Does biochar field aging reduce the kinetic retention for weakly hydrophobic antibiotics in purple soil?

Xinyu Liu , Yang He , Jinghan Li , Jiahui Li , Jianqiang Zhang , Xiangyu Tang

Biochar ›› 2025, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) : 69

PDF
Biochar ›› 2025, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) : 69 DOI: 10.1007/s42773-025-00460-4
Original Research

Does biochar field aging reduce the kinetic retention for weakly hydrophobic antibiotics in purple soil?

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The impact of field aged biochar (FABC) on the adsorption kinetics and transport behavior of weakly hydrophobic antibiotics in soil is scarcely discussed. This study investigated the impact of FABC on weakly hydrophobic antibiotics (sulfadiazine, SD and florfenicol, FF) transport in purple soil by comparing fresh biochar (FBC), one-year aged biochar (ABC1), and five-year aged biochar (ABC5). Through batch adsorption, soil column experiments, and Hydrus 1D modeling, this study examined the evolution of physicochemical properties of biochar, their effects on soil porosity and dispersion, and antibiotic adsorption. Results showed that aging significantly altered biochar characteristics, with carbon (C) content decreasing by 10.40% while oxygen (O) content increased by 40.52%. ABC1 demonstrated optimal performance with a 99.28% increase in specific surface area (SSA) and enhanced oxygen-containing functional groups, leading to maximum antibiotic retention rates of 16.57% for SD and 24.78% for FF. Although ABC5 showed decreased SSA and adsorption capacity, it maintained stable remediation effects through enhanced biochar–soil interactions, as evidenced by increased dispersivity (λ) and hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient (D). The two-site chemical nonequilibrium model (TSM) revealed that the fraction of equilibrium adsorption sites (f) increased from 0.1164 to 0.3514 after aging, indicating improved antibiotic retention. These findings demonstrate that while one-year aging enhanced remediation capacity, five-year aging stabilized environmental effects through modified soil structure.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Field aging / Biochar / Antibiotics / Adsorption / Dispersivity / Soil / Environmental Sciences / Soil Sciences

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xinyu Liu, Yang He, Jinghan Li, Jiahui Li, Jianqiang Zhang, Xiangyu Tang. Does biochar field aging reduce the kinetic retention for weakly hydrophobic antibiotics in purple soil?. Biochar, 2025, 7(1): 69 DOI:10.1007/s42773-025-00460-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

BalanV, MihaiCT, CojocaruFD, UrituCM, DodiG, BotezatD, GardikiotisI. Vibrational spectroscopy fingerprinting in medicine: from molecular to clinical practice. Materials, 2019.

[2]

BekiarisG, PeltreC, JensenLS, BruunS. Using FTIR-photoacoustic spectroscopy for phosphorus speciation analysis of biochars. Spectrochim Acta A, 2016, 168: 29-36.

[3]

BiošićM, MitrevskiM, BabićS. Environmental behavior of sulfadiazine, sulfamethazine, and their metabolites. Environ Sci Pollut R, 2017, 24109802-9812.

[4]

CaoT, ChenW, YangT, HeT, LiuZ, MengJ. Surface characterization of aged biochar incubated in different types of soil. BioResources, 2017, 12: 6366-6377.

[5]

DannerMC, RobertsonA, BehrendsV, ReissJ. Antibiotic pollution in surface fresh waters: occurrence and effects. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 664: 793-804.

[6]

DongX, LiG, LinQ, ZhaoX. Quantity and quality changes of biochar aged for 5 years in soil under field conditions. CATENA, 2017, 159: 136-143.

[7]

DuanM, LiuG, ZhouB, ChenX, WangQ, ZhuH, LiZ. Effects of modified biochar on water and salt distribution and water-stable macro-aggregates in saline-alkaline soil. J Soils Sediments, 2021, 2162192-2202.

[8]

GámizB, VelardeP, SpokasKA, CelisR, CoxL. Changes in sorption and bioavailability of herbicides in soil amended with fresh and aged biochar. Geoderma, 2019, 337: 341-349.

[9]

GaoL, ShiY, LiW, LiuJ, CaiY. Occurrence and distribution of antibiotics in urban soil in Beijing and Shanghai China. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2015, 221511360-11371.

[10]

GbadegesinLA, LiuXY, TangXY, LiuC, CuiJF. Leaching of sulfadiazine and florfenicol in an Entisol of a chicken-raising orchard: Impact of manure-derived dissolved organic matter. Agronomy, 2022, 12123228.

[11]

HeY, LiuC, TangXY, XianQS, ZhangJQ, GuanZ. Biochar impacts on sorption-desorption of oxytetracycline and florfenicol in an alkaline farmland soil as affected by field ageing. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 671: 928-936.

[12]

IvanovaN, ObaeedGLO, SulkarnaevF, BuchkinaN, GubinA, YurtaevA. Effect of biochar aging in agricultural soil on its wetting properties and surface structure. Biochar, 2023, 5175.

[13]

JefferyS, MeindersMBJ, StoofCR, BezemerTM, Van de VoordeTFJ, MommerL, Van GroenigenJW. Biochar application does not improve the soil hydrological function of a sandy soil. Geoderma, 2015, 251–252: 47-54.

[14]

JingF, SunY, LiuY, WanZ, ChenJ, TsangDCW. Interactions between biochar and clay minerals in changing biochar carbon stability. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 809. 151124

[15]

KhorramMS, LinD, ZhangQ, ZhengY, FangH, YuY. Effects of aging process on adsorption-desorption and bioavailability of fomesafen in an agricultural soil amended with rice hull biochar. J Environ Sci, 2017, 56: 180-191.

[16]

KongLL, LiuWT, ZhouQX. Biochar: an effective amendment for remediating contaminated soil. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol, 2014, 228: 83-99.

[17]

LeiW, TangX, ZhouX. Biochar amendment effectively reduces the transport of 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (a main degradation product of chlorpyrifos) in purple soil: experimental and modeling. Chemosphere, 2020, 245. 125651

[18]

LiY, HeJ, QiH, LiH, BoydSA, ZhangW. Impact of biochar amendment on the uptake, fate and bioavailability of pharmaceuticals in soil-radish systems. J Hazard Mater, 2020, 398. 122852

[19]

LiJ, OuyangF, ZhengS, LiuX, HeY, RenS. Effects of biochar on sorption and transport of florfenicol in purple soil. Res Environ Sci, 2022, 3561467-1474.

[20]

LinY, MunroeP, JosephS, KimberS, Van ZwietenL. Nanoscale organo-mineral reactions of biochars in ferrosol: an investigation using microscopy. Plant Soil, 2012, 3571369-380.

[21]

LinX, XuJ, KellerAA, HeL, GuY, ZhengW, SunD, LuZ, HuangJ, HuangX, LiG. Occurrence and risk assessment of emerging contaminants in a water reclamation and ecological reuse project. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 744. 140977

[22]

LinQ, LiB, LiuX, ZhangB, XuS. Insights into sorption and leaching behavior of sulfadiazine in soil as affected by humic acid. J Soils Sediments, 2021, 223809-817.

[23]

LiuZ, DuganB, MasielloCA, GonnermannHM. Biochar particle size, shape, and porosity act together to influence soil water properties. PLoS ONE, 2017, 126. e0179079

[24]

LiuZ, HanY, JingM, ChenJ. Sorption and transport of sulfonamides in soils amended with wheat straw-derived biochar: Effects of water pH, coexistence copper ion, and dissolved organic matter. J Soils Sediments, 2017, 173771-779.

[25]

LiuXY, ZhangJQ, GbadegesinLA, HeY. Modelling approaches for linking the residual concentrations of antibiotics in soil with antibiotic properties and land-use types in the largest urban agglomerations in China: a review. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 838. 156141

[26]

LiuXY, GuXY, LiuC, GbadegesinLA, HeY, ZhangJQ. Field migration of veterinary antibiotics via surface runoff from chicken-raising orchard in responding to natural rainfalls. Sci Total Environ, 2024, 909. 168527

[27]

MajorJ, LehmannJ, RondonM, GoodaleC. Fate of soil-applied black carbon: Downward migration, leaching and soil respiration. Glob Change Biol, 2010, 1641366-1379.

[28]

MaoJ, ZhangK, ChenB. Linking hydrophobicity of biochar to the water repellency and water holding capacity of biochar-amended soil. Environ Pollut, 2019, 253: 779-789.

[29]

MartinSM, KookanaRS, Van ZwietenL, KrullE. Marked changes in herbicide sorption-desorption upon ageing of biochars in soil. J Hazard Mater, 2012, 231–232: 70-78.

[30]

MiaS, DijkstraFA, SinghB. Aging induced changes in biochar's functionality and adsorption behavior for phosphate and ammonium. Environ Sci Technol, 2017, 51158359-8367.

[31]

NanQ, HuS, QinY, WuW. Methane oxidation activity inhibition via high amount aged biochar application in paddy soil. Sci Total Environ, 2021, 796. 149050

[32]

ObiaA, BørresenT, MartinsenV, CornelissenG, MulderJ. Vertical and lateral transport of biochar in light-textured tropical soils. Soil till Res, 2017, 165: 34-40.

[33]

OECD. Test no. 106: adsorption-desorption using a batch equilibrium method. OECD Guidel Test Chem, 2006, 1: 1-44

[34]

OmondiMO, XiaX, NahayoA, LiuX, KoraiPK, PanG. Quantification of biochar effects on soil hydrological properties using meta-analysis of literature data. Geoderma, 2016, 274: 28-34.

[35]

PaetschL, MuellerCW, Kögel-KnabnerI, Von LützowM, GirardinC, RumpelC. Effect of in-situ aged and fresh biochar on soil hydraulic conditions and microbial C use under drought conditions. Sci Rep, 2018, 816852.

[36]

PanM, ChuLM. Leaching behavior of veterinary antibiotics in animal manure-applied soils. Sci Total Environ, 2017, 579: 466-473.

[37]

ParkJY, HuweB. Effect of pH and soil structure on transport of sulfonamide antibiotics in agricultural soils. Environ Pollut, 2016, 213: 561-570.

[38]

PengJ, WuE, WangN, QuanX, SunM, HuQ. Removal of sulfonamide antibiotics from water by adsorption and persulfate oxidation process. J Mol Liq, 2019, 274: 632-638.

[39]

QiuL, WuJ, QianY, NafeesM, ZhangJ, DuW, YinY, GuoH. Impact of biochar-induced vertical mobilization of dissolved organic matter, sulfamethazine and antibiotic resistance genes variation in a soil-plant system. J Hazard Mater, 2021, 417. 126022

[40]

QuanG, FanQ, ZimmermanAR, SunJ, CuiL, WangH, GaoB, YanJ. Effects of laboratory biotic aging on the characteristics of biochar and its water-soluble organic products. J Hazard Mater, 2020, 382. 121071

[41]

RenX, SunH, WangF, ZhangP, ZhuH. Effect of aging in field soil on biochar's properties and its sorption capacity. Environ Pollut, 2018, 242Pt B1880-1886.

[42]

SumanS, YadavAM, JainT, SkAA. Study in the changes on the functional groups present in biomass during pyrolysis process. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng, 2021.

[43]

SunH, BrewerCE, MasielloCA, ZygourakisK. Nutrient transport in soils amended with biochar: a transient model with two stationary phases and intraparticle diffusion. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2015, 54: 4123-4135.

[44]

TanL, SunC, WangY, WangT, WuGL, HeH, ZhengJ. Changes in biochar properties in typical loess soil under a 5-year field experiment. J Soils Sediments, 2019, 201340-351.

[45]

TanL, MaZ, YangK, CuiQ, WangK, WangT, WuGL, ZhengJ. Effect of three artificial aging techniques on physicochemical properties and Pb adsorption capacities of different biochars. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 699. 134223

[46]

TangXY, YinWM, YangG, CuiJF, ChengJH, YangF, LiXY, WuCY, ZhuSG. Biochar reduces antibiotic transport by altering soil hydrology and enhancing antibiotic sorption. J Hazard Mater, 2024, 472. 134468

[47]

UsevičiūtėL, Baltrėnaitė-GedienėE, BaltrėnasP. Hydrophilicity enhancement of low-temperature lignocellulosic biochar modified by physical-chemical techniques. J Mater Cycles Waste, 2021, 2351838-1854.

[48]

Van GenuchtenMT, WagenetRJ. Two-site/two-region models for pesticide transport and degradation: theoretical development and analytical solutions. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1989, 5351303-1310.

[49]

WangD, LiC, ParikhSJ, ScowKM. Impact of biochar on water retention of two agricultural soils – a multi-scale analysis. Geoderma, 2019, 340: 185-191.

[50]

WangY, ZhangW, ShangJ, ShenC, JosephSD. Chemical aging changed aggregation kinetics and transport of biochar colloids. Environ Sci Technol, 2019, 53148136-8146.

[51]

WangL, O'ConnorD, RinklebeJ, OkYS, TsangDCW, ShenZ, HouD. Biochar aging: mechanisms, physicochemical changes, assessment, and implications for field applications. Environ Sci Technol, 2020, 54: 14797-14814.

[52]

WeiJ, LiuY, LiJ, ZhuY, YuH, PengY. Adsorption and co-adsorption of tetracycline and doxycycline by one-step synthesized iron loaded sludge biochar. Chemosphere, 2019, 236. 124254

[53]

YangF, ZhaoL, GaoB, XuX, CaoX. The interfacial behavior between biochar and soil minerals and its effect on biochar stability. Environ Sci Technol, 2016, 5052264-2271.

[54]

YiQ, LiangB, NanQ, WangH, ZhangW, WuW. Temporal physicochemical changes and transformation of biochar in a rice paddy: Insights from a 9-year field experiment. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 721. 137670

[55]

YinWM, GuanZ, LiuC, HeY, YangF, TangXY. Effects of biochar application and ageing on the adsorption of antibiotics in purple soil. Environ Sci, 2019, 4062920-2929.

[56]

ZhouD, Thiele-BruhnS, Arenz-LeufenMG, JacquesD, LichtnerP, EngelhardtI. Impact of manure-related DOM on sulfonamide transport in arable soils. J Contam Hydrol, 2016, 192: 118-128.

[57]

ZhuangL, RaoofA, MahmoodluMG, BiekartS, de WitteR, BadiL, Van GenuchtenMT, LinK. Unsaturated flow effects on solute transport in porous media. J Hydrol, 2021, 598. 126301

[58]

ZimmermanAR. Abiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory-produced black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol, 2010, 4441295-1301.

[59]

ZouY, ZhengW. Modeling manure colloid-facilitated transport of the weakly hydrophobic antibiotic florfenicol in saturated soil columns. Environ Sci Technol, 2013, 47105185-5192.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province(2024NSFSC0837)

the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution(2024YYSKY-05)

the Open Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Eco-industry of Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences(2024KFF-04)

the Key Research and Development Program of Ganzi Prefecture's Science and Technology Plan(24kjjh0005)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

165

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/