Structure design and coordinated motion analysis of bionic crocodile robot

Abstract

Crocodiles, one of the oldest and most resilient species on Earth, have demonstrated remarkable locomotor abilities both on land and in water, evolving over millennia to adapt to diverse environments. In this study, we draw inspiration from crocodiles and design a highly biomimetic crocodile robot equipped with multiple degrees of freedom and articulated trunk joints. This design is based on comprehensive analysis of the structural and motion characteristics of real crocodiles. The bionic crocodile robot has a problem of limb-torso incoordination during movement. To solve this problem, we used the D-H method for both forward and inverse kinematics analysis of the robot’s legs and spine. Through a series of simulation experiments, we investigated the robot’s motion stability, fault tolerance, and adaptability to environments in two motor patterns: with and without spine and tail movements. The experimental results show that the bionic crocodile robot exhibits superior motion performance when the spine and tail cooperate with the extremities. This study not only demonstrates the potential of biomimicry in robotics but also underscores the significance of understanding how nature’s designs can inform and enhance technological innovations.

Keywords

Bionic crocodile robot / Kinematic modeling / Motion simulation / Multipart coordination

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Graduate Reaearch and Innovation Projects of Jiangsu Province (KYCX21_2251).

References

[1] G. Bledt, M.J. Powell, B. Katz, et al., Mit cheetah 3: design and control of a robust, dynamic quadruped robot 2018, in: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS, IEEE, 2018, 22452252.

[2] D. Dholakiya, S. Bhattacharya, A. Gunalan, et al., Design, development and experimental realization of a quadrupedal research platform: Stoch, in: 2019 5th International Conference on Control. Automation and Robotics, ICCAR, IEEE, 2019, pp. 229-234.

[3] J. Lee, J. Hwangbo, L. Wellhausen, V. Koltun, M. Hutter, Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain, Science Robotics 5 (47)(2020) eabc5986.

[4] A. Kumar, Z. Fu, D. Pathak, et al., Rma: rapid motor adaptation for legged robots, 2021, arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.04034.

[5] C. Zhiyuan, T.U. Qunzhang, Z. Xiangpo, et al., Review of multi-legged crawling robot, J. Ordnance Equip. Eng. 41 (09) (2020) 1-12.

[6] S. Kitano, S. Hirose, A. Horigome, et al., TITAN-XIII: sprawling-type quadruped robot with ability of fast and energy-efficient walking, Robomech J. 3 (2016) 1-16.

[7] P. Čížek, M. Zoula, Faigl J., Design, construction,and rough-terrain locomo-tion control of novel hexapod walking robot with four degrees of freedom per le’’, IEEE Access 9 (2021) 17866-17881.

[8] P.M. James, A. Prakash, V. Kalburgi,Sreedharan P., Design, analysis, manu-facturing of four-legged walking robot with insect type leg, Mater. Today: Proc. 46 (2021) 4647-4652.

[9] F. Akira, G. Megu, M. Yoichi, Comparative anatomy of quadruped robots and animals: a review, Adv. Robot. 36 (13) (2022).

[10] D. Owaki, A. Ishiguro, A quadruped robot exhibiting spontaneous gait transitions from walking to trotting to galloping, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) (2017) 277.

[11] M. Hildebr, Motions of the running cheetah and horse J. Mammal. 40 (4)(1959) 481-495.

[12] K. Jagnandan, T.E. Higham, Lateral movements of a massive tail influence gecko locomotion: an integrative study comparing tail restriction and autotomy, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) (2017) 10865.

[13] K. Melo, T. Horvat, A.J. Ijspeert, Animal robots in the african wilderness: lessons learned and outlook for field robotics, Science Robotics 8 (85)(2023) eadd8662.

[14] X. Jia, Z. Chen, J.M. Petrosino, et al., Biological undulation inspired swimming robot, in: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, IEEE, 2017, pp. 4795-4800.

[15] X. Jia, Z. Chen, J.M. Petrosino, et al., Biological undulation inspired swimming robot, in: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, IEEE, 2017, pp. 4795-4800.

[16] K.G. Karwa, S. Mondal, A. Kumar, et al., An open source low-cost alligator inspired robotic research platform, in: 2016 Sixth International Symposium on Embedded Computing and System Design, ISED, IEEE, 2016, 234238.

[17] K. Agrawal, K. Jain, D. Gupta, et al., Bayesian optimization based terres-trial gait tuning for a 12-dof alligator-inspired robot with active body undulation,in: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2018, 51807: V05AT07A076.

[18] R. Godiyal, T. Zodage, T. Rane, 2DxoPod-a modular robot for mimicking locomotion in vertebrates, J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 101 (1) (2021) 1-16.

[19] C.A. Brochu, Phylogenetic approaches toward crocodylian history, Annual Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 31 (2003) 357-397.

[20] C.A. Brochu, Phylogenetics, taxonomy, and historical biogeography of alligatoroidea, J. Vertebrate Paleontol. 19 (sup002) (1999) 9-100.

[21] C.S. Straub, Crocodiles; their natural history, folklore and conservation 1973, pp. 404-405.

[22] J. Harshman, C.J. Huddleston, J.P. Bollback, T.J. Parsons, M.J. Braun, True and false gharials: a nuclear gene phylogeny of crocodylia, Syst. Biol. 52(3) (2003) 386-402.

[23] G.J. Webb, S.C. Manolis, M.L. Brien, Saltwater crocodile Crocodylus Porosus. Crocodiles- status survey and conservation action plan, third ed., Darwin: Crocodile Specialist Group, 2010, pp. 99-113.

[24] D. You-Zhong, W. Xiao-Ming, H.E. Li-Jun, et al., Study on the current population and habitat of the wild Chinese alligator, 9(2001), 2001, p. 102.

[25] G. Grigg, C. Gans, Morphology and physiology of the crocodylia, Fauna Australia 2 (1993) 326-336.

[26] F.E. Fish, Kinematics of undulatory swimming in the American alligator, Copeia 1984 (4) (1984) 839-843.

[27] J.M. Hutton, Morphometrics and field estimation of the size of the nile crocodile, African J. Ecol. 25 (4) (1987) 225-230.

[28] A.L.A. Wiseman, P.J. Bishop, O.E. Demuth, et al., Musculoskeletal modelling of the nile crocodile (crocodylus niloticus) hindlimb: effects of limb posture on leverage during terrestrial locomotion, J. Anatomy 239 (2) (2021) 424-444.

[29] J.S. Willey, A.R. Biknevicius, S.M. Reilly, K.D. Earls, The tale of the tail: limb function and locomotor mechanics in alligator mississippiensis, J. Exp. Biol. 207 (3) (2004) 553-563.

[30] H.E.J. Veeger, F.C.T. van der Helm, Shoulder function: the perfect com-promise between mobility and stability, J. Biomech. 40 (10) (2007) 2119-2129.

[31] T. Wa, Foundations of Robotics:Analysis and Control, MIT Press, 1990.

[32] H. Milton, The adaptive significance of tetrapod gait selection, Am. Zool. 20 (1) (1980).

[33] R.J. Wassersug, Tetrapod gait patterns, Science 188 (4195) (1975) 1256-1258.