A novel methodology for modeling the effects of geometrical uncertainties in tree root-soil geometry on tree uprooting

Mahtab Shiravi , Ivan Depina , Marco Uzielli , Gianni Bartoli

Biogeotechnics ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 100183

PDF (6504KB)
Biogeotechnics ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) :100183 DOI: 10.1016/j.bgtech.2025.100183
Research Article
research-article
A novel methodology for modeling the effects of geometrical uncertainties in tree root-soil geometry on tree uprooting
Author information +
History +
PDF (6504KB)

Abstract

Tree root-soil interaction is important for problems such as uprooting of trees subjected to wind loads or the stability of vegetated slopes. This paper examines the stability of laterally loaded trees (e.g., subjected to wind) and introduces a novel methodology for characterizing the uprooting capacity of tree root-soil systems. The novelty of the methodology originates from the coupling between the Space Colonization Algorithm (SCA) for the geometry characterization of the root system with an efficient Finite Element Method(FEM) model. Each tree is unique, and finding a generalized model would need to account for multiple scenarios involving different a priori uncertain tree root geometries and soil types. The proposed methodology allows for the assessment of uncertain root geometries and their effects on the mechanical response of the root-soil system, thanks to the stochastic nature of the SCA. It introduces a competitive growth algorithm that models root branch expansion in the soil as a dynamic and stochastic process. The study captures the mechanical response of a tree root system with a 3D FEM model by using an elastoplastic mechanical model for the soil, while the roots are modeled with elastoplastic embedded beams. The proposed model enables the identification of the locations of root breakage and soil failure paths in multiple scenarios. Model outputs allow quantitative investigation into the relationship between root system geometry and the root-soil system uprooting capacity and base stiffness.

Keywords

Tree roots / Root-soil interaction / Uprooting / Space colonization algorithm / Embedded beam

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Mahtab Shiravi, Ivan Depina, Marco Uzielli, Gianni Bartoli. A novel methodology for modeling the effects of geometrical uncertainties in tree root-soil geometry on tree uprooting. Biogeotechnics, 2026, 4(2): 100183 DOI:10.1016/j.bgtech.2025.100183

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Mahtab Shiravi: Writing - review & editing, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Ivan Depina: Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Methodology, Conceptualization. Marco Uzielli: Writing - review & editing, Methodology, Conceptualization. Gianni Bartoli: Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgment

The research presented in this paper was conducted as part of the RETURN project (“Multi-risk analysis for trees in urban environments”). This project is financed through the European Union's Next Generation EU initiative under PNRR Italian National funding Grant ID: B83C22004820002 (2022-2025).

References

[1]

Achim, A., & Nicoll, B. C. (2009). Modelling the anchorage of shallow-rooted trees. Forestry, 82(3), 273-284. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpp004

[2]

Allan Jones, C., Bland, W.L., Ritchie, J.T., & Williams, J.R. (1991). Simulation of root growth. In Modeling Plant and Soil Systems (pp. 91-123). https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr31.c6.

[3]

Bischetti, G. B., Chiaradia, E. A., Epis, T., & Morlotti, E. (2009). Root cohesion of forest species in the Italian Alps. Plant and Soil, 324(1), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9941-0

[4]

Blackwell, P. G., Rennolls, K., & Coutts, M. P. (1990). A root anchorage model for shallowly rooted Sitka spruce. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 63(1), 73-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/63.1.73

[5]

Bloomenthal, J. (1985). Modeling the mighty maple Proceedings of the 12th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, https://doi.org/10.1145/325334.325249.

[6]

Coutts, M. P. (1983). Root architecture and tree stability. Plant and Soil, 71(1), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182653

[7]

Coutts, M. P. (1986). Components of tree stability in sitka spruce on peaty gley soil. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 59(2), 173-197. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/59.2.173

[8]

Danjon, F., Fourcaud, T., & Bert, D. (2005). Root architecture and wind-firmness of mature Pinus pinaster. New Phytologist, 168(2), 387-400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01497.x

[9]

Dupuy, L., Fourcaud, T., & Stokes, A. (2005a). A numerical investigation into the influence of soil type and root architecture on tree anchorage. Plant and Soil, 278(1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-7577-2

[10]

Dupuy, L., Fourcaud, T., & Stokes, A. (2005b). A numerical investigation into the influence of soil type and root architecture on tree anchorage. Plant and Soil, 278(1-2), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-7577-2

[11]

Dupuy, L. X., Fourcaud, T., Lac, P., & Stokes, A. (2007). A generic 3D finite element model of tree anchorage integrating soil mechanics and real root system architecture. American Journal of Botany, 94(9), 1506-1514. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.9.1506

[12]

Fourcaud, T., Ji, J. N., Zhang, Z. Q., & Stokes, A. (2008). Understanding the impact of root morphology on overturning mechanisms: A modelling approach. Annals of Botany, 101(8), 1267-1280. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm245

[13]

Giachi, E., Giambastiani, Y., Giannetti, F., Dani, A., & Preti, F. (2024). Root system evolution survey in a multi-approach method for SWBE monitoring: A case study in Tuscany (Italy). Sustainability, 16(10), https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104022

[14]

Hidayat, E.W., Giriantari, I.A.D., Sudarma, M., & Widyantara, I.M.O. (2020). Visualization of A Three-Dimensional Tree Modeling using Fractal Based on L-System. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Engineering and Creative Computing (ICSECC).

[15]

Honda, H. (1971). Description of the form of trees by the parameters of the tree-like body: Effects of the branching angle and the branch length on the shape of the tree-like body. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 31(2), 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(71)90191-3

[16]

Huang, Q., Wang, Y., Leung, A. K., & Zhu, J. (2024). Large-deformation simulations of root pull-out and breakage using material point method with a multi-level grid. Ecological Engineering, 201, Article 107216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107216

[17]

Kebede, B., & Soromessa, T. (2018). Allometric equations for aboveground biomass estimation of Olea europaea L. subsp. cuspidata in Mana Angetu Forest. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 4(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1433951

[18]

Kim, Y., Rahardjo, H., & Tsen-Tieng, D. L. (2020). Stability analysis of laterally loaded trees based on tree-root-soil interaction. Urban Forestry Urban Greening, 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126639

[19]

Li, Z., Hao, Y., Kopp, G. A., & Wu, C.-H. (2022). Identification of multimodal dynamic characteristics of a decurrent tree with application to a model-scale wind tunnel Study. Applied Sciences, 12(15), https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157432

[20]

Lintermann, B., & Deussen, O. (1999). Interactive modeling of plants. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 19(1), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.736469

[21]

Mansour, M. A., Newson, T., & Peterson, C. J. (2024). Windthrow resistance of trees: Geotechnical engineering approach. Trees, 38(2), 373-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-024-02488-8

[22]

Mickovski, S. B., Bengough, A. G., Bransby, M. F., Davies, M. C. R., Hallett, P. D., & Sonnenberg, R. (2007). Material stiffness, branching pattern and soil matric potential affect the pullout resistance of model root systems. European Journal of Soil Science, 58(6), 1471-1481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00953.x

[23]

Nicoll, B. C., Achim, A., Mochan, S., & Gardiner, B. A. (2005). Does steep terrain influence tree stability? A field investigation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35(10), 2360-2367. https://doi.org/10.1139/x05-157

[24]

Oppenheimer, P. E. (1986). Real time design and animation of fractal plants and trees. Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. https://doi.org/10.1145/15922.15892

[25]

PLAXIS, 3D. In. ( 2024). (Version 2024.2) Bentley Communities.

[26]

Preti, F., Dani, A., & Laio, F. (2010). Root profile assessment by means of hydrological, pedological and above-ground vegetation information for bio-engineering purposes. Ecological Engineering, 36(3), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.07.010

[27]

Preti, F., & Giadrossich, F. (2009). Root reinforcement and slope bioengineering stabilization by Spanish Broom (Spartium junceum L.). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13(9), 1713-1726. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1713-2009

[28]

Prusinkiewicz, P., Mündermann, L., Karwowski, R., & Lane, B. (2001). The use of positional information in the modeling of plants. Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, https://doi.org/10.1145/383259.383291.

[29]

Rahardjo, H., Harnas, F. R., Indrawan, I. G. B., Leong, E. C., Tan, P. Y., Fong, Y. K., & Ow, L. F. (2014). Understanding the stability of Samanea saman trees through tree pulling, analytical calculations and numerical models. Urban Forestry Urban Greening, 13(2), 355-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.12.002

[30]

Runions, A., Lane, B., & Prusinkiewicz, P. (2007). Modeling trees with a space colonization algorithm. In D. E. Merillou (Ed.). The Eurographics Association https://doi.org/10.2312/NPH/NPH07/063-070

[31]

Sachs, T., & Novoplansky, A. (1995). Tree form: Architectural models do not suffice. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences, 43(3), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/07929978.1995.10676605

[32]

Stokes, A. (1999). Strain distribution during anchorage failure of Pinus pinaster Ait. at different ages and tree growth response to wind-induced root movement. Plant and Soil, 217(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004613126353

[33]

Tomobe, H., Fujisawa, K., & Murakami, A. (2019). Experiments and FE-analysis of 2-D root-soil contact problems based on node-to-segment approach. Soils and Foundations, 59(6), 1860-1874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2019.08.003

[34]

Tomobe, H., Fujisawa, K., & Murakami, A. (2021). A Mohr-Coulomb-Vilar model for constitutive relationship in root-soil interface under changing suction. Soils and Foundations, 61(3), 815-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2021.03.005

[35]

van Noordwijk, M., Spek, L. Y., & de Willigen, P. (1994). Proximal root diameter as predictor of total root size for fractal branching models. Plant and Soil, 164(1), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00010116

[36]

Wilson, B.F. (1984). The Growing Tree. University of Massachusetts Press.

[37]

Wu, Q., Pagès, L., & Wu, J. (2016). Relationships between root diameter, root length and root branching along lateral roots in adult, field-grown maize. Annals of Botany, 117(3), 379-390. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv185

[38]

Yang, M., Defossez, P., Danjon, F., & Fourcaud, T. (2014). Tree stability under wind: Simulating uprooting with root breakage using a finite element method. Annals of Botany, 114(4), 695-709. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcu122

[39]

Yang, M., Défossez, P., Danjon, F., & Fourcaud, T. (2018). Analyzing key factors of roots and soil contributing to tree anchorage of Pinus species. Trees, 32(3), 703-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-018-1665-4

[40]

Zanotto, F., Grigolato, S., Schindler, D., & Marchi, L. (2024). Identifying wind-tree dynamics with numerical simulations based on experimental modal analysis. Forest Ecology and Management, 569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122188

PDF (6504KB)

93

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/