High-cell density two-stage self-cycling fermentation system for the enhanced production of ethanol from steam-exploded poplar hydrolysate

Abstract

The economics of lignocellulosic ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae remain a challenge due to low product yields, which can be partially addressed by improving the performance of pretreatment optimization and fermentation systems, an aspect that has received limited attention. In this study, we investigated how the combination of self-cycling fermentation (SCF) with continuous adapted feeding (controlled by evolved gas) in a two-stage system could improve bioethanol production from steam-exploded poplar hydrolysates. This system benefited from the improved productivity associated with SCF and from the high titers obtained in fed-batch operation. The system consisted of a first fed-batch SCF stage, which led to approximately two-fold improvements in cell dry weight compared to conventional batch culture and low residual glucose (< 0.5 g/L), demonstrating efficient substrate utilization by the yeast. The second high-cell density SCF stage was initiated upon reaching a metabolic threshold by adding a pulse feed in the harvested medium to further enhance ethanol titer and productivity. The patterns of glucose consumption, ethanol production, and evolved gas flow rate were all reproducible between the SCF cycles. The two-stage fermentation approach led to final ethanol titer of ~ 11% (v/v) with an overall yield of 0.453 g/g and productivity of 1.33 g/L/h (a 30% improvement over the first stage). Overall, this study presents a robust two-stage high-cell density SCF system for lignocellulosic ethanol production and highlights the feasibility and potential of implementing it in biorefinery processes.

Keywords

Self-cycling fermentation / Adapted fed-batch strategy / Two-stage fermentation / Steam-exploded poplar wood hydrolysate / Lignocellulosic ethanol

References

[1] Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, et al.. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: A review. Bioresour Technol, 2010, 101(134851-4861

[2] Bai F, Anderson W, Moo-Young M. Ethanol fermentation technologies from sugar and starch feedstocks. Biotechnol Adv, 2008, 26(1): 89-105

[3] Balan V (2014) Current challenges in commercially producing biofuels from lignocellulosic biomass. Int Sch Res Notices 20141–20131. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/463074

[4] Beigbeder J-B, de Medeiros Dantas JM, Lavoie J-M. Optimization of yeast, sugar and nutrient concentrations for high ethanol production rate using industrial sugar beet molasses and response surface methodology. Fermentation, 2021, 7(2): 86

[5] Beyene D, Chae M, Dai J, et al.. Enzymatically-mediated co-production of cellulose nanocrystals and fermentable sugars. Catalysts, 2017, 7(11): 322

[6] Beyene D, Chae M, Vasanthan T et al (2020) A biorefinery strategy that introduces hydrothermal treatment prior to acid hydrolysis for co-generation of furfural and cellulose nanocrystals. Front Chem 8323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00323

[7] Brexó RP, Sant’Ana AS. Impact and significance of microbial contamination during fermentation for bioethanol production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2017

[8] Brown WA (2001) The self-cycling fermentor: Development, applications, and future opportunities. Recent Research Developments in Biotechnology & Bioengineering 461 – 90. http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14760666

[9] Chang Y-H, Chang K-S, Huang C-W et al (2012) Comparison of batch and fed-batch fermentations using corncob hydrolysate for bioethanol production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.02.006. Fuel 97166-173

[10] Chang Y-H, Chang K-S, Chen C-Y, et al.. Enhancement of the efficiency of bioethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae via gradually batch-wise and fed-batch increasing the glucose concentration. Fermentation, 2018, 4(2): 45

[11] Cot M, Loret M-O, François J, et al.. Physiological behaviour of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in aerated fed-batch fermentation for high level production of bioethanol. FEMS Yeast Res, 2007, 7(1): 22-32

[12] Elliston A, Collins SR, Wilson DR et al (2013) High concentrations of cellulosic ethanol achieved by fed batch semi simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of waste-paper. Bioresour Technol 134117–134126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.084

[13] Ergun M, Mutlu SF. Application of a statistical technique to the production of ethanol from sugar beet molasses by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresour Technol, 2000, 73(3): 251-255

[14] Feng S, Srinivasan S, Lin Y-H. Redox potential-driven repeated batch ethanol fermentation under very-high-gravity conditions. Process Biochem, 2012, 47(3): 523-527

[15] Haddis DZ, Chae M, Asomaning J et al (2024) Evaluation of steam explosion pretreatment on the cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) yield from poplar wood. Carbohydr Polym 323121460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121460

[16] Hung Y-HR, Chae M, Sauvageau D, et al.. Adapted feeding strategies in fed-batch fermentation improve sugar delivery and ethanol productivity. Bioeng, 2023, 14(1): 2250950

[17] Hung Y-HR, Sauvageau D, Bressler DC (2025) An adaptive, continuous substrate feeding strategy based on evolved gas to improve fed-batch ethanol fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 10964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-025-13447-9

[18] IEA, Liquid biofuel production by feedstock and technology in the Net Zero Scenario, 2021 and 2030, 2023. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/liquid-biofuel-production-by-feedstock-and-technology-in-the-net-zero-scenario-2021-and-2030-2. Accessed 15 Jan 2025

[19] Koppram R, Nielsen F, Albers E, et al.. Simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation for bioethanol production using corncobs at lab, PDU and demo scales. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2013, 6(1): 1-10

[20] Kuhad RC, Gupta R, Khasa YP, et al.. Bioethanol production from pentose sugars: Current status and future prospects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2011, 15(9): 4950-4962

[21] Kusumawati N, Sumarlan S, Zubaidah E, et al.. Isolation of xylose-utilizing yeasts from oil palm waste for xylitol and ethanol production. Bioresour Bioprocess, 2023, 10(1): 71

[22] Laopaiboon L, Thanonkeo P, Jaisil P, et al.. Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice in batch and fed-batch fermentations by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2007, 23(10): 1497-1501

[23] Lim HC, Shin HS (2013) Fed-batch cultures: Principles and applications of semi-batch bioreactors. Cambridge University Press

[24] Nair LG, Verma P. Harnessing carbon potential of lignocellulosic biomass: advances in pretreatments, applications, and the transformative role of machine learning in biorefineries. Bioresour Bioprocess, 2025, 12(1): 97

[25] Narisetty V, Cox R, Bommareddy R, et al.. Valorisation of xylose to renewable fuels and chemicals, an essential step in augmenting the commercial viability of lignocellulosic biorefineries. Sustainable Energy Fuels, 2022, 6(1): 29-65

[26] Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification. Bioresour Technol, 2000, 74(1): 17-24

[27] Parashar A, Jin Y, Mason B, et al.. Incorporation of whey permeate, a dairy effluent, in ethanol fermentation to provide a zero waste solution for the dairy industry. J Dairy Sci, 2016, 99(3): 1859-1867

[28] Patel A, Shah AR. Integrated lignocellulosic biorefinery: Gateway for production of second generation ethanol and value added products. J Bioresources Bioprod, 2021, 6(2): 108-128

[29] Patiño MA, Ortiz JP, Velásquez M, et al.. d-Xylose consumption by nonrecombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A review. Yeast, 2019, 36(9): 541-556

[30] Phukoetphim N, Salakkam A, Laopaiboon P et al (2017) Improvement of ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice under batch and fed-batch fermentations: Effects of sugar levels, nitrogen supplementation, and feeding regimes. Electron J Biotechnol 2684–2692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2017.01.005

[31] Samantaray B, Mishra RR, Mohapatra S, et al.. Optimization of pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis using commercial and isolated bacterial enzyme cocktail for bioethanol production from corn husk through yeast co-culture batch fermentation. Bioresour Bioprocess, 2026, 13(1): 69

[32] Sauvageau D, Cooper DG. Two-stage, self-cycling process for the production of bacteriophages. Microb Cell Fact 91 – 10, 2010

[33] Stanley D, Bandara A, Fraser S, et al.. The ethanol stress response and ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Appl Microbiol, 2010, 109(1): 13-24

[34] Suhartini S, Rohma NA, Mardawati E et al (2022) Biorefining of oil palm empty fruit bunches for bioethanol and xylitol production in Indonesia: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 154111817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111817

[35] Tan Y, Agustin RVC, Stein LY, et al.. Transcriptomic analysis of synchrony and productivity in self-cycling fermentation of engineered yeast producing shikimic acid. Biotechnol Rep, 2021

[36] Verardi A, De Bari I, Ricca E et al Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass: Current status of processes and technologies and future perspectives, in: Lima M A P (Ed.), Bioethanol, IntechOpen2012, pp. 95–122

[37] Viikari L, Vehmaanperä J, Koivula A (2012) Lignocellulosic ethanol: From science to industry. Biomass Bioenergy 4613–4624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.05.008

[38] Wang J, Chae M, Sauvageau D, et al.. Improving ethanol productivity through self-cycling fermentation of yeast: A proof of concept. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2017, 10(1): 193

[39] Wang J, Chae M, Bressler DC, et al.. Improved bioethanol productivity through gas flow rate-driven self-cycling fermentation. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2020, 13(1): 14

[40] Wang J, Chae M, Beyene D et al (2021) Co-production of ethanol and cellulose nanocrystals through self-cycling fermentation of wood pulp hydrolysate. Bioresour Technol 330124969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124969

[41] Wentworth SD, Cooper DG. Self-cycling fermentation of a citric acid producing strain of Candida lipolytica. J Ferment Bioeng, 1996, 81(5): 400-405

[42] Zacchi G, Axelsson A. Economic evaluation of preconcentration in production of ethanol from dilute sugar solutions. Biotechnol Bioeng, 1989, 34(2): 223-233

[43] Zenaitis MG, Cooper DG. Antibiotic production by Streptomyces aureofaciens using self-cycling fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng, 1994, 44(11): 1331-1336

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada(Discovery)

Canada First Research Excellence Fund(Future Energy Systems)

Canada Foundation for Innovation(John R. Evans Leaders Fund)

Rights & permissions

The Author(s)