Machine learning optimization for algal biochar yield: integrating experimental validation and sensitivity analysis

Abstract

Pyrolysis requires extensive experimentation to achieve optimum thermochemical conversion, which can be addressed by integrating machine learning (ML) predictive solutions. The abundant availability of algae with low volume footprint makes it viable green biomass to achieve thermochemical products. For optimum algal biochar (BC) yield production, the relation of ultimate, proximate analysis with process conditions is critical. This study’s objective is twofold: It aims to develop a robust ML model, trained on diverse literature data and optimized using particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm, that predicts BC yield across various feedstocks and conditions. Secondly, the optimum process parameters are derived to maximize BC yield with the experimental validation for the collected samples at their respective chemical and structural compositions. Limited data points for algal biomass induce a comparative analysis of ML models, including Gaussian process regression, ensembled tree (ET), decision tree and support vector machine. The predictive capability of ET enhanced through optimization performed exceptionally well for BC yield prediction with testing R² = 0.77993 and RMSE = 6.9792. 2D and 3D partial dependence plots imply that BC yield is primarily influenced by pyrolysis temperature, volatile matter, and heating rate with SHAP values of 1.2785, 0.3972, and 0.2949, respectively. Monte Carlo simulation and Sobol sensitivity analysis substantiate statistically the impact of selected features on algal BC yield. Inverse optimization of ET model suggests that the maximum BC yield production is 76.33% at a temperature of 500 °C, a heating rate of 10 °C/min, a residence time of 60 min, a N₂ flow rate of 0.5 L/min, and particle size of 1.5mm.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence / Pyrolysis / Algae bi0omass / Optimization / Sensitivity analysis / Biochar

References

[1] Adhikari S, Timms W, Mahmud MAP. Optimising water holding capacity and hydrophobicity of biochar for soil amendment—a review. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 851 158043

[2] Aghbashlo M, Almasi F, Jafari A, Nadian MH, Soltanian S, Lam SS, Tabatabaei M. Describing biomass pyrolysis kinetics using a generic hybrid intelligent model: a critical stage in sustainable waste-oriented biorefineries. Renew Energy, 2021, 170: 81-91

[3] Amalina F, Abd Razak AS, Krishnan S, Sulaiman H, Zularisam AW, Nasrullah M. Biochar production techniques utilizing biomass waste-derived materials and environmental applications–a review. J Hazard Mater Adv, 2022, 7100134

[4] Cao H, Xin Y, Yuan Q. Prediction of biochar yield from cattle manure pyrolysis via least squares support vector machine intelligent approach. Bioresour Technol, 2016, 202: 158-164

[5] Chang Y-M, Tsai W-T, Li M-H. Chemical characterization of char derived from slow pyrolysis of microalgal residue. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 2015, 111: 88-93

[6] Critchley F, Jones MC. Asymmetry and gradient asymmetry functions: density-based skewness and kurtosis. Scand J Stat, 2008, 35: 415-437

[7] Faleeva YM, Lavrenov VA, Zaichenko VM. Investigation of plant biomass two-stage pyrolysis based on three major components: cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Biomass Convers Biorefin, 2024, 14: 14519-14529

[8] Ganesan A, Rezazgui O, Langlois S, Boussabbeh C, Barnabé S. Pyrolytic conversion of construction, renovation, and demolition (CRD) wood wastes in Québec to biochar: production, characterization, and identifying relevant stability indices for carbon sequestration. Sci Total Environ, 2025, 965 178650

[9] Ghosh M, Guha R, Alam I, Lohariwal P, Jalan D, Sarkar R. Binary genetic swarm optimization: a combination of GA and PSO for feature selection. J Intell Syst, 2019, 29: 1598-1610

[10] Hadey C, Allouch M, Alami M, Boukhlifi F, Loulidi I. Preparation and characterization of biochars obtained from biomasses for combustible briquette applications. Sci World J, 2022, 2022: 2554475

[11] Hao S, Ryu D, Western AW, Perry E, Bogena H, Franssen HJH. Global sensitivity analysis of APSIM-wheat yield predictions to model parameters and inputs. Ecol Modell, 2024, 487 110551

[12] Haq ZU, Ullah H, Khan MNA, Naqvi SR, Ahsan M. Hydrogen production optimization from sewage sludge supercritical gasification process using machine learning methods integrated with genetic algorithm. Chem Eng Res des, 2022, 184: 614-626

[13] Haykiri-Acma H, Kurt G, Yaman S. Properties of biochars obtained from RDF by carbonization: influences of devolatilization severity. Waste Biomass Valorizat, 2017, 8: 539-547

[14] Hoang AT, Goldfarb JL, Foley AM, Lichtfouse E, Kumar M, Xiao L, Ahmed SF, Said Z, Luque R, Bui VG. Production of biochar from crop residues and its application for anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol, 2022

[15] Huang J, Zhu Y, Kelly JT, Jang C, Wang S, Xing J, Chiang P-C, Fan S, Zhao X, Yu L. Large-scale optimization of multi-pollutant control strategies in the Pearl River Delta region of China using a genetic algorithm in machine learning. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 722 137701

[16] Janssen H. Monte-Carlo based uncertainty analysis: sampling efficiency and sampling convergence. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2013, 109: 123-132

[17] Jung K-W, Jeong T-U, Kang H-J, Ahn K-H. Characteristics of biochar derived from marine macroalgae and fabrication of granular biochar by entrapment in calcium-alginate beads for phosphate removal from aqueous solution. Bioresour Technol, 2016, 211: 108-116

[18] Khan M, Ullah Z, Mašek O, Naqvi SR, Khan MNA. Artificial neural networks for the prediction of biochar yield: a comparative study of metaheuristic algorithms. Bioresour Technol, 2022, 355 127215

[19] Khan AA, Gul J, Naqvi SR, Ali I, Farooq W, Liaqat R, AlMohamadi H, Štěpanec L, Juchelková D. Recent progress in microalgae-derived biochar for the treatment of textile industry wastewater. Chemosphere, 2022

[20] Kudelytė V, Eimontas J, Paulauskas R, Striūgas N. Co-pyrolysis of plastic waste and lignin: a pathway for enhanced hydrocarbon recovery. Energies, 2025, 15: 1-19

[21] Lalaymia I, Belaadi A, Ghernaout D. Studying Gaussian deconvolution and multicomponent kinetics models in Agave cellulosic fibers pyrolysis: application in sustainable bioenergy for cleaner production. Biomass Bioenerg, 2025, 192 107488

[22] Lang T, Jensen AD, Jensen PA. Retention of organic elements during solid fuel pyrolysis with emphasis on the peculiar behavior of nitrogen. Energy Fuels, 2005, 19: 1631-1643

[23] Leng L, Lei X, Al-Dhabi NA, Wu Z, Yang Z, Li T, Zhang W, Liu W, Zhan H, Peng H. Machine-learning-aided prediction and engineering of nitrogen-containing functional groups of biochar derived from biomass pyrolysis. Chem Eng J, 2024, 485 149862

[24] Lu L, Gao X, Gel A, Wiggins GM, Crowley M, Pecha B, Shahnam M, Rogers WA, Parks J, Ciesielski PN. Investigating biomass composition and size effects on fast pyrolysis using global sensitivity analysis and CFD simulations. Chem Eng J, 2021, 421 127789

[25] Meyer H, Reudenbach C, Wöllauer S, Nauss T. Importance of spatial predictor variable selection in machine learning applications–moving from data reproduction to spatial prediction. Ecol Modell, 2019, 411 108815

[26] Naveed MH, Khan MNA, Mukarram M, Naqvi SR, Abdullah A, Haq ZU, Ullah H, Al Mohamadi H. Cellulosic biomass fermentation for biofuel production: review of artificial intelligence approaches. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2024, 189 113906

[27] Nguyen VG, Sharma P, Ağbulut Ü, Le HS, Truong TH, Dzida M, Tran MH, Le HC, Tran VD. Machine learning for the management of biochar yield and properties of biomass sources for sustainable energy. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin, 2024, 18: 567-593

[28] Papadakis S, Markaki M. An in depth economic restructuring framework by using particle swarm optimization. J Clean Prod, 2019, 215: 329-342

[29] Pathy A, Meher S, Balasubramanian P. Predicting algal biochar yield using extreme gradient boosting (XGB) algorithm of machine learning methods. Algal Res, 2020, 50 102006

[30] Potter K, Hagen H, Kerren A, Dannenmann P. Methods for presenting statistical information: the box plot. 2006. p. 97–106.

[31] Shuttleworth P, Budarin V, Gronnow M, Clark JH, Luque R. Low temperature microwave-assisted vs conventional pyrolysis of various biomass feedstocks. J Nat Gas Chem, 2012, 21: 270-274

[32] Sun J, Norouzi O, Mašek O. A state-of-the-art review on algae pyrolysis for bioenergy and biochar production. Bioresour Technol, 2022, 346 126258

[33] Tag AT, Duman G, Ucar S, Yanik J. Effects of feedstock type and pyrolysis temperature on potential applications of biochar. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 2016, 120: 200-206

[34] Ullah Z, Naqvi SR, Farooq W, Yang H, Wang S, Vo D-VN. A comparative study of machine learning methods for bio-oil yield prediction—a genetic algorithm-based features selection. Bioresour Technol, 2021, 335 125292

[35] Ullah H, Haq ZU, Naqvi SR, Khan MNA, Ahsan M, Wang J. Optimization based comparative study of machine learning methods for the prediction of bio-oil produced from microalgae via pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 2023, 170 105879

[36] Wang K, Brown RC, Homsy S, Martinez L, Sidhu SS. Fast pyrolysis of microalgae remnants in a fluidized bed reactor for bio-oil and biochar production. Bioresour Technol, 2013, 127: 494-499

[37] Westerhof RJM, Kuipers NJM, Kersten SRA, Van Swaaij WPM. Controlling the water content of biomass fast pyrolysis oil. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2007, 46: 9238-9247

[38] Yanik J, Stahl R, Troeger N, Sinag A. Pyrolysis of algal biomass. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 2013, 103: 134-141

[39] Yuan T, Tahmasebi A, Yu J. Comparative study on pyrolysis of lignocellulosic and algal biomass using a thermogravimetric and a fixed-bed reactor. Bioresour Technol, 2015, 175: 333-341

[40] Zhang C, Chao L, Zhang Z, Zhang L, Li Q, Fan H, Zhang S, Liu Q, Qiao Y, Tian Y. Pyrolysis of cellulose: evolution of functionalities and structure of bio-char versus temperature. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2021, 135 110416

[41] Zhang Y, Maierdan Y, Guo T, Chen B, Fang S, Zhao L. Biochar as carbon sequestration material combines with sewage sludge incineration ash to prepare lightweight concrete. Constr Build Mater, 2022, 343 128116

[42] Zhong S, Zhang K, Bagheri M, Burken JG, Gu A, Li B, Ma X, Marrone BL, Ren ZJ, Schrier J. Machine learning: new ideas and tools in environmental science and engineering. Environ Sci Technol, 2021, 55: 12741-12754

[43] Zhou B, Li H, Wang Z, Huang H, Wang Y, Yang R, Huo R, Xu X, Zhou T, Dong X. Prediction of phosphate adsorption amount, capacity and kinetics via machine learning: a generally physical-based process and proposed strategy of using descriptive text messages to enrich datasets. Chem Eng J, 2024, 479 147503

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)