Influence of size and concentration of carbonate biomineral on biocementation and bioclogging for mitigating soil degradation

Surabhi Jain , Sarat Kumar Das

Biogeotechnics ›› 2023, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) : 100021

PDF (5026KB)
Biogeotechnics ›› 2023, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) :100021 DOI: 10.1016/j.bgtech.2023.100021
Research article
research-article

Influence of size and concentration of carbonate biomineral on biocementation and bioclogging for mitigating soil degradation

Author information +
History +
PDF (5026KB)

Abstract

Microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) is a promising technique to enhance the geotechnical properties of geomaterial either by strengthening via biocementation or reducing the hydraulic conductivity via bioclogging. This rate of modification mainly depends on the amount, and nature of biomineral precipitated and it is influenced by various environmental, chemical, and microbial factors. Given this, the present study aims to investigate the effect of biochemical conditions such as concentration of biomass and chemical reagents on the amount and nature of biomineral and its impact on the strength and permeability of biomodified sand. For this, the two microbes i.e., Sporosarcina pasteurii and isolated Proteus species at three different initial concentrations and chemical reagents by varying 0.1-1 molar of urea and calcium were considered. The amount and microstructural behavior of biomineral in different biochemical conditions concluded that the governing mechanism differs for both biocementation and bioclogging under identical MICP treatment. The strength enhancement or biocementation is dependent on the size of the biomineral precipitated whereas the reduction in permeability or bioclogging is mainly dominated by the amount of biomineral. The optimum value of biochemical conditions i.e., 108 cells/ml of biomass and 0.25 M concentration of cementation reagents was chosen to further evaluate the effect of equal MICP treatment on the biocementation and bioclogging of sands having different grain sizes. The study infers that not the absolute size of the biomineral but the relative size of soil grain and biomineral influence the linkage between the soil particles and hence affect the strength of biomodified soil.

Keywords

MICP / Biocementation / Bioclogging / Biochemical conditions / Carbonate biomineral

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Surabhi Jain, Sarat Kumar Das. Influence of size and concentration of carbonate biomineral on biocementation and bioclogging for mitigating soil degradation. Biogeotechnics, 2023, 1(2): 100021 DOI:10.1016/j.bgtech.2023.100021

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgment

The authors are thankful to Prof Dali Naidu Arnepalli of the Department of Civil Engineering at IIT Madras for his supervision and guidance.

References

[1]

A. Al Qabany k Soga, Effect of chemical treatment used in MICP on engineering properties of cemented soils, Geotechnique 63 (4) (2013) 331-339, https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.SIP13.P.022

[2]

A. Al Qabany, K. Soga, C. Santamarina, Factors affecting efficiency of microbially induced calcite precipitation, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (8) (2012) 992-1001, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000666

[3]

S.M. Al-Thawadi, R. Cord-Ruwisch, Calcium carbonate crystals formation by ureolytic bacteria isolated from Australian soil and sludge, Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci. 2 (1) (2012) 12-26.

[4]

F. Altuhafi, C. O’Sullivan, I. Cavarretta, Analysis of an image-based method to quantify the size and shape of sand particles, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (8) (2013) 1290-1307, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000855

[5]

ASTM, D2166. (2006). Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

[6]

ASTM, D2487. (2011) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

[7]

ASTM, D4253. (2016). Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

[8]

ASTM, D4254. (2016). Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

[9]

ASTM, D4972. (2013). Standard test method for pH of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

[10]

ASTM, D5084. (2016a). Standard test methods for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated porous materials using a flexible wall permeameter. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

[11]

ASTM, D5084. (2016b). Standard test methods for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated porous materials using a flexible wall permeameter. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

[12]

ASTM, D5550. (2014). Standard test method for specific gravity of soil solids by gas pycnometer. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

[13]

L. Cheng, R. Cord-Ruwisch, M.A. Shahin, Cementation of sand soil by microbially induced calcite precipitation at various degrees of saturation, Can. Geotech. J. 50 (1) (2013) 81-90, https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0023

[14]

L. Cheng, M.A. Shahin, D. Mujah, Influence of key environmental conditions on microbially induced cementation for soil stabilization, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (1) (2017) 04016083, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001586

[15]

J. Chu, V. Stabnikov, V. Ivanov, B. Li, Microbial method for construction of an aquaculture pond in sand, Geotechnique 63 (10) (2013) 871-875, https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.SIP13.P.007

[16]

J. Chu, V. Ivanov, M. Naeimi, V. Stabnikov, H.L. Liu, Optimization of calcium-based bioclogging and biocementation of sand, Acta Geotech. 9 (2) (2014) 277-285, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-013-0278-8

[17]

S.C. Chuo, S.F. Mohamed, S.H.M. Setapar, A. Ahmad, M. Jawaid, W.A. Wani, A.A. Yaqoob, M.N.M. Ibrahim, Insights into the current trends in the utilization of bacteria for microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation, Materials 13 (21) (2020) 4993, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214993

[18]

A. Dadda, C. Geindreau, F. Emeriault, S.R.D. Roscoat, A.E. Filet, A. Garandet, Characterization of contact properties in biocemented sand using 3D X-ray micro- tomography, Acta Geotech. 14 (2019) 597-613, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0744-4

[19]

A. Dadda, C. Geindreau, F. Emeriault, S.R.D. Roscoat, A. Garandet, L. Sapin, A.E. Filet, Characterization of microstructural and physical properties changes in biocemented sand using 3D X-ray microtomography, Acta Geotech. 12 (2017) 955-970, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-017-0578-5

[20]

J.T. Dejong, B.M. Mortensen, B.C. Martinez, D.C. Nelson, Biomediated soil improvement, Ecol. Eng. 36 (2) (2010) 197-210, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.12.029

[21]

A.D. Demenev, V.T. Khmurchik, N.G. Maksimovich, E.P. Demeneva, A.M. Sedinin, Improvement of sand properties using biotechnological precipitation of calcite cement (CaCO3), Environ. Earth Sci. 80 (17) (2021) 1-13, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09818-w

[22]

R. Devrani, A.A. Dubey, K. Ravi, L. Sahoo, Applications of bio-cementation and bio- polymerization for aeolian erosion control, J. Arid Environ. 187 (2021) 104433, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104433

[23]

A.A. Dubey, K. Ravi, M.A. Shahin, N.K. Dhami, A. Mukherjee, Bio-composites treatment for mitigation of current-induced riverbank soil erosion, Sci. Total Environ. 800 (2021) 149513, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149513

[24]

A.A. Dubey, K. Ravi, A. Mukherjee, L. Sahoo, M.A. Abiala, N.K. Dhami, Biocementation mediated by native microbes from Brahmaputra riverbank for mitigation of soil erodibility, Sci. Rep. 11 (2021) 15250, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94614-6

[25]

K.S. Gandhi, R. Kumar, D. Ramkrishna, Some basic aspects of reaction engineering of precipitation processes, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 34 (10) (1995) 3223-3230, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00037a007

[26]

Y. Gao, X. Tang, J. Chu, J. He, Microbially induced calcite precipitation for seepage control in sandy soil, Geomicrobiol. J. 36 (4) (2019) 366-375, https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2018.1556750

[27]

M.P. Harkes, L.A. van Paassen, J.L. Booster, V.S. Whiffin, M.C.M. van Loosdrecht, Fixation and distribution of bacterial activity in sand to induce carbonate precipitation for ground reinforcement, Ecol. Eng. 36 (2) (2010) 112-117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.01.004

[28]

V. Ivanov, J. Chu, Applications of microorganisms to geotechnical engineering for bioclogging and biocementation of soil in situ, Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 7 (2) (2008) 139-153, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-007-9126-3

[29]

S. Jain, D.N. Arnepalli, Adhesion and de-adhesion of ureolytic bacteria on sand under variable pore fluid chemistry, J. Environ. Eng. 146 (6) (2020), https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001708

[30]

N.J. Jiang, R. Liu, Y.J. Du, Y.Z. Bi, Microbial induced carbonate precipitation for immobilizing Pb contaminants: toxic effects on bacterial activity and immobilization efficiency, Sci. Total Environ. 672 (2019) 722-731, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.294

[31]

E.G. Lauchnor, D.M. Topp, A.E. Parker, R. Gerlach, Whole cell kinetics of ureolysis by Sporosarcina pasteurii, J. Appl. Microbiol. 118 (6) (2015) 1321-1332, https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12804

[32]

B.C. Martinez, J.T. DeJong, T.R. Ginn, B.M. Montoya, T.H. Barkouki, C. Hunt, B. Tanyu, B. Major, Experimental optimization of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation for soil improvement, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (4) (2013) 587-598, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000787

[33]

A.C. Mitchell, G.F. Ferris, The influence of bacillus pasteurii on the nucleation and growth of calcium carbonate, Geomicrobiol. J. 23 (3-4) (2006) 213-226, https://doi.org/10.1080/01490450600724233

[34]

D. Mori, K.V. Uday, A review on qualitative interaction among the parameters affecting ureolytic microbial-induced calcite precipitation, Environ. Earth Sci. 80 (8) (2021) 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09613-7

[35]

B.M. Mortensen, M.J. Haber, J.T. DeJong, L.F. Caslake, D.C. Nelson, Effects of environmental factors on microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation, J. Appl. Microbiol. 111 (2) (2011) 338-349, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05065.x

[36]

D. Mujah, L. Cheng, M.A. Shahin, Microstructural and geomechanical study on biocemented sand for optimization of MICP process, J. Mater. Civil Eng. 31 (4) (2019) 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002660

[37]

R. Murugan, G.K. Suraishkumar, A. Mukherjee, N.K. Dhami, Insights into the influence of cell concentration in design and development of microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) process, Plos One 16 (7) (2022) e0254536, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254536

[38]

T. Pan, Fineaggregate Characterisation Using Digital Image Analysis. MS Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Louisiana State University, USA, 2002.

[39]

V. Rebata-Landa, Microbialactivity in Sediments: Effects on Soil Behavior. Dissertation, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2007.

[40]

S.R. Shahrokhi, S.M. Zomorodian, A. Niazi, B.C.O. Kelly,Improving sand with microbial-induced carbonate precipitation, Proc. ICE Ground Improv. 168 (3) (2015) 217-230, https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.14.00001

[41]

C.S. Tang, L.Y. Yin, N.J. Jiang, C. Zhu, H. Zeng, H. Li, B. Shi, Factors affecting the performance of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) treated soil: a review, Environ. Earth Sci. 79 (5) (2020) 94, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-8840-9

[42]

L.A. van Paassen, Biogrout: Ground Improvement by Microbially Induced Carbonate Precipitation. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands, 2009.

[43]

P. Vangla, G.M. Latha, Influence of particle size on the friction and interfacial shear strength of sands of similar morphology, Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng. 1 (6) (2015) 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-014-0008-9

[44]

X. Wang, J. Tao, Polymer-modified microbially induced carbonate precipitation for one-shot targeted and localized soil improvement, Acta Geotech. 14 (2018) 1657-1671, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0757-z

[45]

V.S. Whiffin, L.A. van Paassen, M.P. Harkes, Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvement technique, Geomicrobiol. J. 24 (5) (2007) 417-423, https://doi.org/10.1080/01490450701436505

[46]

Y. Yan, Y. Tang, G. Xu, J. Lian, D. Fu, Study on the relationship between mechanical properties and mesostructure of microbial cemented sand bodies, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2 (2019) 1-13, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3684645

[47]

Q. Zhao, L. Li, C. Li, M. Li, F. Amini, H. Zhang, Factors affecting improvement of engineering properties of MICP treated soil catalyzed by bacteria and urease, J. Mater. Civil Eng. 26 (12) (2014) 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001013

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (5026KB)

49

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/