Biochar application enhances ant (Formica japonica) ecological functions as indicated by their social behaviors

Sha Liu , Danling Xiong , Liang Zeng , Wei Du , Yang Liu , Christian E. W. Steinberg , Bo Pan , Shu Tao , Baoshan Xing

Biochar ›› 2026, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 77

PDF
Biochar ›› 2026, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) :77 DOI: 10.1007/s42773-026-00594-z
Original Research
research-article
Biochar application enhances ant (Formica japonica) ecological functions as indicated by their social behaviors
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Soil fauna activity is crucial for soil ecosystem functioning and health, but soil remediation techniques, such as biochar application, are seldom examined for their influence on soil fauna activity. This study systematically evaluated the effects of rice straw biochar application on the social behaviors of ants, Formica japonica, and elucidated how these behavioral changes enhance ant ecological functional traits. At moderate concentrations (2.5–5%), biochar significantly enhanced several ant colony functions: nest site selection specificity increased by 73.4%, nest architecture complexity improved by 2.8-fold, foraging efficiency accelerated by 2 fold, and social recognition accuracy enhanced by 3.5-fold. The improved colony performance was manifested through sophisticated behavioral responses, including strengthened territorial defense (3.5-fold increase in aggressive behavior duration) and enhanced intraspecific cooperation (4 fold increase in peaceful touch frequency). These behavioral enhancements coincided with specific soil physicochemical conditions at the application rate of 5% biochar. However, higher biochar doses (10%) reduced colony-level survival to 60 ± 5.44% and diminished functional enhancement of behavioral performance, in part due to the presence of persistent free radicals and high pH. Our results indicate that ant social behavior may be altered during soil remediation, which should be carefully considered prior to engineering practices.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Rice straw / Social behavior / Nesting / Foraging / Species recognition / Ecosystem engineering

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Sha Liu, Danling Xiong, Liang Zeng, Wei Du, Yang Liu, Christian E. W. Steinberg, Bo Pan, Shu Tao, Baoshan Xing. Biochar application enhances ant (Formica japonica) ecological functions as indicated by their social behaviors. Biochar, 2026, 8(1): 77 DOI:10.1007/s42773-026-00594-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Auclerc A, Beaumelle L, Barantal S, Chauvat M, Cortet J, De Almeida T, Dulaurent AM, Dutoit T, Joimel S, Séré G. Fostering the use of soil invertebrate traits to restore ecosystem functioning. Geoderma. 2022, 424: 116019.

[2]

Barbero F, Mannino G, Casacci LP. The role of biogenic amines in social insects: with a special focus on ants. Insects. 2023, 14386.

[3]

Bender SF, Wagg C, van der Heijden MG. An underground revolution: biodiversity and soil ecological engineering for agricultural sustainability. Trends Ecol Evol. 2016, 31440-452.

[4]

Bernadou A, Busch J, Heinze J. Diversity in identity: behavioral flexibility, dominance, and age polyethism in a clonal ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015, 69: 1365-1375.

[5]

Biederman LA, Harpole WS. Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy. 2013, 5: 202-214.

[6]

Bolton B. A taxonomic and zoogeographical census of the extant ant taxa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Nat Hist. 1995, 29: 1037-1056.

[7]

Bos N, Grinsted L, Holman L. Wax on, wax off: nest soil facilitates indirect transfer of recognition cues between ant nestmates. PLoS ONE. 2011, 6: e19435.

[8]

Brassard P, Godbout S, Raghavan V. Soil biochar amendment as a climate change mitigation tool: key parameters and mechanisms involved. J Environ Manage. 2016, 181484-497.

[9]

Calabrese EJ, Baldwin LA. Hormesis: the dose-response revolution. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2003, 43: 175-197.

[10]

Calabrese EJ, Baldwin LA. Toxicology rethinks its central belief. Nature. 2003, 421: 691-692.

[11]

Calabrese EJ, Mattson MP. How does hormesis impact biology, toxicology, and medicine?. NPJ Aging Mech Dis. 2017, 3: 13.

[12]

Casillas-Pérez B, Boďová K, Grasse AV, Tkačik G, Cremer S. Dynamic pathogen detection and social feedback shape collective hygiene in ants. Nat Commun. 2023, 143232.

[13]

Castracani C, Maienza A, Grasso D, Genesio L, Malcevschi A, Miglietta F, Vaccari F, Mori A. Biochar–macrofauna interplay: searching for new bioindicators. Sci Total Environ. 2015, 536449-456.

[14]

Celorio-Mancera MLP, Ahn SJ, Vogel H, Heckel DG. Transcriptional responses underlying the hormetic and detrimental effects of the plant secondary metabolite gossypol on the generalist herbivore Helicoverpa armigera. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12: 575.

[15]

Chen Y, Zhao C, Zhang D, Zhang S, Zeng W, Li Z. The effect of amending soils with biochar on the microhabitat preferences of Coptotermes formosanus (Blattodea: Rhinotermitidae). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022, 232113240.

[16]

da Costa VB, Ogura AP, Alexandre DS, Soares MB, Alleoni LRF, Espíndola ELG, da Silva Pinto TJ. How much biochar is safe? Exploring potential ecotoxicological consequences for soil invertebrates and plants. Appl Soil Ecol. 2024, 202105552.

[17]

de Carvalho Campos AE. Analysis of ant communities comparing two methods for sampling ants in an urban park in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Sociobiology. 2012, 59971-984.

[18]

De Tender C, Vandecasteele B, Verstraeten B, Ommeslag S, Kyndt T, Debode J. Biochar-enhanced resistance to Botrytis cinerea in strawberry fruits (but not leaves) is associated with changes in the rhizosphere microbiome. Front Plant Sci. 2021, 12: 700479.

[19]

Dirzo R, Raven PH. Global state of biodiversity and loss. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2003, 28137-167.

[20]

Fu J, Qin M, Liang Y, Lu Y, An Y, Luo Y. Toxicity and behavioral effects of amending soils with biochar on red imported fire ants, Solenopsis invicta. Insects. 2024, 15: 42.

[21]

Glaser SM, Grüter C. Social and individual learners use different pathways to success in an ant minisociety. Anim Behav. 2023, 1981-9.

[22]

Hais A, Casacci LP, d'Ettorre P, Badía-Villas D, Leroy C, Barbero F. Variation in ants' chemical recognition signals across vineyard agroecosystems. Int J Mol Sci. 2024, 25: 10407.

[23]

Hancock GR, Kunkel V, Wells T, Martinez C. Soil organic carbon and soil erosion – understanding change at the large catchment scale. Geoderma. 2019, 34360-71.

[24]

Häring V, Fischer H, Cadisch G, Stahr K. Implication of erosion on the assessment of decomposition and humification of soil organic carbon after land use change in tropical agricultural systems. Soil Biol Biochem. 2013, 65: 158-167.

[25]

Hassan NA, Aly HM, Wahba TF. Laboratory evaluation of four types of biochar to manage some stored product insects. Int J Trop Insect Sci. 2022, 42: 2959-2968.

[26]

Hussain M, Farooq M, Nawaz A, Al-Sadi AM, Solaiman ZM, Alghamdi SS, Ammara U, Ok YS, Siddique KH. Biochar for crop production: potential benefits and risks. J Soils Sediments. 2017, 17: 685-716.

[27]

Krapf P, Hochenegger N, Arthofer W, Schlick-Steiner BC, Steiner FM. Comparing ant behaviour indices for fine-scale analyses. Sci Rep. 2019, 9: 6856.

[28]

Krapf P, Sedfaoui K, Contala M-L, Steiner FM, Schlick-Steiner BC. Short-time development of among-colony behaviour in a high-elevation ant. Behav Process. 2023, 208104872.

[29]

Laghari M, Naidu R, Xiao B, Hu Z, Mirjat MS, Hu M, Kandhro MN, Chen Z, Guo D, Jogi Q. Recent developments in biochar as an effective tool for agricultural soil management: a review. J Sci Food Agric. 2016, 964840-4849.

[30]

Lal R. Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability. 2015, 7: 5875-5895.

[31]

Lee X, Yang F, Xing Y, Huang Y, Xu L, Liu Z, Holtzman R, Kan I, Li Y, Zhang L. Use of biochar to manage soil salts and water: effects and mechanisms. CATENA. 2022, 211: 106018.

[32]

Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D. Biochar effects on soil biota – a review. Soil Biol Biochem. 2011, 431812-1836.

[33]

Leite PAM, Carvalho MC, Wilcox BP. Good ant, bad ant? Soil engineering by ants in the Brazilian Caatinga differs by species. Geoderma. 2018, 323: 65-73.

[34]

Li T, Zhang HC, Wang XY, Cheng SL, Fang HJ, Liu G, Yuan WP. Soil erosion affects variations of soil organic carbon and soil respiration along a slope in Northeast China. Ecol Process. 2019, 8: 28.

[35]

Li HJ, Li H, Zuo N, Lang D, Du W, Zhang P, Pan B. Can the concentration of environmentally persistent free radicals describe its toxicity to Caenorhabditis elegans? Evidence provided by neurotoxicity and oxidative stress. J Hazard Mater. 2024, 469133823.

[36]

Liao SH, Pan B, Li H, Zhang D, Xing BS. Detecting free radicals in biochars and determining their ability to inhibit the germination and growth of corn, wheat and rice seedlings. Environ Sci Technol. 2014, 488581-8587.

[37]

Lieke T, Zhang XC, Steinberg CEW, Pan B. Overlooked risks of biochars: persistent free radicals trigger neurotoxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Sci Technol. 2018, 52: 7981-7987.

[38]

Liu T, Yang LH, Hu ZK, Xue JR, Lu YR, Chen XY, Griffiths BS, Whalen JK, Liu MQ. Biochar exerts negative effects on soil fauna across multiple trophic levels in a cultivated acidic soil. Biol Fertil Soils. 2020, 56: 597-606.

[39]

Liu S, Li JS, Zhou ZM, Steinberg CEW, Pan B, Tao S, Xing BS. Biochar soil addition alters ant functional traits as exemplified with three species. Biochar. 2024, 6: 1-12.

[40]

Lu M, Wang SJ, Zhang Z, Chen MK, Li SH, Cao R, Cao QB, Zuo QQ, Wang P. Modifying effect of ant colonization on soil heterogeneity along a chronosequence of tropical forest restoration on slash-burn lands. Soil Tillage Res. 2019, 194: 104329.

[41]

Ma C, Zhang RJ, He Z, Su PJ, Wang LK, Yao YZ, Zhang XJ, Liu XY, Yang FS. Biochar alters the soil fauna functional traits and community diversity: a quantitative and cascading perspective. J Hazard Mater. 2024, 477135302.

[42]

Meurville MP, Silvestro D, LeBoeuf AC. Ecological change and conflict reduction led to a social circulatory system in ants. Commun Biol. 2025, 8(1): 246.

[43]

Montanarella L, Badraoui M, Chude V, Costa I, Mamo T, Yemefack M, Aulang M, Yagi K, Hong SY, Vijarnsorn P. Status of the world's soil resources: main report. 2015, Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

[44]

Noyce GL, Basiliko N, Fulthorpe R, Sackett TE, Thomas SC. Soil microbial responses over 2 years following biochar addition to a north temperate forest. Biol Fertil Soils. 2015, 51649-659.

[45]

Pennock D, McKenzie N, Montanarella L. Status of the world’s soil resources. Technical summary. 2015, Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

[46]

Perfecto I, Philpott SM. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and ecosystem functions and services in urban areas: a reflection on a diverse literature. Myrmecol News. 2023, 33: 103-122.

[47]

Pohl M, Hommen U, Eilebrecht S, Schäfers C, Gadau J, Otto M. Ants are no bees–gaps in the assessment of relevant exposure routes to pesticides and plant incorporated protectants. Environ Chem Ecotoxicol. 2024, 6: 71-81.

[48]

Poissonnier L-A, Hartmann Y, Czaczkes T. Ants combine object affordance with latent learning to make efficient foraging decisions. PNAS. 2023, 120: e2302654120.

[49]

R Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

[50]

Rasa K, Tähtikarhu M, Miettinen A, Kähärä T, Uusitalo R, Mikkola J, Hyväluoma J. A large one-time addition of organic soil amendments increased soil macroporosity but did not aff ect intra-aggregate porosity of a clay soil. Soil Tillage Res. 2024, 242. 106139

[51]

Ruan XX, Sun YQ, Du WM, Tang YY, Liu Q, Zhang ZY, Doherty W, Frost RL, Qian GR, Tsang DCW. Formation, characteristics, and applications of environmentally persistent free radicals in biochars: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2019, 281457-468.

[52]

Sappington JD. Imidacloprid alters ant sociobehavioral traits at environmentally relevant concentrations. Ecotoxicology. 2018, 27: 1179-1187.

[53]

Skaldina O, Sorvari J. Kesari K. Biomarkers of ecotoxicological effects in social insects. Perspectives in environmental toxicology. 2017, Cham, Springer International Publishing203-214.

[54]

Steinberg CEW, Pietsch K, Saul N, Menzel S, Swain SC, Stürzenbaum SR, Menzel R. Transcript expression patterns illuminate the mechanistic background of hormesis in Caenorhabditis elegans Maupas. Dose Response. 2013, 11: 558-576.

[55]

Suarez AV, Goodisman MA. Non-kin cooperation in ants. Front Ecol Evol. 2021, 9: 736757.

[56]

Tschinkel WR. Ant architecture: the wonder, beauty, and science of underground nests. 2021, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

[57]

Uhey DA, Hofstetter RW. From pests to keystone species: ecosystem influences and human perceptions of harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex, Veromessor, and Messor spp.). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2022, 115127-140.

[58]

Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. 2016, New York, Springer International Publishing, Verlag.

[59]

Xiao X, Zhao W, Shao Y, Hu C, Liu J, Zhang G, Yang F, Zhao J, Fu Y, Li L. Environmental exposure to cadmium induces olfactory neurotoxicity in fire ants and the molecular basis. Environ Pollut. 2024, 362: 124945.

[60]

Yang HQ, Chen N, Wang ZQ, Liu JB, Qin JJ, Zhu KC, Jia HZ. Biochar-associated free radicals reduce soil bacterial diversity: new insight into ecoenzymatic stoichiometry. Environ Sci Technol. 2023, 5720238-20248.

[61]

Yi Y, Dou GJ, Yu ZY, He H, Wang CQ, Li L, Zhou J, Liu DJ, Shi JY, Li GR, Pang L, Yang N, Huang QW, Qi HY. Z-ligustilide exerted hormetic effect on growth and detoxification enzymes of Spodoptera litura larvae. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018, 2018: 7104513.

[62]

Zhang JL, Liu M, Cui W, Yang L, Zhang CN. Quercetin affects shoaling and anxiety behaviors in zebrafish: involvement of neuroinflammation and neuron apoptosis. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 105359-368.

[63]

Zhang TR, Wei W, Xie JC, Zhou ZJ, Pu Y, Jia YL, Jia YX, Liu XJ, Zhang SR, Wang GY, Xu XX, Li T. Synergistic effects of biochar-immobilized Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila on potassium availability and ryegrass productivity in purplish soil. J Environ Manage. 2025, 396. 128119

[64]

Zhang XH, Zhang ZS, Xin Y, Wu HT, Bai JH. Effects of ant mounds construction on the carbon cycle in a drained peatland, Northeast China. CATENA. 2024, 243108191.

[65]

Zhao LL, Li LS, Chen XJ, Li YB, Ge JK, Wang XW. Responses of soil profile hydrology, structure and microbial respiration to organic amendments under diff erent tillage systems on the Loess Plateau. Agronomy. 2025, 151250.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(42130711)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/