The molecular conformation of silk fibroin regulates osteogenic cell behavior by modulating the stability of the adsorbed protein-material interface

Abstract

Silk fibroin (SF) can be used to construct various stiff material interfaces to support bone formation. An essential preparatory step is to partially transform SF molecules from random coils to β-sheets to render the material water insoluble. However, the influence of the SF conformation on osteogenic cell behavior at the material interface remains unknown. Herein, three stiff SF substrates were prepared by varying the β-sheet content (high, medium, and low). The substrates had a comparable chemical composition, surface topography, and wettability. When adsorbed fibronectin was used as a model cellular adhesive protein, the stability of the adsorbed protein-material interface, in terms of the surface stability of the SF substrates and the accompanying fibronectin detachment resistance, increased with the increasing β-sheet content of the SF substrates. Furthermore, (i) larger areas of cytoskeleton-associated focal adhesions, (ii) higher orders of cytoskeletal organization and (iii) more elongated cell spreading were observed for bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BMSCs) cultured on SF substrates with high vs. low β-sheet contents, along with enhanced nuclear translocation and activation of YAP/TAZ and RUNX2. Consequently, osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs was stimulated on high β-sheet substrates. These results indicated that the β-sheet content influences osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs on SF materials in vitro by modulating the stability of the adsorbed protein-material interface, which proceeds via protein-focal adhesion-cytoskeleton links and subsequent intracellular mechanotransduction. Our findings emphasize the role of the stability of the adsorbed protein-material interface in cellular mechanotransduction and the perception of stiff SF substrates with different β-sheet contents, which should not be overlooked when engineering stiff biomaterials.

References

[1] Gao C, Peng S, Feng P, Shuai C. Bone biomaterials and interactions with stem cells. Bone Res., 2017, 5:1-33

[2] Perrone GS et al. The use of silk-based devices for fracture fixation. Nat. Commun., 2014, 5

[3] Cheng X et al. Electrodeposited assembly of additive-free silk fibroin coating from pre-assembled nanospheres for drug delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12:12018-12029

[4] Han H et al. Silk biomaterials with vascularization capacity. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2016, 26:421-432

[5] Sengupta S et al. Quantifying osteogenic cell degradation of silk biomaterials. Biomacromolecules, 2010, 11:3592-3599

[6] Marelli B et al. Silk fibroin derived polypeptide-induced biomineralization of collagen. Biomaterials, 2012, 33:102-108

[7] Li Y, Cai Y, Kong X, Yao J. Anisotropic growth of hydroxyapatite on the silk fibroin films. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2008, 255:1681-1685

[8] Cheng X, Yang F. More than just a barrier—Challenges in the development of guided bone regeneration membranes. Matter, 2019, 1:558-560

[9] Han C et al. Electrophoretic deposition of gentamicin-loaded silk fibroin coatings on 3d-printed porous Cobalt–Chromium–Molybdenum bone substitutes to prevent orthopedic implant infections. Biomacromolecules, 2017, 18:3776-3787

[10] Rockwood DN et al. Materials fabrication from Bombyx mori silk fibroin. Nat. Protoc., 2011, 6:1612-1631

[11] Lawrence B, Omenetto FG, Chui K, Kaplan DL. Processing methods to control silk fibroin film biomaterial features. J. Mater. Sci., 2008, 43:6967-6985

[12] Lu Q et al. Water-insoluble silk films with silk I structure. Acta Biomaterialia, 2010, 6:1380-1387

[13] Morgan AW et al. Characterization and optimization of RGD-containing silk blends to support osteoblastic differentiation. Biomaterials, 2008, 29:2556-2563

[14] Zheng K et al. Chemically functionalized silk for human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells proliferation and differentiation. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8:14406-14413

[15] Hu X et al. Regulation of silk material structure by temperature-controlled water vapor annealing. Biomacromolecules, 2011, 12:1686-1696

[16] Hu X et al. The influence of elasticity and surface roughness on myogenic and osteogenic-differentiation of cells on silk-elastin biomaterials. Biomaterials, 2011, 32:8979-8989

[17] Lu Q et al. Stabilization and release of enzymes from silk films. Macromol. Biosci., 2010, 10:359-368

[18] Hu Y, Zhang Q, You R, Wang L, Li M. The relationship between secondary structure and biodegradation behavior of silk fibroin scaffolds. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2012, 2012:1-5

[19] Liu Y et al. Built‐in electric fields dramatically induce enhancement of osseointegration. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2017, 27:1703771

[20] Case LB et al. Molecular mechanism of vinculin activation and nanoscale spatial organization in focal adhesions. Nat. Cell Biol., 2015, 17:880-892

[21] Parsons JT, Horwitz AR, Schwartz MA. Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2010, 11:633-643

[22] Lin M et al. Adsorption force of fibronectin controls transmission of cell traction force and subsequent stem cell fate. Biomaterials, 2018, 162:170-182

[23] Ingber DE, Wang N, Stamenovic D. Tensegrity, cellular biophysics, and the mechanics of living systems. Rep. Prog. Phys., 2014, 77:046603

[24] Dupont S et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature, 2011, 474:179-183

[25] Brusatin G, Panciera T, Gandin A, Citron A, Piccolo S. Biomaterials and engineered microenvironments to control YAP/TAZ-dependent cell behaviour. Nat. Mater., 2018, 17:1063-1075

[26] Pan J-X et al. YAP promotes osteogenesis and suppresses adipogenic differentiation by regulating β-catenin signaling. Bone Res., 2018, 6:1-12

[27] Pan H et al. YAP-mediated mechanotransduction regulates osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of BMSCs on hierarchical structure. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces, 2017, 152:344-353

[28] Caliari SR, Vega SL, Kwon M, Soulas EM, Burdick JA. Dimensionality and spreading influence MSC YAP/TAZ signaling in hydrogel environments. Biomaterials, 2016, 103:314-323

[29] Chaudhuri O et al. Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity. Nat. Mater., 2016, 15:326-334

[30] Zhang J et al. Thermally responsive microfibers mediated stem cell fate via reversibly dynamic mechanical stimulation. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28:1804773

[31] Wei Y et al. Directing stem cell differentiation via electrochemical reversible switching between nanotubes and nanotips of polypyrrole array. ACS Nano, 2017, 11:5915-5924

[32] Yang C, Tibbitt MW, Basta L, Anseth KS. Mechanical memory and dosing influence stem cell fate. Nat. Mater., 2014, 13:645-652

[33] Macdonald DE, Deo N, Markovic B, Stranick MA, Somasundaran P. Adsorption and dissolution behavior of human plasma fibronectin on thermally and chemically modified titanium dioxide particles. Biomaterials, 2002, 23:1269-1279

[34] Allen LT et al. Surface-induced changes in protein adsorption and implications for cellular phenotypic responses to surface interaction. Biomaterials, 2006, 27:3096-3108

[35] Zhang Z et al. Electrophoretic deposition of chitosan/gelatin coatings with controlled porous surface topography to enhance initial osteoblast adhesive responses. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2016, 4:7584-7595

[36] Kuroda M, Wada H, Kimura Y, Ueda K, Kioka N. Vinculin promotes nuclear localization of TAZ to inhibit ECM stiffness-dependent differentiation into adipocytes. J. Cell Sci., 2017, 130:989-1002

[37] Mandal BB, Das S, Choudhury K, Kundu SC. Implication of silk film RGD availability and surface roughness on cytoskeletal organization and proliferation of primary rat bone marrow cells. Tissue Eng. Part A, 2010, 16:2391-2403

[38] Buduo CAD et al. Programmable 3D silk bone marrow niche for platelet generation ex vivo and modeling of megakaryopoiesis pathologies. Blood, 2015, 125:2254-2264

[39] Evans ND et al. Substrate stiffness affects early differentiation events in embryonic stem cells. Eur. Cells Mater., 2009, 18:1-14

[40] Wang PY, Tsai W, Voelcker NH. Screening of rat mesenchymal stem cell behaviour on polydimethylsiloxane stiffness gradients. Acta Biomaterialia, 2012, 8:519-530

[41] Brown JE, Lu C, Coburn JM, Kaplan DL. Impact of silk biomaterial structure on proteolysis. Acta Biomaterialia, 2015, 11:212-221

[42] Kharkar PM, Kiick KL, Kloxin AM. Designing degradable hydrogels for orthogonal control of cell microenvironments. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42:7335-7372

[43] Ayala R et al. Engineering the cell-material interface for controlling stem cell adhesion, migration, and differentiation. Biomaterials, 2011, 32:3700-3711

[44] Carisey A et al. Vinculin regulates the recruitment and release of core focal adhesion proteins in a force-dependent manner. Curr. Biol., 2013, 23:271-281

[45] Kuroda M, Ueda K, Kioka N. Vinexin family (SORBS) proteins regulate mechanotransduction in mesenchymal stem cells. Sci. Rep., 2018, 8

[46] Bilem I et al. Interplay of geometric cues and RGD/BMP-2 crosstalk in directing stem cell fate. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 2017, 3:2514-2523

[47] Frank V et al. Frequent mechanical stress suppresses proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow without loss of multipotency. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6:24264

[48] Swift J et al. Nuclear lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation. Science, 2013, 341:1240104

[49] Tang Y, Feinberg TY, Keller ET, Li XY, Weiss SJ. Snail/Slug binding interactions with YAP/TAZ control skeletal stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Nat. Cell Biol., 2016, 18:917-929

[50] Midha S, Murab S, Ghosh S. Osteogenic signaling on silk-based matrices. Biomaterials, 2016, 97:133-153

[51] Hu X, Kaplan DL, Cebe P. Determining beta-sheet crystallinity in fibrous proteins by thermal analysis and infrared spectroscopy. Macromolecules, 2006, 39:6161-6170

[52] Pellenc D, Berry H, Gallet O. Adsorption-induced fibronectin aggregation and fibrillogenesis. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2006, 298:132-144

[53] Zhang S et al. Porous niobium coatings fabricated with selective laser melting on titanium substrates: preparation, characterization, and cell behavior. Mater. Sci. Eng.: C., 2015, 53:50-59

[54] Horzum U, Ozdil B, Pesenokvur D. Step-by-step quantitative analysis of focal adhesions. MethodsX, 2014, 1:56-59

[55] Boudaoud A et al. FibrilTool, an ImageJ plug-in to quantify fibrillar structures in raw microscopy images. Nat. Protoc., 2014, 9:457-463

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)(31725011)

National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC1104301)

China Scholarship Council (CSC)(201606160095)