Gordon Derek, Herring John A, Watanabe Kota, Chiba Kazuhiro, Kamatani Naoyuki, Jiang Qing, Hiraki Yuji, Kubo Michiaki, Toyama Yoshiaki, Tsunoda Tatsuhiko, Wise Carol A, Qiu Yong, Shukunami Chisa, Matsumoto Morio, Ikegawa Shiro. Genetic variants in GPR126 are associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nature Genetics, 2013, 45 6 676-679

[71] Shukunami C et al. Chondrogenic differentiation of clonal mouse embryonic cell line ATDC5 in vitro: differentiation-dependent gene expression of parathyroid hormone (PTH)/PTH-related peptide receptor. J. Cell Biol., 1996, 133:457-468

[72] Ikegawa S. Genomic study of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Japan. Scoliosis Spinal Disord., 2016, 11

[73] Monk KR et al. G protein-coupled receptor is essential for Schwann cells to initiate myelination. Science, 2009, 325:1402-1405

[74] Liebscher I et al. A tethered agonist within the ectodomain activates the adhesion G protein-coupled receptors GPR126 and GPR133. Cell Rep., 2014, 9:2018-2026

[75] Petersen SC et al. The adhesion GPCR GPR126 has distinct, domain-dependent functions in Schwann cell development mediated by interaction with laminin-211. Neuron, 2015, 85:755-769

[76] Philippova M et al. A guide and guard: the many faces of T-cadherin. Cell Signal., 2009, 21:1035-1044

[77] Fredette BJ, Miller J, Ranscht B. Inhibition of motor axon growth by T-cadherin substrata. Development, 1996, 122:3163-3171

[78] Brohmann H, Jagla K, Birchmeier C. The role of Lbx1 in migration of muscle precursor cells. Development, 2000, 127:437-445

[79] Gross MK, Dottori M, Goulding M. Lbx1 specifies somatosensory association interneurons in the dorsal spinal cord. Neuron, 2002, 34:535-549

[80] Miyake A et al. Identification of a susceptibility locus for severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis on chromosome 17q24.3. Plos One, 2013, 8

[81] Gonzalez-Sandoval A, Gasser SM. On TADs and LADs: spatial control over gene expression. Trends Genet., 2016, 32:485-495

[82] Ogura Y et al. A functional variant in MIR4300HG, the host gene of microRNA MIR4300 is associated with progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Hum. Mol. Genet., 2017, 26:4086-4092

[83] Manolio TA et al. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature, 2009, 461:747-753

[84] Lek M et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature, 2016, 536:285-291

[85] Chatterjee S, Ahituv N. Gene regulatory elements, major drivers of human disease. Annu Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet., 2017, 18:45-63

[86] Verstraeten A, Alaerts M, Van Laer L, Loeys B. Marfan syndrome and related disorders: 25 years of gene discovery. Hum. Mutat., 2016, 37:524-531

[87] Loeys BL et al. The revised Ghent nosology for the Marfan syndrome. J. Med. Genet., 2010, 47:476-485

[88] Haller G et al. A polygenic burden of rare variants across extracellular matrix genes among individuals with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Hum. Mol. Genet., 2016, 25:202-209

[89] Spranger J. The type XI collagenopathies. Pediatr. Radiol., 1998, 28:745-750

[90] Krakow D. Skeletal dysplasias. Clin. Perinatol., 2015, 42:301-319

[91] Nebert, D. W. Z. L. SLC39A8 gene encoding a metal ion transporter: discovery and bench to bedside. Hum. Genet. 13, 51 (2019).

[92] Haller G et al. A missense variant in SLC39A8 is associated with severe idiopathic scoliosis. Nat. Commun., 2018, 9

[93] Baschal EE et al. Idiopathic scoliosis families highlight actin-based and microtubule-based cellular projections and extracellular matrix in disease etiology. G3., 2018, 8:2663-2672

[94] Baschal EE et al. Exome sequencing identifies a rare HSPG2 variant associated with familial idiopathic scoliosis. G3., 2014, 5:167-174

[95] Viljoen D, Beighton P. Schwartz-Jampel syndrome (chondrodystrophic myotonia). J. Med. Genet., 1992, 29:58-62

[96] Will RE, Stokes IA, Qiu X, Walker MR, Sanders JO. Cobb angle progression in adolescent scoliosis begins at the intervertebral disc. Spine., 2009, 34:2782-2786

[97] Long, F., Zhang, X. M., Karp, S., Yang, Y. & McMahon, A. P. Genetic manipulation of hedgehog signaling in the endochondral skeleton reveals a direct role in the regulation of chondrocyte proliferation. Development. 128, 5099–5108 (2001).

[98] Karner CM, Long F, Solnica-Krezel L, Monk KR, Gray RS. Gpr126/Adgrg6 deletion in cartilage models idiopathic scoliosis and pectus excavatum in mice. Hum. Mol. Genet., 2015, 24:4365-4373

[99] Gorman KF, Breden F. Idiopathic-type scoliosis is not exclusive to bipedalism. Med. Hypotheses, 2009, 72:348-352

[100] Boswell CW, Ciruna B. Understanding idiopathic scoliosis: a new zebrafish school of thought. Trends Genet., 2017, 33:183-196

[101] Gray RS et al. Loss of col8a1a function during zebrafish embryogenesis results in congenital vertebral malformations. Dev. Biol., 2014, 386:72-85

[102] Hayes M et al. ptk7 mutant zebrafish models of congenital and idiopathic scoliosis implicate dysregulated Wnt signalling in disease. Nat. Commun., 2014, 5

[103] Van Gennip JLM, Boswell CW, Ciruna B. Neuroinflammatory signals drive spinal curve formation in zebrafish models of idiopathic scoliosis. Sci. Adv., 2018, 4

[104] Grimbacher B et al. Hyper-IgE syndrome with recurrent infections-an autosomal dominant multisystem disorder. N. Engl. J. Med., 1999, 340:692-702

[105] Hawary Ron El, Zaaroor-Regev Daphna, Floman Yizhar, Lonner Baron S., Alkhalife Yasser Ibrahim, Betz Randal R.. Brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors for failure—a literature review. The Spine Journal, 2019, 19 12 1917-1925

[106] Sampara P, Banala RR, Vemuri SK, Av GR, Gpv S. Understanding the molecular biology of intervertebral disc degeneration and potential gene therapy strategies for regeneration: a review. Gene Ther., 2018, 25:67-82

[107] Choi H, Johnson ZI, Risbud MV. Understanding nucleus pulposus cell phenotype: a prerequisite for stem cell based therapies to treat intervertebral disc degeneration. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther., 2015, 10:307-316

[108] Dunbar Cynthia E., High Katherine A., Joung J. Keith, Kohn Donald B., Ozawa Keiya, Sadelain Michel. Gene therapy comes of age. Science, 2018, 359 6372 eaan4672

[109] Loibl M et al. Controversies in regenerative medicine: should intervertebral disc degeneration be treated with mesenchymal stem cells? JOR Spine, 2019, 2

[110] Tibiletti M, Kregar Velikonja N, Urban JP, Fairbank JC. Disc cell therapies: critical issues. Eur. Spine J., 2014, 23 Suppl 3 S375-S384

[111] Kou I et al. Genome-wide association study identifies 14 previously unreported susceptibility loci for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Japanese. Nat. Commun., 2019, 10

Funding

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)(P01HD084387)

Texas Scottish Rite Hospital Research Fund

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)(R01AR067715)

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)