Two-year clinical outcome of denosumab treatment alone and in combination with teriparatide in Japanese treatment-naive postmenopausal osteoporotic women

Yukio Nakamura , Takako Suzuki , Mikio Kamimura , Shota Ikegami , Kohei Murakami , Shigeharu Uchiyama , Akira Taguchi , Hiroyuki Kato

Bone Research ›› 2017, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 16055

PDF
Bone Research ›› 2017, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 16055 DOI: 10.1038/boneres.2016.55
Article

Two-year clinical outcome of denosumab treatment alone and in combination with teriparatide in Japanese treatment-naive postmenopausal osteoporotic women

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This randomized prospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of denosumab treatment alone and in combination with teriparatide in treatment-naive postmenopausal Japanese female patients with osteoporosis. Thirty patients were randomly assigned to two groups: (1) denosumab group (denosumab alone, n=13); and (2) combination group (denosumab+teriparatide, n=17). Serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP)-5b, urinary cross-linked N-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX), and bone mineral density (BMD) of L1–4 lumbar vertebrae (L-BMD) and bilateral total hips (H-BMD) were determined at the first visit and at various time points up to 24 months post-treatment to determine percentage changes. Serum TRACP-5b and urinary NTX were equally suppressed in both groups and maintained at low levels, with slight increases at 12, 18 and 24 months. BAP was significantly decreased in both groups from 4 to 24 months, with significant differences between the groups at 4, 8 and 15 months (P<0.05). L-BMD was significantly increased at most time points in both groups, with a significant difference between the combination group and denosumab group at 24 months (17.2% increase versus 9.6% increase; P<0.05). There was no significant difference in H-BMD between the two groups, although the levels tended to be higher in the combination group than in the denosumab group (9.5% increase versus 5.6% increase). These findings suggest that denosumab+teriparatide combination therapy may represent an important treatment for primary osteoporotic patients at high risk of vertebral fracture.

A two-year trial has confirmed the benefits of using two osteoporosis treatments in combination in Japanese postmenopausal women. Yukio Nakamura from the Shinshu University School of Medicine, Japan, and colleagues tested denosumab, a synthetic antibody that inhibits bone resorption, alone and in combination with teriparatide, a synthetic form of parathyroid hormone which promotes bone formation, in 30 women. In patients who received the combination therapy, hip and lumbar bone mineral density increased to a greater extent than in patients who received denosumab alone. Previous studies had yielded similar results, but included patients who had already received bisphosphates, the standard first-line therapy for osteoporosis, which might have influenced the effects of denosumab and teriparatide. The new trial identifies the combination therapy as an important treatment option for patients with severe osteoporosis.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yukio Nakamura, Takako Suzuki, Mikio Kamimura, Shota Ikegami, Kohei Murakami, Shigeharu Uchiyama, Akira Taguchi, Hiroyuki Kato. Two-year clinical outcome of denosumab treatment alone and in combination with teriparatide in Japanese treatment-naive postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Bone Research, 2017, 5(1): 16055 DOI:10.1038/boneres.2016.55

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Lim SY, Bolster MB. Current approaches to osteoporosis treatment. Curr Opin Rheumatol, 2015, 27: 216-224

[2]

Siris ES, Chen YT, Abbott TA et al. Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med, 2004, 164: 1108-1112

[3]

Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR et al. Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med, 2001, 344: 1434-1441

[4]

Kamimura M, Nakamura Y, Ikegami S et al. Bisphosphonate pre-treatment diminishes the therapeutic benefits of teriparatide in Japanese osteoporotic patients. Tohoku J Exp Med, 2016, 239: 17-24

[5]

Boytsov N, Zhang X, Sugihara T et al. Osteoporotic fractures and associated hospitalizations among patients treated with teriparatide compared to a matched cohort of patients not treated with teriparatide. Curr Med Res Opin, 2015, 31: 1665-1675

[6]

Tsai JN, Uihlein AV, Lee H et al. Teriparatide and denosumab, alone or combined, in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: the DATA study randomised trial. Lancet, 2013, 382: 50-56

[7]

Leder BZ, Tsai JN, Uihlein AV et al. Denosumab and teriparatide transitions in postmenopausal osteoporosis (the DATA-Switch study): extension of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2015, 386: 1147-1155

[8]

Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A et al. Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res, 2005, 20: 1185-1194

[9]

Finkelstein JS, Hayes A, Hunzelman JL et al. The effects of parathyroid hormone, alendronate, or both in men with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med, 2003, 349: 1216-1226

[10]

Finkelstein JS, Wyland JJ, Lee H et al. Effects of teriparatide, alendronate, or both in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2010, 95: 1838-1845

[11]

Walker MD, Cusano NE, Sliney J Jr et al. Combination therapy with risedronate and teriparatide in male osteoporosis. Endocrine, 2013, 44: 237-246

[12]

Brown JP, Prince RL, Deal C et al. Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial. J Bone Miner Res, 2009, 24: 153-161

[13]

Orimo H, Nakamura T, Hosoi T et al. Japanese 2011 guidelines for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis--executive summary. Arch Osteoporos, 2012, 7: 3-20

[14]

Obermayer-Pietsch BM, Marin F, McCloskey EV et al. Effects of two years of daily teriparatide treatment on BMD in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis with and without prior antiresorptive treatment. J Bone Miner Res, 2008, 23: 1591-1600

[15]

Kamimura M, Nakamura Y, Ikegami S et al. Significant improvement of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers by denosumab therapy in bisphosphonate-unresponsive patients. Osteoporos Int, 2017, 28: 559-566

[16]

Bauss F, Russell RG. Ibandronate in osteoporosis: preclinical data and rationale for intermittent dosing. Osteoporos Int, 2004, 15: 423-433

[17]

Usui T, Hidetaka H. Pharmacokinetics of Minodronic acid hydrate, a Novel Bisphosphonate, in Rats and Dogs. Shinyaku to Rinsho, 2008, 18: S129-S142

[18]

Kobayashi Y, Uehara S, Koide M et al. The regulation of osteoclast differentiation by Wnt signals. BoneKEy Rep, 2015, 4: 713

[19]

Nakamura Y, Kamimura M, Ikegami S et al. Changes in serum vitamin D and PTH values using denosumab with or without bisphosphonate pre-treatment in osteoporotic patients: a short-term study. BMC Endocr Disord, 2015, 15: 81

[20]

Gatti D, Viapiana O, Fracassi E et al. Sclerostin and DKK1 in postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with denosumab. J Bone Miner Res, 2012, 27: 2259-2263

[21]

Diarra D, Stolina M, Polzer K et al. Dickkopf-1 is a master regulator of joint remodeling. Nat Med, 2007, 13: 156-163

[22]

Glass DA 2nd, Bialek P, Ahn JD et al. Canonical Wnt signaling in differentiated osteoblasts controls osteoclast differentiation. Dev Cell, 2005, 8: 751-764

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

145

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/