Lopinavir and Ritonavir have High Affinity Toward the SARS-CoV-2 S-protein Receptor-binding Domain Sequenced in Brazil

Aline Diogo Marinho , Helyson Lucas Bezerra Braz , João Alison de Moraes Silveira , Danilo Galvão Rocha , Roberta Jeane Bezerra Jorge , Geanne Matos de Andrade

BIO Integration ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 3

PDF (3623KB)
BIO Integration ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) :3 DOI: 10.15212/bioi-2024-0055
Original Article
research-article
Lopinavir and Ritonavir have High Affinity Toward the SARS-CoV-2 S-protein Receptor-binding Domain Sequenced in Brazil
Author information +
History +
PDF (3623KB)

Abstract

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), first identified in China in December 2019, rapidly spread worldwide, resulting in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Understanding the structural and functional interactions between the virus and host cells is critical for developing therapeutic strategies.

Methods: In this study, we employed in silico docking models to investigate the molecular interactions between the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein, derived from the Brazilian genome sequence, and seven clinically approved drugs: umifenovir, darunavir, lopinavir, ritonavir, remdesivir, pirfenidone, and oseltamivir. The three-dimensional structure of the Omicron RBD model was generated through homology modeling, and potential active site cavities were predicted within the RBD structure.

Results: Among the seven drugs tested, only lopinavir and ritonavir demonstrated significant binding affinities to the RBD. Lopinavir exhibited a binding affinity of −9.8 kcal/mol, forming interactions with residues PHE168, GLY167, SER176, GLN175, GLU166, LEU134, LEU137, TYR171, PHE138, LEU174, and PHE172. Ritonavir showed a binding affinity of −8.9 kcal/mol, interacting with residues ARG148, ASN130, VAL23, SER81, ASN33, PHE29, TYR33, SER31, ASN132, ALA26, ALA30, ALA34, and TYR133. Molecular dynamics simulations confirmed the stability of the complexes formed between lopinavir and ritonavir and the RBD active site.

Conclusion: These findings underscore the potential of these protease inhibitors as therapeutic agents targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

Keywords

COVID-19 / molecular docking / protease inhibitors / receptor-binding domain / SARS-CoV-2 / spike glycoprotein

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Aline Diogo Marinho, Helyson Lucas Bezerra Braz, João Alison de Moraes Silveira, Danilo Galvão Rocha, Roberta Jeane Bezerra Jorge, Geanne Matos de Andrade. Lopinavir and Ritonavir have High Affinity Toward the SARS-CoV-2 S-protein Receptor-binding Domain Sequenced in Brazil. BIO Integration, 2025, 6 (1) : 3 DOI:10.15212/bioi-2024-0055

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Hall DC Jr, Ji HF. A search for medications to treat COVID-19 via in silico molecular docking models of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and 3CL protease. Travel Med Infect Dis 2020; 35: 101646. [PMID: 32294562 DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101646]

[2]

Srivastava K. Association between COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2020; 29: 100583. [PMID: 32715080 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100583]

[3]

World Health Organization. WHO COVID-19 dashboard. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2020. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/. [Last accessed on 16 May 2022].

[4]

de Jesus JG, Sacchi C, Candido DDS, Claro IM, Sales FCS, et al. Importation and early local transmission of COVID-19 in Brazil, 2020. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2020; 62: e30. [PMID: 32401959 DOI: 10.1590/s1678-9946202062030]

[5]

Samyuktha V, Naveen-Kumar V . Emergence of RBD and D614G mutations in spike protein: an insight from Indian SARS-CoV-2 genome analysis. Preprints 2020;2020060032. [DOI: 10.20944/preprints202006.0032.v1]

[6]

Wrapp D, Wang N, Corbett KS, Goldsmith JA, Hsieh CL, et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 2020; 367(6483): 1260-3. [PMID: 32075877 DOI: 10.1126/science.abb2507]

[7]

Yan R, Zhang Y, Li Y, Xia L, Guo Y, et al. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science 2020; 367(6485): 1444-8. [PMID: 32132184 DOI: 10.1126/science.abb2762]

[8]

Istifli ES, Tepe , SarikÜrkcÜ C, Tepe B. Interaction of certain monoterpenoid hydrocarbons with the receptor binding domain of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2), cathepsin B, and cathepsin L (CatB/L) and their pharmacokinetic properties. Turk J Biol 2020; 44(3): 242-64. [PMID: 32595360 DOI: 10.3906/biy-2005-46]

[9]

Thanh Le T, Andreadakis Z, Kumar A, Gómez Román R, Tollefsen S, et al. The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2020; 19(5): 305-6. [PMID: 32273591 DOI: 10.1038/d41573-020-00073-5]

[10]

Okba NM, Müller MA, Li W, Wang C, GeurtsvanKessel CH, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-specific antibody responses in coronavirus disease patients. Emerg Infect Dis 2020; 26(7): 1478-88. [PMID: 32267220 DOI: 10.3201/eid2607.200841]

[11]

Poduri R, Joshi G, Jagadeesh G. Drugs targeting various stages of the SARS-CoV-2 life cycle: exploring promising drugs for the treatment of Covid-19. Cell Signal 2020; 74: 109721. [PMID: 32711111 DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2020.109721]

[12]

Elmezayen AD, Al-Obaidi A, Şahin AT, Yelekçi K. Drug repurposing for coronavirus (COVID-19): in silico screening of known drugs against coronavirus 3CL hydrolase and protease enzymes. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2020; 39(8): 2980-92. [PMID: 32306862 DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1758791]

[13]

Biasini M, Bienert S, Waterhouse A, Arnold K, Studer G, et al. SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42(W1): W252-8. [PMID: 24782522 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku340]

[14]

Elfiky AA. Anti-HCV, nucleotide inhibitors, repurposing against COVID-19. Life Sci 2020; 248: 117477. [PMID: 32119961 DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117477]

[15]

University of California. SAVEs v6: structure analysis and verification server. Available from: https://saves.mbi.ucla.edu/. [Last accessed on 30 Jul 2021].

[16]

Laskowski RA, Rullmann JAC, MacArthur MW, Kaptein R, Thornton JM. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J Biomol NMR 1996; 8(4): 477-86. [PMID: 9008363 DOI: 10.1007/bf00228148]

[17]

Eisenberg D, Lüthy R, Bowie JU. VERIFY3D: assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Methods Enzymol 1997; 277: 396-404. [PMID: 9379925 DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(97)77022-8]

[18]

Pontius J, Richelle J, Wodak SJ. Deviations from standard atomic volumes as a quality measure for protein crystal structures. J Mol Biol 1996; 264(1): 121-36. [PMID: 8950272 DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0628]

[19]

Hooft RW, Vriend G, Sander C, Abola EE. Errors in protein structures. Nature 1996; 381(6580): 272. [PMID: 8692262 DOI: 10.1038/381272a0]

[20]

Maier JA, Martinez C, Kasavajhala K, Wickstrom L, Hauser KE, et al. ff14SB: improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB. J Chem Theory Comput 2015; 11(8): 3696-713. [PMID: 26574453 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00255]

[21]

Wiederstein M, Sippl MJ. ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35: W407-10. [PMID: 17517781 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm290]

[22]

Barca GMJ, Bertoni C, Carrington L, Datta D, De Silva N, et al. Recent developments in the general atomic and molecular electronic structure system. J Chem Phys 2020; 152(15): 154102. [PMID: 32321259 DOI: 10.1063/5.0005188]

[23]

Rogério MEF, Chaves HV, Pinto IR, de Sousa NA, Ribeiro KA, et al. ADME-Tox prediction and molecular docking studies of two lead flavonoids from the roots of Tephrosia egregia Sandw and the gastroprotective effects of its root extract in mice. BIO Integr. 2022; 3(2): 43-52. [DOI: 10.15212/bioi-2021-0035]

[24]

Tian W, Chen C, Lei X, Zhao J, Liang J. CASTp 3.0: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46(W1): W363-7. [PMID: 29860391 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky473]

[25]

Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 2010; 31(2): 455-61. [PMID: 19499576 DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21334]

[26]

SCHRÖDINGER, LLC. PyMOL molecular graphics system (version 2.0) [Software]. 2021. Available at: https://www.pymol.org.

[27]

Laskowski RA, Swindells MB. LigPlot+: multiple ligand-protein interaction diagrams for drug discovery. J Chem Inf Model 2011; 51(10): 2778-86. [PMID: 21919503 DOI: 10.1021/ci200227u]

[28]

Abraham MJ, Murtola T, Schulz R, Páll S, Smith JC, et al. GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 2015; 1-2: 19-25. [DOI: 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001]

[29]

Kaminski GA, Friesner RA, Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL. Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. J Phys Chem B 2001; 105(28): 6474-87. [DOI: 10.1021/jp003919d]

[30]

Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJC, Fraaije JGEM. LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem 1997; 18(12): 1463-72. [DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-H]

[31]

Miyamoto S, Kollman PA. Settle: an analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models. J Comput Chem 1992; 13(8): 952-62. [DOI: 10.1002/jcc.540130805]

[32]

Darden T, York D, Pedersen L. Particle mesh Ewald: an N·log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 1993; 98(12): 10089-92. [DOI: 10.1063/1.464397]

[33]

Ghosh R, Chakraborty A, Biswas A, Chowdhuri S. Evaluation of green tea polyphenols as novel coronavirus (SARS CoV-2) main protease (Mpro) inhibitors - an in silico docking and molecular dynamics simulation study. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2021; 39(12): 4362-74. [PMID: 32568613 DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1779818]

[34]

Studer G, Rempfer C, Waterhouse AM, Gumienny R, Haas J, et al. QMEANDisCo-distance constraints applied on model quality estimation. Bioinformatics 2020; 36(6): 1765-71. Erratum in: Bioinformatics 2020;36(8):2647. [PMID: 31697312 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz828]

[35]

Benkert P, Tosatto SC, Schomburg D. QMEAN: a comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. Proteins 2008; 71(1): 261-77. [PMID: 17932912 DOI: 10.1002/prot.21715]

[36]

Blaising J, Polyak SJ, Pécheur EI. Arbidol as a broad-spectrum antiviral: an update. Antiviral Res 2014; 107: 84-94. [PMID: 24769245 DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.04.006]

[37]

McKee DL, Sternberg A, Stange U, Laufer S, Naujokat C. Candidate drugs against SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Pharmacol Res 2020; 157: 104859. [PMID: 32360480 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104859]

[38]

Uyeki TM. Oseltamivir treatment of influenza in children. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 66(10): 1501-3. [PMID: 29315362 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix1150]

[39]

Tchesnokov EP, Feng JY, Porter DP, Götte M. Mechanism of inhibition of Ebola virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase by remdesivir. Viruses 2019; 11(4): 326. [PMID: 30987343 DOI: 10.3390/v11040326]

[40]

Wang M, Cao R, Zhang L, Yang X, Liu J, et al. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res 2020; 30: 269-71. [PMID: 32020029 DOI: 10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0]

[41]

de Wilde AH, Jochmans D, Posthuma CC, Zevenhoven-Dobbe JC, Van Nieuwkoop S, et al. Screening of an FDA-approved compound library identifies four small-molecule inhibitors of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus replication in cell culture. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58(8): 4875-84. [PMID: 24841269 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.03011-14]

[42]

Taniguchi H, Ebina M, Kondoh Y, Ogura T, Azuma A, et al. Pirfenidone in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J 2010; 35(4): 821-9. [PMID: 19996196 DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00005209]

[43]

Noble PW, Albera C, Bradford WZ, Costabel U, Glassberg MK, et al. Pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (CAPACITY): two randomised trials. Lancet 2011; 377(9779): 1760-9. [PMID: 21571362 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60405-4]

[44]

Wang Z, Yang B, Li Q, Wen L, Zhang R. Clinical features of 69 cases with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71(15): 769-77. [PMID: 32176772 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa272]

[45]

Deng L, Li C, Zeng Q, Liu X, Li X, et al. Arbidol combined with LPV/r versus LPV/r alone against corona virus disease 2019: a retrospective cohort study. J Infect 2020; 81(1): e1-5. [PMID: 32171872 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.002]

[46]

Singh TU, Parida S, Lingaraju MC, Kesavan M, Kumar D, et al. Drug repurposing approach to fight COVID-19. Pharmacol Rep 2020; 72(6): 1479-508. [PMID: 32889701 DOI: 10.1007/s43440-020-00155-6]

[47]

Akram J, Azhar S, Shahzad M, Latif W, Khan KS. Pakistan Randomized and Observational Trial to Evaluate Coronavirus Treatment (PROTECT) of hydroxychloroquine, oseltamivir and azithromycin to treat newly diagnosed patients with COVID-19 infection who have no comorbidities like diabetes mellitus: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21(1): 702. [PMID: 32771032 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04616-4]

[48]

Muralidharan N, Sakthivel R, Velmurugan D, Gromiha MM. Computational studies of drug repurposing and synergism of lopinavir, oseltamivir and ritonavir binding with SARS-CoV-2 protease against COVID-19. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2020; 39(7): 2673-8. [PMID: 32248766 DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1752802]

[49]

Deshpande RR, Tiwari AP, Nyayanit N, Modak M. In silico molecular docking analysis for repurposing therapeutics against multiple proteins from SARS-CoV-2. Eur J Pharmacol 2020; 886: 173430. [PMID: 32758569 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173430]

[50]

Gordon CJ, Tchesnokov EP, Feng JY, Porter DP, Götte M. The antiviral compound remdesivir potently inhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Biol Chem 2020; 295(15): 4773-9. [PMID: 32094225 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.AC120.013056]

[51]

Shannon A, Le NT, Selisko B, Eydoux C, Alvarez K, et al. Remdesivir and SARS-CoV-2: structural requirements at both nsp12 RdRp and nsp14 exonuclease active-sites. Antiviral Res 2020; 178: 104793. [PMID: 32283108 DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104793]

[52]

Elfiky AA. Ribavirin, remdesivir, sofosbuvir, galidesivir, and tenofovir against SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp): a molecular docking study. Life Sci 2020; 253: 117592. Erratum in: Life Sci 2020;258:118350. [PMID: 32222463 DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117592]

[53]

Zhang XY, Huang HJ, Zhuang DL, Nasser MI, Yang MH, et al. Biological, clinical and epidemiological features of COVID-19, SARS and MERS and AutoDock simulation of ACE2. Infect Dis Poverty 2020; 9(1): 99. [PMID: 32690096 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-020-00691-6]

[54]

Agostini ML, Andres EL, Sims AC, Graham RL, Sheahan TP, et al. Coronavirus susceptibility to the antiviral remdesivir (GS-5734) is mediated by the viral polymerase and the proofreading exoribonuclease. mBio 2018; 9(2): e00221-18. [PMID: 29511076 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00221-18]

[55]

Williamson BN, Feldmann F, Schwarz B, Meade-White K, Porter DP, et al. Clinical benefit of remdesivir in rhesus macaques infected with SARS-CoV-2. Nature 2020; 585(7824): 273-6. [PMID: 32516797 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2423-5]

[56]

National Institutes of Health . ClinicalTrials.gov. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. [Last accessed on 4 Jul 2022].

[57]

Ahmed MZ, Zia Q, Haque A, Alqahtani AS, Almarfadi OM, et al. Aminoglycosides as potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease: an in silico drug repurposing study on FDA-approved antiviral and anti-infection agents. J Infect Public Health 2021; 14(5): 611-9. [PMID: 33866129 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.01.016]

[58]

Zarezade V, Rezaei H, Shakerinezhad G, Safavi A, Nazeri Z, et al. The identification of novel inhibitors of human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and main protease of Sars-Cov-2: a combination of in silico methods for treatment of COVID-19. J Mol Struct 2021; 1237: 130409. [PMID: 33840836 DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.130409]

[59]

Anastasiou IA, Eleftheriadou I, Tentolouris A, Tsilingiris D, Tentolouris N. In vitro data of current therapies for SARS-CoV-2. Curr Med Chem 2020; 27(27): 4542-8. [PMID: 32400323 DOI: 10.2174/0929867327666200513075430]

[60]

Kang CK, Seong MW, Choi SJ, Kim TS, Choe PG, et al. In vitro activity of lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 at concentrations achievable by usual doses. Korean J Intern Med 2020; 35(4): 782-7. [PMID: 32460458 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2020.157]

[61]

Nutho B, Mahalapbutr P, Hengphasatporn K, Pattaranggoon NC, Simanon N, et al. Why are lopinavir and ritonavir effective against the newly emerged coronavirus 2019? Atomistic insights into the inhibitory mechanisms. Biochemistry 2020; 59(18): 1769-79. [PMID: 32293875 DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00160]

[62]

Duangchaemkarn K, Reisfeld B, Lohitnavy M. A pharmacokinetic model of lopinavir in combination with ritonavir in human. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2014; 36: 5699-702. [PMID: 25571289 DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944921]

[63]

Oldfield V, Keating GM, Plosker G. Enfuvirtide: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection. Drugs 2005; 65(8): 1139-60. [PMID: 15907147 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200565080-00007]

[64]

Li Y, Xie Z, Lin W, Cai W, Wen C, et al. Efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir or arbidol in adult patients with mild/moderate COVID-19: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Med 2020; 1(1): 105-13. [PMID: 32838353 DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2020.04.001]

[65]

Chen J, Xia L, Liu L, Xu Q, Ling Y, et al. Antiviral activity and safety of darunavir/cobicistat for the treatment of COVID-19. Open Forum Infect Dis 2020; 7(7): ofaa241. [PMID: 32671131 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa241]

PDF (3623KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/