Artificial intelligence and automation in enzyme engineering: evolution, advances, and future perspectives
Kexin Hao , Jianguang Liu , Hui Tang , Yan Zhang , Yandong Sun , Hongyu Zhang , Ji Wang , Peng Liu , Jianmei Luo , Jing Zhao
Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1) : 101
Natural enzymes often fail to meet industrial demands for catalytic efficiency, stability, and substrate specificity, creating a critical bottleneck in biomanufacturing. This review examines how artificial intelligence (AI) and automation are reshaping enzyme engineering from empirical trial‑and‑error toward data-driven, closed-loop design. We trace AI development from feature-engineered machine learning to supervised deep learning and self-supervised protein language models, and automation from standalone task execution to cascade integration and biofoundry-enabled build-test workflows. Their convergence is analyzed through a stage-based autonomy framework, highlighting the transition from semi-automated workflows to conditional and high-autonomy DBTL systems. Recent studies demonstrate that AI-guided prediction, automated experimentation, and active learning can accelerate enzyme optimization; however, key barriers remain, including biased datasets, limited out-of-distribution generalization, weak mechanistic interpretability, automation interoperability constraints, and unresolved multi-objective trade-offs. We discuss future directions involving FAIR-compliant data infrastructure, hybrid sequence-structure-physics models, modular automation platforms, and autonomous closed-loop systems. By integrating historical evolution, representative case studies, success and failure analysis, and practical bottlenecks, this review provides a roadmap for advancing AI-guided and autonomous enzyme engineering.
Enzyme engineering / Artificial intelligence / Automation technologies / Protein language models / Biofoundry / Design-build-test-learn (DBTL) cycle
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
Bloom J, Labthavikul S, Otey C, Arnold F (2006) Protein stability promotes evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(15):5869–5874 |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
Ding F, Steinhardt J (2024) Protein language models are biased by unequal sequence sampling across the tree of life. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.07.584001 |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
Fried S D, Boxer S G (2017) Electric Fields and Enzyme Catalysis. Annu Rev Biochem 86(1):387–415 |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
Gordon C, Lu AX, Abbeel P (2025) Protein language model fitness is a matter of preference. In: ICLR 2025 (13th International Conference on Learning Representations). OpenReview |
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
Jiang K, Yan Z, Di Bernardo M, Sgrizzi SR, Villiger L, Kayabolen A, Kim BJ, Carscadden JK, Hiraizumi M, Nishimasu H, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO (2025) Rapid in silico directed evolution by a protein language model with EVOLVEpro. Science 387 (6732):377 |
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
Kamerlin S C L, Warshel A (2010) At the dawn of the 21st century: Is dynamics the missing link for understanding enzyme catalysis? Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf 78(6):1339–1375 |
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
Kroll A, MJ L (2024) DLKcat cannot predict meaningful kcat values for mutants and unfamiliar enzymes. Biol Methods Protoc 9(1):bpae061 |
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
Malzacher S, Meißner D, Range J, Findrik Blažević Z, Rosenthal K, Woodley JM, Wohlgemuth R, Wied P, Nidetzky B, Giessmann RT, Prakinee K, Chaiyen P, Bommarius AS, Rohwer JM, de Souza PJ, Pleiss J, Kettner C, Rother D (2024) The STRENDA Biocatalysis Guidelines for cataloguing metadata. Nat Catal 7(12):1245–1249 |
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
Meier J, Rao R, Verkuil R, Liu J, Sercu T, Rives A (2021) Language models enable zero-shot prediction of the effects of mutations on protein function. In: 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2021), pp 29287–29303 |
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
Paul S, Kollasch A, Notin P, Marks D (2023) Combining structure and sequence for superior fitness prediction. NeurIPS 2023 Workshop. Generative AI and Biology |
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
Rives A, Meier J, Sercu T, Goyal S, Lin Z, Liu J, Guo D, Ott M, Zitnick C L, Ma J, Fergus R (2021) Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci 118(15):e2016239118 |
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
Shi Z, Liu P, Liao X, Mao Z, Zhang J, Wang Q, Sun J, Ma H, Ma Y (2022) Data-Driven Synthetic Cell Factories Development for Industrial Biomanufacturing. Biodes Res 2022:9898461 |
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
Shi Z, Xu S, Xue S, Chen K, Lu Y, Wang F, Long S, Tian Y, Zhang P, Wang J, Gu Y, Zhou J, Zhou H, Meng S, Cui H (2026b) From machine learning to multimodal models: The AI revolution in enzyme engineering. Biodes Res 8(1) |
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
|
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
|
| [115] |
|
| [116] |
|
| [117] |
|
| [118] |
|
| [119] |
|
| [120] |
|
| [121] |
Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Kaiser Ł, Polosukhin I (2017) Attention is all you need. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017). Curran Associates, pp 5998–6008 |
| [122] |
Victorino da Silva Amatto I, Gonsales da Rosa-Garzon N, Antônio de Oliveira Simões F, Santiago F, Pereira da Silva Leite N, Raspante Martins, Cabral J (2021) H Enzyme engineering and its industrial applications. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 69(2):389–409 |
| [123] |
|
| [124] |
|
| [125] |
Wang M, Zhang Z, Singh Bedi A, Guerra S, Lin-Gibson S, Cong L, Chakraborty S, Qu Y, Ma J, Xing E, Church G (2025a) A call for built-in biosecurity safeguards for generative AI tools. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202503.1761.v1 |
| [126] |
|
| [127] |
Warshel A, Sharma P, Kato M, Xiang Y, Liu H, Olsson M (2006) Electrostatic Basis for Enzyme Catalysis. Chem Rev 106:3210−3235 |
| [128] |
|
| [129] |
|
| [130] |
|
| [131] |
Winnifrith A, Outeiral C, Hie BL (2024) Generative artificial intelligence for de novo protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 86 |
| [132] |
Wittmann B J, Yue Y, Arnold F H (2021) Informed training set design enables efficient machine learning-assisted directed protein evolution. Cell Systems 12(11):1026–1045 |
| [133] |
|
| [134] |
|
| [135] |
|
| [136] |
|
| [137] |
|
| [138] |
|
| [139] |
|
| [140] |
|
| [141] |
|
| [142] |
|
| [143] |
|
| [144] |
|
| [145] |
|
| [146] |
Zeng Z, Jin J, Xu R, Luo X (2026) Benchmarking and experimental validation of machine learning strategies for enzyme engineering. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.29.715152 |
| [147] |
|
| [148] |
|
| [149] |
|
| [150] |
|
| [151] |
|
| [152] |
|
| [153] |
Zhang Z, Wang Z, Li D, Wang Z, Liu X, Guo J, Wang S, Li W, Zheng L, Han N (2026b) Deep learning for enzyme kcat prediction: what works, what doesn't, and why? Res Sq. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9154046/v1 |
| [154] |
|
| [155] |
|
| [156] |
|
| [157] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |