Heterologous production of tungsten-dependent formate dehydrogenase I from Methylorubrum extorquens in Escherichia coli reveals α-subunit maturation as the major bottleneck

Abstract

Methylorubrum extorquens formate dehydrogenase I (Me-FDH1) is a tungsten-dependent heterodimeric enzyme with high activity for CO₂/formate interconversion, making it an attractive biocatalyst for carbon capture, formate production, and bioelectrocatalysis. Its broader application, however, is limited by the lack of a heterologous production host for this complex metalloenzyme. Here, we systematically evaluated Escherichia coli as a host for Me-FDH1 production and compared its performance with that of the native host and a previous heterologous host. Across multiple E. coli strains, active Me-FDH1 was obtained only when tungstate uptake was supported by a functional ModABC system or by heterologous expression of the TupBCA transporter, demonstrating that E. coli can synthesize and incorporate the W-bis-MGD cofactor. Nevertheless, expression remained low (< 1% of total cellular protein), and the purified enzyme displayed only 4–14 U mg^− 1 specific activity, far below the 80–100 U.mg^− 1 observed for the enzyme produced in M. extorquens. Operon redesign, altered gene order, stronger ribosome-binding sites, SUMO fusion, chaperone co-expression, and codon harmonization did not improve α-subunit production. In both E. coli and M. extorquens, the α-subunit was poorly produced in the absence of the β-subunit, indicating that the β-subunit contributes to α-subunit stabilization and/or maturation. Cell-free translation produced both subunits efficiently, showing that the principal barrier in E. coli is not transcription or translation, but post-translational instability and likely proteolytic loss of the α-subunit. These findings define the key bottleneck for Me-FDH1 production in E. coli and provide a roadmap for engineering hosts for tungsten-containing enzymes.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Methylorubrum extorquens / Tungsten-dependent formate dehydrogenase / W-bis-MGD / Tungstate transport / α-subunit maturation / Post-translational instability

References

[1] Alissandratos A, Kim HK, Easton CJ. Formate production through carbon dioxide hydrogenation with recombinant whole cell biocatalysts. Bioresour Technol, 2014, 164: 7-11

[2] Böck A, King PW, Blokesch M, Posewitz MC. Maturation of Hydrogenases. Adv Microb Physiol, 2006

[3] Böhmer N, Hartmann T, Leimkühler S. The chaperone FdsC for Rhodobacter capsulatus formate dehydrogenase binds the bis-molybdopterin guanine dinucleotide cofactor. FEBS Lett, 2014, 588: 531-537

[4] Francis DM, Page R. Strategies to Optimize Protein Expression in E. coli. Curr Protoc Protein Sci, 2010, 61: 5241

[5] Girbal L, Von Abendroth G, Winkler M, Benton PMC, Meynial-Salles I, Croux C, Peters JW, Happe T, Soucaille P. Homologous and heterologous overexpression in Clostridium acetobutylicum and characterization of purified clostridial and algal Fe-only hydrogenases with high specific activities. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2005, 71: 2777-2781

[6] Hartmann T, Leimkühler S. The oxygen-tolerant and NAD+-dependent formate dehydrogenase from Rhodobacter capsulatus is able to catalyze the reduction of CO2 to formate. FEBS J, 2013, 280: 6083-6096

[7] Jang J, Jeon BW, Kim YH (2018) Bioelectrochemical conversion of CO2 to value added product formate using engineered Methylobacterium extorquens. Sci Rep 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23924-z

[8] Kuchenreuther JM, Grady-Smith CS, Bingham AS, George SJ, Cramer SP, Swartz JR (2010) High-yield expression of heterologous [FeFe] hydrogenases in Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE 5. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015491

[9] Laukel M, Chistoserdova L, Lidstrom ME, Vorholt JA. The tungsten-containing formate dehydrogenase from Methylobacterium extorquens AM1: Purification and properties. Eur J Biochem, 2003, 270: 325-333

[10] Leimkühler S, Wuebbens MM, Rajagopalan KV. The History of the Discovery of the Molybdenum Cofactor and Novel Aspects of its Biosynthesis in Bacteria. Coord Chem Rev, 2011, 255: 1129

[11] Lipinszki Z, Vernyik V, Farago N, Sari T, Puskas LG, Blattner FR, Posfai G, Gyorfy Z. Enhancing the Translational Capacity of E. coli by Resolving the Codon Bias. ACS Synth Biol, 2018, 7: 2656-2664

[12] Lobstein J, Emrich CA, Jeans C, Faulkner M, Riggs P, Berkmen M (2012) SHuffle, a novel Escherichia coli protein expression strain capable of correctly folding disulfide bonded proteins in its cytoplasm

[13] Lorenz R, Bernhart SH, Höner Zu Siederdissen C, Tafer H, Flamm C, Stadler PF, Hofacker IL (2011) ViennaRNA Package 2.0.

[14] Maia LB, Moura I, Moura JJG. Molybdenum and tungsten-containing formate dehydrogenases: Aiming to inspire a catalyst for carbon dioxide utilization. Inorganica Chim Acta, 2017

[15] Nguyen-Vo TP, Ko S, Ryu H, Kim JR, Kim D, Park S. Systems evaluation reveals novel transporter YohJK renders 3-hydroxypropionate tolerance in Escherichia coli. Sci Rep, 2020, 10: 1-12

[16] Niks D, Hille R. Molybdenum- and tungsten-containing formate dehydrogenases and formylmethanofuran dehydrogenases: Structure, mechanism, and cofactor insertion. Protein Sci, 2019, 28: 111-122

[17] Nishihara K, Kanemori M, Kitagawa M, Yanagi H, Yura T. Chaperone coexpression plasmids: differential and synergistic roles of DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE and GroEL-GroES in assisting folding of an allergen of Japanese cedar pollen, Cryj2, in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1998, 64: 1694-1699

[18] Nishihara K, Kanemori M, Yanagi H, Yura T. Overexpression of trigger factor prevents aggregation of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2000, 66: 884-889

[19] Otrelo-Cardoso AR, Nair RR, Correia MAS, Cordeiro RSC, Panjkovich A, Svergun DI, Santos-Silva T, Rivas MG (2017) Highly selective tungstate transporter protein TupA from Desulfovibrio alaskensis G20. Sci Rep 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06133-y

[20] Park J, Heo Y, Jeon BW, Jung M, Kim YH, Lee HH, Roh SH. Structure of recombinant formate dehydrogenase from Methylobacterium extorquens (MeFDH1). Sci Rep, 2024, 14: 1-10 SUBJMETA=337,45,61,631;KWRD=BIOCHEMISTRY,BIOTECHNOLOGY,MOLECULAR+BIOLOGY

[21] Ryu H, Nguyen CNM, Lee K, Park S. Development of Cupriavidus necator H16 as a host for heterologous production of formate dehydrogenase I of Methylorubrum extorquens: Possibilities and limitations. Bioresour Technol, 2024, 394: 130187

[22] Ryu H, Nguyen NMC, Park HY, Lee SK, Park S. Production and characterization of CO2 reducing and tungsten-containing formate dehydrogenase of Cupriavidus necator H16. Springer, 2025, 30: 363-376

[23] Schmidt M, Lee N, Zhan C, Roberts JB, Nava AA, Keiser LS, Vilchez AA, Chen Y, Petzold CJ, Haushalter RW, Blank LM, Keasling JD. Maximizing Heterologous Expression of Engineered Type I Polyketide Synthases: Investigating Codon Optimization Strategies. ACS Synth Biol, 2023, 12: 3366-3380

[24] Serganov A, Nudler E. A decade of riboswitches. Cell, 2013

[25] Sundara Sekar B, Seol E, Mohan Raj S, Park S (2016) Co-production of hydrogen and ethanol by pfkA-deficient Escherichia coli with activated pentose-phosphate pathway: reduction of pyruvate accumulation. Biotechnol Biofuels 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13068-016-0510-5

[26] Winkler M, Esselborn J, Happe T. Molecular basis of [FeFe]-hydrogenase function: An insight into the complex interplay between protein and catalytic cofactor. Biochim et Biophys Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, 2013, 1827: 974-985

[27] Yoshikawa T, Makino F, Miyata T, Suzuki Y, Tanaka H, Namba K, Kano K, Sowa K, Kitazumi Y, Shirai O (2022) Multiple electron transfer pathways of tungsten-containing formate dehydrogenase in direct electron transfer-type bioelectrocatalysis. Chem Commun 58. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2cc01541b

[28] Zhou S, Ainala SK, Seol E, Nguyen TT, Park S. Inducible gene expression system by 3-hydroxypropionic acid. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2015, 8: 1-8

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (RS-2020-NR049543)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)