Effects of the Intestinal Microbiome and Metabolites on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy in Breast Cancer

Jingyue Fu , Hongxin Lin , Shuaikang Li , Xingying Yu , Yufan Jin , Jie Mei , Yichao Zhu , Tiansong Xia

BIO Integration ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 16

PDF (4482KB)
BIO Integration ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) :16 DOI: 10.15212/bioi-2025-0040
Original Article
research-article
Effects of the Intestinal Microbiome and Metabolites on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy in Breast Cancer
Author information +
History +
PDF (4482KB)

Abstract

Background: Imbalances in the intestinal microbiome are closely associated with the occurrence and development of cancer, and can affect tumorigenesis by influencing the inflammatory response, regulating the immune system, producing specific metabolites, and participating in tumor signaling pathways. Methods: This study investigated the relationships among intestinal microbial dynamics, metabolite profiles, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) outcomes in patients with breast cancer. Patients were stratified by Miller-Payne (MP) grade into good (MP 4–5) or poor (MP 1–3) responders. Fecal samples from patients (pre- and post-NAC) were analyzed via 16S rRNA sequencing and untargeted metabolic analysis. Results: After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the species diversity and abundance of the intestinal microbiome significantly decreased, and these trends were not correlated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy. Fusobacterium abundance remained significantly higher in poor responders than good responders post-NAC, thus suggesting its association with chemoresistance. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio was lower in patients with breast cancer than healthy controls, and was correlated with the therapeutic response: this ratio rose post-NAC but remained suboptimal in poor responders. Untargeted metabolomics identified upregulated amino acids (Thr-Thr and histidine) in poor responders and elevated lipids (C17-sphinganine) in good responders. ROC (receiver operating characteristic curve) analysis validated these metabolites (AUC >0.7) as predictive biomarkers. KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathway analysis highlighted enrichment in mTOR signaling, endocrine resistance, and estrogen signaling pathways. Conclusions: These findings underscore the intestinal microbiome’s potential as a predictor of NAC efficacy and a therapeutic target. Modulating Fusobacterium or metabolite pathways may enhance chemotherapy response.

Keywords

Breast cancer / intestinal microbiome / metabolites / neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jingyue Fu, Hongxin Lin, Shuaikang Li, Xingying Yu, Yufan Jin, Jie Mei, Yichao Zhu, Tiansong Xia. Effects of the Intestinal Microbiome and Metabolites on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy in Breast Cancer. BIO Integration, 2025, 6 (1) : 16 DOI:10.15212/bioi-2025-0040

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71(3): 209-49. [PMID: 33538338 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660]

[2]

Trayes KP, Cokenakes SEH. Breast cancer treatment. Am Fam Physician 2021; 104(2): 171-8. [PMID: 34383430]

[3]

Shien T, Iwata H. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2020; 50(3): 225-9. [PMID: 32147701 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyz213]

[4]

Wang W, Liu Y, Zhang H, Zhang S, Duan X, et al. Prognostic value of residual cancer burden and Miller-Payne system after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Gland Surg 2021; 10(12): 3211-21. [PMID: 35070881 DOI: 10.21037/gs-21-608]

[5]

Wang H, Mao X. Evaluation of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Drug Des Devel Ther 2020; 14: 2423-33. [PMID: 32606609 DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S253961]

[6]

Rossi P, Difrancia R, Quagliariello V, Savino E, Tralongo P, et al. B-glucans from Grifola frondosa and Ganoderma lucidum in breast cancer: an example of complementary and integrative medicine. Oncotarget 2018; 9(37): 24837-56. [PMID: 29872510 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24984]

[7]

Paul B, Barnes S, Demark-Wahnefried W, Morrow C, Salvador C, et al. Influences of diet and the gut microbiome on epigenetic modulation in cancer and other diseases. Clin Epigenetics 2015; 7: 112. [PMID: 26478753 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-015-0144-7]

[8]

Jin C, Luo T, Zhu Z, Pan Z, Yang J, et al. Imazalil exposure induces gut microbiota dysbiosis and hepatic metabolism disorder in zebrafish. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 2017; 202: 85-93. [PMID: 28888875 DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2017.08.007]

[9]

McCoy KD, Mager LF. Impact of the microbiome on tumor immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 2021; 69: 39-46. [PMID: 33647829 DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2021.01.002]

[10]

Borella F, Carosso AR, Cosma S, Preti M, Collemi G, et al. Gut microbiota and gynecological cancers: a summary of pathogenetic mechanisms and future directions. ACS Infect Dis 2021; 7(5): 987-1009. [PMID: 33848139 DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00839]

[11]

Park EM, Chelvanambi M, Bhutiani N, Kroemer G, Zitvogel L, et al. Targeting the gut and tumor microbiota in cancer. Nat Med 2022; 28(4): 690-703. [PMID: 35440726 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01779-2]

[12]

Mera RM, Bravo LE, Camargo MC, Bravo JC, Delgado AG, et al. Dynamics of Helicobacter pylori infection as a determinant of progression of gastric precancerous lesions: 16-year follow-up of an eradication trial. Gut 2018; 67(7): 1239-46. [PMID: 28647684 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311685]

[13]

Gao R, Kong C, Huang L, Li H, Qu X, et al. Mucosa-associated microbiota signature in colorectal cancer. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2017; 36(11): 2073-83. [PMID: 28600626 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-017-3026-4]

[14]

Yu LX, Schwabe RF. The gut microbiome and liver cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 14(9): 527-39. [PMID: 28676707 DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.72]

[15]

Lee SH, Sung JY, Yong D, Chun J, Kim SY, et al. Characterization of microbiome in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with lung cancer comparing with benign mass like lesions. Lung Cancer 2016; 102: 89-95. [PMID: 27987594 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.10.016]

[16]

Yu Y, Champer J, Beynet D, Kim J, Friedman AJ. The role of the cutaneous microbiome in skin cancer: lessons learned from the gut. J Drugs Dermatol 2015; 14(5): 461-5. [PMID: 25942663]

[17]

Plaza-Díaz J, Álvarez-Mercado AI, Ruiz-Marín CM, Reina-Pérez I, Pérez-Alonso AJ, et al. Association of breast and gut microbiota dysbiosis and the risk of breast cancer: a case-control clinical study. BMC Cancer 2019; 19(1): 495. [PMID: 31126257 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5660-y]

[18]

Chan AA, Bashir M, Rivas MN, Duvall K, Sieling PA, et al. Characterization of the microbiome of nipple aspirate fluid of breast cancer survivors. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 28061. [PMID: 27324944 DOI: 10.1038/srep28061]

[19]

Xuan C, Shamonki JM, Chung A, Dinome ML, Chung M, et al. Microbial dysbiosis is associated with human breast cancer. PLoS One 2014; 9(1): e83744. [PMID: 24421902 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083744]

[20]

Anand S, Mande SS. Diet, microbiota and gut-lung connection. Front Microbiol 2018; 9: 2147. [PMID: 30283410 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02147]

[21]

Cai J, Sun L, Gonzalez FJ. Gut microbiota-derived bile acids in intestinal immunity, inflammation, and tumorigenesis. Cell Host Microbe 2022; 30(3): 289-300. [PMID: 35271802 DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.02.004]

[22]

Parida S, Sharma D. The power of small changes: comprehensive analyses of microbial dysbiosis in breast cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2019; 1871(2): 392-405. [PMID: 30981803 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.04.001]

[23]

Aarnoutse R, Ziemons J, Penders J, Rensen SS, de Vos-Geelen J, et al. The clinical link between human intestinal microbiota and systemic cancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20(17): 4145. [PMID: 31450659 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20174145]

[24]

Saad R, Rizkallah MR, Aziz RK. Gut pharmacomicrobiomics: the tip of an iceberg of complex interactions between drugs and gut-associated microbes. Gut Pathog 2012; 4(1): 16. [PMID: 23194438 DOI: 10.1186/1757-4749-4-16]

[25]

Montassier E, Batard E, Massart S, Gastinne T, Carton T, et al. 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing reveals shift in patient faecal microbiota during high-dose chemotherapy as conditioning regimen for bone marrow transplantation. Microb Ecol 2014; 67(3): 690-9. [PMID: 24402367 DOI: 10.1007/s00248-013-0355-4]

[26]

Zwielehner J, Lassl C, Hippe B, Pointner A, Switzeny OJ, et al. Changes in human fecal microbiota due to chemotherapy analyzed by TaqMan-PCR, 454 sequencing and PCR-DGGE fingerprinting. PLoS One 2011; 6(12): e28654. [PMID: 22194876 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028654]

[27]

Munyaka PM, Eissa N, Bernstein CN, Khafipour E, Ghia JE. Antepartum antibiotic treatment increases offspring susceptibility to experimental colitis: a role of the gut microbiota. PLoS One 2015; 10(11): e0142536. [PMID: 26605545 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142536]

[28]

Edgar RC . UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 2013; 10(10): 996-8. [PMID: 23955772 DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2604]

[29]

Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009; 75(23): 7537-41. [PMID: 19801464 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09]

[30]

An J, Kwon H, Kim YJ. The firmicutes/bacteroidetes ratio as a risk factor of breast cancer. J Clin Med 2023; 12(6): 2216. [PMID: 36983217 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12062216]

[31]

Bashiardes S, Tuganbaev T, Federici S, Elinav E. The microbiome in anti-cancer therapy. Semin Immunol 2017; 32: 74-81. [PMID: 28431920 DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2017.04.001]

[32]

Burcelin R, Serino M, Chabo C, Garidou L, Pomié C, et al. Metagenome and metabolism: the tissue microbiota hypothesis. Diabetes Obes Metab 2013; 15(Suppl 3): 61-70. [PMID: 24003922 DOI: 10.1111/dom.12157]

[33]

Jaye K, Li CG, Chang D, Bhuyan DJ. The role of key gut microbial metabolites in the development and treatment of cancer. Gut Microbes 2022; 14(1): 2038865. [PMID: 35220885 DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2038865]

[34]

Kovács T, Mikó E, Vida A, Sebo E, Toth J, et al. Cadaverine, a metabolite of the microbiome, reduces breast cancer aggressiveness through trace amino acid receptors. Sci Rep 2019; 9(1): 1300. [DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37664-7]

[35]

Cao ZG, Qin XB, Liu FF, Zhou LL. Tryptophan-induced pathogenesis of breast cancer. Afr Health Sci 2015; 15(3): 982-5. [PMID: 26957990 DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v15i3.36]

[36]

Bekki K, Vogel H, Li W, Ito T, Sweeney C, et al. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) mediates resistance to apoptosis induced in breast cancer cells. Pestic Biochem Physiol 2015; 120: 5-13. [PMID: 25987214 DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2014.12.021]

[37]

Postler TS, Ghosh S. Understanding the holobiont: how microbial metabolites affect human health and shape the immune system. Cell Metab 2017; 26(1): 110-30. [PMID: 28625867 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.05.008]

[38]

Luu TH, Michel C, Bard JM, Dravet F, Nazih H, et al. Intestinal proportion of Blautia sp. is associated with clinical stage and histoprognostic grade in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Nutr Cancer 2017; 69(2): 267-75. [PMID: 28094541 DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2017.1263750]

[39]

Fernández MF, Reina-Pérez I, Astorga JM, Rodríguez-Carrillo A, Plaza-Díaz J, et al. Breast cancer and its relationship with the microbiota. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15(8): 1747. [PMID: 30110974 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15081747]

[40]

Mikó E, Kovács T, Sebo É, Tóth J, Csonka T, et al. Microbiome-microbial metabolome-cancer cell interactions in breast cancer-familiar, but unexplored. Cells 2019; 8(4): 293. [PMID: 30934972 DOI: 10.3390/cells8040293]

[41]

Alon-Maimon T, Mandelboim O, Bachrach G. Fusobacterium nucleatum and cancer. Periodontol 2000 2022; 89(1): 166-80. [PMID: 35244982 DOI: 10.1111/prd.12426]

[42]

Duggan WP, Salvucci M, Kisakol B, Lindner AU, Reynolds IS, et al. Increased Fusobacterium tumoural abundance affects immunogenicity in mucinous colorectal cancer and may be associated with improved clinical outcome. J Mol Med (Berl) 2023; 101(7): 829-41. [PMID: 37171483 DOI: 10.1007/s00109-023-02324-5]

[43]

Guo X, Yu K, Huang R. The ways Fusobacterium nucleatum translocate to breast tissue and contribute to breast cancer development. Mol Oral Microbiol 2024; 39(1): 1-11. [PMID: 38171827 DOI: 10.1111/omi.12446]

[44]

Parhi L, Alon-Maimon T, Sol A, Nejman D, Shhadeh A, et al. Breast cancer colonization by Fusobacterium nucleatum accelerates tumor growth and metastatic progression. Nat Commun 2020; 11(1): 3259. [DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16967-2]

[45]

Van der Merwe M, Van Niekerk G, Botha A, Engelbrecht AM. The onco-immunological implications of Fusobacterium nucleatum in breast cancer. Immunol Lett 2021; 232: 60-6. [PMID: 33647328 DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2021.02.007]

[46]

Li G, Sun Y, Huang Y, Lian J, Wu S, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum-derived small extracellular vesicles facilitate tumor growth and metastasis via TLR4 in breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23(1): 473. [PMID: 37221488 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10844-z]

[47]

Wang X, Fang Y, Liang W, Wong CC, Qin H, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum facilitates anti-PD-1 therapy in microsatellite stable colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell 2024; 42(10): 1729-46.e8. [PMID: 39303724 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2024.08.019]

[48]

Gao Y, Bi D, Xie R, Li M, Guo J, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum enhances the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade in colorectal cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2021; 6(1): 398. [PMID: 34795206 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-021-00795-x]

[49]

Chen Z, Huang L. Fusobacterium nucleatum carcinogenesis and drug delivery interventions. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2024; 209: 115319. [PMID: 38643839 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2024.115319]

[50]

Liu Y, Baba Y, Ishimoto T, Tsutsuki H, Zhang T, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum confers chemoresistance by modulating autophagy in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2021; 124(5): 963-74. [PMID: 33299132 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01198-5]

[51]

Zeng W, Pan J, Ye G. miR-135b aggravates fusobacterium nucleatum-induced cisplatin resistance in colorectal cancer by targeting KLF13. J Microbiol 2024; 62(2): 63-73. [PMID: 38402337 DOI: 10.1007/s12275-023-00100-1]

[52]

Lu ZN, Song J, Song J, Sun TH, Sun G. UBE2C affects breast cancer proliferation through the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Chin Med J (Engl) 2021; 134(20): 2465-74. [PMID: 34620747 DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001708]

[53]

Miricescu D, Totan A, Stanescu-Spinu II, Badoiu SC, Stefani C, et al. PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in breast cancer: from molecular landscape to clinical aspects. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 22(1): 173. [PMID: 33375317 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22010173]

[54]

Hanker AB, Sudhan DR, Arteaga CL. Overcoming endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Cancer Cell 2020; 37(4): 496-513. [PMID: 32289273 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.009]

[55]

Saatci O, Huynh-Dam KT, Sahin O. Endocrine resistance in breast cancer: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies. J Mol Med (Berl) 2021; 99(12): 1691-710. [PMID: 34623477 DOI: 10.1007/s00109-021-02136-5]

[56]

Kulkoyluoglu-Cotul E, Arca A, Madak-Erdogan Z. Crosstalk between estrogen signaling and breast cancer metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2019; 30(1): 25-38. [PMID: 30471920 DOI: 10.1016/j.tem.2018.10.006]

[57]

Saha T, Makar S, Swetha R, Gutti G, Singh SK. Estrogen signaling: an emanating therapeutic target for breast cancer treatment. Eur J Med Chem 2019; 177: 116-43. [PMID: 31129450 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.05.023]

[58]

Zhang J, Zhang M, Huo XK, Ning J, Yu ZL, et al. Macrophage inactivation by small molecule wedelolactone via targeting sEH for the treatment of LPS-induced acute lung injury. ACS Cent Sci 2023; 9(3): 440-56. [PMID: 36968547 DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.2c01424]

[59]

Sun CP, Zhou JJ, Yu ZL, Huo XK, Zhang J, et al. Kurarinone alleviated Parkinson’s disease via stabilization of epoxyeicosatrienoic acids in animal model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119(9): e2118818119. [PMID: 35217618 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2118818119]

[60]

Zhang J, Luan ZL, Huo XK, Zhang M, Morisseau C, et al. Direct targeting of sEH with alisol B alleviated the apoptosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress in cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury. Int J Biol Sci 2023; 19(1): 294-310. [PMID: 36594097 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.78097]

[61]

Zhang J, Zhang WH, Morisseau C, Zhang M, Dong HJ, et al. Genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition of soluble epoxide hydrolase attenuated particulate matter 2.5 exposure mediated lung injury. J Hazard Mater 2023; 458: 131890. [PMID: 37406527 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131890]

[62]

Jia YX, Wang N, Hui SW, Chang J, Zhu QM, et al. Discovery of soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors from Inula britannica: inhibition kinetics, molecular dynamics simulation, biochemical, and in vitro cell-based studies. Int J Biol Macromol 2025; 306(Pt 3): 141704. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.141704]

[63]

Zhang HL, Wang N, Shi XL, Wang MM, Zhu QM, et al. Sesquiterpenoids from Inula britannica and their potential mechanism for immunomodulation. Phytochemistry 2025; 231: 114343. [PMID: 39613278 DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2024.114343]

PDF (4482KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/