Optimization of pulsed electric field pretreatment followed by cellulase hydrolysis for enhanced protein recovery and antioxidant activity from brown seaweed (Undaria pinnatifida)

Antony Rinthiya Mariadavid , Maya Malikhaturohmah , Hye-Ryeon An , Sana Mansoor , Giovanni Luzi , Jae Hak Sohn , Khawaja Muhammad Imran Bashir , Jae-Suk Choi

Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1) : 140

PDF
Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1) :140 DOI: 10.1186/s40643-026-01140-2
Research
research-article
Optimization of pulsed electric field pretreatment followed by cellulase hydrolysis for enhanced protein recovery and antioxidant activity from brown seaweed (Undaria pinnatifida)
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Undaria pinnatifida is a promising brown seaweed due to its relatively high protein content and functional bioactive compounds. However, efficient recovery of these components is limited by its rigid, polysaccharide-rich cell wall structure. In this study, pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment followed by cellulase hydrolysis was investigated as a sequential approach to enhance protein extraction and antioxidant functionality from U. pinnatifida. PEF conditions were optimized by varying electric field strength, pulse width, pulse repetition frequency, treatment duration, seaweed loading, and pretreatment conditions to maximize protein release. The optimized conditions were 3 kV cm−1 electric field strength, 10 µs pulse width, 100 Hz pulse repetition frequency, and 60 s treatment duration, using 100 g of seaweed pretreated by mechanical cutting followed by 2 days of soaking in 3.5% saline solution. Under these conditions, protein concentration reached 493 ± 2.06 µg mL−1. The optimized PEF treatment required 0.18 kJ of electrical energy and achieved an energy efficiency of 684.72 ± 2.78 mg protein kJ−1. Subsequent cellulase hydrolysis further enhanced protein extraction, with the PEF + 1% cellulase treatment yielding 1307 ± 38.62 µg mL−1, compared with 870 ± 42.38 µg mL−1 for 1% cellulase alone, 512 ± 15.94 µg mL−1 for PEF alone, and 275 ± 10.46 µg mL−1 for the untreated control. Thus, the combined treatment produced approximately 50%, 155%, and 375% higher protein concentrations than 1% cellulase alone, PEF alone, and the untreated control, respectively. Antioxidant activity assessed separately using DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP assays also showed the highest responses for the combined treatment, with 52.08 ± 2.68% DPPH radical-scavenging activity, 51.00 ± 1.08% ABTS radical-scavenging activity, and 679 ± 1.08 µM Fe2+ equivalents in the FRAP assay. Overall, the optimized sequential PEF–cellulase treatment substantially improved protein extraction and produced the highest antioxidant responses among the treatments investigated, demonstrating its potential for enhancing the recovery of protein and antioxidant-active components from U. pinnatifida under laboratory-scale conditions.

Keywords

Non-thermal processing / Electroporation / Cell membrane disruption / Enzymatic hydrolysis / Marine biorefinery / Antioxidant activity / Energy-efficient bioprocessing

Highlight

Optimal PEF conditions included 3 kV cm−1, 10 µs, 100 Hz, and 60 s.

Cutting followed by 2-day soaking in 3.5% saline water yielded 493 ± 2.06 µg mL−1 protein after PEF.

Optimized PEF required 0.18 kJ and achieved an energy efficiency of 684.72 ± 2.78 mg protein kJ−1.

PEF followed by 1% cellulase increased protein concentration to 1307 ± 38.62 µg mL−1.

PEF + cellulase achieved 52.08 ± 2.68% DPPH and 51.00 ± 1.08% ABTS radical-scavenging activity.

PEF + cellulase produced the highest FRAP response at 679 ± 1.08 µM Fe2+ equivalents.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Antony Rinthiya Mariadavid, Maya Malikhaturohmah, Hye-Ryeon An, Sana Mansoor, Giovanni Luzi, Jae Hak Sohn, Khawaja Muhammad Imran Bashir, Jae-Suk Choi. Optimization of pulsed electric field pretreatment followed by cellulase hydrolysis for enhanced protein recovery and antioxidant activity from brown seaweed (Undaria pinnatifida). Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 2026, 13 (1) : 140 DOI:10.1186/s40643-026-01140-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abad V, Ruíz A, Grasa J, Calvo B, Escursell N, Peiro T, Raso J, Cebrián G, Álvarez-Lanzarote IEffect of electrical conductivity on the inactivation of Anisakis spp. by PEF. Food Control, 2025, 179: 111571.

[2]

Ali A, Wei S, Liu Z, Fan X, Sun Q, Xia Q, Liu S, Hao J, Deng CNon-thermal processing technologies for the recovery of bioactive compounds from marine by-products. LWT-Food Sci Technol, 2021, 147111549.

[3]

Alirezalu K, Munekata PES, Parniakov O, Barba FJ, Witt J, Toepfl S, Wiktor A, Lorenzo JMPulsed elethe ctric field and mild heating for milk processing: a review on recent advances. J Sci Food Agric, 2020, 100(1): 16-24.

[4]

Angersbach A, Heinz V, Knorr DEffects of pulsed electric fields on cell membranes in real food systems. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol, 2000, 1(2): 135-149.

[5]

Aronsson K, Lindgren M, Johansson BR, Rönner UInactivation of microorganisms using pulsed electric fields: the influence of process parameters on Escherichia coli, Listeria innocua, Leuconostoc mesenteroides and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol, 2001, 2(1): 41-54.

[6]

Assaf N, Chiavaro E, Rinaldi MPulsed electric field effects on plant matrices: a comprehensive review of structural and textural responses. Food Biosci, 2026, 77108402.

[7]

Astráin-Redín L, Moya J, Alejandre M, Beitia E, Raso J, Calvo B, Cebrián G, Álvarez IImproving the microbial inactivation uniformity of pulsed electric field ohmic heating treatments of solid products. LWT-Food Sci Technol, 2022, 154112709.

[8]

Ayub M, Fincan MVisualization of the frequency effect of pulsed electric field on enzymatic browning of peel ground tissue. Food Bioprod Process, 2023, 14282-93.

[9]

Barba FJ, Koubaa M, do Prado-Silva L, Orlien V, Sant’Ana ADSMild processing applied to the inactivation of the main foodborne bacterial pathogens: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol, 2017, 66: 20-35.

[10]

Bashir KMI, Mohibbullah M, An JH, Choi JY, Hong YK, Sohn JH, Kim JS, Choi JSIn vivo antioxidant activity of mackerel (Scomber japonicus) muscle protein hydrolysate. PeerJ, 2018, 6: e6181.

[11]

Bashir KMI, Sohn JH, Kim J, Choi JIdentification and characterization of novel antioxidant peptides from mackerel (Scomber japonicus) muscle protein hydrolysates. Food Chem, 2020, 323126809.

[12]

Bashir KMI, Chakniramol S, Mansoor S, Jahn A, Cho MG, Choi JSAntioxidant activity of protein hydrolysates from redlip mullet (Chelon haematocheilus) muscle and byproducts. Foods, 2024, 13(18): 3009.

[13]

Bashir KMI, An HR, Mansoor S, Shin HY, Luzi G, Sohn JH, Choi JSInnovative applications of pulsed electric field technology in marine biomass processing. Food Bioprocess Tech, 2026, 1919.

[14]

Benzie IF, Strain JJThe ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of antioxidant power: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem, 1996, 239(1):70-76.

[15]

Bitwell C, Indra SS, Luke C, Kakoma MKA review of modern and conventional extraction techniques and their applications for extracting phytochemicals from plants. Sci Afr, 2023, 19e01585.

[16]

Bocker R, Silva EKPulsed electric field assisted extraction of natural food pigments and colorings from plant matrices. Food Chem X, 2022, 15100398.

[17]

Bojorges H, Martínez-Sanz M, Fontes-Candia C, Díaz-Piñero L, Martínez-Abad A, López-Rubio A, Fabra MJProtein extraction from the industrial solid residue of brown seaweed after alginate extraction. Food Hydrocoll, 2025, 159110708.

[18]

Chudasama M, Singh DK, Pradhan RCReview on electroporation mechanisms for PEF-assisted extraction and microbial inactivation. Food Eng Rev, 2025, 17706-726.

[19]

Costa M, Pio L, Bule P, Cardoso V, Alfaia CM, Coelho D, Brás J, Fontes CMGA, Prates JAMAn individual alginate lyase is effective in the disruption of Laminaria digitata recalcitrant cell wall. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 9706.

[20]

Dudonné S, Vitrac X, Coutière P, Woillez M, Mérillon JMComparative study of antioxidant properties and total phenolic content of 30 plant extracts of industrial interest using DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, SOD, and ORAC assays. J Agric Food Chem, 2009, 57(5):1768-1774.

[21]

Echave J, Fraga-Corral M, Garcia-Perez P, Popović-Djordjević J, H Avdović E, Radulović M, Xiao J, Prieto A, Simal-Gandara MSeaweed protein hydrolysates and bioactive peptides: extraction, purification, and applications. Mar Drugs, 2021, 19(9): 500.

[22]

Fleurence J, Levine ISeaweed in health and disease prevention, 2016, London: Academic

[23]

Fonseca-Barahona I, Shahbaz K, Baroutian SBioactives from brown algae: antioxidant, anti-Inflammatory, anticancer, and antimicrobial potential. Chem Bio Eng Rev, 2025, 12: e70007.

[24]

Fonseca-Barahona I, Shahbaz K, Baroutian SEmerging methods to extract bioactive compounds from brown algae: a comprehensive review of performance, readiness, and sustainability. Sep Purif Technol, 2026, 395137731.

[25]

García-Sánchez T, Merla C, Fontaine J, Muscat A, Mir LMSine wave electropermeabilization reveals the frequency-dependent response of the biological membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr, 2018, 1860(5):1022-1034.

[26]

Ghelichi S, Jacobsen CSeaweed proteins: properties, extraction, challenges, and prospects. J Food Sci, 2025, 90e70418.

[27]

Ghoshal GComprehensive review on pulsed electric field in food preservation: gaps in current studies for potential future research. Heliyon, 2023, 9(6): e17532.

[28]

Golberg A, Sack M, Teissie J, Pataro G, Pliquett U, Saulis G, Stefan T, Miklavcic D, Vorobiev E, Frey WEnergy-efficient biomass processing with pulsed electric fields for bioeconomy and sustainable development. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2016, 994.

[29]

Gonzalez ME, Barrett DMThermal, high pressure, and electric field processing effects on plant cell membrane integrity and relevance to fruit and vegetable quality. J Food Sci, 2010, 75R121-R130.

[30]

Gorgey AS, Dudley GAThe role of pulse duration and stimulation duration in maximizing the normalized torque during neuromuscular electrical stimulation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2008, 38(8): 508-516.

[31]

Khojasteh SK, Elmizadeh A, Sarraf M, Dodange SNon-thermal innovations in solid food processing: eco-friendly alternatives to thermal methods. Appl Food Res, 2025, 5(2): 101256.

[32]

Kumar A, Konar A, Garg S, Kaul SC, Wadhwa RExperimental evidence and mechanism of action of some popular neuro-nutraceutical herbs. Neurochem Int, 2021, 149105124.

[33]

Li L, Yang R, Zhao WThe effect of pulsed electric fields (PEF) combined with temperature and natural preservatives on the quality and microbiological shelf-life of cantaloupe juice. Foods, 2021, 10(11):2606.

[34]

Lobban CS, Harrison PJSeaweed ecology and physiology, 1994, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[35]

Luzi G, Bashir KMI, Lyu W, Jahn A, Cho M-G, Choi J-S (2026a) Numerical modeling of pulsed electric field–enhanced release of active compounds from viscoelastic matrices. J Food Eng 423:113268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2026.113268

[36]

Luzi G, Bashir KMI, Lyu W, Cho MG, Choi JSMathematical modeling and computational approaches for pulsed electric field processing in food preservation: a comprehensive review. Foods, 2026, 15164.

[37]

Lytras F, Psakis G, Gatt R, Cebrián G, Raso J, Valdramidis VExploring the efficacy of pulsed electric fields (PEF) in microbial inactivation during food processing: A deep dive into the microbial cellular and molecular mechanisms. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol, 2024, 95103732.

[38]

Maribu I, Blikra MJ, Eilertsen KE, Elvevold KProtein enrichment of the red macroalga Palmaria palmata using pulsed electric field and enzymatic processing. J Appl Phycol, 2024, 363665-3673.

[39]

Marín-Sánchez J, Berzosa A, Álvarez I, Sánchez-Gimeno C, Raso JPulsed electric fields effects on proteins: extraction, structural modification, and enhancing enzymatic activity. Bioelectricity, 2024, 6(3): 154.

[40]

Meneses N, Jaeger H, Knorr DMinimization of thermal impact by application of electrode cooling in a co-linear PEF treatment chamber. J Food Sci, 2011, 76(8):E536-E543.

[41]

Nadeeshani H, Hassouna A, Lu JProteins extracted from seaweed Undaria pinnatifida and their potential uses as foods and nutraceuticals. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2022, 62(22): 6187-6203.

[42]

O’ Connor J, Meaney S, Williams GA, Hayes MExtraction of protein from four different seaweeds using three different physical pre-treatment strategies. Molecules, 2020, 25(8): 2005.

[43]

Park JS, Han JM, Park SW, Kim JW, Choi MS, Lee SM, Haq M, Zhang W, Chun BSSubcritical water extraction of Undaria pinnatifida: comparative study of the chemical properties and biological activities across different parts. Mar Drugs, 2024, 22(8):344.

[44]

Pataro G, Goettel M, Straessner R, Gusbeth C, Ferrari G, Frey WEffect of PEF treatment on extraction of valuable compounds from microalgae C. vulgaris. Chem Eng Trans, 2017, 5767-72.

[45]

Pedro B, Guedes L, André R, Gaspar H, Vaz P, Ascensão L, Melo R, Luísa Serralheiro MUndaria pinnatifida (U. Pinnatifida) bioactivity: antioxidant, gastro-intestinal motility, cholesterol biosynthesis and liver cell lines proteome. J Funct Foods, 2021, 83104567.

[46]

Perez B, Baumgartner J, Macken D, Haberkorn I, Mathys APulsed electric fields for emerging single-cell bioprocessing in food applications: electropermeabilization mechanisms and design principles. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf, 2026, 25(2): e70411.

[47]

Picot-Allain C, Mahomoodally MF, Ak G, Zengin GConventional versus green extraction techniques - a comparative perspective. Curr Opin Food Sci, 2021, 40144-156.

[48]

Pliquett UJoule heating during solid tissue electroporation. Med Biol Eng Comput, 2003, 41(2): 215-219.

[49]

Polikovsky M, Fernand F, Sack M, Frey W, Müller G, Golberg ATowards marine biorefineries: selective proteins extractions from marine macroalgae Ulva with pulsed electric fields. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol, 2016, 37194-200.

[50]

Postma PR, Cerezo-Chinarro O, Akkerman RJ, Olivieri G, Wijffels RH, Brandenburg WA, Eppink MHMBiorefinery of the macroalgae Ulva lactuca: extraction of proteins and carbohydrates by mild disintegration. J Appl Phycol, 2018, 30: 1281-1293.

[51]

Ranjha MMAN, Kanwal R, Shafique B, Arshad RN, Irfan S, Kieliszek M, Kowalczewski PŁ, Irfan M, Khalid MZ, Roobab U, Aadil RMA critical review on pulsed electric field: a novel technology for the extraction of phytoconstituents. Molecules, 2021, 26(16): 4893.

[52]

Raso J, Frey W, Ferrari G, Pataro G, Knorr D, Teissie J, Miklavčič DRecommendations guidelines on the key information to be reported in studies of application of PEF technology in food and biotechnological processes. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol, 2016, 37312-321.

[53]

Solana V, Ixtaina V, Dellatorre FGPostharvest processing of Undaria pinnatifida: effect of blanching and salting parameters on the quality of yudoshi-enzo wakame. Algal Res, 2025, 90104178.

[54]

Steinbruch E, Wise J, Levkov K, Chemodanov A, Israel Á, Livney YD, Golberg AEnzymatic cell wall degradation combined with pulsed electric fields increases yields of water-soluble-protein extraction from the green marine macroalga Ulva sp. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol, 2023, 84103231.

[55]

Steinbruch E, Kashyap M, Chemodanov A, Levkov K, Golberg AContinuous pulsed electric field processing for intensification of aqueous extraction of protein from fresh green seaweed Ulva sp. biomass. Food Hydrocoll, 2024, 157110477.

[56]

Taha A, Casanova F, Šimonis P, Stankevič V, Gomaa MAE, Stirkė APulsed electric field: fundamentals and Effects on the Structural and Techno-Functional Properties of Dairy and Plant Proteins. Foods, 2022, 11(11): 1556.

[57]

Timmermans R, Mastwijk H, Berendsen L, Nederhoff A, Matser A, Van Boekel M, Nierop Groot MModerate intensity Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF) as alternative mild preservation technology for fruit juice. Int J Food Microbiol, 2019, 29863-73.

[58]

Toepfl S, Heinz V, Knorr DHigh intensity pulsed electric fields applied for food preservation. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif, 2007, 46(6): 537-546.

[59]

Tomasevic I, Heinz V, Djekic I, Terjung NPulsed electric fields and meat processing: latest updates. Ital J Anim Sci, 2023, 22(1): 857-866.

[60]

Vaessen EMJ, Timmermans RAH, Tempelaars MH, Schutyser MAI, den Besten HMWReversibility of membrane permeabilization upon pulsed electric field treatment in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 19990.

[61]

Wang Q, Li Y, Sun DW, Zhu ZEnhancing food processing by pulsed and high voltage electric fields: principles and applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2018, 58(13):2285-2298.

[62]

Wang L, Hu Y, Zeng X, Wang R, Xu FPulsed electric field technology in fruit and vegetable products processing: a non-thermal path to preserving quality and enhancing efficiency. J Future Foods, 2026in press

[63]

Zhao W, Ma R, Sun Y, Xia Q, Wu Z, Fan X, Pan DPulsed electric field processing of meat: mechanisms, quality responses and future perspectives. J Future Foods, 2026in press

[64]

Zhou Q, Wang Z, Chen W, Liu X, Cheong K, Zou Y, Zhong S, Li RThe structural characteristics, biological activities and mechanisms of bioactive brown seaweed polysaccharides: a review. J Funct Foods, 2024, 119106303.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea(RS-2024–00335405)

Rights & permissions

The Author(s)

PDF

1

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉