Carbon dioxide removal potential of biochar with biomass supply from bioenergy crops in China

Mengjie Han , Chenyi Yuan , Philippe Ciais , Daniel S. Goll , Yi Leng , Minxuan Sun , Nan Meng , Jiaxin Zhou , Xiaomeng Du , Dabo Guan , Wenjia Cai , Rui Wang , Jianxiang Shen , Liang Jing , Qing Zhao , Wei Li

Biochar ›› 2026, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 43

PDF
Biochar ›› 2026, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) :43 DOI: 10.1007/s42773-025-00564-x
Original Research
research-article

Carbon dioxide removal potential of biochar with biomass supply from bioenergy crops in China

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Biochar and bioenergy crop cultivation with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) are two major negative emission technologies for carbon dioxide removal (CDR). However, biochar production is limited by biomass supply, while BECCS depends on costly CCS infrastructure and faces storage constraints. Here, a novel combination of biochar with biomass supply from dedicated bioenergy crops (BCBE) is proposed to overcome their respective limitations. Through retrofitting current biomass power plants in China with pyrolysis systems or CCS, biomass power plants are assumed to use either residues from agriculture and forestry or from dedicated bioenergy crops on abandoned croplands to meet their capacity for biochar production. Based on these plants, the CDR potential and the economic cost of BCBE are first investigated by considering different components in the life cycle of biochar, and are compared with an alternative scenario using bioenergy crops supply for BECCS. Locations for building new pyrolysis plants are then identified and the achievable CDR under biomass utilization scenarios is estimated. With 73% agricultural and half forestry residues or 84% bioenergy crops supplied to plants, the CDR potential of BCBE is 25.8 Tg CO2 year−1 (95% CI: 23.6–32.4 Tg CO2 year−1), comparable to that of biochar derived from agricultural and forestry residues (29.8 Tg CO2 year−1, 95% CI: 28.2–36.8 Tg CO2 year−1). Despite the lower CDR potential of BCBE compared with BECCS, the cost of BCBE ($9.6 t−1 CO2) is much lower than that of BECCS ($90.9 t−1 CO2). With newly built pyrolysis plants supplied with bioenergy crops and agricultural and forestry residues, the maximum CDR of all biochar sources can reach 1880.4 Tg CO2 year−1. Thus, deploying biochar on a large scale with additional biomass supply from bioenergy crops is expected to contribute substantially to achieving China's carbon neutrality goal. However, critical uncertainties remain regarding plant retrofit feasibility, technology integration, and the biomass supply chain.

Keywords

Biochar / Bioenergy crop / BECCS / Carbon dioxide removal / Life cycle analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Mengjie Han, Chenyi Yuan, Philippe Ciais, Daniel S. Goll, Yi Leng, Minxuan Sun, Nan Meng, Jiaxin Zhou, Xiaomeng Du, Dabo Guan, Wenjia Cai, Rui Wang, Jianxiang Shen, Liang Jing, Qing Zhao, Wei Li. Carbon dioxide removal potential of biochar with biomass supply from bioenergy crops in China. Biochar, 2026, 8(1): 43 DOI:10.1007/s42773-025-00564-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bozzi E, Genesio L, Toscano P, Pieri M, Miglietta F (2015) Mimicking biochar-albedo feedback in complex Mediterranean agricultural landscapes. Environ Res Lett 10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084014

[2]

Cadoux S, Riche AB, Yates NE, Machet J-M. Nutrient requirements of Miscanthus x giganteus: conclusions from a review of published studies. Biomass Bioenergy, 2012, 38: 14-22

[3]

Chiquier S, Patrizio P, Bui M, Sunny N, Mac Dowell N. A comparative analysis of the efficiency, timing, and permanence of CO2 removal pathways. Energy Environ Sci, 2022, 15: 4389-4403

[4]

Daioglou V, Doelman JC, Wicke B, Faaij A, van Vuuren DP. Integrated assessment of biomass supply and demand in climate change mitigation scenarios. Glob Environ Chang, 2019, 54: 88-101

[5]

de Oliveira Paiva I, de Morais EG, Jindo K, Silva CA. Biochar N content, pools and aromaticity as affected by feedstock and pyrolysis temperature. Waste Biomass Valoriz, 2024, 15: 3599-3619

[6]

Deng X, Teng F, Chen M, Du Z, Wang B, Li R, Wang P. Exploring negative emission potential of biochar to achieve carbon neutrality goal in China. Nat Commun, 2024, 15: 1085

[7]

Deng X, Teng F, Zhang X, Fan J-L, Forsell N,Reiner DM (2025) Co-deploying biochar and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage improves cost-effectiveness and sustainability of China’s carbon neutrality. One Earth 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.12.008

[8]

Fajardy M, Mac Dowell N. Can BECCS deliver sustainable and resource efficient negative emissions?. Energy Environ Sci, 2017, 10: 1389-1426

[9]

Fan J-L, Fu J, Zhang X, Li K, Zhou W, Hubacek K, Urpelainen J, Shen S, Chang S, Guo S, Lu X. Co-firing plants with retrofitted carbon capture and storage for power-sector emissions mitigation. Nat Clim Chang, 2023, 13: 807-815

[10]

Fan J-L, Xu M, Wei S, Shen S, Diao Y,Zhang X (2021) Carbon reduction potential of China's coal-fired power plants based on a CCUS source-sink matching model. Resour Conserv Recycl 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105320

[11]

Fang J, Yu G, Liu L, Hu S, Chapin FSIII. Climate change, human impacts, and carbon sequestration in China INTRODUCTION. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018, 115: 4015-4020

[12]

Fang Y, Singh B, Singh BP, Krull E. Biochar carbon stability in four contrasting soils. Eur J Soil Sci, 2014, 65: 60-71

[13]

Fuss S, Lamb WF, Callaghan MW, Hilaire J, Creutzig F, Amann T, Beringer T, Garcia WdO, Hartmann J, Khanna T, Luderer G, Nemet GF, Rogelj J, Smith P, Vicente JLV, Wilcox J, Dominguez MdMZ, Minx JC (2018) Negative emissions-Part 2: costs, potentials and side effects. Environ Res Lett 13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f

[14]

Gaunt JL, Lehmann J. Energy balance and emissions associated with biochar sequestration and pyrolysis bioenergy production. Environ Sci Technol, 2008, 42: 4152-4158

[15]

Gautam S, Baral NR, Mishra U, Scown CD. Impact of bioenergy feedstock carbon farming on sustainable aviation fuel viability in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2023, 120 e2312667120

[16]

Glaser B, Lehr V-I. Biochar effects on phosphorus availability in agricultural soils: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep, 2019, 9: 9338

[17]

Goerndt ME, Aguilar FX, Skog K. Drivers of biomass co-firing in US coal-fired power plants. Biomass Bioenergy, 2013, 58: 158-167

[18]

Goll DS, Ciais P, Amann T, Buermann W, Chang J, Eker S, Hartmann J, Janssens I, Li W, Obersteiner M, Penuelas J, Tanaka K, Vicca S. Potential CO2 removal from enhanced weathering by ecosystem responses to powdered rock. Nat Geosci, 2021, 14: 545-549

[19]

Gregg JS, Smith SJ. Global and regional potential for bioenergy from agricultural and forestry residue biomass. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change, 2010, 15: 241-262

[20]

Guo H, Cui J, Li J. Biomass power generation in China: status, policies and recommendations. Energy Rep, 2022, 8: 687-696

[21]

Han M, Zhao Q, Li W, Ciais P, Wang Y-P, Goll DS, Zhu L, Zhao Z, Wang J, Wei Y, Wu F. Global soil organic carbon changes and economic revenues with biochar application. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy, 2022, 14: 364-377

[22]

Huo L, Zhao L, Meng H, Yao Z. Study on straw multi-use potential in China. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2019, 35: 218-224

[23]

ISO. ISO 14040:2006 environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework, 2006, Geneva, International Standards Organisation

[24]

Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, Kammann C, Abalos D. Biochar effects on methane emissions from soils: a meta-analysis. Soil Biol Biochem, 2016, 101: 251-258

[25]

Karan SK, Woolf D, Azzi ES, Sundberg C, Wood SA. Potential for biochar carbon sequestration from crop residues: a global spatially explicit assessment. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy, 2023, 15: 1424-1436

[26]

Lehmann J. A handful of carbon. Nature, 2007, 447: 143-144

[27]

Lehmann J, Cowie A, Masiello CA, Kammann C, Woolf D, Amonette JE, Cayuela ML, Camps-Arbestain M, Whitman T. Biochar in climate change mitigation. Nat Geosci, 2021, 14: 883-892

[28]

Leng L, Huang H, Li H, Li J, Zhou W. Biochar stability assessment methods: a review. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 647: 210-222

[29]

Li W, Ciais P, Stehfest E, van Vuuren D, Popp A, Arneth A, Di Fulvio F, Doelman J, Humpenoeder F, Harper AB, Park T, Makowski D, Havlik P, Obersteiner M, Wang J, Krause A, Liu W. Mapping the yields of lignocellulosic bioenergy crops from observations at the global scale. Earth Syst Sci Data, 2020, 12: 789-804

[30]

Li X, Wu D, Liu X, Huang Y, Cai A, Xu H, Ran J, Xiao J, Zhang W. A global dataset of biochar application effects on crop yield, soil properties, and greenhouse gas emissions. Sci Data, 2024, 11: 57

[31]

Liu J, Wang S, Wei Q, Yan S. Present situation, problems and solutions of China׳ s biomass power generation industry. Energy Policy, 2014, 70: 144-151

[32]

Lomax G, Workman M, Lenton T, Shah N. Reframing the policy approach to greenhouse gas removal technologies. Energy Policy, 2015, 78: 125-136

[33]

Løvenskiold AC, Hu X, Zhao W, Cherubini F. Comparing the climate change mitigation potentials of alternative land uses: crops for biofuels or biochar vs. natural regrowth. Geogr Sustain, 2022, 3: 347-357

[34]

Lu N, Tian H, Fu B, Yu H, Piao S, Chen S, Li Y, Li X, Wang M, Li Z, Zhang L, Ciais P, Smith P. Biophysical and economic constraints on China's natural climate solutions. Nat Clim Chang, 2022, 12: 847-853

[35]

Miguez FE, Villamil MB, Long SP, Bollero GA. Meta-analysis of the effects of management factors on Miscanthus x giganteus growth and biomass production. Agric for Meteorol, 2008, 148: 1280-1292

[36]

Næss JS, Cavalett O, Cherubini F. The land–energy–water nexus of global bioenergy potentials from abandoned cropland. Nat Sustain, 2021, 4: 525-536

[37]

Nivala M, Anttila P, Laitila J, Salminen O, Flyktman M. A GIS-based methodology to estimate the regional balance of potential and demand of forest chips. J Geogr Inf Syst, 2016, 08: 633-662

[38]

OV Bluefire (2023). Accessed 2025-10-11. http://ovbluefire.com/index.php?c=content&a=list&catid=25

[39]

PM today (2024), UK’s largest biochar facility to open in wiltshire, aiming to sequester 17,000 tonnes of CO2 annually. Accessed 2025-10-11. https://www.pmtoday.co.uk/uks-largest-biochar-facility-to-open-in-wiltshire-aiming-to-sequester-17000-tonnes-of-co2-annually/

[40]

Renewable Carbon News (2023), NetZero inaugurates in Brazil world’s largest biochar factory using crop residues. Accessed 2025-10-11. https://renewable-carbon.eu/news/netzero-inaugurates-in-brazil-worlds-largest-biochar-factory-using-crop-residues/

[41]

Roberts KG, Gloy BA, Joseph S, Scott NR, Lehmann J. Life cycle assessment of biochar systems: estimating the energetic, economic, and climate change potential. Environ Sci Technol, 2010, 44: 827-833

[42]

Robertson GP, Hamilton SK, Barham BL, Dale BE, Izaurralde RC, Jackson RD, Landis DA, Swinton SM, Thelen KD, Tiedje JM. Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future: choices and outcomes. Science, 2017, 356 eaal2324

[43]

Rogelj J, Popp A, Calvin KV, Luderer G, Emmerling J, Gernaat D, Fujimori S, Strefler J, Hasegawa T, Marangoni G, Krey V, Kriegler E, Riahi K, van Vuuren DP, Doelman J, Drouet L, Edmonds J, Fricko O, Harmsen M, Havlik P, Humpenoeder F, Stehfest E, Tavoni M. Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C. Nat Clim Chang, 2018, 8: 325-332

[44]

Rosen J. The carbon harvest. Science, 2018, 359: 733-737

[45]

Sammarchi S, Li J, Yang Q, Yu J, Chen L. Decarbonizing China′s coal power with sustainable BECCS: a techno-spatial analysis. Clean Technol Environ Policy, 2024, 26: 1553-1570

[46]

Smith P. Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies. Glob Change Biol, 2016, 22: 1315-1324

[47]

Wang F, Zhou W, Wang X, Zhao Q, Han M. Biochar technology cannot offset land carbon emissions in Guangdong province, China. Carbon Res, 2024, 3 55

[48]

Wang J, Xiong Z, Kuzyakov Y. Biochar stability in soil: meta-analysis of decomposition and priming effects. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy, 2016, 8: 512-523

[49]

Wang R, Cai W, Yu L, Li W, Zhu L, Cao B, Li J, Shen J, Zhang S, Nie Y,Wang C (2023) A high spatial resolution dataset of China's biomass resource potential. Scientific Data 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02227-7

[50]

Wang R, Li H, Cai W, Cui X, Zhang S, Li J, Weng Y, Song X, Cao B, Zhu L, Yu L, Li W, Huang L, Qi B, Ma W, Bian J, Zhang J, Nie Y, Fu J, Zhang J, Wang C. Alternative pathway to phase down coal power and achieve negative emission in China br. Environ Sci Technol, 2022

[51]

Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrott FA, Lehmann J, Joseph S. Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat Commun, 2010, 1: 56

[52]

Wu CZ, Yin XL, Yuan ZH, Zhou ZQ, Zhuang XS. The development of bioenergy technology in China. Energy, 2010, 35: 4445-4450

[53]

Wu P, Ata-Ul-Karim ST, Singh BP, Wang H, Wu T, Liu C, Fang G, Zhou D, Wang Y, Chen W. A scientometric review of biochar research in the past 20 years (1998–2018). Biochar, 2019, 1: 23-43

[54]

Xia L, Chen W, Lu B, Wang S, Xiao L, Liu B, Yang H, Huang C-L, Wang H, Yang Y, Lin L, Zhu X, Chen W-Q, Yan X, Zhuang M, Kung C-C, Zhu Y-G, Yang Y. Climate mitigation potential of sustainable biochar production in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2023, 175 113145

[55]

Xie J, Zhuge X, Liu X, Zhang Q, Liu Y, Sun P, Zhao Y,Tong Y (2023) Environmental sustainability opportunity and socio-economic cost analyses of phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge. Environ Sci Ecotechnol 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2023.100258

[56]

Yang Q, Zhou H, Bartocci P, Fantozzi F, Masek O, Agblevor FA, Wei Z, Yang H, Chen H, Lu X, Chen G, Zheng C, Nielsen CP, McElroy MB. Prospective contributions of biomass pyrolysis to China's 2050 carbon reduction and renewable energy goals. Nat Commun, 2021, 12: 1-12

[57]

Yang Y, Tilman D, Lehman C, Trost JJ. Sustainable intensification of high-diversity biomass production for optimal biofuel benefits. Nat Sustain, 2018, 1: 686-692

[58]

Yang Y, Zhang P, Zhang W, Tian Y, Zheng Y, Wang L. Quantitative appraisal and potential analysis for primary biomass res0ces for energy utilization in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2010, 14: 3050-3058

[59]

Yuan X, Chen L, Sheng X, Liu M, Xu Y, Tang Y, Wang Q, Ma Q, Zuo J. Life cycle cost of electricity production: a comparative study of coal-fired, biomass, and wind power in China. Energies, 2021, 14: 3463

[60]

Zhang L, Jing Y, Chen C, Xiang Y, Rezaei Rashti M, Li Y, Deng Q, Zhang R. Effects of biochar application on soil nitrogen transformation, microbial functional genes, enzyme activity, and plant nitrogen uptake: a meta‐analysis of field studies. GCB Bioenergy, 2021, 13: 1859-1873

[61]

Zhang Y-L, Kang J-N, Dai M, Hou J-J, Liu L-C, Wei Y-M, Liao H. The role of BECCS technology in achieving carbon neutrality: evidences from China' coal power sector. Environ Dev Sustain, 2023

[62]

Zheng H, Guo L, He B, Shen Y, Yuan W, Yang W, Li T, Zheng H. The great climate mitigation potential of cropland ecosystem management in China. Earths Future, 2023, 11 e2023EF003586

[63]

Zilberman D, Laird D, Rainey C, Song J, Kahn G. Biochar supply-chain and challenges to commercialization. GCB Bioenergy, 2023, 15: 7-23

[64]

Zimmerman AR, Gao B, Ahn M-Y. Positive and negative carbon mineralization priming effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils. Soil Biol Biochem, 2011, 43: 1169-1179

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

5

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/