Rhizosphere metabolite-mediated soil enhancement: long-term biochar application optimizes continuous soybean production systems

Abstract

Biochar offers promising solutions for agricultural sustainability, yet the intricate mechanisms governing rhizosphere metabolite-microbe-soil interactions remain poorly understood. Through a decade-long field experiment, the effects of sustained biochar application (BC1: 3 t ha⁻¹ and BC2: 6 t ha⁻¹) versus conventional fertilization (CF) in a continuous soybean system were investigated. The results showed that biochar improved soil properties, especially, BC2, which significantly enhanced porosity (+ 12.71%), pH (+ 11.60%), soil organic carbon (+ 112.45%), enzymatic activities and nutrient content, while reducing bulk density (− 9.92%). Notably, the biochar restructured microbial community networks, increasing beneficial taxa (Firmicutes, Enterococcus, Pseudomonas, Ascomycota and Mortierellomycota) while suppressing potential pathogens. Meanwhile, the biochar significantly optimized rhizosphere metabolites, including key defensive compounds (di-O-methyl quercetin, capric acid, hypoxanthines, etc.), and optimized the differential metabolites enriched in the isoflavonoid biosynthesis pathway. Multi-omics analysis revealed strong correlations between differential metabolites and improved soil properties under biochar amendment. Accordingly, these improvements manifested in plant performance, including enhanced root development, plant height, biomass accumulation, and yield. Furthermore, the PLS-PM analysis demonstrated that biochar could promote soybean growth in two key pathway mechanisms that directly enhance soil properties, and indirectly improve soil properties by negatively regulating the key metabolites (capric acid, phosphocreatine, beta 1-tomatine, and daidzin). Our findings provide critical theoretical insights for addressing challenges in soybean continuous cropping systems and advancing sustainable farming practices.

Keywords

Biochar / Soybean / Soil properties / Soil microorganism / Rhizosphere metabolites

References

[1] AsafS, NumanM, KhanAL, Al-HarrasiA. Sphingomonas: from diversity and genomics to functional role in environmental remediation and plant growth. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 2020, 40: 138-152.

[2] BaoSDSoil and agricultural chemistry analysis, 20003Beijing. China Agriculture Press.

[3] BeimfordeC, FeldbergK, NylinderS, RikkinenJ, TuovilaH, DörfeltH, GubeM, JacksonDJ, ReitnerJ, SeyfullahLJ, SchmidtAR. Estimating the phanerozoic history of the Ascomycota lineages: combining fossil and molecular data. Mol Phylogenet Evol, 2014, 78: 386-398.

[4] BolyenE, RideoutJR, DillonMR, BokulichNA, CaporasoJG. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol, 2019, 37: 852-857.

[5] ChenL, LiuY. The function of root exudates in the root colonization by beneficial soil rhizobacteria. Biology, 2024, 1395.

[6] ChenXL, WangYF, LiWQ, WangY, WeiD, WangXJ, HanXZ. Impact of long-term continuous soybean cropping on ammonia oxidizing bacteria communities in the rhizosphere of soybean in Northeast China. Acta Agricult Scand, Section B - Soil Plant Sci, 2015, 65: 470-478.

[7] ChenWF, MengJ, HanXR, LanY, ZhangWM. Past, present, and future of biochar. Biochar, 2019, 1: 75-87.

[8] ChenP, WangY, LiuQZ, ZhangYT, LiXY, LiHQ, LiWH. Phase changes of continuous cropping obstacles in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) production. Appl Soil Ecol, 2020, 155103626.

[9] ChenS, QiGF, MaGQ, ZhaoXY. Biochar amendment controlled bacterial wilt through changing soil chemical properties and microbial community. Microbiol Res, 2020, 231126373.

[10] ChenZY, KumarA, FuYY, SinghBP, GeTD, TuH, LuoY, XuJM. Biochar decreased rhizodeposits stabilization via opposite effects on bacteria and fungi: diminished fungi-promoted aggregation and enhanced bacterial mineralization. Biol Fertil, 2021, 57: 533-546.

[11] ChenYD, DuJF, LiY, TangH, YinZY, YangL, DingXH. Evolutions and managements of soil microbial community structure drove by continuous cropping. Front Microbiol, 2022, 13839494.

[12] ChuHY, FiererN, LauberCL, CaporasoJG, KnightR, GroganP. Soil bacterial diversity in the arctic is not fundamentally different from that found in other biomes. Environ Microbiol, 2010, 13833.

[13] EgidiE, Delgado-BaquerizoM, PlettJM, WangJT, EldridgeDJ, BardgettRD, MaestreFT, SinghBK. A few Ascomycota taxa dominate soil fungal communities worldwide. Nat Commun, 2019, 102369.

[14] EhtiatiS, AlizadehM, FarhadiF, KhalatbariK, AjiboyeBO, RahimiVB, AskariVR. Promising influences of caffeic acid and caffeic acid phenethyl ester against natural and chemical toxins: a comprehensive and mechanistic review. J Funct Anal, 2023, 107105637.

[15] EvansSE, WallensteinMD. Soil microbial community response to drying and rewetting stress: does historical precipitation regime matter?. Biogeochemistry, 2012, 109: 101-116.

[16] FuHC, MaSL, WangL, XueWJ, XiongSW, SuiFQ, LiuHG, LiC, LiGX, DuanR, ZhaoP. Hierarchically porous magnetic biochar as an amendment for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivation in alkaline Cd-contaminated soils: impacts on plant growth, soil properties and microbiota. Chemosphere, 2024, 352141295.

[17] GaoZY, HanMK, HuYY, LiZQ, LiuCF, WangX, TianQ, JiaoWJ, HuJM, LiuLF, GuanZJ, MaZM. Effects of continuous cropping of sweet potato on the fungal community structure in rhizospheric soil. Front Microbiol, 2019, 102269.

[18] GoldbergEDBlack carbon in the environment: Properties and distribution, 1985, New York. John Wiley Press.

[19] GongB, HeY, LuoZB, PengHW, CaiHQ, ZhuYN, BinJ, DingMJ. Response of rhizosphere soil physicochemical properties and microbial community structure to continuous cultivation of tobacco. Ann Microbiol, 2024, 744.

[20] GoodfellowM, WilliamsST. Ecology of actinomycetes. Annu Rev Microbiol, 1983, 37: 189-216.

[21] GuoZY, KongCH, WangJG, WangYF. Rhizosphere isoflavones (daidzein and genistein) levels and their relation to the microbial community structure of mono-cropped soybean soil in field and controlled conditions. Soil Biol Biochem, 2011, 43: 2257-2264.

[22] GuoY, SongB, LiA, WuQ, HuangH, LiN, YangY, AdamsJM, YangL. Higher pH is associated with enhanced co-occurrence network complexity, stability and nutrient cycling functions in the rice rhizosphere microbiome. Environ Microbiol, 2022, 24: 6200-6219.

[23] HanGM, LanJY, ChenQQ, YuC, BieS. Response of soil microbial community to application of biochar in cotton soils with different continuous cropping years. Sci Rep, 2017, 710184.

[24] HawkinsJP, OresnikIJ. The rhizobium-legume symbiosis: coopting successful stress management. Front Plant Sci, 2022, 12796045.

[25] HeL, WangN. Research progress on formation mechanism of plant continuous cropping disorder. Sci J Technol, 2022, 4: 8-13

[26] HettlingH, van BeekJH. Analyzing the functional properties of the creatine kinase system with multiscale ‘sloppy’ modeling. PLoS Comput Biol, 2011, 7e1002130.

[27] HuL, CaoLX, ZhangRD. Bacterial and fungal taxon changes in soil microbial community composition induced by short-term biochar amendment in red oxidized loam soil. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2014, 30: 1085-1092.

[28] HuLF, RobertCAM, CadotS, ZhangX, YeM, LiBB, ManzoD, ChervetN, SteingerT, HeijdenMGA, SchlaeppiK, ErbM. Root exudate metabolites drive plant-soil feedbacks on growth and defense by shaping the rhizosphere microbiota. Nat Commun, 2018, 92738.

[29] HuangYQ, HanXR, YangJF, LiangCH, ZhanXM. Autotoxicity of peanut and identification of phytotoxic substances in rhizosphere soil. Allelopath J, 2013, 31: 297-308

[30] HuangWC, TsaiTH, ChuangLT, LiYY, ZouboulisCC, TsaiPJ. Anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory properties of capric acid against Propionibacterium acnes: a comparative study with lauric acid. Dermatol Sci, 2014, 73: 232-240.

[31] JiangYL, WangXJ, ZhaoYM, ZhangCG, JinZW, ShanSD, PingLF. Effects of biochar application on enzyme activities in tea garden soil. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2021, 972853.

[32] KalakodioL, BakayokoM, KalagodioA, AboBO, MuhozaJP, IsmailaEM. Progress on the amendment in biochars and its effects on the soil-plant-micro-organism-biochar system. Rev Environ Health, 2018, 33: 281-293.

[33] KarimiA, MoezziA, ChoromM, EnayatizamirN. Application of biochar changed the status of nutrients and biological activity in a calcareous soil. J Soil Sci Plant Nut, 2020, 20: 450-459.

[34] KitzenbergD, ColganSP, GloverLE. Creatine kinase in ischemic and inflammatory disorders. Clin Trans Med, 2016, 531.

[35] LalR. Soil quality changes under continuous cropping for seventeen seasons of an alfisol in western Nigeria. Land Degrad Dev, 1998, 9: 259-274.

[36] LauberCL, StricklandMS, BradfordMA, FiererN. The influence of soil properties on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities across land-use types. Soil Biol Biochem, 2008, 40: 2407-2415.

[37] LehmannJ. A handful of carbon. Nature, 2007, 447: 143-144.

[38] LehmannJ, GauntJ, RondonM. Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems: a review. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change, 2006, 11: 403-427.

[39] LehmannJ, RilligMC, ThiesJ, MasielloCA, HockadayWC, CrowleyD. Biochar effects on soil biota-a review. Soil Biol Biochem, 2011, 43: 1812-1836.

[40] LiXG, DingCF, ZhangTL, WangXX. Fungal pathogen accumulation at the expense of plant-beneficial fungi as a consequence of consecutive peanut mono culturing. Soil Biol Biochem, 2014, 72: 11-18.

[41] LiXN, SongY, BianYR, WangF, GuCG, YangXL, JiangX. Effects of root exudates on the sorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons onto biochar. Environ Pollut Bioavailability, 2019, 31: 156-165.

[42] LiKP, YuanM, WuYL, PinedaM, ZhangCM, ChenYF, ChenZQ, RongXL, TurnbullJE, GuoJ. A high-fat high-fructose diet dysregulates the homeostatic crosstalk between gut microbiome, metabolome, and immunity in an experimental model of obesity. Mol Nutr Food Res, 2022, 66e2100950.

[43] LinXGPrinciples and methods of soil microbiology research, 2010, Beijing. High Education Press.

[44] LiuZX, LiuJJ, YuZH, YaoQ, LiYS, LiangAZ, ZhangW, MiG, JinJ, LiuXB, WangGH. Long-term continuous cropping of soybean is comparable to crop rotation in mediating microbial abundance, diversity and community composition. Soil Tillage Res, 2020, 197104503.

[45] LiuWB, WangN, YaoXD, HeDX, SunHX, AoX, WangHY, ZhangHJ, StevenSM, XieFT, WangJK. Continuous-cropping-tolerant soybean cultivars alleviate continuous cropping obstacles by improving structure and function of rhizosphere microorganisms. Front Microbiol, 2023, 131048747.

[46] MaAZ, ZhuangXL, WuJM, CuiMM, LvD, LiuCZ, ZhuangGQ. Ascomycota members dominate fungal communities during straw residue decomposition in arable soil. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8e66146.

[47] MaL, MaS, ChenG, LuX, ChaiQ, LiS. Mechanisms and mitigation strategies for the occurrence of continuous cropping obstacles of legumes in China. Agronomy, 2024, 14104.

[48] MessinaM. Perspective: soybeans can help address the caloric and protein needs of a growing global population. Front Nutr, 2022, 9909464.

[49] PangZQ, DongF, LiuQ, LinWX, HuCH, YuanZN. Soil metagenomics reveals effects of continuous sugarcane cropping on the structure and functional pathway of rhizospheric microbial community. Front Microbiol, 2021, 32: 465-473.

[50] RobbinsWJ, KavanaghF. Hypoxanthine, a growth substance for phycomyces. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 1942, 28: 65-69.

[51] SashidharP, KocharM, SinghB, GuptaM, CahillD, AdholeyaA, DubeyM. Biochar for delivery of agri-inputs: current status and future perspectives. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 703134892.

[52] SheSY, NiuJJ, ZhangC, XiaoYH, ChenW, DaiLJ, LiuXD, YinHQ. Significant relationship between soil bacterial community structure and incidence of bacterial wilt disease under continuous cropping system. Arch Microbiol, 2017, 199: 267-275.

[53] ShiGX, WuY, LiTX, FuQ, WeiYX. Mid- and long-term effects of biochar on soil improvement and soil erosion control of sloping farmland in a black soil region, China. Environ Manage, 2022, 320115902.

[54] SohiSP, KrullE, Lopez-CapelE, BolR. A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Adv Agron, 2010, 105: 47-82.

[55] SunL. Effect of soybean continuous cropping on the rhizosphere soil nutrition. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2008, 24: 266-269.

[56] TanL, XiaoYS, ZengWA, GuSS, ZhaiZG, WuSL, LiPF, FengK, DengY, HuQL. Network analysis reveals the root endophytic fungi associated with Fusarium root rot invasion. Appl Soil Ecol, 2022, 178104567.

[57] TanY, ZhangX, CheangWS. Isoflavones daidzin and daidzein inhibit lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in RAW264.7 macrophages. Chin Med, 2022, 1795.

[58] TianL, ShiSH, MaLN, TranLP, TianCJ. Community structures of the rhizomicrobiomes of cultivated and wild soybeans in their continuous cropping. Microbiol Res, 2020, 232126390.

[59] Vives-PerisV, de OllasC, Gómez-CadenasA, Pérez-ClementeRM. Root exudates: from plant to rhizosphere and beyond. Plant Cell Rep, 2020, 39: 3-17.

[60] WangJ, XiongZ, KuzyakovY. Biochar stability in soil: meta-analysis of decomposition and priming effects. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy, 2016, 8: 512-523.

[61] WangY, WangLW, SuoM, QiuZJ, WuH, ZhaoM, YangHY. Regulating root fungal community using Mortierella alpina for Fusarium oxysporum resistance in panax ginseng. Front Microbiol, 2022, 13850917.

[62] WangYC, NiJJ, GuoHW, KravchenkoE. Influences of phosphorus-modified biochar on bacterial community and diversity in rhizosphere soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2024, 31: 1681-1691.

[63] WenZG, MurataM, XuZY, ChenYH, NaraK. Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities on the endangered Chinese Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga sinensis) indicating regional fungal sharing overrides host conservatism across geographical regions. Plant Soil, 2015, 387: 189-199.

[64] WolthuisJC, MagnusdottirS, Pras-RavesM, MoshiriM, JansJJM, BurgeringB, van MilS, de RidderJ. MetaboShiny: interactive analysis and metabolite annotation of mass spectrometry-based metabolomics data. Metabolomics, 2020, 1699.

[65] WuZX, HaoZP, ChenYL, ZengY, GuoLP, HuangLQ, WangY, ChenBD. Characterization of fungal community composition and carbon source utilization in the rhizosphere soil of Panax notoginseng suffering from root-rot disease. Mycosystema, 2015, 34: 65-74.

[66] WuD, ZhangWM, XiuLQ, SunYY, GuWQ, WangYN, ZhangHG, ChenWF. Soybean yield response of biochar-regulated soil properties and root growth strategy. Agronomy, 2022, 121412.

[67] WuD, YuanHC, GuWQ, FengZB, SunYY, XiuLQ, ZhangWM, ChenWF. Photosynthetic physiological metabolism and yield response of continuous soybean cropping mediated by long-term application of biochar. J Agro-Environ Sci, 2023, 42: 37-45.

[68] WuJT, LvS, ZhaoL, GaoT, YuC, HuJN, MaF. Advances in the study of the function and mechanism of the action of flavonoids in plants under environmental stresses. Planta, 2023, 257108.

[69] XuGX, LiLJ, ZhouJ, LyuD, ZhaoDY, QinSJ. Comparison of transcriptome and metabolome analysis revealed differences in cold resistant metabolic pathways in different apple cultivars under low temperature stress. Hortic Plant J, 2023, 9: 183-198.

[70] YangM, HeMD, DuanJ, ZhengYX, WangJM, ZhongY, HuangFY, TongWJ, DengXP, MoXH, ChenXL, ZhouHF, YuL, HeYS. Effects of biochar addition on phenolic acids and microbial community in rhizosphere soil at continuous cropping field of tobacco. Fujian J Agric Sci, 2020, 1: 103-110

[71] YangY, ZouJ, HuangWH, OlesenJE, LiWJ, ReesRM, HarrisonMT, FengB, FengYP, ChenF, YinXG. Drivers of soybean-based rotations synergistically increase crop productivity and reduce GHG emissions. AGR Ecosyst Environ, 2024, 372109094.

[72] YaoY, GaoB, ZhangM, InyangM, ZimmermanAR. Effect of biochar amendment on sorption and leaching of nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate in a sandy soil. Chemosphere, 2012, 89: 1467-1471.

[73] YuFB, ShanSD, LuoLP, GuanLB, QinH. Isolation and characterization of a Sphingomonas sp. strain F-7 degrading fenvalerate and its use in bioremediation of contaminated soil. J Environ Sci Health, Part B, 2013, 48: 198-207.

[74] ZhalninaK, LouieKB, HaoZ, MansooriN, Da RochaUN, ShiS, ChoH, KaraozU, LoquéD, BowenBP, FirestoneMK, NorthenTR, BrodieEL. Dynamic root exudate chemistry and microbial substrate preferences drive patterns in rhizosphere microbial community assembly. Nat Microbiol, 2018, 3: 470-480.

[75] ZhangY, GuoRY, LiSH, ChenY, LiZD, HePY, HuangXY, HuangKF. Effects of continuous cropping on soil, senescence, and yield of Tartary buckwheat. Agron J, 2021, 113: 5102-5113.

[76] ZhangZZ, WuJH, XiYP, ZhangLZ, GaoQ, Wang-PruskiG. Effects of autotoxicity on seed germination, gas exchange attributes and chlorophyll fluorescence in melon seedlings. J Plant Growth Regul, 2021, 41: 993-1003.

[77] ZhaoYM, WangXJ, YaoGW, LinZZ, XuLY, JiangYL, JinZW, ShanSD, PingLF. Advances in the effects of biochar on microbial ecological function in soil andcrop quality. Sustainability, 2022, 1410411.

[78] ZimmermanAR, GaoB, AhnMY. Positive and negative carbon mineralization priming effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils. Soil Biol Biochem, 2011, 43: 1169-1179.

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China(2023YFD1501200)

Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA28090300)

Special Fund for Academicians

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)