Sustainable carotenoid production using amylaceous agro-industrial byproducts: process efficiency and environmental assessment
Thércia Rocha Balbino , Salvador Sánchez-Muñoz , Stephanie Custódio Inácio , Gabriele Campelo Almeida , Ana Cláudia Dias , Júlio César Santos , Silvio Silvério da Silva , Jorge Fernando Brandão Pereira
Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1) : 91
Agro‑industrial brans are abundant residues that can be valorized as low‑cost feedstocks for microbial bioprocesses within a circular‑economy framework. Here, we investigated the use of corn, soybean, rice and wheat bran hydrolysates as sole nutrient sources (no detoxification and no supplementation) for carotenoid production by the yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa. After standardizing total fermentable sugars to 10–12 g/L, the yeast successfully consumed mixed sugars and produced biomass and carotenoids in all hydrolysates. Rice bran hydrolysate led to the highest carotenoid titer (28.41 ± 0.23 mg/L) and the highest specific carotenoid content (1.11 ± 0.05 mgcarotenoids/gdry cells), whereas soybean bran hydrolysate favored biomass formation (29.74 ± 0.18 g/L). UV–Vis/FTIR analyses of the pigment-rich extract showed spectral features consistent with carotenoids (absorption maxima at 480–490 nm and characteristic FTIR bands), supporting the qualitative identification of a carotenoid mixture. Finally, a cradle‑to‑gate life cycle assessment (LCA) showed that the RBH scenario presented the lowest impacts across the evaluated categories, with electricity demand during fermentation as the main hotspot. Overall, rice bran emerges as a promising residue for sustainable carotenoid bioproduction coupling process performance and environmental benefits. This study highlights the valorization of agro-industrial residues as an efficient strategy to reduce production costs and environmental impact, contributing to the development of more sustainable biotechnologies for carotenoid synthesis and beyond.
Bran / Hydrolysis / Pigments / Renewable feedstocks / Life cycle assessment
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
FAO STAT- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2022) Crops and livestock products. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize. Last accessed: May 2024 |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
ISO. Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework, 2006. Geneva, Switzerland, International Organization for Standardization |
| [17] |
ISO. Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Requirements and Guidelines, 2006. Geneva, Switzerland, International Organization for Standardization |
| [18] |
Kaur M, Singh AK, Singh A (2023) Bioconversion of food industry waste to value added products: Current technological trends and prospects. Food Bioscience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102935 |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
Mordor Intelligence Research & Advisory (2023) Carotenoids Market Size & Share Analysis - Growth Trends & Forecasts (2024–2029). Mordor Intelligence., available at https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/carotenoids-market-industry. Latest access: May 2024 |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
Nemecek T, Bengoa X, Lansche J, Roesch A, Faist-Emmenegger M, Rossi V, Humbert S (2019) Methodological Guidelines for the Life Cycle Inventory of Agricultural Products. Version 3.5, December 2019. World Food LCA Database (WFLDB). Quantis and Agroscope. Lausanne and Zurich, Switzerland |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
UNEP - United Nations Environmental Programme Division of Technology, Industry and Economics International Environmental Technology Centre. Converting waste agricultural biomass into a resource, 2009. Japan, Compendium of Technologies Osaka/Shiga: 6 |
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |