Restoring degraded agricultural peatlands: how rewetting, biochar, and iron sulphate synergistically modify microbial hotspots and carbon storage

Abstract

The draining and conversion of peatlands for agriculture has led to their degradation globally, diminishing their carbon (C) storage capacity and functioning. However, rewetting, alongside the addition of organic/inorganic amendments, has the potential to accelerate peat formation and C accrual. The aim of this experiment was therefore to examine the combined benefits of altering water table depth and adding organic (e.g., biochar, paper waste, biosolids, cereal straw; 20 t C ha⁻¹) and inorganic (e.g., FeSO₄; 0.5 t ha⁻¹) materials on net C storage and peatland functioning (i.e., microbial communities, greenhouse gas emissions and biogeochemical cycling). The experiment consisted of outdoor agricultural peat mesocosms monitored over 1 year. The relative effectiveness of the amendments in preserving peat-C (t C ha⁻¹) followed the series: Miscanthus biochar (18.9 t C ha⁻¹) >  Miscanthus residues (17.3 t C ha⁻¹) > biosolids (17.2 t C ha⁻¹) > cereal straw (14.5 t C ha⁻¹) > paper waste (13.3 t C ha⁻¹) based on C additional rate (20 t C ha⁻¹). Overall, a high-water table combined with biochar and FeSO₄ addition was the most effective at suppressing enzyme activity (e.g., β-glucosidase, phenol oxidase, cellobiase), methanogen activity (e.g., Methanosarcina) and peat mineralization rate. We ascribe this in part to changes in the fungal and bacterial community structure (e.g., reductions in Actinobacteria by − 22% and Ascomycota by − 61%). FeSO₄ also increased the Fe-bound C content in the non-rewetted treatment, supporting the ‘iron gate’ mechanism for C preservation. The mechanisms behind our results appear to be both abiotic (affecting SOC solubility through changes in redox conditions and Fe–C interactions) and biotic (via shifts in microbial community and enzyme activities), creating conditions that enhance C preservation. These findings provide evidence for implementing biochar and FeSO₄ amendments alongside water table management as practical, scalable strategies for restoring C storage capacity in agricultural peatlands.

Keywords

Soil solution / Hydrolytic enzymes / Sustainable agriculture / Soil microbes / Fe gate / Histosol

References

[1] AliRS, IngwersenJ, DemyanMS, FunkuinYN, WizemannH-D, KandelerE, PollC. Modelling in situ activities of enzymes as a tool to explain seasonal variation of soil respiration from agro-ecosystems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2015, 81: 291-303.

[2] AndersenR, ChapmanSJ, ArtzRRE. Microbial communities in natural and disturbed peatlands: a review. Soil Biol Biochem, 2013, 57: 979-994.

[3] AndersonMJDISTLM forward: a FORTRAN computer program to calculate a distance-based multivariate analysis for a linear model using forward selection, 2003, Department of Statistics. University of Auckland, New Zealand. 10

[4] AscoughPL, BirdMI, BrockF, HighamTFG, MeredithW, SnapeCE, VaneCH. Hydropyrolysis as a new tool for radiocarbon pre-treatment and the quantification of black carbon. Quat Geochronol, 2009, 4: 140-147.

[5] Blake, G.R., Hartge, K.H., 1986. Particle Density, Methods of Soil Analysis, pp. 377–382

[6] BonnA, AllottT, EvansM, JoostenH, StonemanRPeatland restoration and ecosystem services: science, policy and practice, 2016Cambridge University Press. .

[7] BradfieldEG, CookeDT. Determination of inorganic anions in water extracts of plants and soils by ion chromatography. Analyst, 1985, 110: 1409-1410.

[8] Bräuer LS, Basiliko N, MP Siljanen HH, Zinder S (2020) Methanogenic archaea in peatlands. FEMS Microbiology Letters 367, fnaa172

[9] BreeuwerA, RobroekBJM, LimpensJ, HeijmansMMPD, SchoutenMGC, BerendseF. Decreased summer water table depth affects peatland vegetation. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2009, 10: 330-339.

[10] BrookesPC, LandmanA, PrudenG, JenkinsonDS. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1985, 17: 837-842.

[11] BrounsK, KeuskampJA, PotkampG, VerhoevenJTA, HeftingMM. Peat origin and land use effects on microbial activity, respiration dynamics and exo-enzyme activities in drained peat soils in the Netherlands. Soil Biol Biochem, 2016, 95: 144-155.

[12] BrownRW, ChadwickDR, BendingGD, CollinsCD, WheltonHL, DaultonE, CovingtonJA, BullID, JonesDL. Nutrient (C, N and P) enrichment induces significant changes in the soil metabolite profile and microbial carbon partitioning. Soil Biol Biochem, 2022, 172. 108779

[13] Butterbach-BahlK, BaggsEM, DannenmannM, KieseR, Zechmeister-BoltensternS. Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls?. Philos Trans Royal Soc B Biol Sci, 2013, 36820130122.

[14] Chowdhury, Z.K., 2013. Activated carbon: solutions for improving water quality. American Water Works Association

[15] CorbettJE, TfailyMM, BurdigeDJ, GlaserPH, ChantonJP. The relative importance of methanogenesis in the decomposition of organic matter in northern peatlands. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2015, 120: 280-293.

[16] DeanJF, MiddelburgJJ, RöckmannT, AertsR, BlauwLG, EggerM, JettenMSM, de JongAEE, MeiselOH, RasigrafO. Methane feedbacks to the global climate system in a warmer world. Rev Geophys, 2018, 56: 207-250.

[17] DeshouxM, Sadet-BourgeteauS, GentilS, Prévost-BouréNC. Effects of biochar on soil microbial communities: a meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ, 2023, 902. 166079

[18] DongD, YangM, WangC, WangH, LiY, LuoJ, WuW. Responses of methane emissions and rice yield to applications of biochar and straw in a paddy field. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2013, 13: 1450-1460.

[19] Wang Y, Knorr KH, Sun J, Sun D, Xu G, Li H, Wu F, Xu Z, Wang S (2024b) Effect of water table restoration on microbial communities and enzyme activities in drained peatland. Land Degradation Dev

[20] EilersKG, LauberCL, KnightR, FiererN. Shifts in bacterial community structure associated with inputs of low molecular weight carbon compounds to soil. Soil Biol Biochem, 2010, 42: 896-903.

[21] EvansCD, PeacockM, BairdAJ, ArtzRRE, BurdenA, CallaghanN, ChapmanPJ, CooperHM, CoyleM, CraigE. Overriding water table control on managed peatland greenhouse gas emissions. Nature, 2021, 593: 548-552.

[22] Evans C, Artz R, Moxley J, Smyth M-A, Taylor E, Archer E, Burden A, Williamson J, Donnelly D, Thomson A (2017) Implementation of an emissions inventory for UK peatlands. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology

[23] Evans CD, Morrison R, Cumming A, Bodo A, Burden A, Callaghan N, Clilverd H, Cooper H, Cowan N, Crabtree D (2023) Defra Lowland Peat 2: Managing agricultural systems on lowland peat for decreased greenhouse gas emissions whilst maintaining agricultural productivity. Report to Defra for Project SP1218

[24] FengX, ZhaoY, WangH, LiuC. Iron-organic carbon interactions in wetlands: implications for wetland carbon preservation under global changes. Glob Change Biol, 2025, 31. e70300

[25] FennerN, FreemanC. Drought-induced carbon loss in peatlands. Nat Geosci, 2011, 4: 895-900.

[26] FreemanC, LiskaG, OstleNJ, LockMA, ReynoldsB, HudsonJ. Microbial activity and enzymic decomposition processes following peatland water table drawdown. Plant Soil, 1996, 180: 121-127.

[27] FreemanC, OstleN, KangH. An enzymic 'latch' on a global carbon store. Nature, 2001, 409: 149-149.

[28] FreemanC, OstleNJ, FennerN, KangH. A regulatory role for phenol oxidase during decomposition in peatlands. Soil Biol Biochem, 2004, 36: 1663-1667.

[29] FuY, LuoY, AuwalM, SinghBP, Van ZwietenL, XuJ. Biochar accelerates soil organic carbon mineralization via rhizodeposit-activated Actinobacteria. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2022, 58: 565-577.

[30] HallSJ, SilverWL. Iron oxidation stimulates organic matter decomposition in humid tropical forest soils. Glob Change Biol, 2013, 19: 2804-2813.

[31] HallSJ, SilverWL, TimokhinVI, HammelKE. Iron addition to soil specifically stabilized lignin. Soil Biol Biochem, 2016, 98: 95-98.

[32] HanX, SunX, WangC, WuM, DongD, ZhongT, ThiesJE, WuW. Mitigating methane emission from paddy soil with rice-straw biochar amendment under projected climate change. Scientific Reports, 2016, 624731.

[33] HuJ, WuH, SunZ, PengQ-A, ZhaoJ, HuR. Ferrous iron addition decreases methane emissions induced by rice straw in flooded paddy soils. ACS Earth Space Chem, 2020, 4: 843-853.

[34] HuangY, LiY, YaoH. Nitrate enhances N 2 O emission more than ammonium in a highly acidic soil. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2014, 14: 146-154.

[35] JeewaniPH, BrownRW, RhymesJM, McNamaraNP, ChadwickDR, JonesDL, EvansCD. Greenhouse gas removal in agricultural peatland via raised water levels and soil amendment. Biochar, 2025, 739.

[36] Jeewani PH, Brown RW, Evans CD, Cook J, Roberts BP, Fraser MD, Chadwick DR, Jones DL (2025) Rewetting alongside biochar and sulphate addition mitigates greenhouse gas emissions and retain carbon in degraded upland peatlands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 207

[37] JonesDL, RouskJ, Edwards-JonesG, DeLucaTH, MurphyDV. Biochar-mediated changes in soil quality and plant growth in a three year field trial. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012, 45: 113-124.

[38] KaiserK, GuggenbergerG. Sorptive stabilization of organic matter by microporous goethite: sorption into small pores vs. surface complexation. Eur J Soil Sci, 2007, 58: 45-59.

[39] KandelTP, LærkePE, HoffmannCC, ElsgaardL. Complete annual CO2, CH4, and N2O balance of a temperate riparian wetland 12 years after rewetting. Ecol Eng, 2019, 127: 527-535.

[40] KasoziGN, ZimmermanAR, Nkedi-KizzaP, GaoB. Catechol and humic acid sorption onto a range of laboratory-produced black carbons (biochars). Environ Sci Technol, 2010, 44: 6189-6195.

[41] KeiluweitM, NicoPS, JohnsonMG, KleberM. Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (Biochar). Environ Sci Technol, 2010, 44: 1247-1253.

[42] KlossS, ZehetnerF, DellantonioA, HamidR, OttnerF, LiedtkeV, SchwanningerM, GerzabekMH, SojaG. Characterization of slow pyrolysis biochars: effects of feedstocks and pyrolysis temperature on biochar properties. J Environ Qual, 2012, 41: 990-1000.

[43] KluberLA, JohnstonER, AllenSA, HendershotJN, HansonPJ, SchadtCW. Constraints on microbial communities, decomposition and methane production in deep peat deposits. PLoS ONE, 2020, 15. e0223744

[44] Koch O, Tscherko D, Kandeler E (2007) Temperature sensitivity of microbial respiration, nitrogen mineralization, and potential soil enzyme activities in organic alpine soils. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 21

[45] Kuo S, Sparks DL (1996) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3: Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 894–895

[46] KwonMJ, BallantyneA, CiaisP, QiuC, SalmonE, RaoultN, GuenetB, GöckedeM, EuskirchenES, NykänenH. Lowering water table reduces carbon sink strength and carbon stocks in northern peatlands. Global Change Biology, 2022, 28: 6752-6770.

[47] LalondeK, MucciA, OuelletA, GélinasY. Preservation of organic matter in sediments promoted by iron. Nature, 2012, 483: 198-200.

[48] LehmannJ, RilligMC, ThiesJ, MasielloCA, HockadayWC, CrowleyD. Biochar effects on soil biota–a review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2011, 43: 1812-1836.

[49] LiY, YuS, StrongJ, WangH. Are the biogeochemical cycles of carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus driven by the “Fe III–Fe II redox wheel” in dynamic redox environments?. J Soils Sediments, 2012, 12: 683-693.

[50] LiuL, ShenG, SunM, CaoX, ShangG, ChenP. Effect of biochar on nitrous oxide emission and its potential mechanisms. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 2014, 64: 894-902.

[51] LuoL, MengH, GuJ-D. Microbial extracellular enzymes in biogeochemical cycling of ecosystems. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 197: 539-549.

[52] LuoY, DurenkampM, De NobiliM, LinQ, BrookesPC. Short term soil priming effects and the mineralisation of biochar following its incorporation to soils of different pH. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2011, 43: 2304-2314.

[53] MantelS, DondeyneS, DeckersS. World reference base for soil resources (WRB). Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment, 2023, 4: 206-217.

[54] MarsdenKA, HolmbergJA, JonesDL, CharterisAF, CárdenasLM, ChadwickDR. Nitrification represents the bottle-neck of sheep urine patch N2O emissions from extensively grazed organic soils. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 695. 133786

[55] MurphyJ, RileyJP. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica chimica acta, 1962, 27: 31-36.

[56] NakhavaliM, LauerwaldR, RegnierP, GuenetB, ChadburnS, FriedlingsteinP. Leaching of dissolved organic carbon from mineral soils plays a significant role in the terrestrial carbon balance. Glob Chang Biol, 2020, 27: 1083-1096.

[57] Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2013) Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package, version 2, 1–295

[58] Op den CampHJM, IslamT, StottMB, HarhangiHR, HynesA, SchoutenS, JettenMSM, BirkelandNK, PolA, DunfieldPF. Environmental, genomic and taxonomic perspectives on methanotrophic Verrucomicrobia. Environ Microbiol Rep, 2009, 1: 293-306.

[59] OzuolmezD, NaH, LeverMA, KjeldsenKU, JørgensenBB, PluggeCM. Methanogenic archaea and sulfate reducing bacteria co-cultured on acetate: teamwork or coexistence?. Front Microbiol, 2015, 6492.

[60] PanditNR, MulderJ, HaleSE, ZimmermanAR, PanditBH, CornelissenG. Multi-year double cropping biochar field trials in Nepal: Finding the optimal biochar dose through agronomic trials and cost-benefit analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 2018, 637: 1333-1341.

[61] PankratovTA, DedyshSN, ZavarzinGA. The leading role of actinobacteria in aerobic cellulose degradation in Sphagnum peat bogs. Dokl Biol Sci, 2006, 410: 428-430.

[62] PeltoniemiK, FritzeH, LaihoR. Response of fungal and actinobacterial communities to water-level drawdown in boreal peatland sites. Soil Biol Biochem, 2009, 41: 1902-1914.

[63] PesterM, KnorrK-H, FriedrichMW, WagnerM, LoyA. Sulfate-reducing microorganisms in wetlands–fameless actors in carbon cycling and climate change. Front Microbiol, 2012, 372.

[64] QuilliamRS, GlanvilleHC, WadeSC, JonesDL. Life in the ‘charosphere’–Does biochar in agricultural soil provide a significant habitat for microorganisms?. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013, 65: 287-293.

[65] RazaviBS, BlagodatskayaE, KuzyakovY. Nonlinear temperature sensitivity of enzyme kinetics explains canceling effect—a case study on loamy haplic Luvisol. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2015, 61126.

[66] RichyE, Cabello-YevesPJ, Hernandes-CoutinhoF, Rodriguez-ValeraF, González-ÁlvarezI, GandoisL, RigalF, LaugaB. How microbial communities shape peatland carbon dynamics: new insights and implications. Soil Biol Biochem, 2024, 191. 109345

[67] RiedelT, ZakD, BiesterH, DittmarT. Iron traps terrestrially derived dissolved organic matter at redox interfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2013, 110: 10101-10105.

[68] RomanowiczKJ, KaneES, PotvinLR, DanielsAL, KolkaRK, LilleskovEA. Understanding drivers of peatland extracellular enzyme activity in the PEATcosm experiment: mixed evidence for enzymic latch hypothesis. Plant Soil, 2015, 397: 371-386.

[69] Saiya-CorkKR, SinsabaughRL, ZakDR. The effects of long term nitrogen deposition on extracellular enzyme activity in an Acer saccharum forest soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2002, 34: 1309-1315.

[70] SegataN, IzardJ, WaldronL, GeversD, MiropolskyL, GarrettWS, HuttenhowerC. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome biology, 2011, 12R60.

[71] SoaresM, RouskJ. Microbial growth and carbon use efficiency in soil: links to fungal-bacterial dominance, SOC-quality and stoichiometry. Soil Biol Biochem, 2019, 131: 195-205.

[72] SpencerRGM, HernesPJ, AufdenkampeAK, BakerA, GulliverP, StubbinsA, AikenGR, DydaRY, ButlerKD, MwambaVL. An initial investigation into the organic matter biogeochemistry of the Congo River. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2012, 84: 614-627.

[73] StookeyLL. Ferrozine–-a new spectrophotometric reagent for iron. Analytical chemistry, 1970, 42: 779-781.

[74] TaftHE, CrossPA, JonesDL. Efficacy of mitigation measures for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from intensively cultivated peatlands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 127: 10-21.

[75] Taghizadeh-ToosiA, CloughTJ, SherlockRR, CondronLM. Biochar adsorbed ammonia is bioavailable. Plant and Soil, 2012, 350: 57-69.

[76] Taghizadeh-ToosiA, ElsgaardL, CloughTJ, LabouriauR, ErnstsenV, PetersenSO. Regulation of N 2 O emissions from acid organic soil drained for agriculture. Biogeosciences, 2019, 16: 4555-4575.

[77] VanceED, BrookesPC, JenkinsonDS. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1987, 19: 703-707.

[78] WangY, WangH, HeJ-S, FengX. Iron-mediated soil carbon response to water-table decline in an alpine wetland. Nat Commun, 2017, 815972.

[79] WangC, LiH, SunX, CaiT. Responses of soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities to natural restoration of reclaimed temperate marshes after abandonment. Front Environ Sci, 2021, 9. 701610

[80] WangS, DuY, LiuS, PanJ, WuF, WangY, WangY, LiH, DongY, WangZ. Response of C: N: P stoichiometry to long-term drainage of peatlands: evidence from plant, soil, and enzyme. Sci Total Environ, 2024, 919. 170688

[81] WenY, ZangH, MaQ, EvansCD, ChadwickDR, JonesDL. Is the ‘enzyme latch’ or ‘iron gate’ the key to protecting soil organic carbon in peatlands?. Geoderma, 2019, 349: 107-113.

[82] XuJ, MorrisPJ, LiuJ, HoldenJ. PEATMAP: Refining estimates of global peatland distribution based on a meta-analysis. CATENA, 2018, 160: 134-140.

[83] YamadaC, KatoS, KimuraS, IshiiM, IgarashiY. Reduction of Fe (III) oxides by phylogenetically and physiologically diverse thermophilic methanogens. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2014, 89: 637-645.

[84] YangS, LiL, PengX, ZhangR, SongL. Methanogen Community Dynamics and Methanogenic Function Response to Solid Waste Decomposition. Front Microbiol, 2021, 12743827.

[85] YangT, HeQ, JiangJ, ShengL, JiangH, HeC. Impact of Water Table on Methane Emission Dynamics in Terrestrial Wetlands and Implications on Strategies for Wetland Management and Restoration. Wetlands, 2022, 42120.

[86] Yang Y, Sun K, Liu J, Chen Y, Han L (2022) Changes in soil properties and CO2 emissions after biochar addition: Role of pyrolysis temperature and aging. Science of The Total Environment 839

[87] YiX, YiK, FangK, GaoH, DaiW, CaoL. Microbial community structures and important associations between soil nutrients and the responses of specific taxa to rice-frog cultivation. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2019, 101752.

[88] ZhangA, ZhouX, LiM, WuHJCImpacts of biochar addition on soil dissolved organic matter characteristics in a wheat-maize rotation system in Loess Plateau of China., 2017, 186: 986-993

[89] ZhangC, LinZ, QueY, FallahN, TayyabM, LiS, LuoJ, ZhangZ, AbubakarAY, ZhangH. Straw retention efficiently improves fungal communities and functions in the fallow ecosystem. BMC Microbiology, 2021, 2152.

[90] ZhangY, LiM, DongL, HanC, LiM, WuH. Effects of biochar dosage on treatment performance, enzyme activity and microbial community in aerated constructed wetlands for treating low C/N domestic sewage. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2021, 24101919.

[91] Zhang X, Han X, Yu W, Wang P, Cheng WJ P.o (2017b) Priming effects on labile and stable soil organic carbon decomposition: Pulse dynamics over two years. 12:e0184978

[92] ZhuX, BurgerM, DoaneTA, HorwathWR. Ammonia oxidation pathways and nitrifier denitrification are significant sources of N2O and NO under low oxygen availability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, 110: 6328-6333.

[93] ZimmermanAR. Abiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory-produced black carbon (biochar). Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44: 1295-1301.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council(BB/V011561/1)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Crown