Mineral nitrogen input modulates the methane mitigation potential of biochar in rice systems: based on meta-analysis and field experiment demonstration

Abstract

The application of organic materials has a profound impact on CH₄ emissions from paddy fields. Biochar has been reported to mitigate CH₄ emissions, but this conclusion has recently been challenged and requires further investigation. This study aimed to determine the effect of biochar on paddy CH₄ emissions by integrating organic amendment emission data through network meta-analysis (NMA), and to identify the key moderators using multiple meta-regression (MR) approaches. Field experiments were conducted to verify the conclusions of MR. Based on 146 entries from 51 studies, a mixed-effects meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of organic material applications on soil CH₄ emissions. We focused on the biochar mitigation potential in rice systems and validated the conclusions through a field experiment. Biochar demonstrated the lowest methane emissions among all treatments. Carbon to nitrogen ratio of biochar (MC:N) and mineral nitrogen input (ICN) were identified as key moderators influencing the methane mitigation potential of biochar in rice cultivation. ICN was the most influential factor. When ICN exceeded 291.18 kg ha⁻¹, biochar tended to increase methane emissions, whereas at lower ICN levels, it contributed to emission reductions. Field experiments confirmed that at high mineral N levels (310 kg ha⁻¹), biochar significantly increased CH₄ flux and emission potential. Overall, this study highlights the potential of biochar to reduce methane emissions in rice systems and underscores the importance of regulating mineral nitrogen inputs to maximize its mitigation effectiveness.

Keywords

Mineral nitrogen addition / Biochar / CH₄ emissions / Network meta-analysis / Field experiment

References

[1] Adugna G. A review on impact of compost on soil properties, water use and crop productivity. Agric Sci Res J, 2018, 4(3): 93-104

[2] Ali I, Yuan P, Ullah S, Iqbal A, Zhao Q, Liang H, Khan A, Imran ZH, Wu X, Wei S, Gu M, Jiang L. biochar amendment and nitrogen fertilizer contribute to the changes in soil properties and microbial communities in a paddy field. Front Microbiol, 2022, 13834751

[3] Balduzzi S, Rücker G, Nikolakopoulou A, Papakonstantinou T, Salanti G, Efthimiou O, Schwarzer G (2023) netmeta: an R package for network meta-analysis using frequentist methods. J Stat Softw 106(2)

[4] Bodelier P, Laanbroek H. Nitrogen as a regulatory factor of methane oxidation in soils and sediments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2004, 47(3): 265-277

[5] Chen Z, Han S, Dong Z, Li H, Zhang A. Trade-off between soil carbon sequestration and net ecosystem economic benefits for paddy fields under long-term application of biochar. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy, 2023, 16(1e13116

[6] Crippa M, Solazzo E, Huang G, Guizzardi D, Koffi E, Muntean M, Schieberle C, Friedrich R, Janssens-Maenhout G. High resolution temporal profiles in the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research. Sci Data, 2020, 71): 121

[7] Csárdi G, Nepusz T (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research.

[8] Cui Y, Meng J, Wang Q, Zhang W, Cheng X, Chen W. Effects of straw and biochar addition on soil nitrogen, carbon, and super rice yield in cold waterlogged paddy soils of North China. J Integr Agric, 2017, 1651064-1074

[9] Egger M, Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 1997, 315(7109): 629-634

[10] Fick S, Hijmans R. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol, 2017, 37(12): 4302-4315

[11] Fohrafellner J, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Murugan R, Valkama E. Quality assessment of meta-analyses on soil organic carbon. Soil, 2023, 9(1): 117-140

[12] Gulledge J, Schimel J. Low-concentration kinetics of atmospheric CH₄ oxidation in soil and mechanism of NH₄⁺ inhibition. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1998, 64: 4291-4298

[13] Haddaway N, Bethel A, Dicks L, Koricheva J, Macura B, Petrokofsky G, Pullin A, Savilaakso S, Stewart G. Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them. Nat Ecol Evol, 2020, 4: 1582-1589

[14] Harrer M, Cuijpers P, Furukawa T, Ebert D (2019) Doing meta-analysis in R: A hands-on guide.

[15] Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, Welch V (2024).Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 6.5 (updated August 2024). Cochrane.

[16] Hou N, Wang K, Zhang H, Bai M, Chen H, Song W, Jia F, Zhang Y, Han S, Xie B. Comparison of detection rate of 16 sampling methods for respiratory viruses: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of clinical data and systematic review. BMJ Glob Health, 2020, 5e003053

[17] Hungate B, van Groenigen K, Six J, Jastrow J, Luo Y, de Graaff M, van Kessel C, Osenberg C. Assessing the effect of elevated carbon dioxide on soil carbon: a comparison of four meta-analyses. Glob Change Biol, 2009, 15(8): 2020-2034

[18] Jeong S, Kim G, Hwang H, Kim P, Kim S. Beneficial effect of compost utilization on reducing greenhouse gas emissions in a rice cultivation system through the overall management chain. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 613–614: 115-122

[19] Ji C, Jin Y, Li C, Chen J, Kong D, Yu K, Liu S, Zou J. Variation in soil methane release or uptake responses to biochar amendment: a separate meta-analysis. Ecosystems, 2018, 21: 1692-1705

[20] Jing H, Li J, Yan B, Wei F, Wang G, Liu G. The effects of nitrogen addition on soil organic carbon decomposition and microbial C-degradation functional genes abundance in a Pinus tabulaeformis forest. For Ecol Manage, 2021, 489119098

[21] Kerner P, Struhs E, Mirkouei A, Aho K, Lohse K, Dungan R, You Y. Microbial responses to biochar soil amendment and influential factors: a three-level meta-analysis. Environ Sci Technol, 2023, 57(48): 19838-19848

[22] Khatibi S, Adviento-Borbe M, Dimaano N, Radanielson A, Ali J. Advanced technologies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from rice fields: is hybrid rice the game changer?. Plant Commun, 2025, 6(2101224

[23] Khosa M, Sidhu B, Benbi D. Effect of organic materials and rice cultivars on methane emission from rice field. J Environ Biol, 2010, 313): 281-285

[24] Kim S, Jeong S, Ho A, Hong C, Lee C, Kim P. Cattle manure composting: shifts in the methanogenic community structure, chemical composition, and consequences on methane production potential in a rice paddy. Appl Soil Ecol, 2018, 124: 344-350

[25] Kuhn M (2008) Building predictive models in R using the caret package. J Stat Softw 28(5).

[26] Lajeunesse M. Facilitating systematic reviews, data extraction and meta-analysis with the metagear package for R. Methods Ecol Evol, 2016, 7(3): 323-330

[27] Lee J, Lee G, Jeong S, Gwon H, Kim P, Kim F. Straw recycling in rice paddy: trade-off between greenhouse gas emission and soil carbon stock increase. Soil Tillage Res, 2020, 199104598

[28] Li J, Li F, Li W, Chen S, Abbott L, Knops J. Nitrogen additions promote decomposition of soil organic carbon in a Tibetan Alpine Meadow. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2018, 82(3): 614-621

[29] Van Lissa C (2017) MetaForest: exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis using random forests. Preprint.

[30] Liu C, Lu M, Cui J, Li B, Fang C. Effects of straw carbon input on carbon dynamics in agricultural soils: a meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol, 2014, 20: 1366-1381

[31] Liu Y, Ge T, van Groenigen K, Yang Y, Wang P, Cheng K, Zhu Z, Wang J, Li Y, Guggenberger G, Sardans J, Penuelas J, Wu J, Kuzyakov Y. Rice paddy soils are a quantitatively important carbon store according to a global synthesis. Commun Earth Environ, 2021, 2: 154

[32] Maillard E, Angers D. Animal manure application and soil organic carbon stocks: a meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol, 2014, 20: 666-679

[33] Middelanis T, Looschelders D, Mueller P, Knorr K. Potential of biochar to mitigate methane production in paddy soils—application of a new incubation and modelling approach. Biogeochemistry, 2025, 1686

[34] Nakagawa S, Noble D, Senior A, Lagisz M. Meta-evaluation of meta-analysis: ten appraisal questions for biologists. BMC Biol, 2017, 158

[35] Nan Q, Wang C, Wang H, Yi Q, Wu W. Mitigating methane emission via annual biochar amendment pyrolyzed with rice straw from the same paddy field. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 746141351–141351

[36] Nan Q, Xin L, Qin Y, Waqas M, Wu W. Exploring long-term effects of biochar on mitigating methane emissions from paddy soil: a review. Biochar, 2021, 3: 125-134

[37] Ng C, Muthiah M, Xiao J, Chin Y, Lim G, Lim W, Tay P, Tan D, Yong J, Pan X, Koh J, Chew N, Syn N, Tan E, Huang D, Siddiqui M, Loomba R, Sanyal A, Noureddin M. Meta-analysis: analysis of mechanistic pathways in the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Evidence from a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2022, 55(9): 1076-1087

[38] Osenberg C, Sarnelle O, Cooper S, Holt R. Resolving ecological questions through meta-analysis: goals, metrics, and models. Ecology, 1999, 80(4): 1105-1117

[39] Pittelkow C, Liang X, Linquist B, van Groenigen K, Lee J, Lundy M, van Gestel N, Six J, Venterea R, van Kessel C. Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature, 2015, 517(7534): 365-368

[40] Qian H, Zhu X, Huang S, Linquist B, Kuzyakov Y, Wassmann R, Minamikawa K, Eixarch M, Yan X, Zhou F, Sander B, Zhang W, Shang Z, Zou J, Zheng X, Li G, Liu Z, Wang S, Ding Y, van Groenigen K, Jiang Y. Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation in rice agriculture. Nat Rev Earth Environ, 2023, 4: 716-732

[41] Qian S, Zhou X, Fu Y, Song B, Yan H, Chen Z, Sun Q, Ye H, Qin L, Lai C. Biochar-compost as a new option for soil improvement: application in various problem soils. Sci Total Environ, 2023, 870162024

[42] Rajendran S, Park H, Kim J, Park S, Shin D, Lee J, Song Y, Paek N, Kim C. Methane emission from rice fields: necessity for molecular approach for mitigation. Rice Sci, 2024, 31(2): 159-178

[43] Rubin D, Schenker N. Multiple imputation in health-are databases: an overview and some applications. Stat Med, 1991, 10(4): 585-598

[44] Rücker G, Schwarzer G. Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2015, 15: 58

[45] Salanti G, Ades A, Ioannidis J. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011, 64(2): 163-171

[46] Sander B, Samson M, Buresh R. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from flooded rice fields as affected by water and straw management between rice crops. Geoderma, 2014, 235: 355-362

[47] Schimel J. Rice, microbes and methane. Nature, 2000, 403: 375-377

[48] Shakoor A, Shakoor S, Rehman A, Ashraf F, Abdullah M, Shahzad S, Farooq T, Ashraf M, Manzoor M, Altaf M. Effect of animal manure, crop type, climate zone, and soil attributes on greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils-A global meta-analysis. J Clean Prod, 2021, 278124019

[49] Shang Z, AIBDalla M, Xia L, Zhou F, Sun W, Smith P. Can cropland management practices lower net greenhouse emissions without compromising yield?. Glob Change Biol, 2021, 27(19): 4657-4670

[50] Shangguan W, Dai Y, Duan Q, Liu B, Yuan H. A global soil data set for earth system modeling. J Adv Model Earth Syst, 2014, 6(1): 249-263

[51] Slingo J, Slingo M. The science of climate change and the effect of anaesthetic gas emissions. Anaesthesia, 2024, 79(3): 252-260

[52] Smith P, Lanigan G, Kutsch W, Buchmann N, Eugster W, Aubinet M, Ceschia E, Béziat P, Yeluripati J, Osborne B, Moors E, Brut A, Wattenbach M, Saunders M, Jones M. Measurements necessary for assessing the net ecosystem carbon budget of croplands. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2010, 139(3): 302-315

[53] Song T, Yin S, Li X, Jiang Y, Lin T. Thymoglobulin vs. ATG-Fresenius as induction therapy in kidney transplantation: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Immunol, 2020

[54] Song H, Lee J, Canatoy R, Lee J, Kim P. Strong mitigation of greenhouse gas emission impact via aerobic short pre-digestion of green manure amended soils during rice cropping. Sci Total Environ, 2021, 761143193

[55] Spiegelhalter D, Best N, Carlin B, Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J Roy Stat Soc B Stat Methodol, 2002, 64(4): 1-34

[56] Spiegelhalter D, Best N, Carlin B, Linde A. The deviance information criterion: 12 years on summary. J Roy Stat Soc B Stat Methodol, 2014, 76(3): 485-493

[57] Sriphirom P, Towprayoon S, Yagi K, Rossopa B, Chidthaisong A. Changes in methane production and oxidation in rice paddy soils induced by biochar addition. Appl Soil Ecol, 2022, 179104585

[58] Sun H, Lee J, Chen X, Zhuang J. Estimating soil water retention for wide ranges of pressure head and bulk density based on a fractional bulk density concept. Sci Rep, 2020, 10: 16666

[59] Tamai N, Takenaka C, Ishizuka S. Water-soluble Al inhibits methane oxidation at atmospheric concentration levels in Japanese forest soil. Soil Biol Biochem, 2007, 39: 1730-1736

[60] Tariq A, Vu Q, Jensen L, de Tourdonnet S, Sander B, Wassmann R, van Mai T, de Neergaard A. Mitigating CH₄ and N₂O emissions from intensive rice production systems in northern Vietnam: Efficiency of drainage patterns in combination with rice residue incorporation. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2017, 249: 101-111

[61] Terrer C, Phillips R, Hungate B, Rosende J, Pett-Ridge J, Craig M, van Groenigen K, Keenan T, Sulman B, Stocker B, Reich P, Pellegrini A, Pendall E, Zhang H, Evans R, Carrillo Y, Fisher J, Van Sundert K, Vicca S, Jackson R. A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO₂. Nature, 2021, 591: 599-603

[62] Valera C, Alexander M. Nutrition and physiology of denitrifying bacteria. Plant Soil, 1961, 15: 268-280

[63] Van Valkenhoef G, Kuiper J (2023) gemtc: Network meta-analysis using Bayesian methods.

[64] Van Valkenhoef G, Lu G, de Brock B, Hillege H, Ades A, Welton N. Automating network meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 2012, 3(4): 285-299

[65] Van Valkenhoef G, Dias S, Ades E, Welton N. Automated generation of node-splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 2016, 7(1): 80-93

[66] Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package. J Stat Softw 36(3).

[67] Wang Y, Hu Y, Zhao X, Wang S, Xing G. Comparisons of biochar properties from wood material and crop residues at different temperatures and residence times. Energy Fuels, 2013, 27(10): 5890-5899

[68] Wang B, Zhou G, Guo S, Li X, Yuan J, Hu A. Improving nitrogen use efficiency in rice for sustainable agriculture: strategies and future perspectives. Life, 2022, 12(10): 1653

[69] Wang J, Ye F, Ji Y, Zhou Z, Zhang X, Nie Y, Qin L, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Wang W, Yang J, Chen Y, Liu L. Straw type and nitrogen-water management balance rice yield and methane emissions by regulating rhizosphere microenvironment. Field Crop Res, 2024, 317109555

[70] Weber K, Quicker P. Properties of biochar. Fuel, 2018, 217: 240-261

[71] Weber S, Stubner S, Conrad R. Bacterial populations colonizing and degrading rice straw in anoxic paddy soil. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2001

[72] Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, 2016, New York, Springer-Verlag

[73] Xia L, Wang S, Yan X. Effects of long-term straw incorporation on the net global warming potential and the net economic benefit in a rice–wheat cropping system in China. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2014, 197: 118-127

[74] Xia L, Ti C, Li B, Xia Y, Yan X. Greenhouse gas emissions and reactive nitrogen releases during the life-cycles of staple food production in China and their mitigation potential. Sci Total Environ, 2016, 556: 116-125

[75] Xia L, Lam S, Yan X, Chen D. How does recycling of livestock manure in agroecosystems affect crop productivity, reactive nitrogen losses, and soil carbon balance?. Environ Sci Technol, 2017, 51(13): 7450-7457

[76] Xia L, Lam S, Wolf B, Kiese R, Chen D, Butterbach-Bahl K. Trade-offs between soil carbon sequestration and reactive nitrogen losses under straw return in global agroecosystems. Glob Change Biol, 2018, 24(12): 5919-5932

[77] Yan X, Yagi K, Akiyama H, Akimoto H. Statistical analysis of the major variables controlling methane emission from rice fields. Glob Change Biol, 2005, 11(7): 1131-1141

[78] Zhou R, Liu Y, Dungait J, Kumar A, Wang J, Tiemann L, Zhang F, Kuzyakov Y, Tian J. Microbial necromass in cropland soils: a global meta-analysis of management effects. Glob Change Biol, 2023, 29: 1998-2014

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(42477136)

National Key Research and Development Program(2023YFD1902901)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)