Nitrogen conservation by hardwood biochar during food waste digestate composting: pyrolytic temperature dictates microbial mechanisms
Dongyi Li , Jun Zhou , Jialin Liang , Qiuxiang Xu , Jiayu Zhang , Wenhua Xue , Jonathan W. C. Wong
Biochar ›› 2026, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 75
Food waste digestate (FWD) composting is hindered by severe nitrogen loss, primarily through ammonia (NH3) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. While biochar amendment is known to mitigate this loss, the optimal pyrolysis temperature to maximize conservation remains unclear. This study decouples the distinct influence of pyrolysis temperature (300, 400, and 800 °C) of hardwood biochar on nitrogen conservation by linking biochar properties to microbial community dynamics. A critical trade-off is revealed: 300 °C biochar maximized NH3 reduction (39.2% vs. control, n = 2, p < 0.05) but was coincided with the enrichment of nirK/S-harboring denitrifiers (e.g., Luteimonas), posing a potential challenge from increased N2O emissions. Conversely, 800 °C biochar achieved the greatest N2O reduction (47.5% vs. control, n = 2, p < 0.05), an outcome consistent with suppressed microbial denitrification. Critically, biochar produced at 400 °C achieved an optimal balance, likely through enhanced NH3 adsorption and the fostering of a microbial community correlated with lower N2O emissions, which ultimately led to a 46.3% reduction in total nitrogen loss (vs. control, n = 2, p < 0.05), the highest performance among all treatments. This work guides the selection of biochar pyrolysis temperature toward targeted nitrogen conservation and sustainable FWD valorization.
Food waste digestate / Composting / Biochar / Nitrogen / Pyrolysis temperature
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
TMECC. (2015). The Test Method for the Examination of Composting and Compost. U.S. Composting Council. https://compostingcouncil.org/tmecc/ |
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |