Rho/Rock signal transduction pathway is required for MSC tenogenic differentiation

Edward Maharam , Miguel Yaport , Nathaniel L Villanueva , Takintope Akinyibi , Damien Laudier , Zhiyong He , Daniel J Leong , Hui B Sun

Bone Research ›› 2015, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 15015

PDF
Bone Research ›› 2015, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 15015 DOI: 10.1038/boneres.2015.15
Article

Rho/Rock signal transduction pathway is required for MSC tenogenic differentiation

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based treatments have shown promise for improving tendon healing and repair. MSCs have the potential to differentiate into multiple lineages in response to select chemical and physical stimuli, including into tenocytes. Cell elongation and cytoskeletal tension have been shown to be instrumental to the process of MSC differentiation. Previous studies have shown that inhibition of stress fiber formation leads MSCs to default toward an adipogenic lineage, which suggests that stress fibers are required for MSCs to sense the environmental factors that can induce differentiation into tenocytes. As the Rho/ROCK signal transduction pathway plays a critical role in both stress fiber formation and in cell sensation, we examined whether the activation of this pathway was required when inducing MSC tendon differentiation using rope-like silk scaffolds. To accomplish this, we employed a loss-of-function approach by knocking out ROCK, actin and myosin (two other components of the pathway) using the specific inhibitors Y-27632, Latrunculin A and blebbistatin, respectively. We demonstrated that independently disrupting the cytoskeleton and the Rho/ROCK pathway abolished the expression of tendon differentiation markers and led to a loss of spindle morphology. Together, these studies suggest that the tension that is generated by MSC elongation is essential for MSC teno-differentiation and that the Rho/ROCK pathway is a critical mediator of tendon differentiation on rope-like silk scaffolds.

Tendon formation: elongation drives stem cell differentiation

The shape change caused by the elongation of adult stem cells leads the stem cells themselves to commit to tendon differentiation. Working with mesenchymal stem cells, which can be isolated from various tissues, including bone marrow, fat and tendons, a team led by Dr. Hui B. Sun from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, USA, cultured the cells on a rope-like silk scaffold that allows for attachment, elongation, and growth. The stem cells changed shape to conform to the structure of the silk fibers, triggering biophysical alterations that stimulated the cells to differentiate toward tendon cells. The researchers used various drug inhibitors to demonstrate that the Rho/ROCK regulatory pathway is a critical mediator of this tension-induced transformation. A better understanding of this process could aid in the development of new stem cell-based therapies for tendon regeneration and repair.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Edward Maharam, Miguel Yaport, Nathaniel L Villanueva, Takintope Akinyibi, Damien Laudier, Zhiyong He, Daniel J Leong, Hui B Sun. Rho/Rock signal transduction pathway is required for MSC tenogenic differentiation. Bone Research, 2015, 3(1): 15015 DOI:10.1038/boneres.2015.15

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Hawkes R, O’Connor P, Campbell D. The prevalence, variety and impact of wrist problems in elite professional golfers on the European Tour. Br J Sports Med, 2013, 47: 1075-1079

[2]

Swenson DM, Collins CL, Best TM, Flanigan DC, Fields SK, Comstock RD. Epidemiology of knee injuries among U.S. high school athletes, 2005/2006-2010/2011. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2013, 45: 462-469

[3]

McCarthy MM, Voos JE, Nguyen JT, Callahan L, Hannafin JA. Injury profile in elite female basketball athletes at the Women’s National Basketball Association combine. Am J Sports Med, 2013, 41: 645-651

[4]

Sereysky JB, Flatow EL, Andarawis-Puri N. Musculoskeletal regeneration and its implications for the treatment of tendinopathy. Int J Exp Pathol, 2013, 94: 293-303

[5]

Liu CF, Aschbacher-Smith L, Barthelery NJ, Dyment N, Butler D, Wylie C. What we should know before using tissue engineering techniques to repair injured tendons: a developmental biology perspective. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 2011, 17: 165-176

[6]

Yang G, Rothrauff BB, Tuan RS. Tendon and ligament regeneration and repair: Clinical relevance and developmental paradigm. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today, 2013, 99: 203-222

[7]

Yin Z, Chen X, Chen JL, Ouyang HW. Stem cells for tendon tissue engineering and regeneration. Expert Opin Biol Ther, 2010, 10: 689-700

[8]

Cheng MT, Yang HW, Chen TH, Lee OK. Isolation and characterization of multipotent stem cells from human cruciate ligaments. Cell Prolif, 2009, 42: 448-460

[9]

Bi Y, Ehirchiou D, Kilts TM et al Identification of tendon stem/progenitor cells and the role of the extracellular matrix in their niche. Nat Med, 2007, 13: 1219-1227

[10]

Lee JY, Zhou Z, Taub PJ et al BMP-12 treatment of adult mesenchymal stem cells in vitro augments tendon-like tissue formation and defect repair in vivo. PLoS One, 2011, 6: e17531

[11]

Altman GH, Diaz F, Jakuba C et al Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials, 2003, 24: 401-416

[12]

Teh TK, Toh SL, Goh JC. Aligned fibrous scaffolds for enhanced mechanoresponse and tenogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A, 2013, 19: 1360-1372

[13]

Teh TK, Toh SL, Goh JC. Aligned hybrid silk scaffold for enhanced differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into ligament fibroblasts. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 2011, 17: 687-703

[14]

Fan H, Liu H, Toh SL, Goh JC. Anterior cruciate ligament regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells and silk scaffold in large animal model. Biomaterials, 2009, 30: 4967-4977

[15]

Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell, 2006, 126: 677-689

[16]

McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell, 2004, 6: 483-495

[17]

Sahai E, Marshall CJ. ROCK and Dia have opposing effects on adherens junctions downstream of Rho. Nat Cell Biol, 2002, 4: 408-415

[18]

Maekawa M, Ishizaki T, Boku S et al Signaling from Rho to the actin cytoskeleton through protein kinases ROCK and LIM-kinase. Science, 1999, 285: 895-898

[19]

Leung T, Chen XQ, Manser E, Lim L. The p160 RhoA-binding kinase ROK alpha is a member of a kinase family and is involved in the reorganization of the cytoskeleton. Mol Cell Biol, 1996, 16: 5313-5327

[20]

Arnsdorf EJ, Tummala P, Kwon RY, Jacobs CR. Mechanically induced osteogenic differentiation--the role of RhoA, ROCKII and cytoskeletal dynamics. J Cell Sci, 2009, 122: 546-553

[21]

Pellegrin S, Mellor H. Actin stress fibres. J Cell Sci, 2007, 120: 3491-3499

[22]

Xu B, Song G, Ju Y, Li X, Song Y, Watanabe S. RhoA/ROCK, cytoskeletal dynamics, and focal adhesion kinase are required for mechanical stretch-induced tenogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Physiol, 2012, 227: 2722-2729

[23]

Shao Z, Vollrath F. Surprising strength of silkworm silk. Nature, 2002, 418: 741

[24]

Jiang Y, Chen H, Zhou W, Hua J, Zheng Q, Xiong W. [Research on preparation of silk fibroin and its biocompatibility with rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells]. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi, 2006, 23: 560-564

[25]

Schweitzer R, Chyung JH, Murtaugh LC et al Analysis of the tendon cell fate using Scleraxis, a specific marker for tendons and ligaments. Development, 2001, 128: 3855-3866

[26]

Shukunami C, Takimoto A, Oro M, Hiraki Y. Scleraxis positively regulates the expression of tenomodulin, a differentiation marker of tenocytes. Dev Biol, 2006, 298: 234-247

[27]

Tsai RY, McKay RD. A nucleolar mechanism controlling cell proliferation in stem cells and cancer cells. Genes Dev, 2002, 16: 2991-3003

[28]

Gerecht S, Bettinger CJ, Zhang Z, Borenstein JT, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Langer R. The effect of actin disrupting agents on contact guidance of human embryonic stem cells. Biomaterials, 2007, 28: 4068-4077

[29]

Carlier MF, Criquet P, Pantaloni D, Korn ED. Interaction of cytochalasin D with actin filaments in the presence of ADP and ATP. J Biol Chem, 1986, 261: 2041-2050

[30]

Léjard V, Brideau G, Blais F et al Scleraxis and NFATc regulate the expression of the pro-alpha1(I) collagen gene in tendon fibroblasts. J Biol Chem, 2007, 282: 17665-17675

[31]

Meinel L, Karageorgiou V, Hofmann S et al Engineering bone-like tissue in vitro using human bone marrow stem cells and silk scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2004, 71: 25-34

[32]

Wang SP, Guo TQ, Guo XY, Huang JT, Lu CD. Structural analysis of fibroin heavy chain signal peptide of silkworm Bombyx mori. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai), 2006, 38: 507-513

[33]

Kim DH, Provenzano PP, Smith CL, Levchenko A. Matrix nanotopography as a regulator of cell function. J Cell Biol, 2012, 197: 351-360

[34]

Ghosh K, Ingber DE. Micromechanical control of cell and tissue development: implications for tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2007, 59: 1306-1318

[35]

Chiquet M, Gelman L, Lutz R, Maier S. From mechanotransduction to extracellular matrix gene expression in fibroblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2009, 1793: 911-920

[36]

Kimura K, Ito M, Amano M et al Regulation of myosin phosphatase by Rho and Rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase). Science, 1996, 273: 245-248

[37]

Tojkander S, Gateva G, Lappalainen P. Actin stress fibers – assembly, dynamics and biological roles. J Cell Sci, 2012, 125: 1855-1864

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

143

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/