Low carbon biochar amended fly ash–cement building blocks: Assessment of metal leaching scenarios

Abstract

Demolition cementitious waste poses significant environmental challenges at the end of its lifecycle. To address this, fly ash (FA), a highly leachable material and a supplementary cementitious material, was combined with biochar (BC) to produce eco-friendly mortar bricks with reduced carbon emissions and contaminant leaching. BC was incorporated at 2%, 4%, and 6% by weight, and the resulting blocks achieved compressive strengths of 8–12 MPa after 28 days, meeting Eurocode 6 standards for use in harsh conditions. Leaching tests under synthetic precipitation showed reductions in Al, Se, Ba, and Cr concentrations by 72%, 48%, 58%, and 53%, respectively, with 6% BC. While Al remained above drinking water limits, Cr levels dropped below limits when BC exceeded 4%. Leaching followed typical pH-dependent behaviour: Al exhibited an amphoteric trend, and Cr showed an oxyanionic trend, with minimal leaching at neutral pH. This study highlights the role of BC in reducing leaching potential in cementitious composites and provides critical data for geochemical modelling in sustainable demolition waste management systems.

Keywords

Biochar / Fly ash / Contaminant / Leaching test / Leachability / Mix design

References

[1] AbbasS, SaleemMA, KazmiSM, MunirMJ. Production of sustainable clay bricks using waste fly ash: mechanical and durability properties. J Building Eng, 2017, 14: 7-14

[2] ACAA coal combustion product (CCP) production & use survey report, (2021). American coal ash association, http://www.acaa-usa.org/

[3] AjorlooM, GhodratM, ScottJ, StrezovV. Heavy metals removal/stabilization from municipal solid waste incineration fly ash: a review and recent trends. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage, 2022, 24(5): 1693-1717

[4] AkhtarA, SarmahAK. Novel biochar-concrete composites: manufacturing, characterization and evaluation of the mechanical properties. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 616: 408-416

[5] BartoliM, GiorcelliM, JagdaleP, RovereM, TagliaferroA. A review of non-soil biochar applications. Materials, 2020, 13(2): 261

[6] CEA, Central Electric Authority Government of India, A report on fly ash generation at coal/lignite based thermal power stations and its utilization in the country for the year 2019–20 Retrieved from http://www.cea.nic.in/tcd.html. Accessed on 01 Mar 2021

[7] ChaudhuryR, SharmaU, ThapliyalPC, SinghLP. Low-CO2 emission strategies to achieve net zero target in cement sector. J Cleaner Prod, 2023, 417: 137466

[8] da SilvaEB, LiS, de OliveiraLM, GressJ, DongX, WilkieAC, TownsendT, MaLQ. Metal leachability from coal combustion residuals under different pHs and liquid/solid ratios. J Hazard Mater, 2018, 341: 66-74

[9] DijkstraJJ, Van der SlootHA, ComansRN. The leaching of major and trace elements from MSWI bottom ash as a function of pH and time. Appl Geochem, 2006, 21(2): 335-351

[10] Dubikov M, Jankowski J, Ward CR, French D, 2006 Modelling element mobility in water-fly ash interactions. Co-operative research centre for coal in sustainable development. Research report

[11] ECOBA, European coal combustion products association. 2020. http://www.ecoba.com/index.html. Accessed on 6 Mar 2020

[12] Fernández-PereiraJL, de CarvalhoW, CabañasM, QuerolX, López-SolerA. Mobility of heavy metals from coal fly ash. Environ Geol, 1994, 23: 264-270

[13] GitariWM, FatobaOO, PetrikLF, VadapalliVR. Leaching characteristics of selected South African fly ashes: Effect of pH on the release of major and trace species. J Environ Sci Health Part A, 2009, 44(2): 206-220

[14] GuptaS, KuaHW. Effect of water entrainment by pre-soaked biochar particles on strength and permeability of cement mortar. Constr Build Mater, 2018, 159: 107-125

[15] GuptaS, KashaniA, MahmoodAH, HanT. Carbon sequestration in cementitious composites using biochar and fly ash–Effect on mechanical and durability properties. Constr Build Mater, 2021, 291 ArticleID: 123363

[16] HanD, XuL, WuQ, WangS, DuanL, WenM, LiZ, TangY, LiG, LiuK. Potential environmental risk of trace elements in fly ash and gypsum from ultra–low emission coal–fired power plants in China. Sci Total Environ, 2021, 798 ArticleID: 149116

[17] Hattaway J, Hardin CD, Daniels JL (2013) Recommended guidelines for the use and application of the leaching environmental assessment framework (LEAF) for coal combustion residuals. In: World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference, pp 22-25

[18] IzquierdoM, QuerolX. Leaching behaviour of elements from coal combustion fly ash: an overview. Int J Coal Geol, 2012, 94: 54-66

[19] KomonweeraketK, CetinB, AydilekAH, BensonCH, EdilTB. Effects of pH on the leaching mechanisms of elements from fly ash mixed soils. Fuel, 2015, 140: 788-802

[20] KossonDS, Van der SlootHA, EighmyTT. An approach for estimation of contaminant release during utilization and disposal of municipal waste combustion residues. J Hazard Mater, 1996, 47(1–3): 43-75

[21] KossonDS, GarrabrantsAC, DeLappR, van der SlootHA. pH-dependent leaching of constituents of potential concern from concrete materials containing coal combustion fly ash. Chemosphere, 2014, 103: 140-147

[22] Kosson DS, Garrabrants AC, Thorneloe S, Fagnant D, Helms G, Connolly K, Rodgers M (2017) Leaching environmental assessment framework (LEAF) how-to guide. US EPA, SW-846 Upd

[23] KuaHW, TanSMH. Novel typology of accelerated carbonation curing: using dry and pre-soaked biochar to tune carbon capture and mechanical properties of cementitious mortar. Biochar, 2023, 5(1): 36

[24] LeeH, CoulonF, WaglandST. Influence of pH, depth and humic acid on metal and metalloids recovery from municipal solid waste landfills. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 806 ArticleID: 150332

[25] LuoY, WuY, MaS, ZhengS, ZhangY, ChuPK. Utilization of coal fly ash in China: a mini-review on challenges and future directions. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2021, 28: 18727-18740

[26] MahediM, CetinB, DayiogluAY. Leaching behavior of aluminum, copper, iron and zinc from cement activated fly ash and slag stabilized soils. Waste Manag9, 2019, 5: 334-355

[27] McDonaldLJ, Carballo-MeilanMA, ChacarteguiR, AfzalW. The physicochemical properties of Portland cement blended with calcium carbonate with different morphologies as a supplementary cementitious material. J Clean Prod, 2022, 338 ArticleID: 130309

[28] MishraG, DanoglidisP, ShahSP, Konsta-GdoutosM. Optimization of biochar and fly ash to improve mechanical properties and CO2 sequestration in cement mortar. Constr Build Mater, 2023, 392 ArticleID: 132021

[29] MuthukrishnanS, GuptaS, KuaHW. Application of rice husk biochar and thermally treated low silica rice husk ash to improve physical properties of cement mortar. Theoret Appl Fract Mech, 2019, 104 ArticleID: 102376

[30] NaganathanS, MohamedAYO, MustaphaKN. Performance of bricks made using fly ash and bottom ash. Constr Build Mater, 2015, 96: 576-580

[31] NeupaneG, DonahoeRJ. Leachability of elements in alkaline and acidic coal fly ash samples during batch and column leaching tests. Fuel, 2013, 104: 758-770

[32] PraneethS, GuoR, WangT, DubeyBK, SarmahAK. Accelerated carbonation of biochar reinforced cement-fly ash composites: enhancing and sequestering CO2 in building materials. Constr Build Mater, 2020, 244 ArticleID: 118363

[33] QuinaMJ, BordadoJC, Quinta-FerreiraRM. The influence of pH on the leaching behaviour of inorganic components from municipal solid waste APC residues. Waste Manage, 2009, 29(9): 2483-2493

[34] RautSP, RalegaonkarRV, MandavganeSA. Development of sustainable construction material using industrial and agricultural solid waste: a review of waste-create bricks. Constr Build Mater, 2011, 25(10): 4037-4042

[35] SahuS, Ravi TejaPR, SarkarP, DavisR. Variability in the compressive strength of fly ash bricks. J Mater Civ Eng, 2019, 31(2): 06018024

[36] SahuS, SarkarP, DavisR. Quantification of uncertainty in compressive strength of fly ash brick masonry. J Building Eng, 2019, 26, ArticleID: 100843

[37] SeferinoğluM, PaulM, SandströmÅ, KökerA, ToprakS, PaulJ. Acid leaching of coal and coal-ashes☆. Fuel, 2003, 82(14): 1721-1734

[38] ShojiT, HugginsFE, HuffmanGP, LinakWP, MillerCA. XAFS spectroscopy analysis of selected elements in fine particulate matter derived from coal combustion. Energy Fuels, 2002, 16(2): 325-329

[39] StatomRA, ThyneGD, McCrayJE. Temporal changes in leachate chemistry of a municipal solid waste landfill cell in Florida, USA. Environ Geol, 2004, 45: 982-991

[40] Townsend TG, and Ma L 2016 Application of new leaching protocols for assessing beneficial use of solid wastes in Florida

[41] USEPA (1992a) Method 1311—toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) cincinnati: U.S. environmental protection agency

[42] USEPA (1992b) Method 1312—synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP) cincinnati: U.S. environmental protection agency

[43] USEPA, (2012). Method 1313- liquid-solid partitioning as a function of extract pH using a parallel batch extraction procedure: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

[44] WangL, ChenL, PoonCS, WangCH, OkYS, MechtcherineV, TsangDC. Roles of biochar and CO₂ curing in sustainable magnesia cement-based composites. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2021, 9(25): 8603-8610

[45] WintersD, BoakyeK, SimskeS. Toward carbon-neutral concrete through biochar–cement–calcium carbonate composites: a critical review. Sustainability, 2022, 14(8): 4633

[46] YinK, ChanWP, DouX, LisakG, ChangVWC. Co-complexation effects during incineration bottom ash leaching via comparison of measurements and geochemical modeling. J Clean Prod, 2018, 189: 155-168

[47] ZhangY, CetinB, LikosWJ, EdilTB. Impacts of pH on leaching potential of elements from MSW incineration fly ash. Fuel, 2016, 184: 815-825

[48] ZhaoL, DaiS, FinkelmanRB, FrenchD, GrahamIT, YangY, LiJ, YangP. Leaching behavior of trace elements from fly ashes of five Chinese coal power plants. Int J Coal Geol, 2020, 219: 103381

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)