Evaluating the two-pool decay model for biochar carbon permanence

Abstract

Accurate estimation of biochar carbon permanence is essential for assessing its effectiveness as a carbon dioxide removal (CDR) strategy. The widely adopted framework, based on the two-pool carbon exponential decay model, forms the basis of policy guidelines and national CDR accounting. However, our re-analysis of the meta-data used in this model reveals significant deficiencies in its parameterization, leading to two critical issues. First, the current parameterization assigns a disproportionally low percentage of the labile carbon fraction (C1) relative to the recalcitrant fraction (C2), effectively reducing the model to a single-pool approach. Due to the limited duration of incubation experiments, the decay constant of the labile fraction is incorrectly applied to the entire biochar mass, resulting in a considerable overestimation of the biochar decay rate. Second, our analysis reveals a lack of causal correlation between the assigned proportions of C1 and C2 and key carbonization parameters such as production temperature and hydrogen-to-carbon (H/C) ratios, suggesting that the model does not accurately represent the underlying chemistry. This misalignment contradicts the established relationship between increased biochar stability and a higher degree of carbonization. Consequently, the the parameterization of current model may not adequately reflect the carbon sequestration potential of biochar. While a multi-pool decay model is suitable for predicting the permanence of biochar, the primary issue with the current model lies in its parameterization rather than its structure. To address these limitations, we recommend that future research prioritize the development of a revised multi-pool decay model with improved parameterization, supported by empirical decomposition data from a variety of experimental methods, including incubation studies, accelerated aging experiments, and comprehensive physicochemical characterization. This refined approach will improve the accuracy of biochar permanence estimations, strengthening its role in global carbon management strategies.

References

[1] Azzi ES, Li H, Cederlund H, Karltun E, Sundberg C. Modelling biochar long-term carbon storage in soil with harmonized analysis of decomposition data Geoderma, 2024.

[2] Budai A, Rasse DP, Lagomarsino A, Lerch TZ, Paruch L. Biochar persistence, priming and microbial responses to pyrolysis temperature series Biol Fertil Soils, 2016, 52: 749-761.

[3] Budai A, Calucci L, Rasse DP, Strand LT, Pengerud A, Wiedemeier D, Abiven S. Effects of pyrolysis conditions on Miscanthus and corncob chars: characterization by IR, solid state NMR and BPCA analysis J Anal Appl Pyrol, 2017, 128: 335-345.

[4] Camps-Arbestain M, Amonette JE, Singh B, Wang T, Schmidt HP (2015) A biochar classification system and associated test methods. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (Eds.), Biochar for environmental management, second edition. ISBN: 978-0-415-70415-1 (hbk) ISBN: 978-0-203-76226-4 (ebk)

[5] Carr AD, Williamson JD. The relationship between aromaticity, vitrinite reflectance and maceral composition of coals: implications for the use of vitrinite reflectance as a maturation parameter Org Geochem, 1990, 16: 313-323.

[6] Dharmakeerthi RS, Hanley K, Whitman T, Woolf D, Lehmann J. Organic carbon dynamics in soils with pyrogenic organic matter that received plant residue additions over seven years Soil Biol Biochem, 2015, 88: 268-274.

[7] European Commission. Renewable Energy Directive (EU RED-II) Implementing Regulation: Soil Carbon Accumulation (Esca) factor for sustainable agronomic practices. European Union Regulation 2022/996. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32022R0996

[8] European Commission. Carbon Dioxide Removals (CDRs) and Negative Emission Technologies (NETs): Policy framework for Carbon Removal and Carbon Farming by DG Clima. Provisional agreement on the Carbon Removal Certification Framework Regulation. European Parliament, 10 April 2024. Available at: https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/carbon-removals-and-carbon-farming_en and https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/plmrep/COMMITTEES/ENVI/DV/2024/03-11/Item9-Provisionalagreement-CFCR_2022-0394COD_EN.pdf

[9] Fang Y, Singh BP, Singh B. Temperature sensitivity of biochar and native carbon mineralisation in biochar-amended soils Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2014, 191: 158-167.

[10] Fang Y, Singh BP, Nazaries L, Keith A. Interactive carbon priming, microbial response and biochar persistence in a Vertisol with varied inputs of biochar and labile organic matter Eur J Soil Sci, 2019, 70: 960-974.

[11] Herath HMSK, Camps-Arbestain M, Hedley MJ, Kirschbaum MUF, Wang T, van Hale R. Experimental evidence for sequestering C with biochar by avoidance of CO2 emissions from original feedstock and protection of native soil organic matter GCB Bioenergy, 2015, 7: 512-526.

[12] Howell A, Helmkamp S, Belmont E. Stable polycyclic aromatic carbon (SPAC) formation in wildfire chars and engineered biochars Sci Total Environ, 2022.

[13] IBI. Biochar Carbon Stability Test Method: an assessment of methods to determine biochar carbon stability. International Biochar Initiative (2013) https://biochar-international.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/IBI_Report_Biochar_Stability_Test_Method_Final.pdf

[14] International Committee for Coal and Organic Petrology (ICCP). The new inertinite classification (ICCP System 1994) Fuel, 2001, 80: 459-471.

[15] Kuzyakov Y, Bogomolova I, Glaser B. Biochar stability in soil: decomposition during eight years and transformation as assessed by compound-specific 14C analysis Soil Biol Biochem, 2014, 70: 229-236.

[16] Lefebvre D, Fawzy S, Aquije CA, Osman AI, Draper KT, Trabold TA. Biomass residue to carbon dioxide removal: quantifying the global impact of biochar Biochar, 2023, 5: 65.

[17] Lehmann J, Abiven S, Klber M, Pan G, Singh BP, Sohi SP, Zimmerman AR Lehmann J, Joseph S. Persistence of biochar in soil Biochar for environmental management: science technology and implication, 2015 Milton Park Routledge 233-280.

[18] Lehmann J, Cowie A, Masiello CA, Kammann C, Woolf D, Amonette JE, Cayuela ML, Camps-Arbestain M, Whitman T. Biochar in climate change mitigation Nat Geosci, 2021, 14: 883-892.

[19] Liu Y, Zhu Y, Liu S, Zhang C. Evolution of aromatic clusters in vitrinite-rich coal during thermal maturation by using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared measurements Energy Fuels, 2020, 34: 10781-10792.

[20] Major J, Lehmann J, Rondon M, Goodale C. Fate of soil-applied black carbon: downward migration, leaching and soil respiration Glob Change Biol, 2010, 16: 1366-1379.

[21] Morga R. Reactivity of semifusinite and fusinite in the view of micro-Raman spectroscopy examination Int J Coal Geol, 2011, 88: 194-203.

[22] Ogle SM, Buendia EC, Butterbach-Bahl K, Breidt FJ, Hartmann M, Yagi K, Nayamuth R, Spencer S, Wirth T, Smith P, Sanz-Cobena A. Chapter 2: Emissions from livestock and manure management. In: Calvo Buendia E, Tanabe K, Kranjc A, Baasansuren J, Fukuda M, Ngarize S, Osako A, Pyrozhenko Y, Shermanau P, Federici S (Eds.), Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Vol. 4: Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use. Geneva: IPCC, 2019

[23] Petersen HI, Lassen L, Rudra A, Nguyen LX, Do PTM, Sanei H. Carbon stability and morphotype composition of biochars from feedstocks in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam Int J Coal Geol, 2023.

[24] Puro.Earth. Biochar Methodology Edition 2022 V3, 01 Feb 2024. https://puro.earth/carbon-removal-methods

[25] Riverse. BECCS and biochar: pyrolysis of biomass for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. Methodology ID: RIV-ENGY-02-PYGAS-V1.0, 2013. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cCuenUtSyd_8lm70OSr0ZKrIgSWiQGqA/view?usp=drive_link

[26] Rodrigues L, Budai A, Elsegaard L, Hardy B, Keel SG, Mondini C, Plaza C, Leifeld J. The importance of biochar quality and pyrolysis yield for soil carbon sequestration in practice Eur J Soil Sci, 2023, 74. e13396

[27] Sanei H, Rudra A, Przyswitt ZMM, Kousted S, Sindlev MB, Zheng X, Nielsen SB, Petersen HI. Assessing biochar's permanence: an inertinite benchmark Int J Coal Geol, 2024, 281. 104409

[28] Scott AC. Observations on the nature and origin of fusain Int J Coal Geol, 1989, 12: 443-475.

[29] Scott AC. The pre-quaternary history of fire Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimtol Palaeoecol, 2000, 164: 281-329.

[30] Singh BP, Cowie AL, Smernik RJ. Biochar carbon stability in a clayey soil as a function of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature Environ Sci Technol, 2012, 46: 11770-11778.

[31] Singh BP, Fang Y, Boersma M, Collins D, Van Zwieten L, Macdonald LM. In situ persistence and migration of biochar carbon and its impact on native carbon emission in contrasting soils under managed temperate pastures PLoS ONE, 2015, 10. e0141560

[32] Verra. VM0044 methodology for biochar utilization in soil and non-soil applications, v1.1. (Verra, 2023). https://verra.org/methodologies/vm0044-methodology-for-biochar-utilization-in-soil-and-non-soil-applications/

[33] Wang J, Xiong Z, Kuzyakov Y. Biochar stability in soil: meta-analysis of decomposition and priming effects GCB Bioenergy, 2016, 8: 512-523.

[34] Whitman T, Pal Singh B, Zimmerman AR (2015) Biochar effects on nitrous oxide and methane emissions from soil. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (Eds.), Biochar for environmental management, second edition. ISBN: 978-0-415-70415-1 (hbk) ISBN: 978-0-203-76226-4 (ebk)

[35] Wiedemeier DB, Abiven S, Hockaday WC, Keiluweit M, Kleber M, Masiello CA, McBeath AV, Nico PS, Pyle LA, Schneider MPW, Smernik RJ, Wiesenberg GLB, Schmidt MWI. Aromaticity and degree of aromatic condensation of char Org Geochem, 2015, 78: 135-143.

[36] Woolf D, Lehmann J. Modelling the long-term response to positive and negative priming of soil organic carbon by black carbon Biogeochemistry, 2012, 111: 83-95.

[37] Woolf D, Lehmann J, Ogle S, Kishimoto-Mo AW, McConkey B, Baldock J. Greenhouse gas inventory model for biochar additions to soil Environ Sci Technol, 2021, 55: 14795-14805.

[38] Wu M, Han X, Zhong T, Yuan M, Wu W. Soil organic carbon content affects the stability of biochar in paddy soil Agr Ecosyst Environ, 2016, 223: 59-66.

[39] Zhang H, Chen C, Gray EM, Boyd SE. Effect of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature on properties of biochar governing end use efficacy Biomass Bioenerg, 2017, 105: 136-146.

[40] Zimmerman AR. Abiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory-produced black carbon (biochar) Environ Sci Technol, 2010, 44: 1295-1301.

[41] Zimmerman AR, Gao B Ladygina N, Rineau F. The stability of biochar in the environment Biochar and soil biota, 2013 Boca Raton CRC Press 1-40

Funding

Innovationsfonden(Biochesta INNO_CCUS 2)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)