Contrasting effects of rice husk and palm silk biochars on water infiltration and leakage in a phosphorus-enriched sandy-loam vegetable soil

Xiongsheng Yu , Rongping Wang , Ying Guo , Yong Liu , Tingjin Ye , Wangxing Luo , Qihao Yang , Songshui Hu , Jiyi Zhu , Mu Zhang , Hongtao Qiao , Nanthi Bolan , Hailong Wang

Biochar ›› 2026, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 26

PDF
Biochar ›› 2026, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) :26 DOI: 10.1007/s42773-025-00543-2
Original Research
research-article

Contrasting effects of rice husk and palm silk biochars on water infiltration and leakage in a phosphorus-enriched sandy-loam vegetable soil

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Biochar amendment impacts soil water movement through modifications of soil properties, yet the mechanisms linking these changes to hydrological dynamics in vegetable soils with phosphorus (P) surplus remain elusive. This study systematically compared the effects of two regionally prevalent biochars—rice husk biochar (RHB) and palm silk biochar (PSB)—on water infiltration and leakage in a P-enriched sandy loam vegetable soil from southern China using a soil column experiment. Biochars were incorporated into the topsoil (0–20 cm) at rates of 0%, 3%, and 6% (w/w). Results demonstrated that RHB, with a broader pore size distribution and significant macropores (>50 nm) despite an average pore diameter of 40.7 nm, inhibited water infiltration more effectively than the uniformly mesoporous PSB (average pore diameter: 4.40 nm), especially in the surface layer. At the 6% amendment rate, RHB increased saturated water content (θs) by 14% and reduced saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) by 52%, whereas PSB delayed water release through mesopore-dominated retention. Both biochars comparably suppressed water leakage at a given amendment rate. Structural equation modeling quantified a dual regulatory mechanism: total organic carbon (TOC) governed infiltration by enhancing θs, while pH controlled it by reducing Ks. This synergy intensified the trade-offs between water retention and infiltration suppression at higher amendment rates. Although 6% RHB amendment (theoretical scaling: 186 t ha−1) maximized hydrological benefits, the 3% amendment rate (theoretical scaling: 93 t ha−1) offers a more practical, cost-effective balance for reducing water and dissolved reactive P losses. We conclude that biochar’s feedstock-specific pore structure (macropore-dominated RHB vs. mesopore-dominated PSB) and induced physicochemical changes (TOC-driven θs increase and pH-mediated Ks reduction) synergistically dictate hydrological regulation. This mechanistic insight optimizes water-P coordination in subtropical vegetable soils (e.g., Olsen-P>40 mg kg−1, a threshold far exceeding the agronomic requirement and indicating a high risk of P leaching).

Keywords

Biochar amendment / Sandy loam / Soil column simulation / Water movement / Infiltration / Water retention curve

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiongsheng Yu, Rongping Wang, Ying Guo, Yong Liu, Tingjin Ye, Wangxing Luo, Qihao Yang, Songshui Hu, Jiyi Zhu, Mu Zhang, Hongtao Qiao, Nanthi Bolan, Hailong Wang. Contrasting effects of rice husk and palm silk biochars on water infiltration and leakage in a phosphorus-enriched sandy-loam vegetable soil. Biochar, 2026, 8(1): 26 DOI:10.1007/s42773-025-00543-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Acharya BS, Dodla S, Wang JJ, Pavuluri K, Darapuneni M, Dattamudi S, Maharjan B, Kharel G. Biochar impacts on soil water dynamics: knowns, unknowns, and research directions. Biochar, 2024, 6: 34

[2]

Ali A, Biggs AJW, Marchuk A, Bennett JML. Effect of irrigation water pH on saturated hydraulic conductivity and electrokinetic properties of acidic, neutral, and alkaline soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2019, 83: 1672-1682

[3]

AMS (American Meteorological Society) (2024) Glossary of meteorology—rain. Available online at http://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/Rain. Accessed 27 March 2024

[4]

Blanco-Canqui H. Biochar and soil physical properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2017, 81: 687-711

[5]

Blanco-Canqui H. Biochar and water quality. J Environ Qual, 2019, 48: 2-15

[6]

Bolan NS, Syers JK, Adey MA, Sumner ME. Origin of the effect of pH on the saturated hydraulic conductivity of non-sodic soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 1996, 27: 2265-2278

[7]

Bolan S, Sharma S, Mukherjee S, Kumar M, Rao CS, Nataraj KC, Singh G, Vinu A, Bhowmik A, Sharma H, El-Naggar A, Chang SX, Hou D, Rinklebe J, Wang H, Siddique KHM, Abbott LK, Kirkham MB, Bolan N. Biochar modulating soil biological health: a review. Sci Total Environ, 2024, 914 169585

[8]

Buurman P, Jongmans AG, PiPujol MD. Clay illuviation and mechanical clay infiltration—Is there a difference?. Quatern Int, 1998, 51–52: 66-69

[9]

Cheng DJ, Zhang YL. Soil physics experiment guide (in Chinese), 2012, Beijing, China Water & Power Press

[10]

Edeh IG, Mašek O. The role of biochar particle size and hydrophobicity in improving soil hydraulic properties. Eur J Soil Sci, 2021, 73 e13138

[11]

Franzluebbers AJ. Water infiltration and soil structure related to matter and its stratification with depth. Soil till Res, 2002, 66: 197-205

[12]

Garg S, Goel A (2019) Infiltration—A critial review. In: Agnihotri AK, Reddy K, Bansal A (eds) Sustainable engineering: Proceedings of EGRWSE 2018. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd, Singapore. pp 111–120

[13]

Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal—a review. Biol Fertil Soils, 2002, 35: 219-230

[14]

Han L, Sun K, Yang Y, Xia X, Li F, Yang Z, Xing B. Biochar’s stability and effect on the content, composition and turnover of soil organic carbon. Geoderma, 2020, 364 114184

[15]

Huang Z, Sun L, Liu Y, Liu YF, López-Vicente M, Wei XH, Wu GL. Alfalfa planting significantly improved alpine soil water infiltrability in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2019, 285 106606

[16]

Hussain R, Bordoloi S, Gupta P, Garg A, Ravi K, Sreedeep S, Sahoo L. Effect of biochar type on infiltration, water retention and desiccation crack potential of a silty sand. Biochar, 2020, 2: 465-478

[17]

Hussain R, Ghosh KK, Ravi K. Impact of biochar produced from hardwood of mesquite on the hydraulic and physical properties of compacted soils for potential application in engineered structures. Geoderma, 2021, 385 114836

[18]

Ibrahim HM, Al-Wabel MI, Usman ARA, Al-Omran A. Effect of conocarpus biochar application on the hydraulic properties of a sandy loam soil. Soil Sci, 2013, 178: 165-173

[19]

Joseph S, Cowie AL, van Zwieten L, Bolan N, Budai A, Buss W, Cayuela ML, Graber ER, Ippolito JA, Kuzyakov Y, Luo Y, Ok YS, Palansooriya KN, Shepherd J, Stephens S, Weng Z, Lehmann J. How biochar works and when it doesn’t: A review of mechanisms controlling soil and plant responses to biochar. GCB Bioenergy, 2021, 13: 1731-1764

[20]

Kalkhajeh YK, Huang B, Hu W, Ma C, Gao H, Thompson ML, Hansen HCB. Environmental soil quality and vegetable safety under current greenhouse vegetable production management in China. Agr Ecosyst Environ, 2021, 307 107230

[21]

Kanthle AK, Lenka NK, Lenka S, Tedia K. Biochar impact on nitrate leaching as influenced by native soil organic carbon in an Inceptisol of central India. Soil till Res, 2016, 157: 65-72

[22]

Kinney TJ, Masiello CA, Dugan B, Hockaday WC, Dean MR, Zygourakis K, Barnes RT. Hydrologic properties of biochars produced at different temperatures. Biomass Bioenerg, 2012, 41: 34-43

[23]

Lado M, Ben-Hur M. Effects of irrigation with different effluents on saturated hydraulic conductivity of arid semiarid soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2010, 74: 23-32

[24]

Lawal AA, Hassan MA, Zakaria MR, Yusoff MZM, Norrrahim MNF, Mokhtar MN, Shirai Y. Effect of oil palm biomass cellulosic content on nanopore structure and adsorption capacity of biochar. Biores Technol, 2021, 332 125070

[25]

Li J, Li X, Chen X, Li Z, Zheng Y, Cao J. Present situation and prospects of oil palm industry in Guangdong Province (in Chinese). Chin J Trop Agric, 2011, 31(12): 84-86

[26]

Li H, Li Y, Xu Y, Lu X. Biochar phosphorus fertilizer effects on soil phosphorus availability. Chemosphere, 2020, 244 125471

[27]

Liu Y, Zhu ZQ, He XS, Yang C, Du YQ, Huang YD, Su P, Wang S, Zheng XX, Xue YJ. Mechanisms of rice straw biochar effects on phosphorus sorption characteristics of acid upland red soils. Chemosphere, 2018, 207: 267-277

[28]

Lu RK. Analytical methods for soil and agro-chemistry (in Chinese), 2000, Beijing, China Agricultural Science and Technology Press

[29]

Lv Y, Zhao X, Shu Y, Chang H, Zhao S, Liu S. Effect of biochar on the migration and leaching of phosphorus in black soil. Paddy Water Environ, 2021, 19: 1-9

[30]

Major J, Lehmann J, Rondon M, Goodale C. Fate of soil-applied black carbon: downward migration leaching and soil respiration. Glob Change Biol, 2010, 16: 1366-1379

[31]

NSSC (National Soil Survey Center) (1998) Soils in China (in Chinese). China Agriculture Press, Beijing

[32]

Qu Z, Li J, Li M, Lu J. Effects of phosphorus addition on one-dimensional vertical infiltration characteristics of soil water (in Chinese). Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2022, 38(5): 72-78

[33]

Ramezanzadeh H, Zarehaghi D, Baybordi A, Bouket AC, Oszako T, Alenezi FN, Belbahri L. The impacts of biochar-assisted factors on the hydrophysical characteristics of amended soils: a review. Sustainability, 2023, 15: 8700

[34]

Rawls WJ, Pachepsky YA, Ritchie JC, Sobecki TM, Bloodworth H. Effect of soil organic carbon on soil water retention. Geoderma, 2003, 116: 61-76

[35]

Rousseau M, Pietro LD, Angulo-Jaramillo R, Tessier D, Cabibel B. Preferential transport of soil colloidal particles: physicochemical effects on particle mobilization. Vadose Zone J, 2004, 3: 247-261

[36]

Sharma P, Kuma A, Shang J. Transport and retention of co-existing contaminants with biochar colloids in porous media: a review. Total Environ Eng, 2025, 3 100021

[37]

SONBS-GD (Survey Office of The National Bureau of Statistics in Guangdong) (2024) 2023 Annual Report on Cereal Crop Production in Guangdong (in Chinese). Available online at https://gdzd.stats.gov.cn/dcsj/nysc/zynzwcl/202404/t20240419_182011.html. Accessed 19 April 2024

[38]

Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortuna AM, Dallmeyer I, Garcia-Pérez M. The role of biochar porosity and surface functionality in augmenting hydrologic properties of a sandy soil. Sci Total Environ, 2017, 574: 139-147

[39]

Sun J, Yang R, Li W, Pan Y, Zheng M, Zhang Z. Effect of biochar amendment on water infiltration in a coastal saline soil. J Soils Sediments, 2018, 18: 3271-3279

[40]

Trapero JR, Alcazar-Ruiz A, Dorado F, Sanchez-Silva L. Biochar price forecasting: a novel methodology for enhancing market stability and economic viability. J Environ Manage, 2025, 377 124681

[41]

van Genuchten MTh. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1980, 44: 892-898

[42]

Wang Z, Li S. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on plant growth and nitrate accumulation in vegetables. J Plant Nutr, 2004, 27: 539-556

[43]

Wang Y, Xiao X, Chen B. Biochar impacts on soil silicon dissolution kinetics and their interaction mechanisms. Sci Rep, 2018, 8: 8040

[44]

Wang H, Shao D, Ji B, Gu W, Yao M. Biochar effects on soil properties, water movement and irrigation water use efficiency of cultivated land in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 829 154520

[45]

Wei L, Huang Y, Li Y, Huang L, Mar NN, Huang Q, Liu Z. Biochar characteristics produced from rice husks and their sorption properties for the acetanilide herbicide metolachlor. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2016, 44: 1295-1301

[46]

Wei B, Peng Y, Lin L, Zhang D, Ma L, Jiang L, Li Y, He T, Wang Z. Drivers of biochar-mediated improvement of soil water retention capacity based on soil texture: a meta-analysis. Geoderma, 2023, 437 116591

[47]

Wiersma W, van der Ploeg MJ, Sauren IJMH, Stoof CR. No effect of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type on hydraulic properties of biochar and amended sandy soil. Geoderma, 2020, 364 114209

[48]

Wu P, Wang Z, Bolan NS, Wang H, Wang Y, Chen W. Visualizing the development trend and research frontiers of biochar in 2020: a scientometric perspective. Biochar, 2021, 3: 419-436

[49]

Wu Y, Wang H, Zhu J. Influence of reclaimed water quality on infiltration characteristics of typical subtropical zone soils: a case study in South China. Sustainability, 2022, 14: 4390

[50]

Xiong J, Xu J, Zhou M, Zhao W, Chen C, Wang M, Tan W, Koopal L. Quantitative characterization of the site density and the charged state of functional groups on biochar. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2021, 9: 2600-2608

[51]

Xu G, Wei LL, Sun JN, Shao HB, Chang SX. What is more important for enhancing nutrient bioavailability with biochar application into a sandy soil: direct or indirect mechanism?. Ecol Eng, 2013, 52: 119-124

[52]

Yan Z, Liu P, Li Y, Ma L, Alva A, Dou Z, Chen Q, Zhang F. Phosphorus in China’s intensive vegetable production systems: overfertilization, soil enrichment, and environmental implications. J Environ Qual, 2013, 42: 982-989

[53]

Yang L, Wu Y, Wang Y, An W, Jin J, Sun K, Wang X. Effects of biochar addition on the abundance, speciation, availability, and leaching loss of soil phosphorus. Sci Total Environ, 2021, 758 143657

[54]

Yu X, Li H, Doluschitz R. Towards sustainable management of mineral fertilizers in China: an integrative analysis and review. Sustainability, 2020, 12: 7028

[55]

Zheng H, Wang Z, Deng X, Herbert S, Xing B. Impacts of adding biochar on nitrogen retention and bioavailability in agricultural soil. Geoderma, 2013, 206: 32-39

[56]

Zhou K, Sui YY, Xu X, Zhang JY, Chen YM, Hou M, Jiao XG. The effects of biochar addition on phosphorus transfer and water utilization efficiency in a vegetable field in Northeast China. Agr Water Manage, 2018, 210: 324-329

[57]

Zou Y, Zhang S, Shi Z, Zhou H, Zheng H, Hu J, Mei J, Bai L, Jia J. Effects of mixed-based biochar on water and evaporation in aeolian sand soil infiltration. J Arid Land, 2022, 14: 374-389

Funding

University-Industry Collaboration Project: Soil Bulk Density Test(H20250054)

Project for Innovation Alliance of Modern Agricultural Technology System of Guangdong Province(2022KJ112)

Guangdong Provincial Program of “Open Competition Mechanism to Select the Best Candidates” in “14th Five-Year Plan” for Ten Main Attack Directions of Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation(2022SDZG08)

2022–2023 Foshan Municipal Special Program for Key Technology Research in Social Sciences(2220001018511)

2023 Foshan Chancheng District Science and Technology Plan Project(2330004004905)

Guangdong Provincal Science and Technology Plan Project(2023B1212060044)

Education Institutions in Guangdong Province in 2022(2022KCXTD049)

Science and Technology Program of Guizhou Provincial Tobacco Company, China National Tobacco Corporation(2022XM11)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

5

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/